Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T04:14:38.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detecting signatures of past pathogen selection on human HLA loci: are there needles in the haystack?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2017

Bridget S. Penman*
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Sunetra Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Bridget S. Penman, E-mail: b.penman@warwick.ac.uk

Abstract

Human leucocyte antigens (HLAs) are responsible for the display of peptide fragments for recognition by T-cell receptors. The gene family encoding them is thus integral to human adaptive immunity, and likely to be under strong pathogen selection. Despite this, it has proved difficult to demonstrate specific examples of pathogen–HLA coevolution. Selection from multiple pathogens simultaneously could explain why the evolutionary signatures of particular pathogens on HLAs have proved elusive. Here, we present an individual-based model of HLA evolution in the presence of two mortality-causing pathogens. We demonstrate that it is likely that individual pathogen species causing high mortality have left recognizable signatures on the HLA genomic region, despite more than one pathogen being present. Such signatures are likely to exist at the whole-population level, and involve haplotypic combinations of HLA genes rather than single loci.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. A schematic representation of model assumptions. As noted in the Methods, we allowed there to exist 10 HLA types with different binding properties (represented by the numbers 1–10), which could be encoded by genes found at either locus of a two locus HLA haplotype. Pathogen species 1 and 2 each possess two antigenic sites (represented here by different colours), at which antigens containing peptide fragments which could be bound by specific HLA molecules can be expressed. Four different antigens can be expressed at each antigenic site (see Table 1 for a description of which antigenic variants are present on which site in which pathogen species). The combination of HLA-binding types, which can present peptides from a particular pathogen defines its strain, e.g. a possible strain of pathogen 1, is [2,8]. As illustrated in this figure, certain HLA molecules are capable of presenting a peptide from either pathogen 1 or pathogen 2. Note that this figure does not display the entire range of possible host or pathogen genotypes.

Figure 1

Table 1. The antigenic properties of the two pathogens

Figure 2

Table 2. Different events that could take place within each time step and the probability of each

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Changing frequencies of HLA haplotypes over time, under selection from pathogen 2. Panel (A) illustrates the frequencies of different HLA haplotypes over the course of a single simulation, panel (B) illustrates the frequencies of different strains of pathogen 2 during the same simulation, and panel (C) indicates the proportion of the population that is homozygous for any HLA haplotype (homozygosity, H), and the ratio of the observed homozygosity in the simulation (Hobs) to that expected under Hardy–Weinberg proportions (Hexp). Each shade of grey in panels (A) and (B) represents a different haplotype or pathogen strain. There are too many HLA haplotypes and pathogen strains to label individually, but two host haplotypes have been highlighted in red and blue. Between them, these haplotypes cover all four possible variants at antigenic site 1 of pathogen 2. Parameter values as follows: r = 0.01, β2 = 0.3, σ2 = 0.02, θ1 = 0 and θ2 = 0.002; other parameters were as detailed in the Methods.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. The adaptation of populations under continuous selection from pathogens 1 and 2. The bar chart on the left-hand side of each panel illustrates the proportion of simulated populations surviving, out of 300 simulations at each parameter combination. The bar chart on the right-hand side of each panel illustrates the proportion of the surviving populations displaying adaptation to one or other pathogen, or no adaptation signal (see legend, and see the text for definition of different types of adaptation). Within each graph, the mortality caused by pathogen 2 (θ2) increases along the x-axis. The mortality caused by pathogen 1 is zero in panel (A) (θ1 = 0), and increases in value in panels (B) and (C) (B: θ1 = 0.00005, C: θ1 = 0.0001). Pathogen 2 has a higher probability of causing death during infection than pathogen 1 (θ2 > θ1) in the regions to the right-hand side of the vertical red line in each panel. β2 = 0.3, σ2 = 0.02 and r = 0. All other parameter values were as detailed in the ‘Methods’ section.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. The adaptation of populations under continuous selection from pathogen 1 and intermittent selection from pathogen 2. This figure uses the same layout as Fig. 3. Unlike in Fig. 3, however, the transmission parameter and recovery rate for pathogen 2 have been given values that lead to pathogen 2 being lost and reintroduced into the population (β2 = 0.4 and σ2 = 0.1). The range of mortality rates affecting to those infected with pathogen 2 (θ2) are also higher than in Fig. 3, as indicated by the x-axis of each graph. Just as in Fig. 3, the mortality caused by pathogen 1 is zero in panel (A) (θ1 = 0), and increases in value in panels (B) and (C) (B: θ1 = 0.00005, C: θ1 = 0.0001). All other parameters are as given in the Methods.

Supplementary material: PDF

Penman and Gupta supplementary material

Figures S1-S6

Download Penman and Gupta supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 404.1 KB