Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:29:08.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

07-01 ECT – future directions: a trial of the effectiveness and safety of four forms of ECT, bitemporal, bifrontal, right unilateral and right unilateral (ultrabrief pulsewidth)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

C Loo,
P Sheehan and
B Lyndon
C Loo
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
P Sheehan
Affiliation:
The Northside Clinic, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
B Lyndon
Affiliation:
The Northside Clinic, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Abstracts from ‘Brainwaves’— The Australasian Society for Psychiatric Research Annual Meeting 2006, 6–8 December, Sydney, Australia
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , December 2006, pp. 329 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard

Background:

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective treatment for depression, but its use is limited by the risk of associated cognitive side-effects. This study aimed to investigate the relative effectiveness and cognitive side-effects of ECT given in four different forms, varying in electrode placement and pulsewidth, to determine the optimal form of ECT.

Methods:

Depressed in-patients referred for ECT in a private clinic in Sydney were recruited after giving informed consent. Subjects received the form of ECT prescribed by their treating psychiatrist [bitemporal at 1.5 times seizure threshold (1.5 ST), bifrontal at 1.5 ST, right unilateral at 5 ST or right unilateral with ultrabrief pulsewidth at 6 ST]. Mood (MADRS) and neuropsychological functioning (digit span, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Rey figure, word generation, STROOP, Autobiographical Memory Interview) were assessed at baseline, after six ECT and at the end of the ECT course.

Results:

The study is in progress and preliminary results (mood, neuropsychological function, seizure indexes) will be presented.

Conclusions:

All four forms of ECT appear effective, but preliminary results suggest some forms may be advantageous in terms of a lower rate of cognitive side-effects. There is evidence for the clinical use of bifrontal ECT. Ultrabrief unilateral ECT may hold great promise for the future.