Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:19:37.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tensile and compressive behaviors of open-tip carbon nanocones under axial strains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2011

Ming-Liang Liao
Affiliation:
Department of Aircraft Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Kaohsiung 82047, Taiwan
Chin-Hsiang Cheng*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
Yang-Ping Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: chcheng@mail.ncku.edu.tw

Abstract

The influences of temperature, cone height, and apex angle on the tensile and compressive behaviors of open-tip carbon nanocones (CNCs) under axial strains were examined. The tensile failure strain and failure load of the CNC were found to decline evidently as the system temperature increases. The average failure strain decreases with the growth in the cone height. Concerning compressive behaviors, the critical strain and critical load of the CNC reduce manifestly with the increase in the system temperature and the apex angle. As the cone height grows, the critical strain decreases evidently but the critical load has no obvious change. The buckling mode does not have much variation when the temperature increases. It displays a more distorted buckling pattern with the growth in the cone height and transfers from an axisymmetric pattern to an unsymmetrical and more warped pattern when the apex angle expands.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Simulation model of this study.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Comparison of the average strain energy calculated from this study and that from the literature20 for the test example: an open-tip carbon nanocone (CNC) under axial compressive strains.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. The average strain energy and internal axial force versus the average tensile strain of the CNC at various temperatures.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. The average strain energy and internal axial force versus the average tensile strain of the CNCs with various cone heights.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Failure modes of the CNCs, with various cone heights, at various temperatures. Values in the parentheses indicate the corresponding average tensile strain at which the failure mode occurred.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. The average strain energy and internal axial force versus the average compressive strain of the CNC at various temperatures.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. The average strain energy and internal axial force versus the average compressive strain of the CNC with various cone heights.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. The average strain energy and internal axial force versus the average compressive strain of the CNC with various apex angles.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Influences of the temperature, cone height, and apex angle on the buckling mode of the CNC. Values in the parentheses indicate the corresponding average compressive strain at which the buckling mode occurred.