Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T02:27:08.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reliability of visible reflectance spectroscopy in discriminating between pasture and stall-fed lambs from thin and fat-tailed sheep breeds in dry and hot environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2019

H. Hajji*
Affiliation:
Institut des régions Arides, IRA-Mednine, Laboratoire d’élevage et de la faune sauvage, Route du Djorf Km 22.5, 4100 Mednine, Tunisia University of Carthage, INRA-Tunisie, Laboratoire de Productions Animales et Fourragères, rue Hédi Karray, 2049 Ariana, Tunisia
S. Prache
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
D. Andueza
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
S. Smeti
Affiliation:
University of Carthage, INRA-Tunisie, Laboratoire de Productions Animales et Fourragères, rue Hédi Karray, 2049 Ariana, Tunisia
M. Mahouachi
Affiliation:
University of Jendouba, ESAK, Route de Dahmani-Boulifa 7100 Le Kef, Tunisia
N. Atti
Affiliation:
University of Carthage, INRA-Tunisie, Laboratoire de Productions Animales et Fourragères, rue Hédi Karray, 2049 Ariana, Tunisia

Abstract

Considering the additional market value of pasture meat, many authentication methods were developed to discriminate it from meat produced in conventional systems. The visible reflectance spectroscopy technique has proved its efficiency under European conditions and breeds. The present study tested the reliability of this method to discriminate between pasture-fed (P) and stall-fed (S) lambs under North African conditions and investigated the effect of feeding system (FS) (P v. S) and breed (Barbarine; Queue Fine de l’Ouest; and Noire de Thibar) on weight and colour of perirenal, subcutaneous and caudal fat. A total of 18 P and 18 S lambs were used with 6 P and 6 S lambs for each breed. The colour and the reflectance spectrum of different fat tissues were measured. The FS affected weights of all fat tissues and all colour parameters of perirenal and subcutaneous fat (P ≤ 0.01); it almost affected redness and yellowness of caudal fat (P ≤ 0.05; P ≤ 0.01). In all adipose tissues, lightness was higher and both redness and yellowness were lower for S lambs than P lambs. The breed affected weight, lightness and redness of perirenal fat and weight and redness of subcutaneous fat with significant interaction with FS for subcutaneous fat data. To discriminate P lambs from S lambs, the reflectance spectrum of perirenal, subcutaneous and caudal fat at wavelengths between 450 and 510 nm (Method 1, M1) or at wavelengths between 400 and 700 nm using partial least squares discriminative analysis as a classification method (Method 2, M2) were used. M2 yielded to a higher proportion of correctly classified lambs compared with M1 (P = 0.001). The proportion of correctly classified lambs using M2 was 76.4, 75.0 and 80.0% for perirenal, subcutaneous and caudal fat for P lambs and 83.3, 76.4 and 100.0% for S lambs. Despite lower reliability in comparisons to European researches, this study confirmed the efficiency of visible reflectance spectroscopy technique applied on perirenal fat in feeding systems authentication under North African conditions and spotted the caudal fat as a new support for better classification of fat-tailed breeds.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 
Figure 0

Table 1 Chemical composition of concentrate, oat hay and natural pasture used in the experimental diets (% DM) fed to lambs

Figure 1

Table 2 Effect of feeding system (FS) and breed on growth performance of lambs and adipose tissues weight

Figure 2

Table 3 Effect of feeding system (FS) and lamb’s breed on fat colour

Figure 3

Table 4 Effect of feeding system on the mean values of AVMI450–510 of the three fats from the three lambs breed (perirenal, subcutaneous and caudal) and the ranges of their variation

Figure 4

Figure 1 Loadings for the first (PC1) and the second (PC2) principal component axes for perirenal fat of lambs.

Figure 5

Figure 2 Loadings for the first (PC1) and the second (PC2) principal component axes for subcutaneous fat of lambs.

Figure 6

Figure 3 Loadings for the first (PC1) and the second (PC2) principal component axes for caudal fat of lambs.

Figure 7

Figure 4 Proportion of correctly classified lambs in each feeding regimen (pasture-feeding (P) black symbols ▪ and stall-feeding (S) white symbols □. using Method 1 (M1: Integral value I450–510) and Method 2 (M2: Full reflectance spectral data set at wavelengths between 400 and 700 nm) applied on subcutaneous, perirenal and caudal adipose tissues.

Supplementary material: File

Hajji et al. supplementary material

Hajji et al. supplementary material 1

Download Hajji et al. supplementary material(File)
File 17 KB