Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T11:16:27.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antimicrobial resistance knowledge and behaviors in Irish university students: gaps and opportunities for educational campaigns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2026

Sheila Faherty*
Affiliation:
Dept Sport Exercise & Nutrition, Atlantic Technological University - Galway City , Galway, Ireland
Debbie Corcoran
Affiliation:
Department of Biopharmaceutical & Medical Science, Atlantic Technological University - Galway City, Galway, Ireland
Ayrton Walshe
Affiliation:
Dept Sport Exercise & Nutrition, Atlantic Technological University - Galway City , Galway, Ireland
Aoife Fleming
Affiliation:
School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
*
Corresponding author: Sheila Faherty; Email: sheila.faherty@atu.ie

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding AMR and antimicrobial use among Irish university students and to inform the development of tailored educational interventions.

Design:

Cross-sectional online survey.

Setting:

Two Irish universities, 2022.

Participants:

University students aged 18–25 years (N = 239).

Methods:

A questionnaire incorporating validated items adapted from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and European Union (EU) barometer survey instruments was administer online. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and principal component analysis.

Results:

A total 239 students participated (73% female). Mean scores were high for knowledge 77.9% (SD 17.8) and attitudes 74.0% (SD 8.9) with no significant differences by gender, discipline, or health status. However, 18% reported using antibiotics without prescription, while 39%–44% of students demonstrated misconceptions across several statements relating to the use of antibiotics for non-bacterial conditions. Awareness of public AMR campaigns was low (27% “Resist” and 18% European Antibiotic Awareness Day). Principal component analysis identified four attitudinal dimensions: responsible use and preventive behavior, global and collective awareness, innovation and policy solutions, and perceived helplessness and reliance on experts.

Conclusions:

Although students demonstrated generally high knowledge and positive attitudes towards AMR, important misconceptions and inappropriate antibiotic behaviors remained. The identified attitudinal dimensions suggest that educational interventions should extend beyond knowledge acquisition to address behavioral and attitudinal factors that support responsible antibiotic use and antimicrobial stewardship.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press or the rights holder(s) must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Figure 0

Table 1.Demographic characteristics of respondents from University College Cork (UCC; n = 131) and atlantic technological university (ATU; n = 108). Age differences were assessed using Welch’s t-test, and categorical variables using χ2 analyses. Significant differences were observed for age, discipline area, year of study, and qualification level, while no significant differences were found for gender or study formatTable 1 long description.

Figure 1

Table 2.Knowledge and misconceptions about antibiotic use and resistance among respondents. This table summarizes participants’ understanding of antibiotic use and resistance, categorized into knowledge areas, interpretation of each statement, and the corresponding proportions of correct, misconception, and unsure responses. Knowledge gaps, defined as the combined proportion of misconception and unsure responsesTable 2 long description.

Figure 2

Table 3.Principal component analysis of attitudes toward antibiotic use and resistance. Four components were identified: (1) Responsible use and preventive behavior, (2) Global and collective awareness, (3) Innovation and policy solutions, and (4) Perceived helplessness and reliance on experts. Together, these components reflect differing levels of knowledge, responsibility, and perceived control in relation to antibiotic stewardship and resistanceTable 3 long description.