Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:19:10.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soft tissue head and neck sarcoma: experience of a tertiary referral centre over a 15-year period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2019

L Harrison*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, UK
T McCulloch
Affiliation:
Department of Histopathology, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
N Beasley
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Ms Laura Harrison, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK E-mail: lauraharrison707@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Head and neck soft tissue sarcoma is uncommon. It is both histologically and clinically heterogeneous, ranging from an indolent, locally destructive tumour, to a locally aggressive neoplasm with metastatic potential.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all adult head and neck soft tissue sarcomas, including cases of malignant soft tissue sarcoma and all intermediate type tumours, diagnosed between 1997 and 2012.

Results

Sixty-eight cases were identified in this series from the sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Seventeen different histological subtypes of sarcoma were identified. Neither age, gender nor tumour size were significant prognostic indicators for survival in this series.

Conclusion

Prognosis is dependent on histological subtype, underscoring the importance of histological classification. Some histological subtypes occur only once or twice in a decade, even within a large regional referral centre. An accumulation of evidence from relatively small case series is key in the long-term development of treatment strategies.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019
Figure 0

Table 1. AJCC TNM and tumour grade staging system for sarcoma1

Figure 1

Table 2. Histological subtypes based on WHO classification7

Figure 2

Table 3. Patients treated with curative intent for each treatment modality

Figure 3

Table 4. Recurrence and histological subtype

Figure 4

Fig. 1. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for (a) overall survival and (b) disease-specific survival, comparing World Health Organization intermediate and malignant tumour subtypes.4