Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T09:26:06.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pharmacological characterization, localization, and regulation of ionotropic glutamate receptors in skate horizontal cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2009

MATTHEW A. KREITZER*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Biology, Indiana Wesleyan University, Marion, Indiana
ANDREA D. BIRNBAUM
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
HAOHUA QIAN
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
ROBERT PAUL MALCHOW
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
*
*Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Matthew A. Kreitzer, Department of Biology, Indiana Wesleyan University, 4201 South Washington Street, Marion, IN 46953. E-mail: matthew.kreitzer@indwes.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glutamate is believed to be the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the vertebrate retina, and its fast postsynaptic effects are elicited by activating NMDA-, kainate-, or AMPA-type glutamate receptors. We have characterized the ionotropic glutamate receptors present on retinal horizontal cells of the skate, which possess a unique all-rod retina simplifying synaptic circuitry within the outer plexiform layer (OPL). Isolated external horizontal cells were examined using whole-cell voltage-clamp techniques. Glutamate and its analogues kainate and AMPA, but not NMDA, elicited dose-dependent currents. The AMPA receptor antagonist GYKI 52466 at 100 μm abolished glutamate-elicited currents. Desensitization of glutamate currents was removed upon coapplication of cyclothiazide, known to potentiate AMPA receptor responses, but not by concanavalin A, which potentiates kainate receptor responses. The dose–response curve to glutamate was significantly broader in the presence of the desensitization inhibitor cyclothiazide. Polyclonal antibodies directed against AMPA receptor subunits revealed prominent labeling of isolated external horizontal cells with the GluR2/3 and GluR4 antibodies. 1-Naphthylacetyl spermine, known to block calcium-permeable AMPA receptors, significantly reduced glutamate-gated currents of horizontal cells. Downregulation of glutamate responses was induced by increasing extracellular ion concentrations of Zn2+ and H+. The present study suggests that Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors likely play an important role in shaping the synaptic responses of skate horizontal cells and that alterations in extracellular concentrations of calcium, zinc, and hydrogen ions have the potential to regulate the strength of postsynaptic signals mediated by AMPA receptors within the OPL.

Information

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (A). Electrical currents obtained from 5 s applications of 1, 10, 30, 100, and 300 μm AMPA followed by a subsequent application of 100 μm glutamate to a horizontal cell whole-cell voltage clamped at −70 mV. (B). Electrical currents obtained from 5 s applications of 300 nm, 1, 3, 10, 30, 100, and 300 μm kainate followed by a subsequent application of 100 μm glutamate to a horizontal cell whole-cell voltage clamped at −70 mV. (C). Dose–response relationships for electrical currents elicited by glutamate (solid trace, squares, seven cells), AMPA (dotted trace, circles, seven cells), and kainate (dashed trace, triangles, seven cells).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A). Effects of GYKI 52466 on glutamate-elicited currents. Traces resulting from application of glutamate onto an individual cell voltage clamped at −70 mV. The top trace shows the current elicited by application of 100 μm glutamate. The cell was then bathed for several seconds in GYKI 52466. The second trace shows the current obtained when glutamate was coapplied with 100 μm GYKI 52466; the glutamate-elicited current was abolished under this condition. The bottom trace shows recovery of the glutamate-elicited current following washout. (B). Effects of naphthylacetyl spermine (NS) on glutamate-induced currents of skate horizontal cells. Traces from a cell challenged with glutamate in the presence of 10 μm NS. The first trace is a control current elicited by a 10 s application of 100 μm glutamate. Two current traces resulting from coapplication of NS and glutamate are shown in the second and third traces. The final trace shows the glutamate-induced current following washout of NS. (C). I–V relationship for the glutamate-gated current from one horizontal cell. The graph reflects the current induced by glutamate at a series of voltage steps subtracted from currents remaining at those voltages in the absence of glutamate. The intracellular pipette contained 300 μm spermine, and the extracellular solution contained 10 mm cesium, 10 mm 4-aminopyridine, 20 mm tetraethylammonium, 100 μm nifedipine, and 1 μm tetrodotoxin to reduce voltage-gated conductances. Similar results were obtained from four additional cells.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Effect of cyclothiazide (CTZ) on glutamate-, AMPA-, and kainate-elicited currents of skate horizontal cells. (A). Responses from a single horizontal cell voltage clamped at −70 mV. Leftmost trace shows control response to 100 μm glutamate. The second trace shows the response to glutamate in the presence of 100 μm CTZ; a large increase in the inward current was observed. Following washout of the CTZ, the cell was then challenged with 50 μm AMPA (third trace). The fourth trace shows the large increase in response to the same concentration of AMPA in the presence of CTZ. The final two traces show kainate-elicited currents in the absence and presence of CTZ. (B). Average current sizes are shown for six cells challenged with glutamate, AMPA, and kainate in the absence and presence of CTZ. (C). Concanavalin A (con A) failed to significantly alter the size of glutamate-induced currents. Traces from a single cell voltage clamped at −70 mV. The first trace is a control 5 s application of 100 μm glutamate. The second trace shows the current elicited during coapplication of 300 μg/ml of con A and glutamate for 5 s. Following washout of con A and glutamate, the cell was bathed in a Ringer’s solution containing 30 μm CTZ, and the cell was again challenged with glutamate in the presence of CTZ (third trace); a large increase in inward current was observed. The final trace shows a control current elicited from a second application of glutamate following washout of the CTZ. (D). Average responses of six cells in the presence of con A or CTZ, normalized to the initial 100 μm glutamate response.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Effects of cyclothiazide (CTZ) on glutamate-gated currents of skate horizontal cells. (A). Traces from a single cell voltage clamped at −70 mV and challenged with 5 s applications of 100 μm glutamate in the presence of increasing concentrations of CTZ (1, 10, 30, 100, and 300 μm). Following washout of CTZ, the glutamate current returned to control levels (seventh trace). (B). Average responses from seven cells to 100 μm glutamate in the presence of increasing concentrations of CTZ; responses are normalized to the response to 100 μm glutamate without CTZ present. (C). Dose–response relationship for electrical currents elicited by glutamate (solid trace, circles, seven cells) and glutamate in the presence of 30 μm CTZ (dashed trace, triangles, seven cells). CTZ broadens the glutamate dose–response curve and shifts it to the right.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Immunohistochemical localization of AMPA receptor subtypes in slices of skate retina [(A), GluR-2, (B) GluR-2/3, and (C) GluR-4] and in isolated external horizontal cells [(D) GluR-2, (E) GluR-2/3, and (F) GluR-4]. Labeling at the level of the photoreceptor inner and outer segments was determined to be nonspecific based on control experiments applying the secondary antibody alone (not shown). Asterisk in (A) shows punctate labeling at the level of the outer limiting membrane. Scale bars are 10 μm. IPL, inner plexiform layer. INL, inner nuclear layer.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. pH effects on glutamate-induced currents in isolated skate horizontal cells. (A). Representative glutamate responses from a cell bathed in solutions ranging in pH from 9.0 to 5.0. Cells were challenged for 5 s with 100 μm glutamate while being continually bathed in Ringer’s solutions at pH 9.0, 7.6, 7.0, 6.0, or 5.0, respectively. (B). Response amplitude as a function of extracellular pH is shown representing the average responses of seven cells. Responses were normalized to the glutamate-elicited current obtained at a pH of 7.6 for each cell.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Zinc effects on glutamate-induced currents in isolated skate horizontal cells. (A). Five traces from a cell voltage clamped at −70 mV. The cell was bathed in a Ringer’s solution containing normal Ca2+ (4 mm), and the traces depict currents elicited when challenged with 100 μm glutamate in the presence of 0, 30, 100, 300, and 1000 μm Zn2+, respectively. (B). Average glutamate responses in the presence of the different Zn2+ concentrations are shown for eight cells. Responses for each cell were normalized to the glutamate response obtained in the absence of extracellular Zn2+. (C). Traces from an individual cell bathed in a Ringer’s solution containing lowered extracellular Ca2+ (0.2 mm) and subsequently challenged with 100 μm glutamate in the presence of 0, 30, 100, 300, and 1000 μm Zn2+, respectively. (D). Average responses from seven cells are shown; currents were normalized to the response initially obtained in a Ringer’s solution lacking extracellular Zn2+.