Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:50:53.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of PCR-based methods for diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections in the clinical laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

JACO J. VERWEIJ
JACO J. VERWEIJ*
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands. E-mail: j.verweij@elisabeth.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

For many years PCR- and other DNA-based methods of pathogen detection have been available in most clinical microbiology laboratories; however, until recently these tools were not routinely exploited for the diagnosis of parasitic infections. Laboratories were initially reluctant to implement PCR as incorporation of such assays within the algorithm of tools available for the most accurate diagnosis of a large variety of parasites was unclear. With regard to diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections, the diversity of parasites that one can expect in most settings is far less than the parasitological textbooks would have you believe, hence developing a simplified diagnostic triage is feasible. Therefore the classical algorithm based on population, patient groups, use of immuno-suppressive drugs, travel history etc. is also applicable to decide when to perform and which additional techniques are to be used, if a multiplex PCR panel is used as a first-line screening diagnostic.

Keywords

Real-time PCREntamoeba histolyticaGiardia lambliaCryptosporidiumDientamoeba fragilishelminths

Information

Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 141 , Issue 14: Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology Volume 52 Advances in diagnostics for parasitic diseases , December 2014 , pp. 1863 - 1872
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

INTRODUCTION

The application of real-time PCR (Klein, Reference Klein2002) in molecular diagnostics has boosted the use of nucleic acid-based detection methods. There is a large variety in the chemistry used for real-time detection of DNA amplification although Taqman® or hydrolysis probes are most commonly used, with the paper by Espy et al. as a good introductory text to these technologies (Espy et al. Reference Espy, Uhl, Sloan, Buckwalter, Jones, Vetter, Yao, Wengenack, Cockerill and Smith2006). Typically, amplification of the specific target is measured real-time during the thermal cycling process making post-PCR processing unnecessary, i.e. gel electrophoresis of amplicons. This closed-tube format of real-time PCR significantly reduces the risk of contamination but also reduces labour time, which in a busy diagnostic laboratory allows for task reallocation(s). Moreover, using different fluorescent molecules makes it possible to combine the detection of different targets which have amplicon sizes of similar lengths and therefore similar amplification efficiency, into one multiplex assay, co-detecting the presence or absence of several pathogens. This can also reduce costs of reagent allowing more wide-scale screening within existing budgets. Additionally, real-time PCR gives a (semi)-quantitative indication of the DNA representing the parasite load in the sample. In parasitology, the importance of power of application of DNA-based methods became apparent in the 1990s with the redescription of the potential invasive Entamoeba histolytica and the non-pathogenic Entamoeba dispar (Diamond and Clark, Reference Diamond and Clark1993). This urged the use of alternative diagnostic methods as the two species are morphologically indistinguishable and microscopy alone could no longer provide the answer for appropriate diagnosis and decision for treatment. From that time, nucleic acid-based detection methods were slowly introduced into the clinical laboratory for differentiation and confirmation in cases where microscopy was lacking specificity, as in the differentiation of E. histolytica/E. dispar. Other applications included those cases in which microscopy was extremely time-consuming or difficult; for example, in the detection of microsporidia (Franzen and Müller, Reference Franzen and Müller1999). These assays proved to be extremely sensitive and specific as compared with microscopy and when real-time PCR was introduced the idea of using multiplex real-time PCR for the simultaneous detection of various pathogens as first-line diagnosis gradually began to take shape (Verweij et al. Reference Verweij, Blange, Templeton, Schinkel, Brienen, van Rooyen, van Lieshout and Polderman2004). Since that time numerous multiplex real-time PCRs have been described and used in different settings (Table 1). Currently, laboratories that are starting to use molecular diagnostics for the diagnosis of parasitic infections may be overwhelmed at first by the large variety of assays and targets to choose from. This can lead to confusion as to how to incorporate molecular diagnostics within the algorithm of applying diagnostic techniques into their daily routine and weekly timetable. It is my intention that this paper will provide some guidance on answering these questions and overcoming hurdles to the introduction and adoption of molecular diagnostic methods in the clinical laboratory.

Table 1.

Examples of real-time PCRs for the detection of intestinal parasitic infections

IS MOLECULAR DETECTION GOOD ENOUGH?

Over the last decade, the application of (multiplex) real-time PCR for the detection of intestinal parasitic infections has been validated against microscopy in a variety of different settings (ten Hove et al. Reference ten Hove, Schuurman, Kooistra, Moller, van Lieshout and Verweij2007, Reference ten Hove, van Esbroeck, Vervoort, van den Ende, van Lieshout and Verweij2009; Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet et al. Reference Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet, Wallinga, Ruijs, Bruins and Verweij2009; Calderaro et al. Reference Calderaro, Gorrini, Montecchini, Peruzzi, Piccolo, Rossi, Gargiulo, Manca, Dettori and Chezzi2010a, Reference Calderaro, Gorrini, Montecchini, Peruzzi, Piccolo, Rossi, Gargiulo, Manca, Dettori and Chezzib; de Boer et al. Reference de Boer, Ott, Kesztyüs and Kooistra-Smid2010; Stark et al. Reference Stark, Al-Qassab, Barratt, Stanley, Roberts, Marriott, Harkness and Ellis2011; Basuni et al. Reference Basuni, Mohamed, Ahmad, Zakaria and Noordin2012; McAuliffe et al. Reference McAuliffe, Anderson, Stevens, Adams, Coleman, Mahagamasekera, Young, Henderson, Hofmann, Jennings and Murdoch2013; Mejia et al. Reference Mejia, Vicuna, Broncano, Sandoval, Vaca, Chico, Cooper and Nutman2013; Nazeer et al. Reference Nazeer, El, von Thien, El-Sibaei, Abdel-Hamid, Tawfik and Tannich2013). These studies have clearly shown that molecular diagnostics outperforms microscopy in the detection rate for the targets chosen. In a Dutch laboratory receiving stool samples from patients presenting with gastrointestinal complaints to the general practitioner the detection rate for Giardia lamblia increased from 5·7% to 9·3% comparing microscopy and real-time PCR, respectively (ten Hove et al. Reference ten Hove, Schuurman, Kooistra, Moller, van Lieshout and Verweij2007). Specific staining for Cryptosporidium was performed on request only and therefore not performed during the study period, whereas it was detected in 5% of the cases in the total study population and in more than 20% of the children under the age of 5. In the same laboratory, an increased detection rate of G. lamblia infections was found after the introduction of a routinely used molecular screening approach in combination with bacterial gastrointestinal pathogens (de Boer et al. Reference de Boer, Ott, Kesztyüs and Kooistra-Smid2010). In another study in the Netherlands, comparing microscopy performed on two sodium-acid-formalin (SAF) preserved samples and one non-preserved stool sample, G. lamblia was detected in 7·3% of cases as compared with 11·1% using real-time PCR (Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet et al. Reference Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet, Wallinga, Ruijs, Bruins and Verweij2009). In this study, Dientamoeba fragilis real-time PCR was included as well, showing almost double the number of detected cases as compared with microscopy performed on the two SAF preserved samples, 30·7 and 17·4% respectively. Similar findings on the performance of D. fragilis real-time PCR as compared with microscopy and culture have been reported by a laboratory in Italy (Calderaro et al. Reference Calderaro, Gorrini, Montecchini, Peruzzi, Piccolo, Rossi, Gargiulo, Manca, Dettori and Chezzi2010a, Reference Calderaro, Gorrini, Montecchini, Peruzzi, Piccolo, Rossi, Gargiulo, Manca, Dettori and Chezzib). Increased detection rates using multiplex real-time PCR for the detection of G. lamblia, Cryptosporidium and Strongyloides stercoralis and excellent specificity differentiating E. histolytica from E. dispar were also shown in travellers when comparing the results of expert microscopy and molecular diagnostics (ten Hove et al. Reference ten Hove, van Esbroeck, Vervoort, van den Ende, van Lieshout and Verweij2009). The higher sensitivity of S. stercoralis PCR in this study could be explained by failure of Baermann and culture methods through the death of S. stercoralis larvae during transport. In rural non-industrialized settings, differences between detection rates obtained by microscopy compared with PCR can be more extreme; in Ecuador, Mejia et al. found 5·8% G. lamblia with microscopy compared with 31·5% with real-time PCR (Mejia et al. Reference Mejia, Vicuna, Broncano, Sandoval, Vaca, Chico, Cooper and Nutman2013). Molecular diagnostics also has found its way into veterinary medicine; a neat example of crossover into zoonotic disease was illustrated in the application of molecular techniques to confirm intestinal schistosomiasis in chimpanzees on Ngamba Island, Uganda (Standley et al. Reference Standley, Mugisha, Verweij, Adriko, Arinaitwe, Rowell, Atuhaire, Betson, Hobbs, van Tulleken, Kane, van Lieshout, Ajarova, Kabatereine and Stothard2011).

IS MOLECULAR DETECTION TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE?

The higher detection rates found using molecular diagnostics as compared with conventional methods are sometimes looked upon with some scepticism; are these additional positives in fact false positives? Reasons for the development of new diagnostic methods will usually be that the old methods are unsatisfactory regarding sensitivity, specificity, ease of use and so forth. Using well-defined controls in the initial validation will probably not lead to many problems regarding specificity and sensitivity when new diagnostic methods are compared with the old (gold standard) methods but this highlights the need for reference biological databanks to compare against as new assays come online. Thereafter, however, when newly developed more sensitive tools are compared with the old (gold standard) method in the target population it is often difficult to define true positive and true negative samples resulting in a low specificity for the new test. To overcome these problems usually new gold standards combining different tests or statistical methods to estimate the performance of new diagnostics without a gold standard are being used.

With the wealth of information of genomic data, in the development of nucleic acid-based diagnostic tests, sensitivity and especially specificity are assured in the design and in silico testing of the primers and probes used. Therefore, knowledge of inter-specific and intra-specific genetic diversity among the organisms targeted, and concerns regarding the accuracy and limitation of the data available are indispensable in the development of molecular diagnostics (Stensvold et al. Reference Stensvold, Lebbad and Verweij2011a). Moreover, unknown intra-specific variation should also be considered when samples are analysed from ‘new’ geographical areas. Additionally the specificity is tested against a challenging panel of well-defined controls. As mentioned, defining true positive and true negative test results when new (molecular) diagnostic methods are applied within a target population is often difficult and results of the technical validation have to be known to the reader.

Moreover, in many studies, additional data on the specificity are somewhat hidden. For example, in most studies, microscopy of only one sample is compared with PCR performed on one sample. However, the gold standard for microscopy is repeated (three times) examination of consecutive stool samples which may already explain the differential sensitivities. Unfortunately, such data are only documented rarely and in some studies given as examples only (Verweij et al. Reference Verweij, Schinkel, Laeijendecker, van Rooyen, van Lieshout and Polderman2003c, Reference Verweij, Blange, Templeton, Schinkel, Brienen, van Rooyen, van Lieshout and Polderman2004; Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet et al. Reference Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet, Wallinga, Ruijs, Bruins and Verweij2009). In general, for most intestinal parasitic infections PCR performed on one sample appears to be at least as sensitive as microscopy performed on three samples (van Mens et al. Reference van Mens, Aryeetey, Yazdanbakhsh, van Lieshout, Boakye and Verweij2013). Or maybe better, PCR on one sample provides a true positive or negative test result with the same confidence interval as obtained by microscopy of three samples. This implies that when PCR is used in some cases pathogens remain undetected in a first sample and will only be detected in a second or even a third sample.

The lower DNA load, reflected as higher Ct-values, found in microscopy negative samples compared with the higher DNA load found in microscopy-positive samples shows that the higher detection rates found by PCR are due to a higher sensitivity rather than lower specificity of molecular diagnostics (ten Hove et al. Reference ten Hove, Schuurman, Kooistra, Moller, van Lieshout and Verweij2007; Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet et al. Reference Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet, Wallinga, Ruijs, Bruins and Verweij2009; de Boer et al. Reference de Boer, Ott, Kesztyüs and Kooistra-Smid2010). Another piece of presumptive evidence can be found in the fact that using the same PCR in a different population gives high detection rates in one study group and is reaching towards almost negative in another group. For example, high detection rates of Cryptosporidium were found in a study performed in late summer and as expected low detection rates were found in a study performed in winter using real-time PCR (ten Hove et al. Reference ten Hove, Schuurman, Kooistra, Moller, van Lieshout and Verweij2007; Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet et al. Reference Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet, Wallinga, Ruijs, Bruins and Verweij2009). Similar results can even be found within one study if detection rates are analysed in different age groups, showing for example a similar age distribution of G. lamblia infections with higher numbers detected with PCR as compared with microscopy but leaving the general picture intact, showing high prevalence in children and (grand) parents age groups and low prevalence in young adults (ten Hove et al. Reference ten Hove, Schuurman, Kooistra, Moller, van Lieshout and Verweij2007).

Although the microscopic detection of, for example, one Giardia cyst in a third sample is taken for granted as a fact beyond doubt there is some debate on the relevance of a positive PCR result found with a high (>35) Ct-value (i.e. a low DNA load) and it is sometimes suggested to regard such samples as being negative. Technically, this is incorrect; a Ct-value measured as a consequence of an exponential curve is the result of amplification of the target DNA. True, at the edge of the detection limit of any assay, including microscopy, non-reproducible results will be obtained and as discussed above even with PCR it remains possible that a pathogen stays undetected in a first sample and will only be detected in a consecutive sample. Therefore one could consider requesting an additional sample in cases in which a low load of pathogenic DNA is detected and there is doubt on its clinical significance. The question remains, however, would a patient or medical practitioner be willing to wait with treatment against E. histolytica even if detected at very low DNA load and be willing to take the risk of a liver abscess when regarding a high Ct-value for E. histolytica as being negative?

WILL MOLECULAR DETECTION BE CONFOUNDED BY ‘dead’ dna?

Since DNA-based methods for the detection of intestinal parasitic infections are now being introduced in daily clinical practice one of the key questions is, how long can DNA be detected in stool after successful treatment? It is a fact that DNA can still be detected after the organism has died; however, bearing in mind that the transit time of the intestinal contents and regeneration time of the intestinal epithelium is within days it is expected that parasitic remains are rapidly cleared from the gut. Although cases have been described mentioning that PCR turns negative after successful treatment, to date there are very few larger follow-up studies using PCR to monitor the effect of treatment. Enterocytozoon bieneusi DNA became undetectable in stool in two patients at day 7 and day 4 after treatment with fumagillin, respectively (Lanternier et al. Reference Lanternier, Boutboul, Menotti, Chandesris, Sarfati, Mamzer Bruneel, Calmus, Mechaï, Viard, Lecuit, Bougnoux and Lortholary2009). In a cohort of 125 children in Ecuador, Ascaris lumbricoides DNA could not be detected 21 days after albendazole/ivermectin treatment in those children that were PCR positive before treatment (Mejia et al. Reference Mejia, Vicuna, Broncano, Sandoval, Vaca, Chico, Cooper and Nutman2013). In the same study, approximately 35% of the subjects remained positive for G. lamblia after albendazole/ivermectin therapy, which might be due to the non-optimal treatment regime and the high degree of infection in this region. In a recent study in the Netherlands, G. lamblia DNA could not be detected one week after metronidazole treatment in children and adults that were diagnosed with giardiasis using real-time PCR (Bijllaard et al. Reference van den Bijllaardt, Overdevest, Buiting and Verweij2014). Rapid disappearance of DNA is expected in other gut infections that are limited to the lumen as well. It is postulated that, for example, remaining Schistosoma eggs in the gut wall could cause ‘leakage’ of parasitic DNA for longer periods.

AS MICROSCOPY COVERS ALL, WHAT WILL BE MISSED?

One of the most discussed tensions between microscopy and molecular diagnostics is the overall capacity of microscopy to detect ‘all’ parasites and the high target specificity of PCR, i.e. you'll find just the thing you are looking for and nothing more. The latter I cannot deny, however, in microscopy a whole range of species-specific additional staining, culture, and concentration techniques are used to achieve ample sensitivity and specificity (Table 2). In daily practice, these techniques will not be performed on all samples that are submitted for parasitology but choices will be made with an algorithm based on travel history (including adoption), eosinophilia, increased IgE level, urticaria, immune status, and so forth. While it is true that in rare cases microscopy can provide an accidental discovery of an unexpected parasite, it is also true that, whether we like it or not, microscopy expertise is waning. Moreover, in most clinical settings in industrialized countries the number of cases with intestinal parasites other than G. lamblia and Cryptosporidium will usually be very limited (Table 3). Therefore, the same algorithm used to decide whether or not to perform additional conventional techniques besides the general ova and cysts microscopy can be used in the decision to apply additional conventional or DNA-based techniques specific for the diagnostic question in a particular patient or patient group in addition to a multiplex PCR for the most common intestinal parasites.

Table 2.

Examples of different species-specific additional techniques

Table 3.

Helminth infections in a non-endemic setting

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

One of the most appealing benefits of molecular diagnostics is the possibility of automation providing a short sample-to-answer time with limited hands-on time. Furthermore, bacterial, viral and parasitic targets can be detected using one overall technique combined in setting-specific panels. Such an automated overall screening approach will result in a considerable cost reduction as compared with conventional methods (Fig. 1). Alternative semi- and fully automated high-throughput platforms allowing multiplexing of up to tens of different targets have been developed and will find their way into commercially available assays that are FDA and/or CE approved (Claas et al. Reference Claas, Burnham, Mazzulli, Templeton and Topin2013; Goldfarb et al. Reference Goldfarb, Dixon, Moldovan, Barrowman, Mattison, Zentner, Baikie, Bidawid, Chan and Slinger2013; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Gratz, Amour, Kibiki, Becker, Janaki, Verweij, Taniuchi, Sobuz, Haque, Haverstick and Houpt2013; Mengelle et al. Reference Mengelle, Mansuy, Prere, Grouteau, Claudet, Kamar, Huynh, Plat, Benard, Marty, Valentin, Berry and Izopet2013; Wessels et al. Reference Wessels, Rusman, van Bussel and Claas2013). Platforms that combine nucleic-acid isolation, amplification and detection of gastrointestinal pathogens e.g. Filmarray (Biofire diagnostics, USA) and BDMax (Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA) are in development phase. Although such assays might be appealing for smaller laboratories that are handling small numbers of samples, the cost effectiveness of these low throughput approaches compared with existing high throughput formats needs to determined.

Fig. 1.

Flowchart of automated nucleic acid isolation, PCR set-up, and PCR integrated through middle-ware with the laboratory information management system (LIMS). Published with permission by the American Society for Microbiology. Image created by Patrick Lane. Copyright 2014.

The use of broad-range 16S rDNA PCR has been established for identification of cultured bacterial isolates but is also increasingly used as a detection method for difficult or non-culturable bacteria in potential sterile clinical samples (Sontakke et al. Reference Sontakke, Cadenas, Maggi, Diniz and Breitschwerdt2009). An extended-range PCR including ITS1, ITS2 regions and 28S eukaryotic ribosomal subunit primers for the amplification of fungal and parasitic DNA followed by sequencing detected Taenia solium in brain biopsy tissue of two patients with solitary central nervous system lesions (Harrington et al. Reference Harrington, Creutzfeldt, Sengupta, Hoogestraat, Zunt and Cookson2009). Using the same approach, Cystoisopora belli was identified in ileal biopsy material from a patient with AIDS (Murphy et al. Reference Murphy, Hoogestraat, Sengupta, Prentice, Chakrapani and Cookson2011). This type of development makes it possible to take advantage of the high sensitivity of DNA amplification without knowing the specific target beforehand. Using traditional Sanger sequencing this approach could give confusing overlaid sequence profiles resultant in cases of mixed infections. However, the increasing user friendliness and accessibility of next-generation sequencing will also allow the use of such a broad-range approach in samples with multiple organisms.

Another interesting development is the application of blood-based real-time PCR for the diagnosis of (acute) schistosomiasis. In a European-wide multicentre study the sensitivity of PCR was 92% at initial presentation of patients with acute schistosomiasis, in contrast with serology and microscopy with a sensitivity of 70% and 24%, respectively (Wichmann et al. Reference Wichmann, Poppert, Von Thien, Clerinx, Dieckmann, Jensenius, Parola, Richter, Schunk, Stich, Zanger, Burchard and Tannich2013). Another successful example of a non-faecal PCR approach was shown in the diagnosis of human neurocysticercosis in which T. solium-specific PCR performed on DNA isolated from cerebrospinal fluid showed a sensitivity of 95·9% compared with a sensitivity of 53·7%, 81% and 90·1% using Antigen-ELISA, Antibody-immunoblot and Ab-ELISA respectively (Michelet et al. Reference Michelet, Fleury, Sciutto, Kendjo, Fragoso, Paris and Bouteille2011).

While this paper focuses more on the application of molecular diagnostics in the clinical laboratory in industrialized countries, it is worth mentioning that this kind of equipment is available in an increasing number of research facilities in low- and moderate-income countries. Multiplex DNA-based techniques can and are being used in epidemiological studies and for the monitoring of integrated control programmes (Basuni et al. Reference Basuni, Mohamed, Ahmad, Zakaria and Noordin2012; Arndt et al. Reference Arndt, John-Stewart, Richardson, Singa, van Lieshout, Verweij, Sangare, Mbogo, Naulikha and Walson2013; Wiria et al. Reference Wiria, Hamid, Wammes, Kaisar, May, Prasetyani, Wahyuni, Djuardi, Ariawan, Wibowo, Lell, Sauerwein, Brice, Sutanto, van Lieshout, de Craen, van Ree, Verweij, Tsonaka, Houwing-Duistermaat, Luty, Sartono, Supali and Yazdanbakhsh2013a, Reference Wiria, Wammes, Hamid, Dekkers, Prasetyani, May, Kaisar, Verweij, Tamsma, Partono, Sartono, Supali, Yazdanbakhsh and Smitb).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of bacterial, viral and parasitic targets makes molecular diagnostics an achievable and cost-effective approach in a clinical diagnostic laboratory. DNA-based methods provide highly sensitive and specific detection of intestinal parasitic infections. The use of additional (molecular) diagnostics is driven through an algorithm based on individual or population patient characteristics. Quality assessment schemes are essential to assure a high diagnostic accuracy among the variety of protocols used in different laboratories. Such schemes for the molecular diagnosis of a range of diarrhoea-causing pathogens have been started (http://www.qcmd.org and http://www.skml.nl) and will be expanded in future. Alternative platforms with assays for simultaneous detection of multiple targets within one sample have been developed and are in the process of commercialization. The application of broad-range PCRs in combination with sequencing or next-generation sequencing offer an interesting non-target specific approach. Non-faecal PCRs, for example on cerebral spinal fluid and serum have shown high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cysticercosis and schistosomiasis respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks to the BSP for the invitation to write this paper and thanks to Professor Russell Stothard and Dr Leslie Chappell for editorial suggestions that greatly improved this manuscript.

References

REFERENCES

Amin, O. M. (2002). Seasonal prevalence of intestinal parasites in the United States during 2000. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 66, 799–803.Google Scholar
Arndt, M. B., John-Stewart, G., Richardson, B. A., Singa, B., van Lieshout, L., Verweij, J. J., Sangare, L. R., Mbogo, L. W., Naulikha, J. M. and Walson, J. L. (2013). Impact of helminth diagnostic test performance on estimation of risk factors and outcomes in HIV-positive adults. PloS One 8, e81915.Google Scholar
Aryeetey, Y. A., Essien-Baidoo, S., Larbi, I. A., Ahmed, K., Amoah, A. S., Obeng, B. B., van Lieshout, L., Yazdanbakhsh, M., Boakye, D. A. and Verweij, J. J. (2013). Molecular diagnosis of Schistosoma infections in urine samples of school children in Ghana. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 88, 1028–1031.Google Scholar
Banik, G. R., Barratt, J. L., Marriott, D., Harkness, J., Ellis, J. T. and Stark, D. (2011). A case-controlled study of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in children. Parasitology 138, 819–823.Google Scholar
Basuni, M., Muhi, J., Othman, N., Verweij, J. J., Ahmad, M., Miswan, N., Rahumatullah, A., Aziz, F. A., Zainudin, N. S. and Noordin, R. (2011). A pentaplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of four species of soil-transmitted helminths. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 84, 338–343.Google Scholar
Basuni, M., Mohamed, Z., Ahmad, M., Zakaria, N. Z. and Noordin, R. (2012). Detection of selected intestinal helminths and protozoa at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia using multiplex real-time PCR. Tropical Biomedicine 29, 434–442.Google Scholar
Blans, M. C., Ridwan, B. U., Verweij, J. J., Rozenberg-Arska, M. and Verhoef, J. (2005). Cyclosporiasis outbreak, Indonesia. Emerging Infectious Diseases 11, 1453–1455.Google Scholar
Blessmann, J., Ali, I. K., Nu, P. A., Dinh, B. T., Viet, T. Q., Van, A. L., Clark, C. G. and Tannich, E. (2003). Longitudinal study of intestinal Entamoeba histolytica infections in asymptomatic adult carriers. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41, 4745–4750.Google Scholar
Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet, L. E., Wallinga, J. A., Ruijs, G. J., Bruins, M. J. and Verweij, J. J. (2009). Parasitological diagnosis combining an internally controlled real-time PCR assay for the detection of four protozoa in stool samples with a testing algorithm for microscopy. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 15, 869–874.Google Scholar
Cai, X. Q., Yu, H. Q., Bai, J. S., Tang, J. D., Hu, X. C., Chen, D. H., Zhang, R. L., Chen, M. X., Ai, L. and Zhu, X. Q. (2012). Development of a TaqMan based real-time PCR assay for detection of Clonorchis sinensis DNA in human stool samples and fishes. Parasitology International 61, 183–186.Google Scholar
Calderaro, A., Gorrini, C., Bommezzadri, S., Piccolo, G., Dettori, G. and Chezzi, C. (2006). Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar: comparison of two PCR assays for diagnosis in a non-endemic setting. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 100, 450–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderaro, A., Gorrini, C., Montecchini, S., Peruzzi, S., Piccolo, G., Rossi, S., Gargiulo, F., Manca, N., Dettori, G. and Chezzi, C. (2010 a). Evaluation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the laboratory diagnosis of giardiasis. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 66, 261–267.Google Scholar
Calderaro, A., Gorrini, C., Montecchini, S., Peruzzi, S., Piccolo, G., Rossi, S., Gargiulo, F., Manca, N., Dettori, G. and Chezzi, C. (2010 b). Evaluation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 67, 239–245.Google Scholar
Claas, E. C. J., Burnham, C. A., Mazzulli, T., Templeton, K. and Topin, F. (2013). Performance of the xTAG® gastrointestinal pathogen panel, a multiplex molecular assay for simultaneous detection of bacterial, viral, and parasitic causes of infectious gastroenteritis. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 23, 1041–1045.Google Scholar
Clerinx, J., Bottieau, E., Wichmann, D., Tannich, E. and Van Esbroeck, M. (2011). Acute schistosomiasis in a cluster of travelers from Rwanda: diagnostic contribution of schistosome DNA detection in serum compared to parasitology and serology. Journal of Travel Medicine 18, 367–372.Google Scholar
Cnops, L. and van Esbroeck, M. (2010). Freezing of stool samples improves real-time PCR detection of Entamoeba dispar and Entamoeba histolytica. Journal of Microbiological Methods 80, 310–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cnops, L., Tannich, E., Polman, K., Clerinx, J. and Van Esbroeck, M. (2012). Schistosoma real-time PCR as diagnostic tool for international travellers and migrants. Tropical Medicine and International Health 17, 1208–1216.Google Scholar
de Boer, R. F., Ott, A., Kesztyüs, B. and Kooistra-Smid, A. M. (2010). Improved detection of five major gastrointestinal pathogens by use of a molecular screening approach. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 48, 4140–4146.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. S. and Clark, C. G. (1993). A redescription of Entamoeba histolytica Schaudinn, 1903 (Emended Walker, 1911) separating it from Entamoeba dispar Brumpt, 1925. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 40, 340–344.Google Scholar
Downs, J. A., Kabangila, R., Verweij, J. J., Jaka, H., Peck, R. N., Kalluvya, S. E., Changalucha, J. M., Johnson, W. D., van Lieshout, L. and Fitzgerald, D. W. (2013). Detectable urogenital schistosome DNA and cervical abnormalities 6 months after single-dose praziquantel in women with Schistosoma haematobium infection. Tropical Medicine and International Health 18, 1090–1096.Google Scholar
Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Buckwalter, S. P., Jones, M. F., Vetter, E. A., Yao, J. D., Wengenack, N. L., Cockerill, F. R. and Smith, T. F. (2006). Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 19, 165–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franzen, C. and Müller, A. (1999). Molecular techniques for detection, species differentiation, and phylogenetic analysis of microsporidia. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 12, 243–285.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, D. M., Dixon, B., Moldovan, I., Barrowman, N., Mattison, K., Zentner, C., Baikie, M., Bidawid, S., Chan, F. and Slinger, R. (2013). Nanolitre real-time PCR detection of bacterial, parasitic, and viral agents from patients with diarrhoea in Nunavut, Canada. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 72, 19903.Google Scholar
Gomes, A. L., Melo, F. L., Werkhauser, R. P. and Abath, F. G. (2006). Development of a real time polymerase chain reaction for quantitation of Schistosoma mansoni DNA. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 101 (Suppl. 1), 133–136.Google Scholar
Hadfield, S. J., Robinson, G., Elwin, K. and Chalmers, R. M. (2011). Detection and differentiation of Cryptosporidium spp. in human clinical samples by use of real-time PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 918–924.Google Scholar
Hamid, F., Wiria, A. E., Wammes, L. J., Kaisar, M. M., Lell, B., Ariawan, I., Uh, H. W., Wibowo, H., Djuardi, Y., Wahyuni, S., Schot, R., Verweij, J. J., van Ree, R., May, L., Sartono, E., Yazdanbakhsh, M. and Supali, T. (2011). A longitudinal study of allergy and intestinal helminth infections in semi urban and rural areas of Flores, Indonesia (ImmunoSPIN Study). BMC Infectious Diseases 11, 83-2334-11-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamzah, Z., Petmitr, S., Mungthin, M., Leelayoova, S. and Chavalitshewinkoon-Petmitr, P. (2010). Development of multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii in clinical specimens. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 83, 909–913.Google Scholar
Harrington, A. T., Creutzfeldt, C. J., Sengupta, D. J., Hoogestraat, D. R., Zunt, J. R. and Cookson, B. T. (2009). Diagnosis of neurocysticercosis by detection of Taenia solium DNA using a global DNA screening platform. Clinical Infectious Diseases 48, 86–90.Google Scholar
Hartmeyer, G. N., Hogh, S. V., Chen, M., Holt, H., Skov, M. N. and Kemp, M. (2013). Need for species-specific detection for the diagnosis of amoebiasis in a non-endemic setting. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 45, 868–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, J. D., Varma, M., Bobst, A. M., Ware, M. W., Lindquist, H. D. and Schaefer, F. W. (2002). Species-specific detection of three human-pathogenic microsporidial species from the genus Encephalitozoon via fluorogenic 5′ nuclease PCR assays. Molecular and Cellular Probes 16, 435–444.Google Scholar
Hussein, E. M., El-Moamly, A., Dawoud, H. A., Fahmy, H., El-Shal, H. and Sabek, N. A. (2007). Real-time PCR and flow cytometry in detection of Cyclospora oocysts in fecal samples of symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 37, 151–170.Google Scholar
Intapan, P. M., Thanchomnang, T., Lulitanond, V., Pongsaskulchoti, P. and Maleewong, W. (2009). Rapid molecular detection of Opisthorchis viverrini in human fecal samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 81, 917–920.Google Scholar
Jones, M. S., Ganac, R. D., Hiser, G., Hudson, N. R., Le, A. and Whipps, C. M. (2008). Detection of Blastocystis from stool samples using real-time PCR. Parasitology Research 103, 551–557.Google Scholar
Jonker, F. A., Calis, J. C., Phiri, K., Brienen, E. A., Khoffi, H., Brabin, B. J., Verweij, J. J., van Hensbroek, M. B. and van Lieshout, L. (2012). Real-time PCR demonstrates Ancylostoma duodenale is a key factor in the etiology of severe anemia and iron deficiency in Malawian pre-school children. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1555.Google Scholar
Kebede, A., Verweij, J. J., Endeshaw, T., Messele, T., Tasew, G., Petros, B. and Polderman, A. M. (2004 a). The use of real-time PCR to identify Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar infections in prisoners and primary-school children in Ethiopia. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 98, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kebede, A., Verweij, J. J., Petros, B. and Polderman, A. M. (2004 b). Short communication: misleading microscopy in amoebiasis. Tropical Medicine and International Health: TM and IH 9, 651–652.Google Scholar
Kim, E. M., Verweij, J. J., Jalili, A., van Lieshout, L., Choi, M. H., Bae, Y. M., Lim, M. K. and Hong, S. T. (2009). Detection of Clonorchis sinensis in stool samples using real-time PCR. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 103, 513–518.Google Scholar
Kjetland, E. F., Hove, R. J., Gomo, E., Midzi, N., Gwanzura, L., Mason, P., Friis, H., Verweij, J. J., Gundersen, S. G., Ndhlovu, P. D., Mduluza, T. and Van Lieshout, L. (2009). Schistosomiasis PCR in vaginal lavage as an indicator of genital Schistosoma haematobium infection in rural Zimbabwean women. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 81, 1050–1055.Google Scholar
Klein, D. (2002). Quantification using real-time PCR technology: applications and limitations. Trends in Molecular Medicine 8, 257–260.Google Scholar
Kramme, S., Nissen, N., Soblik, H., Erttmann, K., Tannich, E., Fleischer, B., Panning, M. and Brattig, N. (2011). Novel real-time PCR for the universal detection of Strongyloides species. Journal of Medical Microbiology 60, 454–458.Google Scholar
Lalonde, L. F. and Gajadhar, A. A. (2011). Detection and differentiation of coccidian oocysts by real-time PCR and melting curve analysis. Journal of Parasitology 97, 725–730.Google Scholar
Lanternier, F., Boutboul, D., Menotti, J., Chandesris, M. O., Sarfati, C., Mamzer Bruneel, M. F., Calmus, Y., Mechaï, F., Viard, J. P., Lecuit, M., Bougnoux, M. E. and Lortholary, O. (2009). Microsporidiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: two Enterocytozoon bieneusi cases and review. Transplant Infectious Disease 11, 83–88.Google Scholar
Lau, Y. L., Anthony, C., Fakhrurrazi, S. A., Ibrahim, J., Ithoi, I. and Mahmud, R. (2013). Real-time PCR assay in differentiating Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii infections in Orang Asli settlements in Malaysia. Parasites and Vectors 6, 250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, S. Y., Hsia, K. T., Chan, Y. H., Fan, C. K., Jiang, D. D., Landt, O. and Ji, D. D. (2010). Evaluation of a new single-tube multiprobe real-time PCR for diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar. Journal of Parasitology 96, 793–797.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Gratz, J., Amour, C., Kibiki, G., Becker, S., Janaki, L., Verweij, J. J., Taniuchi, M., Sobuz, S. U., Haque, R., Haverstick, D. M. and Houpt, E. R. (2013). A laboratory-developed TaqMan array card for simultaneous detection of 19 enteropathogens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 51, 472–480.Google Scholar
Masucci, L., Graffeo, R., Bani, S., Bugli, F., Boccia, S., Nicolotti, N., Fiori, B., Fadda, G. and Spanu, T. (2011). Intestinal parasites isolated in a large teaching hospital, Italy, 1 May 2006 to 31 December 2008. Eurosurveillance 16 (24), Art. 5.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, G. N., Anderson, T. P., Stevens, M., Adams, J., Coleman, R., Mahagamasekera, P., Young, S., Henderson, T., Hofmann, M., Jennings, L. C. and Murdoch, D. R. (2013). Systematic application of multiplex PCR enhances the detection of bacteria, parasites, and viruses in stool samples. Journal of Infection 67, 122–129.Google Scholar
Mejia, R., Vicuna, Y., Broncano, N., Sandoval, C., Vaca, M., Chico, M., Cooper, P. J. and Nutman, T. B. (2013). A novel, multi-parallel, real-time polymerase chain reaction approach for eight gastrointestinal parasites provides improved diagnostic capabilities to resource-limited at-risk populations. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 88, 1041–1047.Google Scholar
Mengelle, C., Mansuy, J. M., Prere, M. F., Grouteau, E., Claudet, I., Kamar, N., Huynh, A., Plat, G., Benard, M., Marty, N., Valentin, A., Berry, A. and Izopet, J. (2013). Simultaneous detection of gastrointestinal pathogens with a multiplex Luminex-based molecular assay in stool samples from diarrhoeic patients. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 19, E458–E465.Google Scholar
Menotti, J., Cassinat, B., Porcher, R., Sarfati, C., Derouin, F. and Molina, J. M. (2003 a). Development of a real-time polymerase-chain-reaction assay for quantitative detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi DNA in stool specimens from immunocompromised patients with intestinal microsporidiosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 187, 1469–1474.Google Scholar
Menotti, J., Cassinat, B., Sarfati, C., Liguory, O., Derouin, F. and Molina, J. M. (2003 b). Development of a real-time PCR assay for quantitative detection of Encephalitozoon intestinalis DNA. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41, 1410–1413.Google Scholar
Michelet, L., Fleury, A., Sciutto, E., Kendjo, E., Fragoso, G., Paris, L. and Bouteille, B. (2011). Human neurocysticercosis: comparison of different diagnostic tests using cerebrospinal fluid. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 195–200.Google Scholar
Murphy, S. C., Hoogestraat, D. R., Sengupta, D. J., Prentice, J., Chakrapani, A. and Cookson, B. T. (2011). Molecular diagnosis of cystoisosporiasis using extended-range PCR screening. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 13, 359–362.Google Scholar
Nazeer, J. T., El, S. K., von Thien, H., El-Sibaei, M., Abdel-Hamid, M., Tawfik, R. A. and Tannich, E. (2013). Use of multiplex real-time PCR for detection of common diarrhea causing protozoan parasites in Egypt. Parasitology Research 112, 595–601.Google Scholar
Obeng, B. B., Aryeetey, Y. A., de Dood, C. J., Amoah, A. S., Larbi, I. A., Deelder, A. M., Yazdanbakhsh, M., Hartgers, F. C., Boakye, D. A., Verweij, J. J., van Dam, G. J. and van Lieshout, L. (2008). Application of a circulating-cathodic-antigen (CCA) strip test and real-time PCR, in comparison with microscopy, for the detection of Schistosoma haematobium in urine samples from Ghana. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 102, 625–633.Google Scholar
Othman, N., Mohamed, Z., Verweij, J. J., Huat, L. B., Olivos-Garcia, A., Yeng, C. and Noordin, R. (2010). Application of real-time polymerase chain reaction in detection of Entamoeba histolytica in pus aspirates of liver abscess patients. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 7, 637–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pecson, B. M., Barrios, J. A., Johnson, D. R. and Nelson, K. L. (2006). A real-time PCR method for quantifying viable Ascaris eggs using the first internally transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72, 7864–7872.Google Scholar
Poirier, P., Wawrzyniak, I., Albert, A., El Alaoui, H., Delbac, F. and Livrelli, V. (2011). Development and evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of Blastocystis parasites in human stool samples: prospective study of patients with hematological malignancies. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 975–983.Google Scholar
Polley, S. D., Boadi, S., Watson, J., Curry, A. and Chiodini, P. L. (2011). Detection and species identification of microsporidial infections using SYBR green real-time PCR. Journal of Medical Microbiology 60, 459–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Praet, N., Verweij, J. J., Mwape, K. E., Phiri, I. K., Muma, J. B., Zulu, G., van Lieshout, L., Rodriguez-Hidalgo, R., Benitez-Ortiz, W., Dorny, P. and Gabriël, S. (2013). Bayesian modelling to estimate the test characteristics of coprology, coproantigen ELISA and a novel real-time PCR for the diagnosis of taeniasis. Tropical Medicine and International Health 18, 608–614.Google Scholar
Qvarnstrom, Y., James, C., Xayavong, M., Holloway, B. P., Visvesvara, G. S., Sriram, R. and da Silva, A. (2005). Comparison of real-time PCR protocols for differential laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 43, 5491–5497.Google Scholar
Sanpool, O., Intapan, P. M., Thanchomnang, T., Janwan, P., Lulitanond, V., Doanh, P. N., Van Hien, H., Dung do, T., Maleewong, W. and Nawa, Y. (2012). Rapid detection and differentiation of Clonorchis sinensis and Opisthorchis viverrini eggs in human fecal samples using a duplex real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer PCR and melting curve analysis. Parasitology Research 111, 89–96.Google Scholar
Schar, F., Odermatt, P., Khieu, V., Panning, M., Duong, S., Muth, S., Marti, H. and Kramme, S. (2013). Evaluation of real-time PCR for Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm as diagnostic tool in asymptomatic schoolchildren in Cambodia. Acta Tropica 126, 89–92.Google Scholar
Shields, J. M., Joo, J., Kim, R. and Murphy, H. R. (2013). Assessment of three commercial DNA extraction kits and a laboratory-developed method for detecting Cryptosporidium and Cyclospora in raspberry wash, basil wash and pesto. Journal of Microbiological Methods 92, 51–58.Google Scholar
Sontakke, S., Cadenas, M. B., Maggi, R. G., Diniz, P. P. and Breitschwerdt, E. B. (2009). Use of broad range16S rDNA PCR in clinical microbiology. Journal of Microbiological Methods 76, 217–225.Google Scholar
Standley, C. J., Mugisha, L., Verweij, J. J., Adriko, M., Arinaitwe, M., Rowell, C., Atuhaire, A., Betson, M., Hobbs, E., van Tulleken, C. R., Kane, R. A., van Lieshout, L., Ajarova, L., Kabatereine, N. B. and Stothard, J. R. (2011). Confirmed infection with intestinal schistosomiasis in semi-captive wild-born chimpanzees on Ngamba Island, Uganda. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) 11, 169–176.Google Scholar
Stark, D., Beebe, N., Marriott, D., Ellis, J. and Harkness, J. (2006). Evaluation of three diagnostic methods, including real-time PCR, for detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 44, 232–235.Google Scholar
Stark, D., Phillips, O., Peckett, D., Munro, U., Marriott, D., Harkness, J. and Ellis, J. (2008). Gorillas are a host for Dientamoeba fragilis: an update on the life cycle and host distribution. Veterinary Parasitology 151, 21–26.Google Scholar
Stark, D., Barratt, J., Roberts, T., Marriott, D., Harkness, J. and Ellis, J. (2010). Comparison of microscopy, two xenic culture techniques, conventional and real-time PCR for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in clinical stool samples. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 29, 411–416.Google Scholar
Stark, D., Al-Qassab, S., Barratt, J. L., Stanley, K., Roberts, T., Marriott, D., Harkness, J. and Ellis, J. T. (2011). Evaluation of multiplex tandem real-time PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in clinical stool samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 257–262.Google Scholar
Stensvold, C. R. and Nielsen, H. V. (2012). Comparison of microscopy and PCR for detection of intestinal parasites in Danish patients supports an incentive for molecular screening platforms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 50, 540–541.Google Scholar
Stensvold, C. R., Lebbad, M. and Verweij, J. J. (2011 a). The impact of genetic diversity in protozoa on molecular diagnostics. Trends in Parasitology 27, 53–58.Google Scholar
Stensvold, C. R., Nielsen, S. D., Badsberg, J. H., Engberg, J., Friis-Møller, N., Nielsen, S. S., Nielsen, H. V. and Friis-Møller, A. (2011 b). The prevalence and clinical significance of intestinal parasites in HIV-infected patients in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 43, 129–135.Google Scholar
Stensvold, C. R., Ahmed, U. N., Andersen, L. O. and Nielsen, H. V. (2012). Development and evaluation of a genus-specific, probe-based, internal process controlled real-time PCR assay for sensitive and specific detection of Blastocystis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 50, 1847–1851.Google Scholar
Stroup, S., Tongjai, S., Swai, N., Maro, A., Kibiki, G. and Houpt, E. R. (2012). Dual probe DNA capture for sensitive real-time PCR detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Molecular and Cellular Probes 26, 104–106.Google Scholar
Suksumek, N., Leelawat, K., Leelawat, S., Russell, B. and Lek-Uthai, U. (2008). TaqMan real-time PCR assay for specific detection of Opisthorchis viverrini DNA in Thai patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Experimental Parasitology 119, 217–224.Google Scholar
Sultana, Y., Jeoffreys, N., Watts, M. R., Gilbert, G. L. and Lee, R. (2013). Real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in stool. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 88, 1048–1051.Google Scholar
Tantrawatpan, C., Intapan, P. M., Thanchomnang, T., Sanpool, O., Janwan, P., Lulitanond, V., Anamnart, W. and Maleewong, W. (2013). Application of a real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer polymerase chain reaction assay with melting curve analysis for the detection of Paragonimus heterotremus eggs in the feces of experimentally infected cats. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 25, 620–626.Google Scholar
ten Hove, R., Schuurman, T., Kooistra, M., Moller, L., van Lieshout, L. and Verweij, J. J. (2007). Detection of diarrhoea-causing protozoa in general practice patients in the Netherlands by multiplex real-time PCR. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 13, 1001–1007.Google Scholar
ten Hove, R. J., Verweij, J. J., Vereecken, K., Polman, K., Dieye, L. and van Lieshout, L. (2008). Multiplex real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium infection in stool samples collected in northern Senegal. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 102, 179–185.Google Scholar
ten Hove, R. J., van Esbroeck, M., Vervoort, T., van den Ende, J., van Lieshout, L. and Verweij, J. J. (2009). Molecular diagnostics of intestinal parasites in returning travellers. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 28, 1045–1053.Google Scholar
van den Bijllaardt, W., Overdevest, I. T., Buiting, A. G. and Verweij, J. J. (2014). Rapid clearance of Giardia lamblia DNA from the gut after successful treatment. Clinical Microbiology and Infection (in press). doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12626.Google Scholar
van Mens, S. P., Aryeetey, Y., Yazdanbakhsh, M., van Lieshout, L., Boakye, D. and Verweij, J. J. (2013). Comparison of real-time PCR and Kato smear microscopy for the detection of hookworm infections in three consecutive faecal samples from schoolchildren in Ghana. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 107, 269–271.Google Scholar
Varma, M., Hester, J. D., Schaefer, F. W., Ware, M. W. and Lindquist, H. D. (2003). Detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis using a quantitative real-time PCR assay. Journal of Microbiological Methods 53, 27–36.Google Scholar
Verweij, J. J., Laeijendecker, D., Brienen, E. A., van Lieshout, L. and Polderman, A. M. (2003 a). Detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in travellers returning from the tropics and subtropics using microscopy and real-time PCR. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 293, 199–202.Google Scholar
Verweij, J. J., Oostvogel, F., Brienen, E. A., Nang-Beifubah, A., Ziem, J. and Polderman, A. M. (2003 b). Prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in northern Ghana. Tropical Medicine and International Health 8, 1153–1156.Google Scholar
Verweij, J. J., Schinkel, J., Laeijendecker, D., van Rooyen, M. A., van Lieshout, L. and Polderman, A. M. (2003 c). Real-time PCR for the detection of Giardia lamblia. Molecular and Cellular Probes 17, 223–225.Google Scholar
Verweij, J. J., Blange, R. A., Templeton, K., Schinkel, J., Brienen, E. A., van Rooyen, M. A., van Lieshout, L. and Polderman, A. M. (2004). Simultaneous detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia, and Cryptosporidium parvum in fecal samples by using multiplex real-time PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 1220–1223.Google Scholar
Verweij, J. J., Brienen, E. A., Ziem, J., Yelifari, L., Polderman, A. M. and Van Lieshout, L. (2007 a). Simultaneous detection and quantification of Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus, and Oesophagostomum bifurcum in fecal samples using multiplex real-time PCR. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 77, 685–690.Google Scholar
Verweij, J. J., Mulder, B., Poell, B., van Middelkoop, D., Brienen, E. A. T. and van Lieshout, L. (2007 b). Real-time PCR for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in fecal samples. Molecular and Cellular Probes 21, 400–404.Google Scholar
Visser, L. G., Verweij, J. J., Van Esbroeck, M., Edeling, W. M., Clerinx, J. and Polderman, A. M. (2006). Diagnostic methods for differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in carriers: performance and clinical implications in a non-endemic setting. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 296, 397–403.Google Scholar
Wessels, E., Rusman, L. G., van Bussel, M. J. A. W. M. and Claas, E. C. J. (2013). Added value of multiplex Luminex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (xTAG®GPP) testing in the diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20, 182–187.Google Scholar
Wichmann, D., Panning, M., Quack, T., Kramme, S., Burchard, G. D., Grevelding, C. and Drosten, C. (2009). Diagnosing schistosomiasis by detection of cell-free parasite DNA in human plasma. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3, e422.Google Scholar
Wichmann, D., Poppert, S., Von Thien, H., Clerinx, J., Dieckmann, S., Jensenius, M., Parola, P., Richter, J., Schunk, M., Stich, A., Zanger, P., Burchard, G. D. and Tannich, E. (2013). Prospective European-wide multicentre study on a blood based real-time PCR for the diagnosis of acute schistosomiasis. BMC Infectious Diseases 13, 55-2334-13-55.Google Scholar
Wiria, A. E., Prasetyani, M. A., Hamid, F., Wammes, L. J., Lell, B., Ariawan, I., Uh, H. W., Wibowo, H., Djuardi, Y., Wahyuni, S., Sutanto, I., May, L., Luty, A. J., Verweij, J. J., Sartono, E., Yazdanbakhsh, M. and Supali, T. (2010). Does treatment of intestinal helminth infections influence malaria? Background and methodology of a longitudinal study of clinical, parasitological and immunological parameters in Nangapanda, Flores, Indonesia (ImmunoSPIN Study). BMC Infectious Diseases 10, 77-2334-10-77.Google Scholar
Wiria, A. E., Hamid, F., Wammes, L. J., Kaisar, M. M., May, L., Prasetyani, M. A., Wahyuni, S., Djuardi, Y., Ariawan, I., Wibowo, H., Lell, B., Sauerwein, R., Brice, G. T., Sutanto, I., van Lieshout, L., de Craen, A. J., van Ree, R., Verweij, J. J., Tsonaka, R., Houwing-Duistermaat, J. J., Luty, A. J., Sartono, E., Supali, T. and Yazdanbakhsh, M. (2013 a). The effect of three-monthly albendazole treatment on malarial parasitemia and allergy: a household-based cluster-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PloS One 8, e57899.Google Scholar
Wiria, A. E., Wammes, L. J., Hamid, F., Dekkers, O. M., Prasetyani, M. A., May, L., Kaisar, M. M., Verweij, J. J., Tamsma, J. T., Partono, F., Sartono, E., Supali, T., Yazdanbakhsh, M. and Smit, J. W. (2013 b). Relationship between carotid intima media thickness and helminth infections on Flores Island, Indonesia. PloS One 8, e54855.Google Scholar
Wolk, D. M., Schneider, S. K., Wengenack, N. L., Sloan, L. M. and Rosenblatt, J. E. (2002). Real-time PCR method for detection of Encephalitozoon intestinalis from stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40, 3922–3928.Google Scholar
Yera, H., Dupont, D., Houze, S., Ben M'rad, M., Pilleux, F., Sulahian, A., Gatey, C., Gay Andrieu, F. and Dupouy-Camet, J. (2011). Confirmation and follow-up of neurocysticercosis by real-time PCR in cerebrospinal fluid samples of patients living in France. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 4338–4340.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Examples of real-time PCRs for the detection of intestinal parasitic infections

Figure 1

Table 2. Examples of different species-specific additional techniques

Figure 2

Table 3. Helminth infections in a non-endemic setting

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Flowchart of automated nucleic acid isolation, PCR set-up, and PCR integrated through middle-ware with the laboratory information management system (LIMS). Published with permission by the American Society for Microbiology. Image created by Patrick Lane. Copyright 2014.