Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T19:54:46.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oocyte development, fecundity and spawning strategy of large sized jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (Oegopsida: Ommastrephinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

Chingis M. Nigmatullin
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Commercial Invertebrates, Atlantic Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (AtlantNIRO), Dm. Donskoy st., 5, Kaliningrad 236000, Russia
Unai Markaida*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE), Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Unai Markaida, Departamento de Aprovechamiento y Manejo de Recursos, Acuáticos, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Calle 10 No. 264, 24000 Campeche, Mexico email: umarkaida@ecosur.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ovaries of 39 large jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (415–875 mm mantle length (ML)) of different stages of maturity from the Gulf of California and Nicaragua were analysed. Oocyte development is asynchronous during female ontogenesis, with predominance (>85–90%) of small protoplasmic oocytes 0.1–0.2 mm in diameter for all stages of female maturity. Potential fecundity (PF) is determined at late immature stage II with average values around 18–21 million oocytes. The maximum PF estimated, 32 million oocytes, is so far the largest recorded for any cephalopod. PF is closely related to female size. Nicaraguan females, of smaller size (415–720 mm ML), show lower fecundity (5–15 million oocytes). Eggs were analysed in oviducts of mature females (540–875 mm ML), 7 from the Gulf of California and three females from Nicaragua. Eggs measured 0.9 × 1.1 mm in diameter and weighed 0.45 mg on average. The oviducts of the largest female (875 mm ML) held 1.2 million eggs, representing 4.6% of PF and no more than 14% of all vitelline oocyte stock of that squid. Variability in oviduct filling is very high and unrelated to ovary weight. However, a strong correlation was found between oviduct fullness and nidamental glands development. These observations suggest that spawning is extended and intermittent. A female spawns no less than half of the initial PF, and the minimal number of spawning activity events (egg batches) is roughly estimated at 8–12. During this terminal spawning stage females continue actively feeding and grow between egg-mass laying periods.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008
Figure 0

Table 1. Means of potential fecundity (PF, in millions), relative fecundity (RF), coefficient of viteline oocytes (%CVO), coefficient of yolk oocytes in ovary to total oocyte number in ovary (%YO), oviductal load (OL, in thousands) and index of potential reproductive investment (PRI) of large size maturing Dosidicus gigas females from the Gulf of California and Nicaragua (*) waters.

Figure 1

Table 2. Maturity stages of the reproductive system of female ommastrephid squids (modified from Nigmatullin, 1989). Most developed oocytes (MDO) in the ovary (O) and development of oviducts (OV), oviductal glands (OG) and nidamental glands (NG) were taken as diagnostic.

Figure 2

Table 3. Squid oocyte morphological groups found in female Dosidicus gigas (modified from Laptikhovsky & Nigmatullin, 1992; Nigmatullin et al., 1995) and their correspondence with the phases of oocyte development (Burukovsky et al., 1977).

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of oocyte morphological groups in the ovaries of Dosidicus gigas females, related in Table 1. (A, B, C & D) stage of maturity II; (E, F & G) stage III; and (H) stage IV. All individuals are from the Gulf of California, except * from Nicaragua. Stage V females are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Frequency distribution of oocyte morphological groups in the different regions of the ovary (anterior, medial and posterior) of mature females (stage V) of Dosidicus gigas from the Gulf of California, as related in Table 1. n, observed oocyte number.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Size–frequency distribution of oocyte morphological groups found in the ovary of 13 Dosidicus gigas females from the Gulf of California of different stages of maturity, as related in Table 1. Frequency axis for oocyte size-groups III–VI is shown at right. n, observed oocyte number.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Size–frequency distribution of shortest and longest diameters of the eggs found in the oviducts of mature Dosidicus gigas females (stage V) from the Gulf of California, as related in Table 4.

Figure 7

Table 4. Mean measures of the diameters and mean weights of the eggs from the oviducts of 11 mature (stage V) females of Dosidicus gigas related in Table 1. For the shortest and longest diameters, 3 subsamples of N = 50 in each case. Significant differences between subsamples of the same female and between females are denoted. For the casual diameters N = 160–325. For the weight of eggs N = 6.

Figure 8

Fig. 5. Relationship between the fecundity and the size of large Dosidicus gigas females. (A) Relationship between the mantle length (ML) and the potential fecundity (PF) of all females; (B) relationship among body weight (BW) and the relative fecundity (RF) of mature V females; (C) all vitelline oocytes (VO) in the ovary of females (IV–V); and (D) oviductal load (OL) of mature (V) females. Circles, squid from the Gulf of California (mean±SD); triangles, squid from Nicaraguan waters (mean).

Figure 9

Table 5. Relationships between potential fecundity (PF, in thousands) and mantle length (ML, in mm) and body weight (BW, in g) for Dosidicus gigas females of different maturing stages.

Figure 10

Fig. 6. Relationships among the reproductive organs of mature (stage V) large Dosidicus gigas females from the Gulf of California: relationship among the ML and (A) both oviductal complex weight (OCW) (the regression calculated from the maximum values each 25 mm ML is shown); (B) the coefficient of oviductal fullness (%OF); relationship among the weight of the ovary and (C) the OCW; (D) both nidamental glands weight (NGW); relationship among the OCW and (E) the NGW; and (F) the index of nidamental gland thickness (NGTI).