Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:00:10.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cardiac complications in childhood cancer survivors treated with anthracyclines*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2015

Vivian I. Franco
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America
Steven E. Lipshultz*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: S. E. Lipshultz, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, 3901 Beaubien Boulevard, Suite 1K40, Detroit, MI 48201, United States of America. Tel: +313 745 5870; Fax: +313 993 0390; E-mail: slipshultz@med.wayne.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cardiovascular complications are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among survivors of childhood cancer, after cancer relapse and secondary malignancies. Although advances in cancer treatment have improved the 5-year survival rates, the same treatments, such as anthracyclines, that cure cancer also increase the risk for adverse cardiovascular effects. Anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity in survivors of childhood cancer is progressive and can take years to develop, initially presenting as sub-clinical cardiac abnormalities that, if left undetected or untreated, can lead to heart failure, myocardial infarction, or other clinical cardiac dysfunction. A higher cumulative dose of anthracycline is associated with cardiotoxicity in children; however, sub-clinical cardiac abnormalities are evident at lower doses with longer follow-up, suggesting that there is no “safe” dose of anthracycline. Other risk factors include female sex, younger age at diagnosis, black race, trisomy 21, longer time since treatment, and the presence of pre-existing cardiovascular disease and co-morbidities. Cardioprotective strategies during treatment are limited in children. Enalapril provides only temporary cardioprotection, whereas continuous anthracycline infusion extends none. On the other hand, dexrazoxane successfully prevents or reduces anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity in children with cancer, without increased risks for recurrence of primary or second malignancies or reductions in anti-tumour efficacy. With more childhood cancer survivors now reaching adulthood, it is vital to understand the adverse effects of cancer treatment on the cardiovascular system and their long-term consequences to identify and establish optimal prevention and management strategies that balance oncologic efficacy with long-term safety.

Figure 0

Table 1 HRs and 95% CIs of reported cardiac conditions in childhood cancer survivors compared with the sibling control group.*

Figure 1

Figure 1 Stages in the course of paediatric ventricular dysfunction. Preventive strategies progressively become less effective as the number increases. For example, primary prevention is possible at number 1; secondary prevention is possible at numbers 2, 3, and 4. Treatment strategies have a greater impact with higher numbers but longer effects with lower numbers. For example, treatment is possible at numbers 4 and 5 to reduce sequelae. Biomarkers/surrogate end points are potentially more useful with lower numbers for possible alteration of course with interventions and are potentially more useful with higher numbers for decisions about transplantation (Reprinted with permission from Elsevier15).

Figure 2

Figure 2 Progressive cardiac dysfunction after doxorubicin therapy in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. DCM was characterised by echocardiographic signs of reduced LV fractional shortening and contractility with LV dilation. In time, the pattern changed, and children showed signs consistent with a RCM: normal to reduced LV dimension with significantly reduced LV thickness, fractional shortening, and contractility. The blue line indicates the overall group mean in this model. Green and red lines are the upper and lower 95% CI from the predicted mean (Reprinted with permission from the American Society of Clinical Oncology12). CI=confidence interval; DCM=dilated cardiomyopathy; LV=left ventricle; RCM=restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Probability of depressed contractility as a function of the cumulative dose of doxorubicin in female and male patients (Reprinted with permission from the Massachusetts Medical Society22).

Figure 4

Figure 4 Mean left ventricular echocardiographic Z scores in boys and girls (n=134). Plots are adjusted for age. *p⩽0.05 for comparison of the mean Z score of the doxorubicin plus dexrazoxane group with zero; †p⩽0.05 for comparison of the mean Z score for the doxorubicin group with zero and ‡p⩽0.05 for comparisons of mean Z scores between the doxorubicin and doxorubicin plus dexrazoxane groups (Reprinted with permission from Elsevier32).

Figure 5

Table 2 Summary of studies investigating the cardioprotective effects of dexrazoxane in children and adolescents with haematological or solid tumours receiving a chemotherapeutic regimen containing doxorubicin.

Figure 6

Table 3 Summary of studies investigating the development of second malignant neoplasms in children and adolescents with haematological or solid tumours treated with a chemotherapy regimen containing doxorubicin, with or without dexrazoxane.

Figure 7

Figure 5 Model-based estimated probability of having (a) an increased cTnT level and (b) an increased NT-proBNP at each depicted time point in patients treated with doxorubicin, with or without dexrazoxane. Increased cTnT is defined as a value >0.01 ng/ml. Increased NT-proBNP is defined as a value ⩾150 pg/ml for children younger than 1 year and a value ⩾100 pg/ml for children aged 1 year or older. The doxorubicin–dexrazoxane group is indicated by the blue line and the doxorubicin group by the gold line. Vertical bars show 95% CIs. *p value versus dexrazoxane group ⩽0.05 and †p value versus dexrazoxane group ⩽0.001. An overall test for dexrazoxane effect of cTnT during treatment was significant (p<0.001). An overall test for dexrazoxane effect of NT-proBNP during treatment was significant (p<0.001) and after treatment was not significant (p=0.24) (Reprinted with permission from the American Society of Clinical Oncology44). CI=confidence interval; cTnT=cardiac troponin T; NT-proBNP=N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.