Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T10:03:44.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Visual recovery of desert pavement surfaces following impacts from vehicle and foot traffic in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2013

Tanya A. O'Neill*
Affiliation:
Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Megan R. Balks
Affiliation:
Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Jerónimo López-Martínez
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sites of past human activity were investigated to assess the visual recovery of the desert pavement following impacts from human trampling and vehicle traffic. Visually disturbed and nearby control sites were assessed using comparative photographic records, a field-based Visual Site Assessment, and Desert Pavement Recovery Assessment. Sites included: vehicle and walking tracks at Marble Point and Taylor Valley; a campsite, experimental treading trial site, and vehicle tracks in Wright Valley; and vehicle and walking tracks at Cape Roberts. The time since last disturbance ranged from three months to over 50 years. This investigation also attempted to determine what has the greatest lasting visual impact on soil surfaces in the Ross Sea region: dispersed trafficking or track formation? Walking tracks remained visible in the landscape (due to larger clasts concentrating along track margins) long after the desert pavement surface had recovered. However, randomly dispersed footprints were undetectable within five years. For many sites, allowing widespread trampling will give lower medium-term visible impact than concentrating traffic flow by track formation. For steep slopes and sites where repeated visits occur, use of a single track is recommended. Some 1950s vehicle tracks remain visible in the Antarctic landscape, but where visually obvious impacts were remediated, evidence of former occupation was almost undetectable.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 General location of the 12 Ross Sea region study sites. Note: there are two study sites at the Loop moraine, two sites at the Vanda experimental treading trial, three sites at Marble Point, and two sites at Cape Roberts.

Figure 1

Table I Site characteristics of the 12 Ross Sea region study sites.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Taylor Valley Visitor Zone and Loop moraine sites. a. Taylor Valley Visitor Zone, walking track from the helicopter landing site to the hilltop lookout, 2006/07 season, after 96 tourist visitors. Picture: Jana Newman. b. Walking track from the helicopter landing site to the hilltop lookout, December 2009, before first tourist group of the season. c. Loop moraine 2004/05 walking track to toilet, track margin visible (white arrows), after five years recovery, December 2009. d. Recovery of the desert pavement on the track surface, after five years. e. Loop moraine tent site, December 2004. Picture: Fiona Shanhun. f. Loop moraine tent site, five years later, December 2009.

Figure 3

Table II Impact assessment criteria scoring system used for Visual Site Assessment (modified from Campbell et al. (1993), and Kiernan & McConnell (2001)).

Figure 4

Table III Desert Pavement Recovery Assessment criteria ratings (O'Neill et al. 2012).

Figure 5

Table IV Visual Site Assessment results for the 12 study sites, Ross Sea region, Antarctica.

Figure 6

Table V Desert Pavement Recovery Assessment results for the 12 study sites, Ross Sea region, Antarctica. Note: mean recovery index (MRI) is based on the percentage recovery of each criterion, relative to the equivalent control surface.

Figure 7

Fig. 3 Vanda experimental treading trial and former Vanda station sites. a. “Vanda Rocky” site, 192 passes, December 1993. b. “Vanda Rocky” site, after 17 years of recovery, December 2009. Note the “out of place” stones that were used to secure the measuring tape in December 1993. c. “Vanda Fan” site, immediately after 200 passes, December 1993. d. “Vanda Fan” site, after 17 years of recovery, December 2009. e. Vanda station, January 1992, immediately prior to removal. f. Site of the former Vanda station mess hut, December 2009. The three people are marking the corners of the former buildings.

Figure 8

Fig. 4 Visual Site Assessment of Cape Roberts Project (CRP) “Northern Plot” monitoring site, pre-CRP (1992/93, after Campbell & Keys 1993), during CRP (1996/97 and 1998/99, after Waterhouse 2001), after remediation (2000/01, after Cowie 2001), and ten years after remediation (January 2010). Note: January 2010 control scores are not shown, however, each impact assessment criteria scored a one.

Figure 9

Fig. 5 Visual Site Assessment of Cape Roberts Project (CRP) “Southern Plot” monitoring site, pre-CRP (1992/93, after Campbell & Keys 1993), during CRP (1996/97 and 1998/99, after Waterhouse 2001), after remediation (2000/01, after Cowie 2001), and ten years after remediation (January 2010). Note: January 2010 control scores are not shown, however, each impact assessment criteria scored a one.