Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:49:40.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual crop size increases predispersal predation by beetles in a tropical palm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2020

Morgana Maria Arcanjo Bruno ,
Klécia Gili Massi Open the ORCID record for Klécia Gili Massi [Opens in a new window] ,
Alexander V. Christianini  and
John du Vall Hay
Morgana Maria Arcanjo Bruno
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, DF 70910-970, Brazil
Klécia Gili Massi*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, DF 70910-970, Brazil
Alexander V. Christianini
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Campus Sorocaba, Sorocaba, SP 18052-780, Brazil
John du Vall Hay
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, DF 70910-970, Brazil
*
Author for Correspondence: Klécia Gili Massi, E-mail: kgmassi@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Predispersal seed predation is one of the main causes of seed mortality in plant populations, contributing to decreased plant recruitment. Seed loss has previously been found to be related to crop size. Thus, we examined the influence of individual crop size on predispersal seed predation by beetles in the palm Syagrus flexuosa in the Brazilian savanna. The study was carried out in three tropical woodland savanna sites, where we sampled the total seed crop of 46 fruiting palms and checked the presence of beetle larvae inside all seeds per plant. We observed predispersal seed predation of S. flexuosa from all sites and a high variation in the number of seeds preyed on per individual palm. Crop size had a positive influence on the number of seeds lost to predispersal seed predators. Variations in levels of predispersal seed predation may also be accounted for by the reproductive phenology of S. flexuosa. If fruits are not available at the same time, less resource is available for predators and therefore a high proportion of seeds may be preyed on. Thus, our study demonstrates that an individual plant trait, crop size, is an important predictor of beetle seed damage per palm and a driver of the number of seeds lost to predispersal seed predators.

Keywords

crop sizesavannaseedSyagrus flexuosa

Information

Type
Short Communication
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 43 - 46
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Predispersal seed predation is one of the main causes of seed mortality in plant populations (Janzen, Reference Janzen1969, Reference Janzen1970, Reference Janzen1971a; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Drummond, Leibman and Hartke1997; Andersen, Reference Andersen1998; Ramírez and Traveset, Reference Ramírez and Traveset2010), increasing seed limitation and contributing to decrease plant recruitment (Louda, Reference Louda1982; Kolb et al., Reference Kolb, Ehrlén and Eriksson2007). Crop size (the number of seeds produced by an individual plant) and intra- and interpopulational variations may explain some changes in predispersal seed predation (Janzen, Reference Janzen1971a; Traveset, Reference Traveset1995; Crawley, Reference Crawley and Fenner2000; Xiao et al., Reference Xiao, Zhang and Wang2015; Christianini, Reference Christianini2017).

Predispersal seed predation is mainly performed by specialized invertebrates (Janzen, Reference Janzen1969, Reference Janzen1971a; Kolb et al., Reference Kolb, Ehrlén and Eriksson2007; Gripenberg, Reference Gripenberg2018). Many insects from Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera and Thysanoptera lay their eggs and grow their larvae inside developing fruits and seeds, preying on seeds before dispersal (Janzen, Reference Janzen1969, Reference Janzen1970; Janzen, Reference Janzen1971b; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Drummond, Leibman and Hartke1997; Crawley, Reference Crawley and Fenner2000; Barford et al., Reference Barford, Hagen and Borchsenius2011). These insects destroy seeds and make fruits less attractive to dispersers (Rathcke and Lacey, Reference Rathcke and Lacey1985), which may limit seed dispersal, plant recruitment and affect the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of their host plants (Kolb et al., Reference Kolb, Ehrlén and Eriksson2007). The interest in predispersal seed predation has not matched the significant attention devoted to post-dispersal seed predation over the last few decades, although both are important for the maintenance of tropical plant diversity (Janzen, Reference Janzen1970; Gripenberg, Reference Gripenberg2018).

Since seeds are critical resources to complete a predator's life cycle, a high number of seeds may allow greater opportunities for oviposition by insects. Therefore, seed predators may exert greater predation pressures where seeds are found in higher densities (density-dependence hypothesis; Janzen, Reference Janzen1969, Reference Janzen1970). On the other hand, a high seed crop size may maximize the probability of satiating local seed predators if many seeds are produced at irregular intervals or are available for only a short period of time (satiation hypothesis; Kelly and Sork, Reference Kelly and Sork2002; Kon et al., Reference Kon, Noda, Terazawa, Koyama and Yasaka2005). In this case, a large seed crop may increase the likelihood of an individual seed reaching maturity even under intense activity of the seed predators (Hubbell, Reference Hubbell1980).

Palms (Arecaceae) are present in all tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Most palms and their interactions with insects remain poorly known in tropical ecosystems around the world (Henderson et al., Reference Henderson, Galeano and Bernal1995; Prance et al., Reference Prance, Beentje, Dransfield and Johns2000; Henderson, Reference Henderson2002). Palms are important components (in terms of richness and abundance: Oliveira-Filho et al., Reference Oliveira-Filho, Shepherd, Martins and Stubblebine1989; Lenza et al., Reference Lenza, Pinto, Pinto, Maracahipes and Bruziguessi2011) of the Brazilian savanna flora, Cerrado. However, less than 50% of flowers of some palm species turn into viable seed due to predispersal seed predation among other reasons (De Steven et al., Reference De Steven, Windsor, Putz and De Léon1987; Henderson, Reference Henderson2002). Therefore, in this study, we examined the effect of seed crop size variation on seed predation. We expected that higher fruit set would lead to greater predispersal seed predation in a tropical palm species.

Materials and methods

Study species

We studied predispersal predation in seeds of Syagrus flexuosa (Mart.) Becc., an endemic palm species widely distributed in the Brazilian savanna. The genus Syagrus is mostly found in South America, primarily in Brazil (Henderson et al., Reference Henderson, Galeano and Bernal1995; Noblick, Reference Noblick2017), and species have been considered fundamental in seasonal ecosystems by offering abundant resources to frugivores in periods of food scarcity (Giombini et al., Reference Giombini, Bravo and Martínez2009). This palm flowers between November and April and fruits mainly from July to October (Martins and Filgueiras, Reference Martins, Filgueiras and Cavalcanti2006). The plant reaches 1–5 m high and it usually has 7–15 green leaves (40–80 pinnate: Noblick, Reference Noblick2017). Flowers are hermaphroditic in 6–12 racemes, with ovoid 4 cm fruits carrying one seed (Mamede, Reference Mamede2008). There are no studies regarding the reproductive biology of S. flexuosa, but the congeneric S. coronata has been described as self-compatible, with high occurrence of cross-pollination done by bees and beetles (Rocha, Reference Rocha2009).

This study was carried out in three tropical woodland savanna (Cerrado) sites in Brazil: Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas (ESECAE, sampled in 2003), Estação Experimental Fazenda Água Limpa (FAL) and Parque Estadual da Serra de Caldas Novas (PESCAN), both sampled in 2012. Study sites are located within conservation areas (distant from each other by at least 45 km) in Central-Western Brazil (Table 1), under Köppen's Aw climate with well-marked rainy (October–March) and dry seasons (April–September) (Nimer, Reference Nimer1989).

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the studied sites in the Cerrado from Central Brazil where predispersal seed predation of Syagrus flexuosa was evaluated: Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas (ESECAE), Estação Experimental Fazenda Água Limpa (FAL) and Parque Estadual da Serra de Caldas Novas (PESCAN). Dash means lack of information

Sampling and recording of the predation level

From 7 to 30 palms presenting fruits were sampled ad libitum per site (Table 2). In total, 46 palms were sampled (Table 2). Due to logistical reasons, we were unable to survey all sites and plants across the 2 years. All infructescences produced by a palm sampled in each site were collected to record the predispersal seed predation. Infructescences with fruits reaching maturity were recognized through the size and/or colour of fruits. After harvest, each infrutescence was placed in a plastic bag and labelled (site, individual). To evaluate predispersal seed predation, we counted the total number of seeds preyed on per infructescence and per palm individual. We first searched for external signs of predation on seeds (such as holes). To avoid underestimation of insect predation (Andersen, Reference Andersen1998), we also opened all seeds using a scissor in order to verify the presence or not of a larva (an unidentified Curculionidae, Coleoptera). Curculionidae larvae commonly feed on seed endosperm and embryo, complete their life cycle inside seeds and drill an exit hole during fruit ripeness and seed dispersal (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Drummond, Leibman and Hartke1997; Crawley, Reference Crawley and Fenner2000).

Table 2.

Average number ± SD of damaged seeds and of individual crop size for Syagrus flexuosa at three sites in Central Brazil (n = total individuals sampled): Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas (ESECAE), Estação Experimental Fazenda Água Limpa (FAL) and Parque Estadual da Serra de Caldas Novas (PESCAN)

Data analysis

We applied a Generalized Linear Mixed Model to test for the effects of seed crop on seed predation, using crop size per plant as a fixed predictor variable, palm identification nested within the site as a random factor to control for the spatial distribution of individual palms, pseudo-replication within sites and variation in the number of palms sampled per site. The number of seeds preyed on per palm was the response variable. The model used a Poisson family of error distribution and log-link function. Statistical analysis was done in R (R Core Team, 2013). We used the glmer function to fit the model by maximum likelihood (Laplace approximation) using the lme4 package in R. The full model was compared with a null model containing only an intercept and random effects with analysis of variance. The full model had a better fit to variance in data than expected by random factors only (Χ2 = 11.17; d.f. = 1; P = 0.008). We tested the overdispersion of the full model with an overdispersion detection function suggested by Thomas et al. (Reference Thomas, Lello, Medeiros, Pollar, Robinson, Seward, Smith, Vafidis and Vaughan2017).

Results

Predispersal seed predation in S. flexuosa ranged from 0 to 95% of seeds of individual palms and 35% of all the individuals were not affected by seed predation (Fig. 1). About 24 ± 27% (mean ± SD) of the palm seed crop was lost to predispersal seed predators (although there was a large coefficient of variation of seed loss: 89.1%). We also noticed a great variance in seed crop and loss among sites, with ESECEAE having more predated seeds than the other two areas (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

Distribution of predispersal seed predation rates (predated seeds per total seeds) in Syagrus flexuosa individuals. Data are pooled for all individuals in three savanna sites in Central Brazil (N = 46).

Additionally, there was a positive effect of crop size on the number of seeds preyed on per palm (untransformed estimate ± SE: 0.041 ± 0.009; z-value = 4.515; P < 0.001; Fig. 2; Model intercept did not differ from zero −0.186 ± 0.387; z-value = −0.480; P = 0.631). Since we detected some under dispersion (ratio = 0.254) in our model, the exact value of fixed factor estimates should be interpreted with caution.

Fig. 2.

Predispersal seed predation in response to variation in the number of seeds produced per palm of Syagrus flexuosa (N = 46). Data are pooled for all individuals in three savanna sites in Central Brazil. Not all points can be seen due to overlap. See the text for details of model fit.

Discussion

We observed predispersal seed predation in all sites sampled and a high variation in the number of seeds preyed on per individual of S. flexuosa. Although seed losses of the palm species reached a mean of 24% per individual and may suggest a low predation pressure compared with other palms (70% of seed loss), such as S. romanzoffiana growing in forest and woodland savanna (Brancalion et al., Reference Brancalion, Novembre and Rodrigues2011) and for Acrocomia aculeata in savanna (Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Fonseca, Mota, Fernandes, Fagundes, Reis-Júnior and Faria2014), there was a large variation among studied individuals. In addition, crop size per palm was a very important driver of the number of seeds lost to predispersal seed predators.

Flower and fruit production in tropical environments are influenced by a multitude of abiotic and biotic factors (Janzen, Reference Janzen1967; Frankie et al., Reference Frankie, Baker and Opler1974; Mendoza et al., Reference Mendoza, Peres and Morellato2017). Several plants from Cerrado show large variations in seed crop among years (Pilon et al., Reference Pilon, Udulutsch and Durigan2015) and S. fleuxosa is not an exception. For instance, an average of 87 fruits was produced per palm in 1998 (data not shown) when compared with 30 fruits in 2012 in FAL. This may yield larger seed crops in less predictable time intervals, decreasing the chances to sustain large densities of specialized seed predators and increasing the chances of predator satiation in years of large crops (Kon et al., Reference Kon, Noda, Terazawa, Koyama and Yasaka2005; Kolb et al., Reference Kolb, Ehrlén and Eriksson2007). Despite this, flowering and fruiting of S. flexuosa is aseasonal within years in study sites (Bruno et al., Reference Bruno, Massi, Vidal and Hay2019). Therefore, insect seed predators may find opportunities for oviposition on seeds of S. flexuosa throughout the year. It is possible that female beetles select the most vigorous plants available for oviposition, based on seed crop size, to enhance offspring fitness (Heisswolf et al., Reference Heisswolf, Obermaier and Poethke2005). This may explain the increased likelihood of insect seed predation with increases in crop size per palm. Masting flowering/fruiting, on the other hand, could result in predator satiation and in a smaller proportion of seed predation (Kon et al., Reference Kon, Noda, Terazawa, Koyama and Yasaka2005; Kolb et al., Reference Kolb, Ehrlén and Eriksson2007). However, we found no evidence of satiation with increasing crop sizes of S. flexuosa. Alternatively, it is possible that less productive plants provide less attractive displays for ovipositing beetles, or that these plants selectively abort infested seeds in early development stages. Future studies could explore this issue further.

This study has shown that predispersal seed predation by Curculionideae larvae is related to the fruit production of S. flexuosa in a density-dependent way. The intensity of the seed predation varied more than 15 times among palms considering all sites, corroborating other studies with plants from the tropical savanna (Custódio et al., Reference Custódio, Carmo-Oliveira, Mendes-Rodrigues and Oliveira2014), including palms (Grenha et al., Reference Grenha, Macedo and Monteiro2008), and increased with the number of fruits produced, indicating that the seed predator's preference for many-flowered individuals may have the potential to affect the selection of plant traits and the overall intensity of seed predation (Kolb et al., Reference Kolb, Ehrlén and Eriksson2007).

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided to the authors by the Coordination of Improvement of Personnel in Higher Education, Brazil (CAPES) and by the National Council of Science and Technology, Brazil (CNPq). We also would like to thank ESECAE, FAL and PESCAN for permission to conduct research.

Footnotes

†

Current address: Universidade Católica de Brasília, Programa de Educação Ambiental – PEA, Águas Claras, DF 71966-700, Brazil.

‡

Current address: Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campos, SP 12247-004, Brazil.

References

Andersen, AN (1998) Insect seed predators may cause far greater losses then they appear to. Oikos 52, 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barford, AS, Hagen, M and Borchsenius, F (2011) Twenty-five years of progress in understanding pollination mechanisms in palms (Arecaceae). Annals of Botany 108, 1503–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancalion, P, Novembre, A and Rodrigues, RR (2011) Seed development, yield and quality of two palm species growing in different tropical forest types in SE Brazil: implications for ecological restoration. Seed Science and Technology 39, 412–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, MMA, Massi, KG, Vidal, MM and Hay, JV (2019) Reproductive phenology of three Syagrus species (Arecaceae) in a tropical savanna in Brazil. Flora 252, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christianini, AV (2017) Crop size influences pre-dispersal seed predation in the Brazilian Cerrado. Acta Botanica Brasilica 32, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, MJ (2000) Seed predators and plant population dynamics, pp. 167–182 in Fenner, M (Ed.), Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. Oxford, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custódio, LN, Carmo-Oliveira, R, Mendes-Rodrigues, C and Oliveira, PE (2014) Pre-dispersal seed predation and abortion in species of Callisthene and Qualea (Vochysiaceae) in a Neotropical savanna. Acta Botanica Brasilica 28, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Steven, D, Windsor, DM, Putz, FE and De Léon, B (1987) Vegetative and reproductive phenologies of a palm assemblage in Panama. Biotropica 19, 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankie, GW, Baker, HG and Opler, PA (1974) Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 62, 881–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giombini, MA, Bravo, SP and Martínez, MF (2009) Seed dispersal of the palm Syagrus romanzoffiana by tapirs in the semi-deciduous atlantic forest of Argentina. Biotropica 41, 408–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenha, V, Macedo, MV and Monteiro, RF (2008) Predação de sementes de Allagoptera arenaria (Gomes) O'Kuntze (Arecaceae) por Pachymerus nucleorum Fabricius (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 52, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gripenberg, S (2018) Do pre-dispersal insect seed predators contribute to maintaining tropical forest plant diversity? Biotropica 50, 839–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, JD, Bizerril, MX, Calouro, AM, Costa, EMN, Ferreira, AA, Gastal, MLA, Goes Júnior, CD, Manzan, DJ, Martins, CR, Monteiro, JMG, Oliveira, SA, Rodrigues, MCM, Seyffarth, JAS and Walter, BMT (2000) Comparação do padrão da distribuição espacial em escalas diferentes de espécies nativas do cerrado, em Brasília, DF. Brazilian Journal of Botany 23, 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisswolf, A, Obermaier, E and Poethke, HJ (2005) Selection of large host plants by oviposition by a monophagous leaf beetle: nutritional quality of enemy-free space? Ecological Entomology 30, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A (2002) Evolution and ecology of palms. New York, The New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, A, Galeano, G and Bernal, R (1995) Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, SP (1980) Seed predation and the coexistence of tree species in tropical forests. Oikos 35, 214–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, DH (1967) Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. The American Naturalist 101, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, DH (1969) Seed eaters versus seed size, number, toxicity and dispersal. Evolution 23, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janzen, DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. The American Naturalist 104, 501–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, DH (1971a) Seed predation by animals. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 2, 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, DH (1971b) Escape of Cassia grandis beans from predators in time and space. Ecology 25, 964–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D and Sork, VL (2002) Mast seeding in perennial plants: why, how, where? Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 33, 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, A, Ehrlén, J and Eriksson, O (2007) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of spatial and temporal variation in pre-dispersal seed predation. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 9, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kon, H, Noda, T, Terazawa, K, Koyama, H and Yasaka, M (2005) Evolutionary advantages of mast seeding in Fagus crenata. Journal of Ecology 93, 1148–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenza, E, Pinto, JRR, Pinto, AS, Maracahipes, L and Bruziguessi, EL (2011) Comparação da vegetação arbustivo-arbórea de uma área de cerrado rupestre na Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás e áreas de cerrado sentido restrito do Bioma Cerrado. Brazilian Journal of Botany 34, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louda, SM (1982) Distribution ecology: variation in plant recruitment over a gradient in relation to insect seed predation. Ecological Monographs 52, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, RC and Filgueiras, TS (2006) Arecaceae, pp. 45–82 in Cavalcanti, TB (Ed.), Flora do Distrito Federal, Brasil, Vol. 5. Brasilia, EMBRAPA-Cenargen.Google Scholar
Mamede, MA (2008) Aspectos da ecologia reprodutiva de Syagrus flexuosa Mart. Becc.: Sucesso reprodutivo e persistência em áreas de Cerrado na região do DF. PhD Dissertation. Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil.Google Scholar
Mendoza, I, Peres, CA and Morellato, LPC (2017) Continental-scale patterns and climatic drivers of fruiting phenology: a quantitative neotropical review. Global Planetary Change 148, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimer, E (1989) Climatologia do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, IBGE.Google Scholar
Noblick, LR (2017) A revision of the genus Syagrus (Arecaceae). Phytotaxa 294, 1–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira-Filho, AT, Shepherd, GJ, Martins, FR and Stubblebine, WH (1989) Environmental factors affecting physiognomic and floristic variation in an area of cerrado in central Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5, 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, ACF, Fonseca, FSA, Mota, GR, Fernandes, AKC, Fagundes, M, Reis-Júnior, R and Faria, ML (2014) Ecological interactions shape the dynamics of seed predation in Acrocomia aculeata (Arecaceae). PLoS One 9, e98026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilon, NAL, Udulutsch, RG and Durigan, G (2015) Padrões fenológicos de 111 espécies de Cerrado em condições de cultivo. Hoehnea 42, 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prance, GT, Beentje, H, Dransfield, J and Johns, R (2000) The tropical flora remains undercollected. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez, N and Traveset, A (2010) Predispersal seed-predation by insects in the Venezuelan central plain: overall patterns and traits that influence its biology and taxonomic groups. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 12, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathcke, B and Lacey, EP (1985) Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 16, 179–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rocha, KMR (2009) Biologia reprodutiva da palmeira licuri (Syagrus coronata (Mart.) Becc.) (Arecaceae) na ecorregião do Raso da Catarina, Bahia. 2009. Master Thesis. Universidade Federal Rural do Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brasil.Google Scholar
Silva, LO, Costa, DA, Espírito Santo Filho, K, Ferreira, HD and Brandão, D (2002) Levantamento florístico e fitossociológico em duas áreas de cerrado sensu stricto no Parque Estadual da Serra de Caldas Novas, Goiás. Acta Botanica Brasilica 16, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R, Lello, J, Medeiros, R, Pollar, A, Robinson, P, Seward, A, Smith, J, Vafidis, J and Vaughan, I (2017) Data analysis with R statistical software: a guidebook for scientists. Cardiff, Eco-explore.Google Scholar
Traveset, A (1995) Spatio-temporal variation in pre-dispersal reproductive losses of a Mediterranean shrub, Euphorbia dendroides L. Oecologia 103, 118–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, Z, Zhang, Z and Wang, Y (2015) The effects of seed abundance on seed predation and dispersal by rodents in Castanopsis fargesii (Fagaceae). Plant Ecology 177, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J, Drummond, FA, Leibman, M and Hartke, A (1997) Insect predation of seeds and plant population dynamics. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 1997, 163.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Main characteristics of the studied sites in the Cerrado from Central Brazil where predispersal seed predation of Syagrus flexuosa was evaluated: Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas (ESECAE), Estação Experimental Fazenda Água Limpa (FAL) and Parque Estadual da Serra de Caldas Novas (PESCAN). Dash means lack of information

Figure 1

Table 2. Average number ± SD of damaged seeds and of individual crop size for Syagrus flexuosa at three sites in Central Brazil (n = total individuals sampled): Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas (ESECAE), Estação Experimental Fazenda Água Limpa (FAL) and Parque Estadual da Serra de Caldas Novas (PESCAN)

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Distribution of predispersal seed predation rates (predated seeds per total seeds) in Syagrus flexuosa individuals. Data are pooled for all individuals in three savanna sites in Central Brazil (N = 46).

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Predispersal seed predation in response to variation in the number of seeds produced per palm of Syagrus flexuosa (N = 46). Data are pooled for all individuals in three savanna sites in Central Brazil. Not all points can be seen due to overlap. See the text for details of model fit.