Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T03:45:59.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization and distribution of clay minerals in the soils of Fildes Peninsula and Ardley Island (King George Island, Maritime Antarctica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2023

Marta Pelayo*
Affiliation:
CIEMAT – Department of Environment, Avda. Complutense, 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Thomas Schmid
Affiliation:
CIEMAT – Department of Environment, Avda. Complutense, 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Francisco Javier Díaz-Puente
Affiliation:
CIEMAT – Department of Environment, Avda. Complutense, 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Jerónimo López-Martínez
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The environmental conditions in Maritime Antarctica are more favorable to soil development than in continental areas, which is reflected in the content and type of clay minerals present. In this context, soil clay minerals of Fildes Peninsula, South Shetland Islands were studied with the aim of relating them to periglacial and paraglacial processes as possible indicators of initial pedogenic processes. In this work, textural, mineralogical and crystallochemical characterization of clay minerals as well as chemical and physical soil analyses were carried out. The soil samples represented various surface cover types present on Fildes Peninsula. All samples were composed mainly of clay minerals, plagioclase, quartz and minor zeolites and pyroxene. The clay mineral content was very variable and reached up to 63% w/w. The clay minerals present are mainly smectite, vermiculite, chlorite and minor kaolinite, mica, corrensite and interstratified illite–smectite, with smectite and vermiculite dominating in almost all of the samples. The primary minerals display chemical alteration, and smectite formed by alteration of plagioclase. The clay mineral types were related to the parent material, which was affected by low-grade metamorphism and hydrothermal alteration that transformed biotite and chlorite into vermiculite via interstratified chlorite–vermiculite. Furthermore, this process and/or ongoing surface weathering transformed vermiculite into smectite. The genetic relationship observed between vermiculite and smectite suggests progressive alteration and transformation into a phase with intermediate composition between vermiculite and smectite. Therefore, vermiculite could be at least in part the smectite precursor. Samples closer to the current Collins Glacier front are composed mainly of vermiculite, with the greatest chemical variation occurring where the soils were developed from a mixture of initially glacially transported volcanic rocks through periglacial and fluvial processes. The clay minerals from the centre and south of Fildes Peninsula are mixtures of montmorillonite and vermiculite, as well as of chlorite and corrensite in various proportions. The clay minerals in soils developed on the west coast are a mixture of Fe-rich montmorillonite and vermiculite.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location of the study area in (a) Antarctica within (b) the South Shetland Islands, on (c) the south-western end of King George Island. (d) Soil sample distribution on Fildes Peninsula (based on maps from IGM & INACH, 1996). Samples were analysed using SEM, TEM or both (SEMTEM); other samples were not studied with either SEM or TEM (REST). Is. = Island; P. = Peninsula.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Locations of the studied samples and of the four zones described in the paper marked on the geomorphological map of Fildes Peninsula and Ardley Island (modified from Serrano & López-Martínez, 2012).

Figure 2

Table 1. Geographical coordinates, altitude and general description of the studied soil samples from Fildes Peninsula.

Figure 3

Table 2. Soil chemical and physical properties of the studied soil samples.

Figure 4

Table 3. Semiquantitative mineralogical compositions of the soil samples.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. XRD traces of the orientated specimens of clay fractions and of random powder in the area of the (060) peaks. (a) Sme from sample FP4 (zone I). (b) Sample FP25 (zone I). (c) Sample FP16 (zone II). (d) Chl and Sme from sample FP17 (zone II). (e) Chl, Sme, Crr and Kln from sample FP14 (zone II). (f) Sme, Chl, Kln and an AM from sample FP13 (zone II). The d spacings are in Å. AD = air dried; AM = amorphous phase; Chl = chlorite; Crr = corrensite; EG = ethylene glycol solvated; Kln = kaolinite; Mca = mica; Qz = quartz; Sme = smectite; Zeo = zeolite (abbreviations after Warr, 2020).

Figure 6

Table 4. Average chemical composition (wt.%) and structural formulae of vermiculites from zone I.

Figure 7

Fig. 4. SEM back-scattered electron images and EDX spectra of (a,b) a vermiculite particle from sample FP4 with platy morphology; (c,d) smectite flakes from sample FP7; and (e,f) aggregates of poorly crystalline Al-Fe phospates from sample FP13.

Figure 8

Fig. 5. TEM images showing: (a) a low-magnification image of sample FP25 showing vermiculite as thin packets without orientation (indicated by arrows); (b) detail of a vermiculite particle from sample FP25 from which AEM analyses were obtained (*); (c) smectite particles from sample FP16 consisting of very thin packets of curved morphology; (d) a smectite particle from sample FP 16 showing wavy fringes with layer terminations (white arrows) and 14 Å periodicity, associated with mica with 10 Å interlayer spacing (black arrows); (e) lattice fringe image of mica and chlorite from sample FP8; and (f) detail of the packet showing two different areas, one of which contains packets of straight parallel 10 Å layers, which suggest a mica (black arrows) that is associated closely to a particle such as chlorite with 14 Å layers that show some dislocations (white arrows).

Figure 9

Table 5. Average chemical composition (wt.%) and structural formulae of phyllosilicates from zone II.

Figure 10

Fig. 6. XRD traces of the orientated specimens of clay fractions and (060) reflections of random powder. (a) Sme from sample FP23 (zone III). (b) Sme and minor Chl from sample FP9 (zone IV). (c) Sme, Kln, Clr, Ilt-Sme and Crr from sample FP12 (zone IV). The d-spacings are expressed in Å. AD = air dried; Chl = chlorite; Crr = corrensite; EG = ethylene glycol solvated; Ilt-Sme = interstratified illite-smectite; Kln = kaolinite; Sme = smectite (abbreviations after Warr, 2020).

Figure 11

Table 6. Average chemical composition (wt.%) and structural formulae of phyllosilicates from zone III.

Figure 12

Fig. 7. SEM back-scattered electron images and EDX spectra of: (a,b) Fe- Mg-rich smectite from sample FP1 with flaky morphology and undulating edges; (c,d) alteration of a feldspar grain to smectite flakes and detail of this process (sample FP1); and (e,f) anhhedral flakes of kaolinite from sample FP12.

Figure 13

Table 7. Average chemical composition (wt.%) and structural formulae of phyllosilicates from zone IV.

Figure 14

Fig. 8. XRD traces of (a) sample FP4, (b) sample FP5, (c) sample FP1 and (d) sample FP14 corresponding to the orientated specimen of the Mg-saturated clay fraction. The d-spacings are in Å. AD = air dried; Chl = chlorite; Crr = corrensite; Gly = glycerol solvated; Mg-550°C: heat treatment at 550°C; Vrm = vermiculite (abbreviations after Warr, 2020).

Figure 15

Fig. 9. Ternary diagrams (Güven, 1988) showing the distribution of the octahedral cations of the smectites (Sme) and vermicultes (Vrm) from various zones: (a) samples from zone I; (b) samples from zone II; (c) samples from zone III; and (d) samples from zone IV. Vme and Sme clay compositions are shown. Note the evolutionary trends from Mg-Fe-rich members (Vme type) to Al-rich Smes in (c).