Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:42:57.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concurrent nematode infection and pregnancy induce physiological responses that impair linear growth in the murine foetus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

M. R. ODIERE*
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, McGill University (Macdonald Campus), 21 111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne de Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada
K. G. KOSKI
Affiliation:
School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University (Macdonald Campus), 21 111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne de Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada
H. A. WEILER
Affiliation:
School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University (Macdonald Campus), 21 111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne de Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada
M. E. SCOTT
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, McGill University (Macdonald Campus), 21 111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne de Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: Institute of Parasitology, McGill University (Macdonald Campus), 21 111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne de Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada. Tel: +514 398 8382. Fax: +514 398 7857. E-mail: maurice.odiere@mail.mcgill.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study examined concurrent stresses of nematode infection and pregnancy using pregnant and non-pregnant CD1 mice infected 3 times with 0, 50 or 100 Heligmosomoides bakeri larvae. Physiological, energetic, immunological and skeletal responses were measured in maternal and foetal compartments. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was elevated by pregnancy, but not by the trickle infection. Energy demands during pregnancy were met through increased food intake and fat utilization whereas mice lowered their body temperature during infection. Both infection and pregnancy increased visceral organ mass and both altered regional bone area and mineralization. During pregnancy, lumbar mineralization was lower but femur area and mineralization were higher. On the other hand, infection lowered maternal femur bone area and this was associated with higher IFN-γ in maternal serum of heavily infected pregnant mice. Infection also reduced foetal crown-rump length which was associated with higher amniotic fluid IL-1β.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Effect of infection dose (low, high) and pregnancy on recovery of Heligmosomoides bakeri. (A) Combined adult worms and L4 recovery as a percentage of dose (main effect of dose: F1,43·7=7·34, P=0·0096; main effect of pregnancy state: F1,43·5=77·7, P<0·0001); interaction of pregnancy state * dose: F1,43·1=0·56, P=0·4597). (B) L4 recovery as a percentage of dose (main effect of dose: F1,43·6=0·34, P=0·5646; main effect of pregnancy state: F1,43·4=98·48, P<0·0001); interaction of pregnancy state * dose: F1,42·8=4·07, P=0·0598). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences between pregnant and non-pregnant mice, or among infection doses (P<0·05).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Percentage distribution of Heligmosomoides bakeri along the small intestine in non-pregnant vs pregnant mice (A) and between low and high dose infections (B). PD, MD, DD, J and I refer to proximal duodenum, mid duodenum, distal duodenum, jejunum and ileum respectively. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among regions (pooled data for pregnant and non-pregnant mice); * indicates higher recovery in non-pregnant compared with pregnant mice within a region (P<0·05).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Effect of pregnancy on average food intake per day over time (data pooled across infection groups). Main effect of pregnancy state: F1,66=14·38, P=0·0003; main effect of dose: F2,64·2=0·87, P=0·4237; main effect of time: F5,265=9·19, P<0·0001; interaction of pregnancy state * time: F5,265=10·12, P<0·0001. Differences between pregnancy states at specific time-points are represented by *; different lowercase letters represent significant differences across time within each group (P<0·05).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Interaction effects of pregnancy and Heligmosomoides bakeri dose on spleen mass (A) (main effect of pregnancy state: F1,60·6=8·09, P=0·006; main effect of dose: F2,60·8=31·7, P<0·0001; interaction of pregnancy state * dose: F2,61·8=5·99, P=0·0042); and heart mass (B) (main effect of pregnancy state: F1,64=95·43, P<0·0001; main effect of dose: F2,64=1·07, P=0·3495; interaction of pregnancy state * dose: F2,64=3·84, P=0·0265). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences across all groups, based on multiple comparisons; * represents a significant difference between pregnant and non-pregnant mice.

Figure 4

Table 1. Main effects of pregnancy (pooled across dose) and Heligmosomoides bakeri infection dose (pooled across pregnancy state) on organ masses (g) and small intestine length (cm)1

Figure 5

Table 2. Main effects of pregnancy (pooled across dose) and infection dose (pooled across pregnancy state) on maternal whole body mass measured on experimental day 14 (day 18 of pregnancy), and on lean and fat mass, and femur and lumbar bone area (BA), bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD), as measured using a QDR 4500 Hologic densitometer1

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Relationship between number of adult Heligmosomoides bakeri and foetal crown-rump length (mean of all pups in litter). y=2·3833−0·0013x, r2=0·23, P=0·0172.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) (adjusted for baseline RMR) for non-pregnant and pregnant mice either uninfected (sham), or infected with low or high dose of Heligmosomoides bakeri. Main effect of pregnancy state: F1,65=245·44, P<0·0001; main effect of dose: F2,61·8=0·68, P=0·5123; main effect of time: F2,107=73·24, P<0·0001; interaction of pregnancy state * time: F2,107=83·1, P<0·0001; interaction of dose * time: F4,107=1·65, P=0·166; interaction of pregnancy state * dose: F2,61·1=0·33, P=0·7235; interaction of pregnancy state * dose * time: F6,130=1·07, P=0·3817. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences across all groups, based on multiple comparisons; * represents a significant difference between pregnant and non-pregnant mice.

Figure 8

Table 3. Relationship between maternal resting metabolic rate (RMR) and average daily food intake, whole body mass, lean mass and litter size

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Effect of infection dose on cytokine profile in serum from non-pregnant (A) and pregnant mice (B), and in amniotic fluid (C). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences between infection doses (P<0·05).

Figure 10

Table 4. Main effect of pregnancy (pooled across dose) on serum cytokine profiles (concentration in pg/ml) at day 19 of pregnancy1