Mars – our current knowledge

Before I outline what was known about Mars before the flyby of Mariner 4 in 1965, here is a very brief summary of our current knowledge of Mars, with an emphasis on features relevant to the possibility of Martian life.

Mars is a small world, 53% the diameter of the Earth. Like the Earth it consists mainly of an iron rich core overlain by a silicate rich mantle, topped by a thin crust rich in silicates and in more volatile materials including water. Its orbit has a semimajor axis of 1.524 AU and an eccentricity of 0.0936. For the Earth these values are 1.000 AU (by definition) and 0.0167, respectively. Mars is our neighbour, being the next planet out from the Sun.

Mars has a thin atmosphere consisting largely of CO₂, with a column mass of only 0.015×10⁴ kg m⁻² (for the Earth the value is 1.07×10⁴ kg m⁻²). This thin atmosphere, the sparse cloud cover and the distance of Mars from the Sun have made it a cold world. On a really good day in the tropics the temperature can reach up to around 20°C, but it plunges to −100°C or even lower at night. The surface has a reddish tint strewn with darker areas (Fig. 1). It divides into two roughly equal areas, divided by a line inclined at nearly 40° with respect to the Equator. The northerly hemisphere shows considerable evidence of geological activity, perhaps confined to the past, and a corresponding low density of impact craters. The southerly hemisphere, being older, is much more impact scarred, and displays little evidence of geological activity. It does, however, bear features that seem to have been carved by liquid water (e.g. the channels in Fig. 13) that suggest Mars was probably a much warmer, wetter place early in the first billion years or so of its 4.6 billion year history. Today, water has only been seen in solid form, in the residual north polar cap, in frosts that form at night and as thin clouds of ice crystals, although it is probably present as liquid in places beneath the surface. Evidence for such subsurface liquid water is provided by narrow gulleys on slopes, some of which seem to have been carved in the last few years (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Hubble Space Telescope images of the whole surface of Mars in August 2003 when the planet was particularly close to the Earth. The white region at the bottom of each image is the residual south polar cap (CO₂ frost and snow). The upward pointing dark triangular feature in the left image is Syrtis Major. (NASA/STScI, J. Bell & M. Wolff.)

Fig. 2.

Gullies in the south facing wall of the channel Nirgal Vallis, imaged by Mars Global Surveyor in 2000. Frame width 2.3 km. (NASA/JPL/Malin Space Science Systems.)

CO₂ condenses to form clouds and haze. It also condenses on to the surface, and accounts for the spread of each polar cap in that hemisphere's winter – Mars's axial inclination is similar to that of the Earth (25.2° and 23.4°, respectively), and so both planets suffer comparable seasonal changes in insolation, although as the Martian ‘year’ is 1.88 of our years, each season lasts considerably longer than on Earth.

This is a very brief outline of our knowledge of Mars today. What about the past, and in particular what was known before the advent in 1965 of the exploration of Mars by spacecraft?

Mars before telescope observations

Every 778 days on average, Mars, as seen from the Earth, moves to lie in the opposite direction from the Sun. Around such oppositions it becomes one of the brightest objects in the night sky. The regular motion among the stars of such a bright object must have drawn the attention of our ancestors well before they could record what they saw. From the dawn of written history a few millennia BC, Mars, and the four other visible planets that move among the stars (Mercury, Venus, Jupiter and Saturn) were considered to be gods by many cultures. For example, the Greek name for Mars is Ares, the god of savage war, or bloodlust, fitting for the red tint of Mars, like a drop of blood in the sky. The Romans also associated the planet with war – Mars is the Roman god of war.

Over the centuries many observations were made of the regular variation of the position of Mars with respect to the background of stars. Of great consequence is the particularly accurate observations made between 1576 and 1597 by the Danish nobleman and astronomer Tycho Brahe (1546–1601, Fig. 3). His young assistant the German astronomer Johannes Kepler (1571–1630, Fig. 3), who joined him in 1600, spent a long time trying to understand the path of Mars, and in 1609 he announced his first two laws of planetary motion.

• First law. Each planet moves around the Sun in an ellipse, with the Sun at one focus, the other being empty.

• Second law. The line from the planet to the Sun sweeps out equal areas in equal times.

Fig. 3.

Monument in Prague to Tycho Brahe (left) and Johannes Kepler (right).

Figure 4(a) shows an orbit with a much greater eccentricity than that of Mars, to make Kepler's laws pictorially clear. Figure 4(b) shows the orbit of Mars, with that of the Earth for comparison. It was Mars that led Kepler to his first two laws, because, although Mercury's orbit has an even greater eccentricity than that of Mars, it orbits much closer to the Sun than the Earth and so is impossible to observe over much of its orbit. Venus, Jupiter and Saturn have much less eccentric orbits, and so departures from circular form are harder to discern. In addition, Jupiter and Saturn have much longer orbital periods than Mars, so have to be observed for much longer to cover a complete orbit. (Kepler's third law also made use of Mars's orbit, and states that the square of the sidereal period of a planetary orbit divided by the cube of the semimajor axis has the same value for all the planets in the Solar System.)

Fig. 4.

(a) An eccentric ellipse, which illustrates Kepler's first two laws of planetary motion. The semimajor axis of the orbit is a and its eccentricity e. The shaded areas are equal and are swept out in equal times. (b) The orbits of Mars and the Earth. The point p on each orbit is the position of perihelion (the point closest to the Sun). The point a on the Earth's orbit is the position of aphelion (the point furthest from the Sun).

Kepler's laws were a change in paradigm. Before, and for some time afterwards, it was believed, in both of the geocentric and heliocentric systems, that planets moved in circular paths, which had by Kepler's time become an unwieldy set of circles, several per planet, involving epicycles (e.g. Pecker Reference Pecker2001). Furthermore, Kepler's laws can be explained by the laws of motion and law of gravity of the British philosopher Isaac Newton (1643–1727; Murray & Dermott Reference Murray and Dermott1999). This was an early success for Newton's laws.

Early telescope observations

The exploration of Mars itself, as opposed to its orbit, began in 1609 when the Italian natural philosopher Galileo Galilei (1564–1642, Fig. 5(a)) turned the newly invented telescope to the skies. He saw Mars as a disc, rather than as a point of light in the sky. At that time this was an important discovery in itself, because it suggested that Mars was a world. However, it was not until the opposition of 1659 that the first clear drawings of surface markings were made. These were by the Dutch astronomer Christiaan Huygens (1629–1695, Fig. 5(b)) who drew a large roughly triangular surface feature, which was dark on the otherwise red tinted surface (Fig. 6). There is little doubt that this is the dark feature subsequently named Syrtis Major (compare with Fig. 1). Moreover, Huygens was able to follow it night by night and recorded in his diary on 01 December 1659 that:

Fig. 5.

(a) Galileo Galilei in 1636, by Justus Sustermans. (b) Christiaan Huygens as a young man.

Fig. 6.

Syrtis Major, sketched by Christiaan Huygens in 1659. North is at the top.

He was very nearly right – the rotation period of Mars with respect to the Sun, the ‘day’ on Mars, is 24 h 39.6 min, just 39.6 min longer than our day.

There were many telescope observations of Mars after Huygens. Of particular note are the drawings by the German amateur astronomer Johann Hieronymus Schröter (1745–1816; Schröter Reference Schröter1881). He, and later observers, recorded changes in the shape, extent and the contrast of the dark regions against the comparatively light red tint of the rest of the Martian surface. Some of these changes followed the seasons. By 1877 many dark markings had been mapped on the surface and changes in these markings had been extensively studied. Most astronomers believed that the dark areas were seas and the light areas continents. A few astronomers believed that the dark areas were plant life, perhaps filling basins that had once been seas.

It had long been known that Mars possessed white polar caps and that these advanced and retreated with the seasons, being largest at the end of winter and smallest at the end of summer. It was known, from observations of surface features as Mars rotates, that the inclination of the rotation axis was about 24° and therefore that the seasonal variations in solar radiation are comparable with those on Earth, although the greater eccentricity of the Martian orbit significantly enhances the seasonal variations in the southern hemisphere where midsummer occurs soon after perihelion. This is why the southern polar cap advances and retreats with the seasons to a far greater extent than the northern polar cap. The caps were widely thought to consist of water, condensed as ice and snow as on the Earth.

There was ample evidence by 1877 for a Martian atmosphere. The polar caps could not exist without an atmosphere – they would rapidly sublime and the water would escape to space, and this would also apply to any open bodies of liquid water. Moreover, as early as 1809 yellow clouds had been observed, sometimes widespread, and by 1858 small white clouds had been seen.

There were no measurements of temperature at the Martian surface, but calculations, laced with a heavy dose of speculation, gave values not much lower than the Earth's surface temperatures.

On such an apparently warm moist planet the possibility of life seemed well worth entertaining, and indeed was widely believed to be present (e.g. Camille Flammarion 1842–1925, see Flammarion Reference Flammarion1862). By 1870 several schemes had been proposed for signalling to the inhabitants of Mars from the Earth (Drake & Sobel Reference Drake and Sobel1993).

This was the position as the opposition of 05 September 1877 gradually approached. Advances in optics and in scientific equipment in general meant that the astronomical community was considerably better prepared than it had been for earlier oppositions. This was a favourable opposition, with Mars not far from perihelion (Fig. 4(b)). It is not hard to imagine the excitement mounting as Mars brightened and its angular diameter grew.

The 1877 opposition and its legacy

Throughout the weeks surrounding the 1877 opposition the Italian astronomer Giovanni Virginio Schiaparelli (1835–1910) scrutinized Mars visually at the Brera Observatory in Milan where he was director. He used a 220 mm aperture refractor, a large telescope at that time.

His maps of Mars were the best yet and we still use the names he gave to the various dark features, including Syrtis Major. However, he is best remembered for about 40 fine lines that he drew crossing the bright red areas, canali as he called them. The Italian word canali means grooves but drop the ‘i’ at the end and you have a sensation! Description becomes interpretation and in a climate that considered life on Mars at least a reasonable possibility it was not entirely ridiculous to imagine that intelligent life was present and that it had built canals.

And yet those scientists who at once took to the canal interpretation were by and large not astronomers. Until the 1880s Schiaparelli alone had seen them, and most astronomers did not believe that the fine lines existed, regardless of the interpretation. This is not as surprising as it might seem. Mars, even at a favourable opposition, is a small target, never more than about 25 arcsec across (the Moon is about 1800 arcsec across). To see much at all on Mars's surface requires visual acuity, skill, experience, a good telescope and good seeing (a clear steady atmosphere above the telescope). However, astronomers had been alerted by Schiaparelli's observations, and by the next favourable opposition of Mars, in 1892, a few other astronomers had seen canali, and the more prominent canali had even been identified on maps earlier than 1877.

Nevertheless, the majority of astronomers could not see them, and did not believe in their existence, including the French astronomer E.-M. Antoniadi (1870–1944), a careful observer of Mars and an excellent draughtsman (Sagan & Pollack Reference Sagan and Pollack1966). The minority that believed in canali were divided into those that thought they were natural and those that thought they were artificial. The natural interpretation was initially of water channels, joining one sea to another across the red continents. However, within a few years of 1877 it was realized that the ‘seas’ did not reflect light in the right sort of way. Then there were their changes in extent, shape and contrast, for which no convincing explanations could be found in terms of seas. Moreover, the dark areas had structures within them, and some were crossed by canali. The interpretation of the dark areas by almost all astronomers therefore shifted away from oceans to either plant life or minerals distinct from those in the bright areas (e.g. Lowell Reference Lowell1908, pp. 104–107). The canali were then thought to be some other natural feature, such as strips of vegetation if the dark areas were plant life.

In the same way, those that thought the canali were artificial considered them at first to be water channels – canals – but as the interpretation of the dark areas shifted from seas to plant life then the canali were considered to be irrigated tracts of land, that what was seen was vegetation sustained by a thread of water too narrow to be seen. Indeed, the interpretation of the dark areas as plant life was preferred by this group, because the canal network could then be understood as an attempt by the Martians to distribute their meagre water supply – hardly meagre if the dark areas were seas.

The idea that Mars was short of water stemmed from the interpretation of the bright, red tinted areas as deserts, and from the rapidity with which the polar caps advanced and retreated with the seasons, thus indicating that the caps were thin. Such a water shortage was seen as consistent with Mars's low surface gravity, due to its small size, which makes the escape of atmospheric constituents easier than on larger planets like the Earth.

A dying world then, becoming desiccated. What more natural than for its inhabitants to build canals?

In the 1890s there emerged two powerful supporters of the view that the canali were canals. One was the US astronomer William Henry Pickering (1858–1938) who began to observe Mars in 1892. The other was another US astronomer, Percival Lowell (1855–1916), who in 1894 founded an observatory at Flagstaff in Arizona, mainly for him to study Mars. The site is appropriately named Mars Hill. Figure 7 shows a map of one hemisphere of Mars, drawn in 1905 (Lowell Reference Lowell1908, facing p. 217).

Fig. 7.

Mars in 1905, drawn by Percival Lowell. Note the canals. Note also the south polar hood of cloud (at the top).

Around this time the world of literature stirred in response to the possibility that there were intelligent Martians. In 1898 appeared The War of the Worlds by the British writer Herbert George Wells (1866–1946; Wells Reference Wells1898) – a fine tale in which the Martians look Earthwards and see:

and we are destined to be invaded (Fig. 8). This, and subsequent fiction involving Mars, kept alive well into the 20th century the belief among the general public that there was intelligent life on Mars.

Fig. 8.

Martians as depicted in an early edition of The War of the Worlds by H.G. Wells, which was first published in 1898. This drawing is by Warwick Goble.

By contrast, in the scientific community, such a belief, never widespread, was eroded by measurements that showed that Mars is not as hospitable as had been thought at the end of the 19th century, but is generally harsher than a dry Antarctic desert. Nevertheless, the belief in canali was sustained into the Space Age by a small minority of astronomers. Then, in 1965, the NASA spacecraft Mariner 4 flew by Mars – no canali were seen. Figure 9 shows three maps of the same area of Mars (Sagan & Fox Reference Sagan and Fox1975). Figure 9(a) shows a 19th century drawing by Schiaparelli, Fig. 9(b) a drawing from 1929 by E. M. Antoniadi (1870–1944) and Fig. 9(c) a map based on images from Mariner 9 and Earth-based photography (Mariner 9 orbited Mars in 1971–1972). Figure 9, and other image comparisons, make it clear that the canali do not exist. Comparison of Fig. 9(a) and 9(b) is particularly telling. None of the canali in Fig. 9(a) are present in Fig. 9(b) – in superior seeing conditions Antoniadi found the canali to be loosely aligned spots and streaks.

Fig. 9.

Three maps of the same area of Mars, about 4400 km across: (a) a drawing by Schiaparelli in the 19th century; (b) a drawing by Antoniadi from 1929; (c) a map of Mars based on images from the 1971–1972 Mars orbiter Mariner 9 and Earth-based photography.

What then are we to make of Lowell (Reference Lowell1908, p. 215)?:

Or even of Schiaparelli (Reference Schiaparelli1894) ?:

The explanation seems to be that the canali were indeed evidence of intelligent life, but, as the US astronomer Carl Sagan (1934–1996) put it, the intelligence was at the eyepiece end of the telescope. The human mind, straining to interpret elusive detail at the limit of perception, invented narrow linear features that are simply not there. At best there are roughly aligned spots and streaks. The canals stand not as a chronicle of Mars but as a monument to the subtleties of human visual perception.

The green and red planet

Aside from the canali, what was our picture of Mars in the years before Mariner 4 flew by in July 1965? Accounts are to be found, for example, in Sheehan (Reference Sheehan1996), Jackson & Moore (Reference Jackson and Moore1965), Slipher (Reference Slipher1962), Strughold (Reference Strughold1954) and de Vaucouleurs (Reference de Vaucouleurs1950). Here is a summary of the main points.

The surface

One of the best pre-Space-Age maps of Mars is shown in Fig. 10. Such maps are based on photographs through Earth-based telescopes and also on visual observations. Photography had the advantage that it gave accurate shapes and that very low contrast features were revealed. Visual observations had the advantage that glimpses of Mars during moments of very good seeing yielded detail that was beyond the reach of photography, because during typical exposure times turbulence in the Earth's atmosphere blurred fine detail.

Fig. 10.

The International Astronomical Union albedo map of Mars, current in the early 1960s. South is at the top. Presumably the features shown are seasonally averaged. Note that the polar regions are not included.

Maps of Mars at this time showed albedo features, not topography. The only reliable topographic data were from radar. These data were of low spatial resolution, although they did indicate altitude differences up to 16 km between different areas of Mars. In fact, the altitude range is greater than this, although only because of local features.

What of the seasonal and non-seasonal changes in the albedo features? There was evidence that in the spring hemisphere, in which the polar cap was consequently retreating, the dark areas became even darker. There was even some evidence of a ‘wave of darkening’ spreading from the waning polar cap towards the equator. This supported the long held belief that the dark areas were plant life, being revived in the spring by the rising temperatures and by moisture released from the polar cap. Non-seasonal changes were then due to changes in the weather from year to year.

What of the astronomers who believed that the dark areas were distinct from the bright areas in being of a different mineralogical composition? One of these was the US astronomer Dean Benjamin McLaughlin (1901–1965) who, in the 1950s, proposed that the dark areas were ash from still-active volcanoes, placed in semi-permanent patterns by the prevailing winds (Veverka & Sagan Reference Veverka and Sagan1974). It had also been suggested that the dark areas contained substances that darkened as they absorbed water, thus accounting for the increased darkness of the dark areas in spring (de Vaucouleurs Reference de Vaucouleurs1950, pp. 70–72). Another suggestion was that the dark areas darkened in spring as the known light patches within the dark areas were filled with new dark spots.

The bright areas were regarded as dusty deserts by almost all astronomers. Some of the variation in the size and shape of the dark areas could be due to a battle between the growth of plants and the encroaching desert.

There was a comparable degree of agreement that the polar caps consisted of condensed water in the form of snow or frost. Their rapid seasonal advances and retreats indicated a thickness in these seasonal caps of no more than 100–200 mm (the residual caps at each pole could be much thicker).

Temperatures at the Martian surface had been measured from Earth by radiometry and spectrometry. Near midday in the Martian tropics the surface could reach a high of about 280 K (7°C), but near sunrise the surface temperatures were typically 228 K.

Mariners 4, 6, and 7

On 15 July 1965 the NASA spacecraft Mariner 4 flew past Mars at a minimum distance of only 9800 km. There were two major surprises. First, all 22 of the images sent to Earth showed impact craters (Fig. 11), the result of small bodies colliding with the Martian surface at very high speeds. The heavily cratered (and hence ancient) surfaces indicate lack of geological activity and lack of extensive weathering by the atmosphere and by condensates of water, which would have erased these craters in a fraction of the age of Mars. Second, as Mariner 4 passed beyond Mars it moved behind the planet as viewed from the Earth. As it did so the radio transmissions from the spacecraft passed through the Martian atmosphere, and the changes induced by the atmosphere enabled the surface pressure of the atmosphere to be determined. It was not the 100 mbar or so that had been confidently expected, but a mere 6 mbar! It followed that nearly all of the atmosphere could be accounted for by the CO₂ that had previously been detected from the Earth, and we now know that 95% of the molecules in the atmosphere are CO₂, and that N₂ and Ar accounts for almost all the rest (the fraction by number of molecules is the same as the fractional contribution to the total surface pressure).

Fig. 11.

One of the images sent to Earth by Mariner 4 during its flyby of Mars in July 1965. This image is centred 26.8° south of the equator and is 267 km across. (NASA, Mariner 4 frame 10D.)

A pressure of 6 mbar is close to the triple pressure of water (6.10 mbar), below which water cannot exist in a stable liquid phase at any temperature. All life on Earth requires liquid water, so its probable scarcity at the Martian surface dealt a heavy blow to the prospect of finding life on Mars. The blow was reinforced by the, at best, low O₂ content of the atmosphere, indicating the absence of copious oxygenic photosynthesis. It was also reinforced by the craters, making Mars seem more like the sterile Moon than the fertile Earth.

The dominance of CO₂ in the atmosphere led to the revival of an old idea that the polar caps were not made of water but of CO₂, which also forms a white snow. This idea gained support from the next two successful missions to Mars, the flyby of Mariner 6 in July 1969 and the flyby of Mariner 7 a few days later in August 1969. The temperature of the south polar cap was measured and found to correspond to the solid–gas phase boundary of CO₂ at a pressure of a few millibars. This provided strong evidence that a polar cap of CO₂ was roughly in equilibrium with the CO₂ atmosphere. Subsequent studies have confirmed that the seasonal cap at both poles is indeed predominantly CO₂ snow and frost, but that this overlies a permanent cap mainly composed of dusty water ice at the North Pole, and dusty CO₂ ice at the colder South Pole, perhaps underlain by dusty water ice.

Mariner 9

Mariners 4, 6 and 7 had imaged only the southern hemisphere of Mars. On 14 November 1971 the spacecraft Mariner 9 was placed in orbit around Mars. It mapped the whole planet and marks the start of the contemporary era of Martian exploration. Figure 12 shows the albedo-topographic map of Mars established by Mariner 9. You can see that the heavily impact cratered ancient terrain is confined to the southerly hemisphere of Mars – south of a line tilted at nearly 40° with respect to the equator. North of this line there are vast plains, volcanic domes, shield volcanoes, rift valleys and many other features, all indicating geological activity extending to within the past few million years in some places.

Fig. 12.

The albedo-topographic map of Mars established by Mariner 9 (the polar regions are not shown). North is at the top.

Mariner 9 confirmed that the bright areas are arid deserts of sand and dust composed of basaltic minerals rich in iron (hence the red tint) and magnesium. Clays are also present resulting from the aqueous alteration of silicates. Mariner 9 found that the dark areas are also sand and dust composed of basaltic minerals rich in iron and magnesium, plus underlying basaltic rock exposed here and there. The dark material is thought to give rise to the bright material through various physical and chemical processes.

Mariner 9 solved the mystery of the changes in the dark areas. It was not long before it was shown that the sand and dust in the bright and dark areas is mobilized by Martian winds, through the interaction of winds with small-scale topography, such as impact craters. Seasonal and non-seasonal changes in wind speed and direction cause the seasonal and non-seasonal changes, respectively. The streakiness of the surface, particularly in the dark areas, is also due to the winds; see Veverka & Sagan (Reference Veverka and Sagan1974).

The most exciting discovery made by Mariner 9, certainly as far as life on Mars is concerned, is many features that seem to have been carved by the flow of liquid water. Figure 13 shows three types of channel. These are considerably more common in the ancient southerly hemisphere and indicate that Mars was much warmer and wetter in the first 1000 million years or so of the 4600 million years of Martian history. Several other types of feature indicating the presence of liquid were discovered. More recently, gulleys have been found that indicate much more recent flows, perhaps even occurring today (Fig. 2). It is now widely believed that liquid water lies at depths of no more than a few kilometres, and at more shallow depths in some locations.

Fig. 13.

Channels on Mars that seem to have been carved by the flow of liquid water, early in Martian history. (a) The outflow channel at the head of Simud Vallis. Frame width about 300 km. (b) The fretted channel Nirgal Vallis. Frame width about 160 km. (c) A valley network, common in the southerly hemisphere of Mars. Frame width about 130 km. (From NASA/JPL.)

Since Mariner 9 there have been many spacecraft missions to Mars, including several landers. We now know a lot more about our planetary neighbour, but the Mariner 9 discoveries outlined here still stand. See Jones (Reference Jones2007) for an account of what we know about Mars today.

A Martian biosphere?

The belief that Mars was inhabited, if only by vegetation, persisted up to the flyby of Mariner 4 in 1965. Then Mariner 4 revealed an ancient cratered landscape more akin to the Moon and a thin atmosphere dominated by CO₂. The belief in Martian life forms waned rapidly. The arrival of Mariner 9 in 1971 restored the picture of Mars as an interesting, distinct place and there is ample evidence that Mars was warmer and wetter early in its history. Could there be fossils left from that time? We do not know. A sample return mission to the ancient cratered areas is needed. A joint ESA–NASA sample return mission is being developed, which, if approved, would see a launch in the next decade (ESA 2007).

Could there be a deep subsurface biosphere? Again, we do not know. None of the landers have found any evidence of life. We await a Mars lander devoted to astrobiology, such as the astrobiology field laboratory under consideration by NASA for the next decade (NASA 2007). However, it is certainly the case that the question of life on Mars is still open.

Summary

Our picture of Mars today is not only much more complete than that before Mariner 4 in 1965, but in several ways it is also quite different. This summary focuses on aspects particularly relevant to life on Mars. The italicized text is the picture in the decade before the flyby of Mariner 4 in 1965, based on difficult-to-make observations from the Earth. The non-italicized text is the current picture, based on data from several orbiters and five landers. These data place the current view on a firm foundation. The current view, as summarized here, is not very different from that prevalent in the early 1970s.

Atmospheric composition

^a Assumed value.

^b Close to the saturation value.

Clouds

Surface temperatures (sample)