Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T11:06:50.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Single layer miniaturized ultra-thin FSS with five closely spaced bands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2019

Anupam Dey*
Affiliation:
Calcutta Institute of Technology, NH6, Banitabla, Uluberia, Howrah, West Bengal 711316, India
Rajarshi Sanyal
Affiliation:
MCKV Institute of engineering, 243, G T Road North, Liluah, Howrah, West Bengal 711204, India
*
Author for correspondence: Anupam Dey, E-mail: anupam.dey107@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This Paper reveals a novel single layer five band frequency selective surface (FSS). Novelties of the proposed FSS lie in its five closely spaced stop bands at 2.4, 3.38, 4.82, 6.32, and 7.75 GHz as well as the reduced single layer structural thickness (0.0016 λ0) and the miniaturized unit cell size (0.0656 λ0) at lower resonant frequency as compared to the existing multiband FSS. The unit cell structure consists of six octagonal concentric interconnected loops. Adjacent loop interconnection technique reduces the cell size by more than 44%. Furthermore, arrow-shaped rings are also introduced on each corner of the outermost octagonal loop, and using this technique approximate 23% cell miniaturization can be achieved. In addition, the proposed FSS exhibits excellent angular stability.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Unit cell geometry of the proposed five band FSS.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Sequential development of unit cell. (a) Configuration-1 (five concentric octagonal loops). (b) Configuration-2 (six concentric octagonal loops). (c) Configuration-3 (six concentric octagonal loops with four arrow-shaped rings without interconnection). (d) Proposed configuration.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Transmission response of different configuration. (a) Configuration-1. (b) Configuration-2. (c) Configuration-3. (d) Proposed configuration.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Variation of transmission response with different “d”.

Figure 4

Table 1. Development of proposed configuration

Figure 5

Fig. 5. (a)Surface current distribution for different frequencies without interconnection. (b) Surface crrent distribution for different frequencies with interconnection.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Equivalent circuits of FSS. at (a) 2.4 GHz. (b) 3.38 GHz. (c) 4.82 GHz. (d) 6.32 GHz. (e) 7.75 GHz.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Simulated transmission coefficient of proposed FSS structure under different incident angle. (a) TE polarization. (b) TM polarization.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Photograph of fabricated FSS prototype.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Simulated and measured S-parameter under normal incidence.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. (a) and (b) Experimental setup in free space (c) colded prototype.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Measured polarization (a) TE and (b) TM in different angles..

Figure 12

Table 2. Comparison with existing multiband FSSs