Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:03:54.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal and plastic behavior of nanoglasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2014

Oliver Franke*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and The Mork Family Department for Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089
Daniel Leisen
Affiliation:
Institute for Applied Materials, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Herbert Gleiter
Affiliation:
Herbert Gleiter Institute of Nanoscience of the Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China; and Institute for Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Horst Hahn
Affiliation:
Institute for Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany; and KIT-TUD Joint Research Laboratory Nanomaterials, Institute of Materials Science, Technische Universitaet Darmstadt (TUD), 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: ofranke@usc.edu

Abstract

The mechanical and thermal behavior of nanoglasses (NGs) were studied with a focus on the effect of the microstructure. The thermal expansion was measured to track changes in excess free volume during heating. It was found that the excess free volume, which is initially more dominant in the interphase region between the denser amorphous particles, is partially lost as well as redistributed during annealing. This relaxation during heating causes the nanoglass to behave like a melt-spun ribbon after heating while remaining amorphous. Nanomechanical tests were used to probe the local incipient plasticity and the influence of the interphase region. This interphase appears to affect the mechanical response of the NGs by inhibiting the propagation of shear bands and thus offers a novel approach for the introduction of plasticity in bulk metallic glasses. The results suggest that the NGs consist of two distinct amorphous phases with different glass transition temperatures.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Temperature–time profile used to measure the thermal expansion behavior of the NG (note that the time increments vary in duration as the prime objective is to avoid exceeding the target temperature).

Figure 1

FIG. 2. (a) Strain plot for the NG in x- and y-direction as a function of temperature (b) comparison of strain for the BMG to the NG in its initial state and after one cycle of thermal expansion measurements.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Thermal strain in the x-direction for the Fe25Sc75 NG and the lost volume for the initial run (a) and after one round of thermal expansion measurements (b). The blue line with squares indicates the irreversible thermal strain contribution as obtained from thermal contraction subtracted from the total thermal strain.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Modulus Er and hardness H maps for the Fe25Sc75 NG and BMG. Modulus (a) NG, (b) BMG and Hardness, (c) NG, and (d) BMG. Triangles indicate the location of the indents.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Modulus map for a Fe28Sc72 before (a) and after the thermal expansion measurement (b).

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Representative load–displacement curves for the Fe25Sc75 NG and the BMG ribbon.