Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T00:41:36.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cow responses and evolution of the rumen bacterial and methanogen community following a complete rumen content transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

T. De Mulder
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
L. Vandaele
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
N. Peiren
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
A. Haegeman
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Plant Science Unit, Caritasstraat 39, 9090, Melle, Belgium
T. Ruttink
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Plant Science Unit, Caritasstraat 39, 9090, Melle, Belgium
S. De Campeneere
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
T. Van De Wiele
Affiliation:
Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
K. Goossens*
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
*
Author for correspondence: K. Goossens, E-mail: karen.goossens@ilvo.vlaanderen.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the rumen microbial ecosystem requires the identification of factors that influence the community structure, such as nutrition, physiological condition of the host and host–microbiome interactions. The objective of the current study was to describe the rumen microbial communities before, during and after a complete rumen content transfer. The rumen contents of one donor cow were removed completely and used as inoculum for the emptied rumen of the donor itself and three acceptor cows under identical physiological and nutritional conditions. Temporal changes in microbiome composition and rumen function were analysed for each of four cows over a period of 6 weeks. Shortly after transfer, the cows showed different responses to perturbation of their rumen content. Feed intake depression in the first 2 weeks after transfer resulted in short-term changes in milk production, methane emission, fatty acid composition and rumen bacterial community composition. These effects were more pronounced in two cows, whose microbiome composition showed reduced diversity. The fermentation metrics and microbiome diversity of the other two cows were not affected. Their rumen bacterial community initially resembled the composition of the donor but evolved to a new community profile that resembled neither the donor nor their original composition. Descriptive data presented in the current paper show that the rumen bacterial community composition can quickly recover from a reduction in microbiome diversity after a severe perturbation. In contrast to the bacteria, methanogenic communities were more stable over time and unaffected by stress or host effects.

Information

Type
Animal Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Possible influences that shape the rumen microbial community after a rumen content transfer. (b) Visualization of the rumen transfer setup. Each colour represents a host specific rumen microbiome. (c) Chronological overview of the experiment, indicating methane measurement periods and sampling moments for VFAs and DNA extraction.

Figure 1

Table 1. Chemical composition of the diet

Figure 2

Fig. 2. (a) Methane production per kg DMI and (b) the ratio of methane to CO2 at different times after rumen content transfer.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Percentage share of the main VFAs in the rumen fluid: acetate, butyrate, propionate and valerate in function of sample time. The arrow indicates the rumen content transfer (day 0).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Relative OTU abundance of four cows (one donor, three acceptors) subjected to rumen content transfer. Bar chart shows the relative abundance of OTUs at the family level. Only OTUs with a relative abundance above 0.1% in at least one of the samples are shown.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Richness, expressed as the observed number of OTUs, Simpson diversity and Shannon diversity of (a) bacterial and (b) methanogen populations at different time points. The arrow indicates the rumen content transfer (day 0).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Heatmap of the (a) bacterial OTUs (vertical) and of the (b) methanogen OTUs in the rumen samples of four cows. The dendrogram indicates the community resemblance between samples based on UPGMA clustering and the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix. After transfer, the donor cow and acceptor cow 3 suffered from feed intake deprivation which is reflected in the bacterial community profile, as they cluster separately (node 1). The samples collected on day 7 and 10 (node 2) of the donor cow and acceptor cow 3 cluster separately form the samples from later time points and from other cows, suggesting that the rumen bacterial communities of these cows were still recovering. The samples collected from the acceptor cows before rumen transfer cluster together and separately from the donor sample before transfer. The first and second day after transfer, the bacterial profiles of acceptor cows 1 and 2 are similar to that of the donor cow before transfer (node 3). From day 7 and onwards, the bacterial community finds a new equilibrium and the position is seemingly determined by the host animal and the sampling times. Both the bacterial and methanogen community from the donor 1 year after the rumen transfer is dissimilar (node 4) from the other observed communities. During that period, the donor cow was in a different physiological stage. She was fed a dry-cow diet consisting of corn silage and straw and had a lower DMI. The acceptor cows were already in a new lactation cycle and back on a lactation diet, similar to the diet given during the experiment.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. (a) Moving window analysis of the community similarities, (b) chronologic similarity progression of the microbial community as compared with the original community of that community before transfer and (c) compared with the original community of the donor cow before the transfer.

Figure 8

Table 2. List of the dominant OTUs detected in the samples one day after transfer in the cows suffering from physiological stress and feed intake deprivation (donor cow and acceptor cow 3)

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Absolute quantity of bacteria (open symbols) and methanogens (closed symbols) at different time points, expressed as 16S gene copies/ng DNA extract. The arrow indicates the rumen content transfer (day 0).

Supplementary material: File

De Mulder et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S2

Download De Mulder et al. supplementary material(File)
File 609.1 KB