Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:18:59.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Circularly polarized beam-steering antenna array with enhanced characteristics using UCEBG structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2015

Tohid Aribi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Naser-Moghadasi*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
R. A. Sadeghzadeh
Affiliation:
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding author: M. Naser-Moghadasi Email: mn.moghaddasi@srbiau.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A broadband circularly polarized (CP) beam-steering antenna array is presented. CP antenna is composed of four identical CP slot elements with 2 × 2 configuration and a 4 × 4 feeding network. CP slot element is utilized in array form to improve impedance bandwidth and sequentially rotation method is used to increase axial-ratio bandwidth. Moreover, uni-planer compact electromagnetic band-gap structure is applied to enhance the overall performance of antenna array. Measured results depict that the array has impedance bandwidth over a frequency range of 4.1–7 GHz (~53%) for S11 ≤ −10 dB and 3 dB axial-ratio bandwidth of 1.95 GHz that is between 4.6 and 6.55 GHz (~35%). The antenna array has peak gain of 11 dBi at 5.5 GHz.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Configuration of presented Antenna array.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Geometry of array element with impedance and axial-ratio bandwidths.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Simulated results of feeding network (a) transmission and reflection coefficients when port 1 is fed, (b) transmission and reflection coefficients when port 2 is fed, and (c) differential phase diagram between ports.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a) Geometry of EBG unit cell, (b) array of EBG structure, and (c) simulated result for transmission coefficient.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Simulated transmission coefficient curve between antenna elements with and without UCEBG structure.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Simulated and measured results of return-loss for antennas when port 1 is fed.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Simulated and measured results of return-loss for antennas when port 2 is fed.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Simulated and measured results of axial-ratio for port 1 excitation.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Simulated and measured results of axial-ratio for port 2 excitation.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Extracted far field results of RHCP and LHCP at 5.5 GHz when port 1 is fed.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Extracted far field results of RHCP and LHCP at 5.5 GHz when port 2 is fed.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Obtained axial-ratio as function of elevation angle when two ports are excited.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Measured gains for both antennas as versus of frequency for two ports excitation.