Introduction
The family Accacoeliidae Odhner, 1911 is a relatively small group of hemiuroidean digeneans (Gibson Reference Gibson, Gibson, Jones and Bray2002). A significant portion of species in this family (10 out of 25) are host specific parasites of teleosts of the family Molidae (Tetraodontiformes), with eight of them being specific to only Mola spp. (Bray and Gibson Reference Bray and Gibson1977; WoRMS 2025). Until recently, two subfamilies were recognized within the Accacoeliidae: the nominotypical subfamily and Paracaccladiinae (e.g., Gibson Reference Gibson, Gibson, Jones and Bray2002). However, molecular data on the genus Paraccacladium Bray & Gibson, Reference Bray and Gibson1977 suggest that the Paraccacladiinae should be considered to be promoted to the family level (Sokolov et al. Reference Sokolov, Atopkin and Gordeev2021).
The genus Mola Linck, 1790 contains only three species, the most common Ocean Sunfish Mola mola (Linnaeus, 1758), Bumphead Sunfish Mola alexandrini (Ranzani, 1839), and recently described hoodwinker ocean sunfish Mola tecta Nyegaard, Sawai, Gemmell, Gillum, Loneragan, Yamanoue & Stewart, Reference Nyegaard, Sawai, Gemmell, Gillum, Loneragan, Yamanoue and Stewart2017 (Caldera et al. Reference Caldera, Whitney, Nyegaard, Ostalé-Valriberas, Kubicek, Thys, Thys, Hays and Houghton2020; Nyegaard et al. Reference Nyegaard, Sawai, Gemmell, Gillum, Loneragan, Yamanoue and Stewart2017). All three species are quite ecologically uniform with a very wide distribution in the ocean except polar regions. However, hoodwinker ocean sunfish is mostly recorded in the 50th latitudes of the Southern hemisphere (Nyegaard et al. Reference Nyegaard, Sawai, Gemmell, Gillum, Loneragan, Yamanoue and Stewart2017). Similarly to their host fish, a wide distribution has also been noted for many accacoeliids, particularly Odhnerium calyptrocotyle (Monticelli, 1893) (Bray and Gibson Reference Bray and Gibson1977; Manter Reference Manter1954; Yamaguti Reference Yamaguti1934). However, the conspecificity of accacoeliid digenean isolates from different geographically distant parts of their range has not been tested using DNA sequence data. The significant taxonomic richness of Mola-associated accacoeliids constitutes one of the major evolutionary puzzles of this parasite group. Resolving this puzzle is impossible without incorporating data on the phylogeny, ecology, and biogeography of both the accacoeliid digeneans and all their hosts. Meanwhile, the phylogenetic relationships among different species and genera of the Accacoeliidae remain one of the least studied aspects. It is enough to note that molecular data are currently available for only four species of this family (Ahuir-Baraja et al. Reference Ahuir-Baraja, Fraija-Fernández, Raga and Montero2015a, Reference Ahuir-Baraja, Padros, Palacios-Abella, Raga and Montero2015b; Louvard et al. Reference Louvard, Yong, Cutmore and Cribb2024; Littlewood and Olson Reference Littlewood, Olson, Littlewood and Bray2001; Olson et al. Reference Olson, Cribb, Tkach, Bray and Littlewood2003). In this study, we focus on reconstructing the phylogeny of two accacoeliid isolates from ocean sunfish caught in the Northwest Pacific, Accacladocoelium sp. and O. calyptrocotyle.
Material and methods
One specimen of ocean sunfish was caught off Iturup Island (Kuril Islands, Russia) on 10 September 2021. The specimen (TL 60 cm, weigh 22 kg) was collected from the fixed seine installed by RUSKOR Ltd. for Pacific salmon fishing in the Odessky Bay (‘Odesskiy Zaliv’) at the coordinates 44°48′24″N&147°13′37″E. In the laboratory, the specimen was examined for parasites using standard techniques of parasitological dissection (Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya 1985; Klimpel et al. Reference Klimpel, Kuhn, Münster, Dörge, Klapper and Kochmann2019). We found the body fragment of Accacladocoelium sp. (anterior extremity from the oral to the ventral suckers) and seven whole specimens of O. calyptrocotyle (Figure 1) in the intestine. The digenean worms were washed in fresh water and subsequently fixed in 70% ethanol. A small fragment (the ventral sucker) of Accacladocoelium sp. and one whole specimen of O. calyptrocotyle were examined using molecular techniques. Remaining Accacladocoelium sp. fragment and other O. calyptrocotyle specimens were stained with acetocarmine, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, cleared with dimethyl phthalate, and finally mounted in Canada balsam. The drawings were made with the help of the camera lucida. Parasite species were identified according to Linton (Reference Linton1898), Timon-David and Musso (Reference Timon-David and Musso1971), and Bray and Gibson (Reference Bray and Gibson1977). Voucher of O. calyptrocotyle was deposited in the Museum of Helminthological Collections of the Centre of Parasitology of the A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, RAS (IEE RAS; Moscow, Russia) numbers # 14363.
Paragenophore of Odhnerium calyptrocotyle ex Mola mola off Iturup Island, lateral view. Scale bar 3 mm.

DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification volume amounted of 10 μl containing 5 μl GoTaq® Green Master Mix, 1 μl each primer, 1 μl DNA template, and 3 μl sterile deionised water. Fragment of the gene encoding 28S ribosomal DNA (28S rRNA gene) was amplified with the primers 28SA (5′-TCG ATT CGA GCG TGA WTA CCC GC-3′) (Matejusova and Cunningham Reference Matejusova and Cunningham2004) and 1500R (5′-GCT ATC CTG AGG GAA ACT TCG-3′) (Tkach et al. Reference Tkach, Littlewood, Olson, Kinsella and Swiderski2003) with an annealing temperature of 55°C. A ribosomal ITS2 fragment was amplified with primers BD1 (5’-GTC GTA ACA AGG TTT CCG TA-3’) and BD2 (5’-TAT GCT TAA ATT CAG CGG GT-3’) (Luton et al. Reference Luton, Walker and Blair1992) with an annealing temperature of 54°C. Mitochondrial cox1 gene partial sequences were amplified with PCR primers JB3 (5’-TTT TTT GGG CAT CCT GAG GTT TAT-3’) and COI-R1_Trema (5’-CAA CAA ATC ATG ATG CAA AAG G-3’) (Bowles et al. Reference Bowles, Blair and McManus1995; Miura et al. Reference Miura, Uematsu, Sakaki and Ito2005). Negative and positive controls using both primers were included. Polymerase chain reaction was performed in a GeneAmp 9700, Applied Biosystems, USA.
PCR products were directly sequenced using the ABI Big Dye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA), as recommended by the manufacturer, with the internal sequencing primers described by Tkach et al. (Reference Tkach, Littlewood, Olson, Kinsella and Swiderski2003) for 28S rRNA gene, and Luton et al. (Reference Luton, Walker and Blair1992) for the ITS2 rDNA fragment. The cox1 gene fragments were sequenced with PCR primers, described above. PCR products were analysed using a GA3500 genetic analyser (Life Technologies, USA) at the FSC of Biodiversity FEB RAS. Sequences were submitted to GenBank of the NCBI database with the accession numbers described in Table 1.
List of nucleotide sequences of hemiuroidean trematodes incorporated into molecular analysis. New material marked with bold

The phylogenetic relationships among species of the Accacoeliidae were inferred from our data and the sequences of the other Hemiurata species obtained from the NCBI GenBank database (Table 1). Ribosomal DNA sequences were assembled with SeqScape v. 2.6 software. Alignments and estimation of the number of variable sites and sequence differences were performed using MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Stecher and Tamura2016). Phylogenetic analyses of the nucleotide sequences were performed using the Bayesian inference algorithm with MrBayes v. 3.2.6 software (Huelsenbeck et al. Reference Huelsenbeck, Ronquist, Nielsen and Bollback2001). The best nucleotide substitution models, TIM3+G and TPM1uf+G for ribosomal 28S rRNA and mitochondrial cox1 gene sequence fragments, respectively, were estimated with jModeltest v. 2.1.5 software (Darriba et al. Reference Darriba, Taboada, Doallo and Posada2012). The HKY+G nucleotide substitution model was estimated as optimal for concatenated ITS2 rDNA and cox1 gene of mtDNA sequence dataset. Bayesian analysis was performed using 10,000,000 generations, with two independent runs. Summary parameters and the phylogenetic tree were calculated with a burnin of 2,500,000 generations. The significance of the phylogenetic relationships was estimated using posterior probabilities (Huelsenbeck et al. Reference Huelsenbeck, Ronquist, Nielsen and Bollback2001).
Results
Three phylogenetic trees for the Accacoeliidae were reconstructed with Bayesian analysis based on 28S rRNA gene fragments (834 bp), mitochondrial cox1 gene fragments (391 bp), and concatenated ribosomal ITS2 and mitochondrial cox1 gene fragments (704 bp), respectively. The 28S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic tree (Figure 2) showed strongly supported monophyly for the family Accacoeliidae. The Accacoeliidae clade was subdivided into two groups. The first group contained Accacoelium contorum (Rudolphi, 1819), and its sister branch was represented by Accacladocoelium sp. The second group included two sister taxa, Tetrochetus coryphaenae Yamaguti, Reference Yamaguti1934, and O. calyptrocotyle. Accacladocoelium sp. and O. calyptrocotyle differed from other molecularly analysed representatives of the Accacoeliidae by 3.24±0.56%–6.6±0.88% and 5.52±0.4%–13.2±1.17%, respectively.
Phylogenetic relationships of Accacladocoelium sp. and Odhnerium calyptrocotyle ex Mola mola off Iturup Island based on partial 28S rRNA gene sequences, generated with a Bayesian inference algorithm. Posterior probability values lower than 0.9 are not shown. Newly obtained sequences are in bold.

The phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences from a mitochondrial cox1 gene fragment (Figure 3) included Accacladocoelium nigroflavum (Rudolphi, 1819), Accacladocoelium macrocotyle (Diesing, 1858), Accacladocoelium sp., and O. calyptrocotyle. The family Accacoeliidae with this species content has poorly supported monophyly, and the genus Accacladocoelium Odhner, 1928, was paraphyletic. Accacladocoelium sp. was closely related to A. nigroflavum, and O. calyptrocotyle was moderately supported as sister to this species clade. However, A. macrocotyle appeared as an early divergent lineage within Accacoeliidae. The genetic p-distance value between Accacladocoelium sp. and A. nigroflavum ranged from 2.3±0.75% to 2.56±0.8%, and between Accacladocoelium sp. and A. macrocotyle – from 9.46±1.42% to 9.72±1.43%. The mean value of p-distance between O. calyptrocotyle and Accacladocoelium spp. was 15.4±1.82%.
Phylogenetic relationships of Accacladocoelium sp. and Odhnerium calyptrocotyle ex Mola mola off Iturup Island based on partial cox1 gene sequences, generated with a Bayesian inference algorithm. Posterior probability values lower than 0.9 are not shown. Newly obtained sequences are in bold. Members of the paraphyletic genus Accacladocoelium are marked with a grey background.

Results of phylogenetic analysis based on the concatenated ribosomal ITS2 and mitochondrial cox1 gene sequence dataset showed highly supported monophyly for Accacoeliidae and confirmed close relationships between Accacladocoelium sp. and A. nigroflavum (Figure 4). Odhnerium calyptrocotyle and A. macrocotyle occupied on this tree a position identical to that on the cox1 tree and render the genus Accacladocoelium paraphyletic as well.
Phylogenetic relationships of Accacladocoelium sp. and Odhnerium calyptrocotyle ex Mola mola off Iturup Island based on concatenated sequences of ITS2 region and cox1 gene, generated with a Bayesian inference algorithm. Posterior probability values lower than 0.9 are not shown. Newly obtained sequences are in bold. Members of the paraphyletic genus Accacladocoelium are marked with a grey background.

The poor capacity of the 312 bp fragment of the ITS2 rDNA sequence dataset was not enough to carry out an adequate phylogenetic analysis. For this reason, we provide only p-distance values between different Accacladocoelium species based on this molecular marker that were from 2.95±0.94% to 4.25±1.14% between Accacladocoelium sp. and A. nigroflavum and 3.92±1.09% between Accacladocoelium sp. and A. macrocotyle. The range of p-distance values between Accacladocoelium sp. and A. nigroflavum observed because of one of three sequences of the last species from the study of Ahuir-Baraja et al. (Reference Ahuir-Baraja, Fraija-Fernández, Raga and Montero2015a) under accession no. KF687304 differs from the other two sequences in four substitutions, representing a 1.31±0.63% differentiation value, which was unmentioned by the authors of that study. For this reason, specimens of Accacladocoelium sp. from our study and A. nigroflavum accession no. KF687304 show greater divergence from each other.
Discussion
The results of phylogenetic analysis show that Accacladocoelium sp. appears as a distinct lineage closely related to A. nigroflavum. The values of p-distances based on mitochondrial cox1 gene sequences between these digeneans are in the interval between the levels of obvious intra- (<2%) and interspecific (>10%) divergence recorded in accacladocoeliids and derogenids related to it (Ahuir-Baraja et al. Reference Ahuir-Baraja, Fraija-Fernández, Raga and Montero2015a; Bouguerche et al. Reference Bouguerche, Huston, Cribb, Karlsbakk, Ahmed and Holovachov2023; Gharbi et al. Reference Gharbi, Bouguerche, Ahmed, de León G and Tazerouti2024; Tsuchida et al. Reference Tsuchida, Flores, Viozzi, Rauque and Urabe2021a). However, p-distance values calculated based on the ITS2 rDNA sequence dataset between Accacladocoelium sp. and A. nigroflavum are consistent with the level of interspecific differentiation observed in accacladocoeliids and derogenids (Ahuir-Baraja et al. Reference Ahuir-Baraja, Fraija-Fernández, Raga and Montero2015a; Gharbi et al. Reference Gharbi, Bouguerche, Ahmed, de León G and Tazerouti2024). For this reason, we suggest that Accacladocoelium sp. is a distinct species that is close to A. nigroflavum genetically.
The genus Accacladocoelium Odhner, 1928, is represented by four nominal species (Bray and Gibson Reference Bray and Gibson1977), three of which were recorded in the Pacific Ocean: A. macrocotyle (Fernández et al. Reference Fernández, Oyarzún, Valenzuela, Burgos, Guaquín and Campos2016; Luque and Oliva Reference Luque and Oliva1993; Pratt and McCauley Reference Pratt and McCauley1961; Villalba and Fernández Reference Villalba and Fernández1985), Accacladocoelium alveolatum Robinson, 1934 (Luque et al. Reference Luque, Cruces, Chero, Paschoal, Alves, Silva, Sanchez and Iannacone2016), and Accacladocoelium petasiporum Odhner, 1928 (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, S-F and Yang2016). However, the data on the occurrence of A. petasiporum in the Pacific Ocean are questionable since the morphology of the ventral sucker in specimens found by Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, S-F and Yang2016) does not correspond to that of this species as described by Bray and Gibson (Reference Bray and Gibson1977). Our specimen of Accacladocoelium sp. had a non-specialised ventral sucker and is thus clearly not conspecific with A. petasiporum. According to the results of our phylogenetic analyses, Accacladocoelium sp. also is not conspecific with A. macrocotyle. Species affiliation of Accacladocoelium sp. needs clarification.
In the present study, we provide the first molecular data for the genus Odhnerium. This taxon is closely related to the genus Tetrochetus Looss, 1912, in the 28S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic tree. Since the species of Tetrochetus, unlike those of Accacladocoelium and Odhnerium, are not specific parasites of fish of the family Molidae (e.g., Bray and Gibson Reference Bray and Gibson1977), we have not received evidence of monophyly of either Mola- or Molidae-associated accacoeliids at present. Results of phylogenetic analysis based on both the mitochondrial cox1 gene and concatenated ribosomal ITS2 and cox1 genes of mtDNA show that the genus Odhnerium is close to A. nigroflavum and a new species, Accacladocoelium sp., thereby creating paraphyly of the genus Accacladocoelium. We cannot make definitive statements concerning this paraphyly because of the poor molecular data available on accacoeliid species to date. Moreover, monophyly of the Accacoeliidae with paraphyletic Accacladocoelium is not supported statistically in the cox1 gene-based phylogenetic tree, suggesting that other tree topologies of the Accacoeliidae may emerge when additional molecular data on members of this family are included.
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to the staff of RUSKOR LLC for their assistance in collecting the material.
Financial support
The study was funded by the Russian Academy of Sciences, project no. 121031000154-4 (Atopkin DM), and FFER-2024-0027 (Sokolov SG).
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.
Ethical standards
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guides on the care and use of laboratory animals.

