Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:01:33.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Camanchacaite, chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite: six new hydrogen-arsenate minerals from the Torrecillas mine, Iquique Province, Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2019

Anthony R. Kampf*
Affiliation:
Mineral Sciences Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
Barbara P. Nash
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA
Aaron J. Celestian
Affiliation:
Mineral Sciences Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
Maurizio Dini
Affiliation:
Pasaje San Agustin 4045, La Serena, Chile
Arturo A. Molina Donoso
Affiliation:
Los Algarrobos 2986, Iquique, Chile
*
*Author for correspondence: Anthony R. Kampf, Email: akampf@nhm.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The new minerals camanchacaite, NaCaMg2[AsO4]2[AsO3(OH)2], chinchorroite, Na2Mg5(As2O7)2(AsO3OH)2(H2O)10, espadaite, Na4Ca3Mg2[AsO3(OH)]2[AsO2(OH)2]10(H2O)6·H2O, magnesiofluckite, CaMg(AsO3OH)2(H2O)2, picaite, NaCa[AsO3OH][AsO2(OH)2] and ríosecoite, Ca2Mg(AsO3OH)3(H2O)2, were discovered on two closely related specimens collected from the Torrecillas mine, Iquique Province, Chile. These minerals occur as secondary phases on massive quartz–hematite also in association with anhydrite, gypsum, halite and talmessite. Camanchacaite is monoclinic, C2/c, a = 12.470(9), b = 12.554(9), c = 6.848(9) Å, β = 113.75(2)°, V = 981.3(16) Å3 and Z = 4. It has a protonated alluaudite-type structure. Chinchorroite is triclinic, P$\bar{1}$, a = 8.7777(2), b = 8.8570(3), c = 9.7981(7) Å, α = 91.097(6), β = 110.544(8), γ = 103.167(7)°, V = 690.43(7) Å3 and Z = 1. The structure contains abbreviated chains of five edge-sharing Mg octahedra that are linked by pyroarsenate and hydrogen-arsenate groups. Espadaite is orthorhombic, Ccca, a = 12.3649(10), b = 22.181(2), c = 18.3292(13) Å, V = 5027.1(7) Å3 and Z = 4. The structure is based on heteropolyhedral sheets of formula {Ca3Mg2[AsO3(OH)]2[AsO2(OH)2]10}4− that contain large voids; NaO6 polyhedra occupy the interlayer region. Magnesiofluckite is triclinic, P$\bar{1}$, a = 8.4143(6), b = 7.5321(5), c = 6.8917(4) Å, α = 82.477(6), β = 97.682(6), γ = 95.379(6)°, V = 427.84(5) Å3 and Z = 2. It is isostructural with fluckite. Picaite is monoclinic, P21/c, a = 7.2474(4), b = 14.6547(7), c = 7.2624(5) Å, β = 99.520(7)°, V = 760.70(8) Å3 and Z = 4. The structure contains chains of edge-sharing Na− and Ca octahedra with bridging AsO3(OH) and AsO2(OH)2 tetrahedra. Ríosecoite is triclinic, P$\bar{1}$, a = 6.8110(9), b = 7.3156(12), c = 11.7773(17) Å, α = 83.466(6), β = 84.394(6), γ = 79.779(6)°, V = 571.95(15) Å3 and Z = 2. The structure contains tetramers of edge-sharing CaO7 and CaO8 polyhedra linked by MgO6 octahedra and bridging AsO3(OH) groups to form chains.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2019 
Figure 0

Table 1. New secondary arsenic minerals from the Torrecillas mine.

Figure 1

Table 2. Other secondary arsenic minerals occurring at the Torrecillas mine.

Figure 2

Table 3. Physical and optical properties of camanchacaite, chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite.

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Balls of camanchacaite on a yellow amorphous phase; note the broken ball of camanchacaite in the foreground. The field of view is 2.33 mm across, specimen #66772.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Chinchorroite crystals with tiny currierite needles and balls of camanchacaite. The field of view is 0.7 mm across, specimen #67257.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Crystal drawing of chinchorroite; clinographic projection in nonstandard orientation, a vertical.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Espadaite blades with balls of camanchacaite. The field of view is 0.84 mm across, specimen #67285.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Crystal drawing of espadaite; clinographic projection in nonstandard orientation, a vertical.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Magnesiofluckite crystals with ball of camanchacaite. The field of view is 0.65 mm across, specimen #67257.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Crystal drawing of magnesiofluckite; clinographic projection in standard orientation.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Picaite crystals with balls of camanchacaite. The field of view is 1.1 mm across, specimen #67285.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Crystal drawing of picaite; clinographic projection in standard orientation.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Ríosecoite crystals with balls of camanchacaite. The field of view is 1 mm across, specimen #67257.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Raman spectra of camanchacaite, chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite.

Figure 14

Table 4. Raman shifts (cm–1) for camanchacaite, chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite.

Figure 15

Table 5. Chemical analyses [mean (std. dev.) range in wt.%] for camanchacaite, chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite.

Figure 16

Table 6. Empirical formulas of camanchacaite, chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite.

Figure 17

Table 7. Crystallographic properties of camanchacaite, chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite.

Figure 18

Table 8. Details of structure refinements for chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite.

Figure 19

Table 9. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite.

Figure 20

Table 10. Bond-valence analyses for chinchorroite, espadaite, magnesiofluckite, picaite and ríosecoite. Values are expressed in valence units.

Figure 21

Fig. 12. The crystal structure of camanchacaite (based on that of isostructural canutite) viewed down [001]. Unit cell shown by dashed line. Na–O bonds shown as sticks. Hydrogen bonds shown as solid lines.

Figure 22

Fig. 13. The abbreviated chains of edge-sharing octahedra with surrounding polyhedra in the structures of chinchorroite and matulaite.

Figure 23

Fig. 14. The thick {10$\bar{1}$} sheet of edge-sharing octahedra with surrounding pyroarsenate and hydrogen-arsenate groups in chinchorroite. Note that O7 vertices link to adjacent sheets. View is down [010].

Figure 24

Fig. 15. The structure of chinchorroite (a) viewed down [100] and (b) viewed down [010].

Figure 25

Fig. 16. The heteropolyhedral layer in the structure of espadaite, viewed along [001].

Figure 26

Fig. 17. The structure of espadaite, viewed down [100].

Figure 27

Fig. 18. The structure of magnesiofluckite, viewed down [101].

Figure 28

Fig. 19. The chain of edge-sharing octahedra with bridging As1O3(OH) and As2O2(OH)2 tetrahedra in the structure of picaite.

Figure 29

Fig. 20. The structure of picaite viewed down [101], the direction of the chains.

Figure 30

Fig. 21. The tetramer of edge-sharing Ca1O8 and Ca2O7 polyhedra in the structure of ríosecoite.

Figure 31

Fig. 22. The complex chain (along a) of edge-sharing CaO7 and CaO8 polyhedra and MgO6 octahedra with bridging AsO3(OH) tetrahedra in the structure of ríosecoite. O–H bonds are shown as sticks and hydrogen bonds as thin lines. The unit cell outline is shown with dashed lines.

Figure 32

Fig. 23. The structure of ríosecoite viewed down [100], the direction of the chains. O–H bonds are shown as sticks and hydrogen bonds as thin lines. The unit-cell outline is shown with dashed lines.

Supplementary material: File

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Download Kampf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 694.6 KB