Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T16:30:27.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AlgaMatrix: A membrane-based microalgae photobioreactor for indoor bio-integrated systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2026

Benedetta Zuccarelli*
Affiliation:
Architecture, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, USA
Ziqi (Lydia) Yan
Affiliation:
Architecture, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, USA
Yihan (Angelina) Zhang
Affiliation:
Architecture, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, USA
Xinyi (Skye) Gao
Affiliation:
Architecture, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, USA
Daniel Tish
Affiliation:
Architecture, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, USA
*
Corresponding author: Benedetta Zuccarelli; Email: zuccarellibenedetta@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Indoor environmental performance is commonly addressed through energy-intensive mechanical systems with limited integration into architectural components. Algae-based systems show potential for carbon uptake and environmental mediation, yet most applications focus on façade-scale or exhibition prototypes, with limited validation in interiors. This research develops AlgaMatrix, a modular interior photobioreactor conceived as an architectural component. The system cultivates Chlorella vulgaris within ultrasonically welded thermoplastic membranes supported by 3D-printed frames. Continuous fluid circulation and embedded sensing enable monitoring of biological activity and localized CO2 variation. Computational fluid dynamics simulations informed internal channel geometry and circulation strategies to promote uniform flow and reduce sedimentation, linking digital design to fabrication constraints. A 14-day comparative experiment demonstrated sustained biomass growth in the circulating system, while a static control declined. Localized CO2 reductions occurred during peak photosynthesis. The study establishes a reproducible framework for integrating and monitoring biological processes within fabricated architectural systems, advancing adaptive indoor ecologies.

Information

Type
Full Paper: Biodesign Conference
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Figure 1 long description.State of the art (from left to right: BIQ by Arup, EcoClosure by Kyoung Hee Kim, Micro-Algae Wall by Cesare Griffa, and Alga Reactor by Chen).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Documentation of C. vulgaris growth in the laboratory.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Compatibility test of TPU membranes with C. vulgaris and D. salina, evaluating viability and surface adhesion.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Figure 4 long description.TPU module set up on ZUND supersonic welding head machine, inflation test, and 3D printing.

Figure 4

Figure 5. AlgaMatrix initial base module iterations.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Figure 6 long description.AlgaMatrix prototype.

Figure 6

Figure 7. AlgaMatrix system diagram and joints details.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Figure 8 long description.Integration of sensors to collect data from the AlgaMatrix prototype.

Figure 8

Figure 9. AlgaMatrix prototype at different daylight conditions and cultivation stages, showing variation in biomass density.

Figure 9

Table 1. Experimental setup.Table 1 long description.

Figure 10

Figure 10. AlgaMatrix device workflow.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Microscopic imaging on Day 1, Day 4, and Day 10 of C. vulgaris and D. salina cultivation.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Microscopic imaging of C. vulgaris and D. salina growth on various TPU sheets over a 10-day period.

Figure 13

Table 2. TPU material test.Table 2 long description.

Figure 14

Table 3. Ultrasonic welding parameters and sealing performance.Table 3 long description.

Figure 15

Figure 13. COMSOL fluid simulation for iterative design.

Figure 16

Figure 14. Figure 14 long description.Comparison of TDS measurements in the static control (Sensor 1) and AlgaMatrix prototype (Sensor 2), including moving average (MA) trends, TDS difference (AlgaMatrix − Control) and CO2 concentrations.