Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:35:34.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Triassic calc-alkaline lamprophyre dykes from the North Qiangtang, central Tibetan Plateau: evidence for a subduction-modified lithospheric mantle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2021

Bin Liu*
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Daxue Road 111, Wuhan 430100, China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Fuxue Road 18, Beijing 102249, China
You-Jun Tang
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environment, Yangtze University, Daxue Road 111, Wuhan 430100, China
Lü-Ya Xing
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environment, Yangtze University, Daxue Road 111, Wuhan 430100, China
Yu Xu
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Daxue Road 111, Wuhan 430100, China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Fuxue Road 18, Beijing 102249, China
Shao-Qing Zhao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Fuxue Road 18, Beijing 102249, China State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Lumo Road 388, Wuhan 430074, China
Yang Sun
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Daxue Road 111, Wuhan 430100, China State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Fuxue Road 18, Beijing 102249, China
Jian Huang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Lumo Road 388, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author for correspondence: Bin Liu, Email: binliu@yangtzeu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Primitive lamprophyres in orogenic belts can provide crucial insights into the nature of the subcontinental lithosphere and the relevant deep crust–mantle interactions. This paper reports a suite of relatively primitive lamprophyre dykes from the North Qiangtang, central Tibetan Plateau. Zircon U–Pb ages of the lamprophyre dykes range from 214 Ma to 218 Ma, with a weighted mean age of 216 ± 1 Ma. Most of the lamprophyre samples are similar in geochemical compositions to typical primitive magmas (e.g. high MgO contents, Mg no. values and Cr, with low FeOt/MgO ratios), although they might have experienced a slightly low degree of olivine crystallization, and they show arc-like trace-element patterns and enriched Sr–Nd isotopic composition ((87Sr/86Sr)i = 0.70538–0.70540, ϵNd(t) = −2.96 to −1.65). Those geochemical and isotopic variations indicate that the lamprophyre dykes originated from partial melting of a phlogopite- and spinel-bearing peridotite mantle modified by subduction-related aqueous fluids. Combining with the other regional studies, we propose that slab subduction might have occurred during Late Triassic time, and the rollback of the oceanic lithosphere induced the lamprophyre magmatism in the central Tibetan Plateau.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Location of the central Tibetan Plateau and (b) simplified geological map of the study area. Data sources for the zircon U–Pb ages are as follows: (1) Zhao et al. (2015); (2) Tan et al. (2019); (3) Yang et al. (2011); (4) Liu et al. (2016b); (5–8) Liu et al. (2016a), Liu et al. (2019), Zhao et al. (2014); (9) Liu et al. (2020).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a–d) Photomicrographs of the Triassic lamprophyre dykes from the North Qiangtang terrane. Hb – hornblende; Pl – plagioclase.

Figure 2

Table 1. Zircon LA-ICP-MS dating results for the Triassic lamprophyre dykes

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a–c) Zircon U–Pb Concordia plots with CL images of representative zircons for the Triassic lamprophyre dykes. The white circles in the CL images indicate analytical spots of the zircon U–Pb dating.

Figure 4

Table 2. Major- (in wt%), trace-element (ppm) and Sr–Nd isotopic compositions of the Triassic lamprophyre dykes

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Plots of (a) Zr/TiO2 versus Nb/Y (Winchester & Floyd,1977) and (b) K2O versus SiO2 (Rock, 1991) for the Triassic lamprophyre dykes.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns and (b) primitive-mantle-normalized trace-element spider diagrams for the Triassic lamprophyre dykes. Chondrite data from Taylor & McLennan (1985); primitive mantle data from Sun & McDonough (1989).

Figure 7

Table 3. Sr–Nd isotopic compositions of typical samples from the Triassic lamprophyre dykes

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Plot of (a) ϵNd(t) versus (87Sr/86Sr)i and (b) ϵNd(t) versus Mg no. for the Triassic lamprophyre dykes. Triassic S-type granites and Proterozoic gneiss (Tao et al.2014; Peng et al.2015) are shown for comparison. MORB data from Liu et al. (2016b). The MORB-type asthenosphere mantle is represented by: Nd = 12.7 ppm, Sr = 93.69 ppm, 87Sr/86Sr = 0.705372 and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512811. Two typical types of crustal components are represented by (1) Nd = 20.9 ppm, Sr = 161 ppm, 87Sr/86Sr = 0.723624 and 43Nd/144Nd = 0.511967, and (2) Nd = 27.4 ppm, Sr = 105 ppm, 87Sr/86Sr = 0.740191 and 43Nd/144Nd = 0.511865.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Plots of FeOt, TiO2, P2O5, Cr, Ni, Sc/Y, CaO/Al2O3, Eu/Eu* and Nb/La versus Mg no. for the Triassic lamprophyre dykes.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Plots of (a) Th/Yb versus Nb/Yb (Pearce, 2014), (b) La/Ba versus La/Nb (Saunders et al.1992), (c) Ba/Th versus Th/Nb and (d) Th/Yb versus Ba/La diagrams for the Triassic lamprophyre dykes.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Plots of (a) Rb/Sr versus Ba/Rb (Ma et al.2014) and (b) Dy/Yb versus (K/Yb)×1000 for the Triassic lamprophyre dykes. Melting curves in (b) after Duggen et al. (2005).

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Plots of (a) DF2 versus DF1 (Agrawal et al.2008) and (b) (Hf/3)–Th–Ta (Wood, 1980) for the Triassic lamprophyre dykes, where DF1 and DF2 are defined as 0.3518 ln(La/Th) + 0.6013 ln(Sm/Th) − 1.3450 ln(Yb/Th) + 2.1056 ln(Nb/Th) − 5.4763 and −0.3050 ln(La/Th) – 1.1801 ln(Sm/Th) + 1.6189 ln(Yb/Th) + 1.2260 ln(Nb/Th) − 0.9944, respectively. IAB – island-arc basalt; MORB – mid-ocean-ridge basalt; OIB – ocean-island basalt; CRB – continental-rift basalt; CAB – calc-alkaline basalts; IAT – island-arc tholeiites; N-MORB – normal-type MORB; E-MORB – enriched-type MORB; WPT – within-plate tholeiites; WPAB – within-plate alkaline basalts.

Supplementary material: File

Liu et al. supplementary material

Liu et al. supplementary material

Download Liu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2 MB