Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:25:25.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of amplified spontaneous emission and parasitic oscillations on the performance of cryogenically-cooled slab amplifiers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2013

Magdalena Sawicka*
Affiliation:
HiLASE Project, Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Martin Divoky
Affiliation:
HiLASE Project, Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
Antonio Lucianetti
Affiliation:
HiLASE Project, Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
Tomas Mocek
Affiliation:
HiLASE Project, Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
*
Address correspondents and reprint requests to: Magdalena Sawicka, Institute of Physics, AS CR, Na Slovance 2,182 21 Prague, Czech Republic. E-mail: sawicka@fzu.cz

Abstract

We present a three-dimensional code for the optimization of energy storage, heat deposition, and amplification in square-shaped laser slabs and multi-slab laser amplifiers. The influence of the slab dimensions, slab face and edge reflectivities, pump parameters, and operating temperature on amplified spontaneous emission and stored energy has been investigated. The multi-slab and single-slab configurations are compared, analyzing in detail the influence of the absorption cladding for the suppression of amplified spontaneous emission radiation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Slab geometry: 3D view (a), side view for two different thicknesses th1 and th2 (b), front view (c) with indicated paths of some ASE photons.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Ratio of the amplified spontaneous emission to the spontaneous emission as a function of the fractional thickness.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Stored energy as a function of pump energy for different slab sizes.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Stored energy as a function of slab size for different pump energies.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Stored energy and ASE/SE ratio for different side wall reflectivities of slab.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Storage efficiency and ASE/SE ratio for slabs coated with AR layer and without it.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Transverse heat distributions of the slab amplifiers and absorptive layer with Fresnel losses (a), scattering (b), and total absorption (c) at the edges.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Temperature dependence of the ASE/SE ratio, storage efficiency (a) and extraction efficiency (b).

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Longitudinal distribution of population inversion density for one-slab and multi-slab architecture.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Evolution of ASE spectrum for slab sizes of 5 mm and 25 mm (a), zoomed in wavelength range from 1010 to 1045 nm (b).