Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T20:38:16.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-energy x-ray scattering studies of battery materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2016

Matthew P.B. Glazer
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Department, Northwestern University, USA; mglazer@u.northwestern.edu
John S. Okasinski
Affiliation:
Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, USA; okasinski@aps.anl.gov
Jonathan D. Almer
Affiliation:
Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, USA; almer@aps.anl.gov
Yang Ren
Affiliation:
Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, USA; ren@aps.anl.gov

Abstract

High-energy x-ray (HEX) scattering is a sensitive and powerful tool to nondestructively probe the atomic and mesoscale structures of battery materials under synthesis and operational conditions. The penetration power of HEXs enables the use of large, practical samples and realistic environments, allowing researchers to explore the inner workings of batteries in both laboratory and commercial formats. This article highlights the capability and versatility of HEX techniques, particularly from synchrotron sources, to elucidate materials synthesis processes and thermal instability mechanisms in situ, to understand (dis)charging mechanisms in operando under a variety of cycling conditions, and to spatially resolve electrode/electrolyte responses to highlight connections between inhomogeneity and performance. Such studies have increased our understanding of the fundamental mechanisms underlying battery performance. By deepening our understanding of the linkages between microstructure and overall performance, HEXs represent a powerful tool for validating existing batteries and shortening battery-development timelines.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Typical penetration depth and spatial resolution, for both 1D and 2D measurements, of selected analytical techniques. (Inset) 1/e penetration depths of various battery-relevant materials are shown as a function of energy (E), where e is Euler’s number. Note: TEM, transmission electron microscope; SEM, scanning electron microscope.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Experimental setup for real-time, in situ high-energy small-angle x-ray scattering/wide-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS/WAXS) studies of supercritical reactions in nanomaterials used for batteries. Incident x-rays pass through the reactor window during the course of the experiment, with the x-ray scattering from nanoparticles present in the reactor collected with the WAXS detector, while scattering from the fiber material is collected with the SAXS detector, which is placed at a shallower angle relative to the transmitted beam than the WAXS detector. The temperature and amount of the reactants in the reactor can be varied while x-rays pass through the reactor, allowing for real-time in situ observations. (b) Development of crystallinity can be monitored by WAXS, as exemplified by the anatase 200 reflection. The SAXS data (c) provide information on mesostructure and (d) enable the extraction of the particle-size distribution (diameter) using a hard-sphere model. The colors shown in (b–d) correspond directly to the vertical axes in each respective plot, where dark blue represents the lowest values and dark red the highest. Reprinted with permission from Reference 6. © 2007 Wiley. Note: Q, magnitude of the scattering vector of scattered x-rays in reciprocal space, in Å–1.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Photograph of a standard stainless-steel high-pressure crucible for in situ high-energy x-ray (HEX) scattering diffraction study of electrode and electrolyte reactions during thermal ramping. The flower-shaped inset part with a 1-mm diameter tunnel is made of either Cu for holding anode materials or Al for cathode materials.7 The inset is a schematic showing how HEXs penetrate through the stainless-steel cap to probe the sample inside the cell and scatter out from the other side to be collected by a 2D detector. Contour plots of the in situ HEX diffraction patterns in a characteristic region of (b) delithiated core–shell materials, and (c) delithiated full-concentration gradient materials during thermal ramping from room temperature up to 375°C. In (b), an abrupt phase transition occurs at about 210°C, suggesting poor thermal stability, while in (c), this transition occurs over a much wider temperature range, suggesting significantly improved thermal stability. The color contours correspond to the scattered x-ray intensity for a given scattering vector magnitude, where blue corresponds to low intensity and red to high intensity with other colors falling in between on a linear scale. Reprinted with permission from Reference 11. © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Note: T, crucible temperature during in situ characterization; Q, magnitude of the scattering vector of scattered x-rays in reciprocal space, in Å–1.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) In operando x-ray diffraction patterns for crystalline silicon taken at various different capacities during the first lithiation cycle with (b) corresponding electrochemical curve, and (c) proposed mechanism for the first cycle amorphization of a crystalline silicon nanoparticle (red) reacting with lithium (blue). (a) As lithiation occurs (from bottom to top), the heights of both Si diffraction peaks decrease while the widths increase, indicating an increase in disorder and amorphization and (b) corresponding to a decrease in potential and increase in stored capacity. The colors in (a) correspond to each respective peak height for each diffraction peak, where blue and black are the lowest values, orange and red are the highest values, and green lies in between the two on a linear scale. (c) In region I, no lithiation occurs, while in region II, lithiation (blue) occurs at surface and grain boundaries. In region III, lithium reacts with silicon cores, with an almost complete reaction of silicon with lithium occurring in region IV. Reprinted with permission from Reference 19. © 2013 Wiley. Note: Q, magnitude of the scattering vector of scattered x-rays in reciprocal space, in Å–1.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Schematic of multimodal experiments on a cylindrical battery cell. In full-field imaging mode, a large beam (W × H = 2.2 mm × 1.2 mm, where W is width and H is height) illuminates the (a) layered region of the battery cell, shown schematically. Phase-contrast tomographic measurements are made such that a 3D reconstruction with 1-µm resolution is achieved. (b) A representative sinogram of a LiOH layer on a metallic Li anode.21 In a focused microbeam mode, the sample is translated across a small vertical beam (20 µm) along a relevant pathway, such as the dashed yellow line shown in (b), indicating the regions that are sampled by the focused microbeam. The scattering of the focused microbeam from the sample at each sampled point creates a scattering pattern that is collected (c) on a 2D area detector, where blue or black represents low intensities and red corresponds to high intensities on a linear scale.18 By translating the sample relative to the beam and quantifying the phase composition using the collected patterns, it is possible to create a (d) profile of the crystallographic phases that are present, where the distribution of lithium peroxide is shown. In (d), a low amount of Li2O2 is present in the gas diffusion layer (GDL), while a high amount is measured in the catalyst layer, with the highest amount near the catalyst–separator interface.20 Additionally, the slightly larger primary crystal size observed in the GDL suggests that the O2-rich environment present in the GDL favors the growth of larger grains. Note: Q, magnitude of the scattering vector of scattered x-rays in reciprocal space, in Å–1; Qx and Qy, in-plane components of the scattering vector measured on the 2D area detector. WAXS refers to wide-angle x-ray scattering; i.p.c., image proportional counts.