Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:30:37.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrophobicity of whey protein hydrolysates enhances the protective effect against oxidative damage on PC 12 cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2014

Qiu-Xiang Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
Man-Man Jin
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
Li Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Ministry of Health, 20 Qian Rong Road, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214063, China
Hui-Xin Yu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Ministry of Health, 20 Qian Rong Road, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214063, China
Zhen Sun
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
Rong-Rong Lu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: lurr@jiangnan.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between hydrophobicity and the protective effect of whey protein hydrolysates (WPHs) against oxidative stress was studied. Whey protein was first hydrolysed by pepsin and trypsin to obtain WPHs. After absorbed by macroporous adsorption resin DA201-C, three fractions named as M20, M40, and M60 were eluted by various concentrations of ethanol. The hydrophobicity showed a trend of increase from M20 to M60. Antioxidant ability test in vitro indicated that all the three components of WPHs displayed reasonably good antioxidant ability. Moreover, with the increase of hydrophobicity, antioxidant ability of WPHs improved significantly. Then rat pheochromocytoma line 12 (PC12) cells oxidative model was built to evaluate the suppression of oxidative stress of three components on PC12 cells induced by H2O2. Morphological alterations, cell viability, apoptosis rate, and intracellular antioxidase system tests all indicated that WPHs exert significant protection on PC cells against H2O2-induced damage. Among them, M60 had the highest protective effect by increasing 19·3% cell survival and reducing 28·6% cell apoptosis. These results suggested hydrophobicity of WPHs was contributing to the antioxidant ability and the protective effect against oxidative damage.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2014 
Figure 0

Table 1. Amino acid content of WPHs (g/100 g protein)

Figure 1

Table 2. Antioxidant ability of WPHs

Figure 2

Table 3. The effect of WPHs on T-AOC, SOD, CAT, MDA and LDH on H2O2-induced PC12 cells (X±sd)

Figure 3

Fig. 1. The effect against H2O2-induced oxidative stress of PC12 cells morphology and viability. (A) Effect of Graded elution fractions of WPHs on H2O2-induced morphological alterations in PC12 cells (a Control, b Model (200 μmol/l H2O2), c M20+200 μmol/l H2O2, d M40+200 μmol/l H2O2, e M60+200 μmol/l H2O2). bar=20 μm. (B) Graded elution samples of WPHs inhibit the reduction of cell viability induced by H2O2 in PC12 cells (a, b, c, and d represent the significant difference among samples, P<0·05).

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Graded elution samples of WPHs protected PC12 cells against H2O2-induced apoptosis. (A) Morphological apoptosis was determined by staining with Hoechst 33342 and PI. Arrowheads indicate apoptosis cells. (a Control, b Model (200 μmol/l H2O2), c M20+200 μmol/l H2O2, d M40+200 μmol/l H2O2, e M60+200 μmol/l H2O2). bar=50 μm. (B) Apoptosis ratio was determined by counting under fluorescence microscope after PC12 cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 and PI. (a, b, c, d, and e represent the significant difference among samples, P<0·05).