Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:54:26.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geographic intraspecific variation in buoyancy within Antarctic notothenioid fishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2008

Thomas J. Near
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8105, USA
Christopher D. Jones
Affiliation:
Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037-1508, USA
Joseph T. Eastman*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701-2979, USA
*
*corresponding author:eastman@ohiou.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated intraspecific geographic variation in buoyancy by obtaining percentage buoyancy (%B) measurements for the Antarctic notothenioid species Pleuragramma antarcticum, Trematomus hansoni, T. bernacchii and Gymnodraco acuticeps from both McMurdo Sound in East Antarctica and the South Shetland Islands in West Antarctica. Mean percentage buoyancies in these species ranged from 0.22–0.52% in the neutrally buoyant P. antarcticum to 3.34–3.67% in the benthic T. bernacchii. Dispersion (1 standard deviation) of percentage buoyancy (%B) values around the mean was ± 0.2–0.5 %B units for the entire sample. Although intraspecific differences in mean percentage buoyancy were statistically significant (P < 0.05) in P. antarcticum and T. hansoni, we consider these differences as normal variation without substantive biological significance. The dispersion in buoyancy measurements during adult life reflects the density of the fish and this may be influenced, in both the short- and long-term, by gut contents, nutritional condition, and reproductive state. Mitigation of the effects of these variables is not biologically realistic because they constitute normal aspects of the daily and yearly life cycles. The results of our measurements of buoyancy are consistent with what is known about the ecology of these four species and this is considered in the discussion.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2009
Figure 0

Table I. Summary of data and comparison of measurements of buoyancy for total sample by geographic region. SL = range of standard length measurements in mm (and mean, * if significant), N = number of specimens, %B = mean percentage buoyancy, SD = standard deviation, SEM = standard error of the mean. Results of t-tests for each species are at bottom of table. Significant P-value (<0.05) is indicated with an asterisk.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Dice-Leraas diagram (modification of Hubbs & Hubbs 1953) showing comparison of measurements of buoyancy for samples of four species from McMurdo Sound (MCM) and the South Shetlands Islands (SSI). Shaded column following locality provides sample size. Heavy horizontal line is the range, short vertical line is the mean, rectangle shows 1 SD on each side of the mean with black portion indicating ± 2 SEM. For sample sizes > 30, 2 SEM approximates the 95% confidence limits for the mean (Sokal & Rohlf 1981, p. 152). Therefore when black rectangles overlap, interspecific differences among measurements of buoyancy are not significant. Fish drawings from Boulenger (1902).

Figure 2

Table II. Analysis of covariance for the relationship between percentage buoyancy and standard length for total sample of each species examined. Significant P-values (<0.05) indicated with an asterisk.