Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:31:13.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LA-ICP-MS U–Pb zircon, columbite-tantalite and 40Ar–39Ar muscovite age constraints for the rare-element pegmatite dykes in the Altai orogenic belt, NW China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2016

QIFENG ZHOU*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
KEZHANG QIN*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
DONGMEI TANG
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
CHUNLONG WANG
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China Xinjiang Research Center for Mineral Resource, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
PATRICK ASAMOAH SAKYI
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, University of Ghana, PO Box LG 58, Legon-Accra, Ghana
*
†Authors for correspondence: zhouqifeng85@163.com, kzq@mail.iggcas.ac.cn
†Authors for correspondence: zhouqifeng85@163.com, kzq@mail.iggcas.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Chinese Altai is renowned for its rich rare-element resources. Nine representative rare-element (REL) pegmatites were dated using LA-ICP-MS and 40Ar–39Ar methods. The columbite grains yield a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 239.6±3.8 Ma for the Dakalasu (Be-Nb-Ta) pegmatite and concordia U–Pb ages of 258.1±3.1 Ma and 262.3±2.5 Ma for the Xiaokalasu (Li-Nb-Ta) pegmatite. The zircons display a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 198.5±2.5 Ma for the Husite (Be) pegmatite and concordia U–Pb ages of 194.3±1.6 Ma and 248.2±2.2 Ma for the Qunkuer (Be) and Taerlang (barren) pegmatites. The muscovite 40Ar–39Ar dating gives plateau ages of 286.4±1.6 Ma, 297.0±2.6 Ma, 265.2±1.5 Ma, 178.8±1.0 Ma, 162.2±0.9 Ma, 237.7±1.3 Ma, 237.4±1.2 Ma and 231.9±1.2 Ma for the Talate (Li-Be-Nb-Ta), Baicheng (Nb-Ta), Kangmunagong (barren), Husite (Be), Qunkuer (Be-Nb-Ta), Xiaokalasu (Li-Nb-Ta), Weizigou (Be) and Taerlang (barren) pegmatites, respectively. These new ages coupled with previous geochronological work suggest that the REL pegmatites in the Chinese Altai formed during early Permain – Late Jurassic time. The REL pegmatites located in the Central Altaishan terrane are younger than those in the Qiongkuer–Abagong terrane, showing a correlation with the coeval and adjacent granites. The formation of the REL pegmatites and these granites indicates frequent and strong magmatic activity in the post-orogenic and anorogenic setting. The spatial and temporal distribution of pegmatites and granites reveals a magmatism path from the SE (of age early–middle Permian), to the NW (middle Permian – Middle Triassic) and finally to the central part (Middle Triassic – Jurassic) of the Chinese Altai.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geological sketch map of the Chinese Altai terranes, showing the locations, geological setting and formation ages of the rare-element (REL) pegmatites and related granites (modified from Luan et al. 1995; Windley et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2006b, 2007c; Zou & Li, 2006; Cai et al. 2011a). I, Altaishan terrane; II, NW Altaishan terrane; III, Central Altaishan terrane; IV, Qiongkuer–Abagong terrane; V, Erqis terrane; VI, Perkin–Ertai terrane. 1, Qinghe pegmatite field; 2, Keketuohai pegmatite field; 3, Kuwei–Jiebiete pegmatite field; 4, Kelumute–Jideke pegmatite field; 5, Kalaeerqisi pegmatite field; 6, Dakalasu–Kekexier pegmatite field; 7, Xiaokalasu–Qiebielin pegmatite field; 8, Hailiutan–Yeliuman pegmatite field; 9, Jiamanhaba pegmatite field. The references of ages of pegmatites and granites are a, Chen et al. (2000); b, Liu et al. (2014); c, Lv et al. (2012); d, Ren et al. (2011); e, Sun et al.(2009a); f, Tong (2006); g, Tong et al.(2006a); h, Tong et al.(2006b); i, Wang et al. (2000); j, Wang et al. (2003); k, Wang et al.(2006b); l, Wang et al. (2007); m, Wang et al. (2015); n, Zhou et al. (2007); o, Zhou et al. (2015a); p, Zou et al. (1986).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Photographs of samples: (a) TLT-2; (b) BC-4; (c) QKE-2-1; (d) 12DKLS-10; (e) WZG-4; (f) TEL-1; (g) 12XKLS-9; (h) 12XKLS-12; and (i) XKLS-2. Field images of: (j) the Kangmunagong pegmatite; and (k) internal zone of the Husite Be pegmatite. Ab – albite; Mc – microcline; Qz – quartz; Ms – muscovite; Spd – spodumene; Brl – beryl; Col-Tan – columbite-tantalite; Tur – tourmaline; Grt – garnet.

Figure 2

Table 1. Descriptions of the studied samples in the Chinese Altai.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Thin-section photomicrographs of occurrences of columbite-tantalite: (a) sample 12DKLS-10, columbite-tantalite grains associate with microcline, quartz, and garnet; (b) sample 12XKLS-9, intergrowth of columbite-tantalite grains and fine-grained albite; (c) sample 12XKLS-12, columbite-tantalite associate with coarse-grained albite. Ab – albite; Mc – microcline; Qz – quartz; Col-Tan – columbite-tantalite; Grt – garnet.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Representative back-scattered electron (BSE) images of columbite-tantalite grains from the Dakalasu (Be-Nb-Ta) and Xiaokalasu (Li-Nb-Ta) pegmatites for in situ U–Pb dating.

Figure 5

Table 2. The EMPA data averages (wt%) of columbite-tantalite in the Dakalasu (Be-Nb-Ta) and Xiaokalasu (Li-Nb-Ta) pegmatites.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Compositions of columbite-tantalite from the Dakalasu (Be-Nb-Ta) and Xiaokalasu (Li-Nb-Ta) pegmatites.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Concordia and weighted mean prism diagrams displaying the LA-ICP-MS U–Pb ages of columbite-tantalite grains from the Dakalasu (Be-Nb-Ta) and Xiaokalasu (Li-Nb-Ta) pegmatites in the Chinese Altai.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Cathodoluminenscenece (CL) images of dated zircon grains from the Husite (Be), Qunkuer (Be) and Taerlang (barren) pegmatites in the Chinese Altai. Analysed spots are circled and the codes correspond to the results in online supplementary Table S2.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Concordia and weighted mean prism diagrams showing the LA-ICP-MS U-Pb ages of zircon grains from the Husite (Be), Qunkuer (Be) and Taerlang (barren) pegmatites in the Chinese Altai.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Weighted plateau and inverse isochron 40Ar/39Ar ages of muscovite for the REL pegmatites in the Chinese Altai.

Figure 11

Table 3. Geochronological results of the REL pegmatites in the Chinese Altai.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Formation times of the REL pegmatites in the Chinese Altai, shown on the basis of both zircon and columbite-tantalite U–Pb and muscovite 40Ar/39Ar dating results. Only one U–Pb age or one U–Pb age accompanied with a muscovite 40Ar/39Ar age are chosen to represent the formation time for a single REL pegmatite dyke. Age data from Chen et al. (2000), Wang et al. (2003, 2007), Ren et al. (2011), Lv et al. (2012), Wang et al. (2015), Zhou et al. (2015a) and this study.

Figure 13

Figure 11. Geochronological data for the REL pegmatites v. REL mineralization types in the Chinese Altai. Data sources: Zou et al. (1986), Chen et al. (2000), Wang et al. (2003, 2007, 2015), Ren et al. (2011), Lv et al. (2012), Wang et al. (2015), Zhou et al. (2015a) and this study.

Figure 14

Figure 12. Geochronological data for the REL pegmatites v. pegmatite fields in the Chinese Altai. Data sources: Zou et al. (1986), Chen et al. (2000), Wang et al. (2000, 2003, 2006b, 2007, 2015); Tong (2006), Tong et al. (2006a, b), Zhou et al. (2007, 2015a), Sun et al. (2009a), Ren et al. (2011), Lv et al. (2012), Liu et al. (2014) and this study.

Figure 15

Figure 13. Tectonic implications of geochronological work for the pegmatites in the Chinese Altai. The spatial and temporal distribution of pegmatites and granites reveals the magmatism path of the Chinese Altai during synorogenic and post-orogenic setting. AT – Altaishan terrane; NW AT – NW Altaishan terrane; CAT – Central Altaishan terrane; QAT – Qiongkuer–Abagong terrane; ET – Erqis terrane; PET – Perkin–Ertai terrane.

Supplementary material: File

Zhou supplementary material

Table S1

Download Zhou supplementary material(File)
File 27.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zhou supplementary material

Table S2

Download Zhou supplementary material(File)
File 23 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zhou supplementary material

Table S3

Download Zhou supplementary material(File)
File 31.7 KB