Introduction
Sports history has been marginalized in the historical sciences for a long time. It used to be the domain of sport scientists interested in the historical development of certain sports and their institutions. But over the last 20 years, and even earlier in Britain, sports history established itself as a serious field of historical research. The turn towards culture in modern historiography with its interest in popular culture and the everyday activities of the historical subject made the field more obviously relevant from the early 1990s onwards. Even though the field was often derided, sport historians have contributed to prestigious historical journals and published widely renowned books.
A recent culmination of this success story can be seen in the publication of the Routledge Companion of Sports History by the American sport historians John Nauright and S.W. Pope, which canonizes the achievements of international sports history. The bibliographical overview is restricted to Anglophone literature, while sophisticated research is acknowledged in Great Britain, Germany and the Nordic countries, as well as in North America. Even though the case studies include ‘Central and Eastern Europe’ as well as ‘Russia/the Soviet Union’, the approach to international sports is clearly framed by a western perspective.Reference Pope and Naurigh1 The roots of modern sports in the highly industrialized and developed United Kingdom and its diffusion by modern educated elites, migrants of modern societies, encourage this westernized approach to sports history and the neglect of non-standard cases of sports development such as the diverse histories of sports in Eastern Europe.Reference Malz, Rohdewald and Wiederkehr2
This one-sided approach is due to various reasons. Since sports history was pioneered by the historians of Great Britain and Western Europe, the source languages for Eastern European sports history were a significant obstacle to comparative research. Moreover, researchers in the comparatively small field of Eastern European history neglected sports history for a longer period than their Western colleagues. This is especially true of historians in Eastern European countries themselves. There, sports history is still very often dominated by sport scientists, who are interested in the development of sports or athletic achievements per se rather than in related social and cultural implications. Mainly, historians do not engage in this supposedly ‘light’ and ‘trivial’ field. Instead of fruitful cooperation between the two disciplines, there is a certain reservation that hinders research, leaving blank spots on the intellectual map of European sports history.
Furthermore, recent research has proven that the development and diffusion of modern sport in Eastern Europe contradicts many paradigms of European sports history. Thus, it disturbs established paradigms but at the same time serves to illuminate sports historiography in new ways.3
Focusing primarily on Poland, this paper will outline three characteristics peculiar to the region, which every critically informed European sports history will now need to take into account. Building on these three characteristics, we want to encourage alternative ways of reading sports history.
(1) Transnationality: East Central Europe constitutes a crossroads of transnational sport regions and thus offers original perspectives on the diffusion, transfer and acquirement of sport and sport practices.
(2) Beyond modernization: the diffusion and development of sports in so-called backward European sub-regions contradict the paradigm of modernization that is at the heart of the majority of sports historiographies.
(3) Multiple identities: The multi-ethnic and multi-cultural environments of Eastern European sports shed new light on diverse ways of generating identity.
Before we elaborate on these three arguments, two preliminary remarks must be made. The first concerns the problems of applying the paradigms of nation and state to the history of modern Eastern Europe. The concept of the nation state was implemented in Eastern Europe relatively late. It was only after the First World War that the three multi-national empires – the Russian, Habsburg and Ottoman empires – collapsed and gave way to a number of nation states such as Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Austria and Hungary. The modern states of Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia were multi-national, and the Soviet Union even restored imperial features with regard to the question of nationalities. After 1918, these states were indeed shaped structurally by the concept of nationality, but in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when the development of sport gained momentum across the whole of Europe, the nation state was not yet established in Eastern Europe.Reference Puttkamer4 Since the evolution of sport is closely linked to the organizing principle of nationhood as well as to the idea of nation, the absence of the nation state in this region until 1918 leaves a significant imprint.
The second preliminary remark is closely linked to the late development of the concept of nation state in the region, and concerns the overall notion of ‘backwardness’ that is often applied to Eastern Europe.Reference Hoffmann and Kotsonis5 This way of thinking is linked to the assumption of a cultural-geographical gap between East and West. Within this framework, the West symbolizes progress and civilization, while the East is equated to underdeveloped regions marked by the absence of civilization and modernity. At first glance, sports history reaffirms this westernized thinking, because the roots of modern sports in a highly industrialized country as well as its diffusion along the patterns of modernism seem to fit perfectly. On the other hand, the diverse and autonomous development of sport fosters a critical evaluation of this teleological understanding of European history.
Transnationality
Even though sports in East Central Europe were closely linked to the concept of nation, at the same time singular conditions fostered the establishment of transnational sports regions and networks that constitute a crossroads of sporting spaces in Europe. This paper will focus primarily on Poland, a country whose imperial divisions and multi-ethnic and heterogeneous demography make it ideally suited to demonstrate the peculiarities of sport and its development in Eastern Europe. Poland did not yet exist as an independent nation state when, at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries, international contacts in sports intensified, the first international sports organizations emerged, and the international sports community took shape. It was thus deprived from entering the international arena of modern sports, where in most cases national representation was introduced as a basic principle of international competition.
Modern sports in Poland developed within the framework of, and through interaction with, Russia, Prussia and the Habsburg Empire, which had annexed the Polish territories at the end of the eighteenth century and controlled them until the end of the First World War. The establishment and activities of Polish associations and thus also sports organizations were subject to restrictions, especially in territories under Russian control, including cities such as Warsaw or Lodz, and in territories under German control, for example Poznan.Reference Lipoński6 Because sports were closely connected with the concept of nation and national identification, sports activities were seen as a threat to the authority of the partitioning powers. Those fears were not without foundation. For many Polish athletes, such as Wacław Kuchar, a famous Polish footballer and athlete of the early twentieth century, sport had clear national connotations (‘Among other things, sport was a way to express one's Polishness’Reference Hałys7). The connection between physical culture and the idea of the nation was most obvious in the Polish Sokół movement.Reference Małolepszy8 Following the example of the Czech Sokoł movement, the Polish Sokół combined physical exercises with national education. The first Sokół association was founded in Lwow in 1867 and spread initially in the areas of Poland under Habsburg rule. In the German Empire, the Sokół activities that developed from 1885 onwards were kept under close surveillance and subject to severe suppression, while the organization was even prohibited in the Russian part of partitioned Poland.
In Habsburg-ruled Galicia, with its limited autonomy, a liberal association law, comparatively free press, Polish school system and Polish university, the development of Polish culture and therefore also Polish sports was much less restricted.Reference Mick9 Galicia, particularly its largest cities Krakow and Lwow, thus became the cradle of the majority of Polish sports organizations and associations and the centre of a flourishing sports culture.
The different political conditions had an important impact on the extent and manner of sports diffusion in the three parts of partitioned Poland. These conditions not only affected the opportunities and limitations of sports development, but also led to the introduction of different sports models in Poland and to integration in different transnational sports networks. The inter-imperial transfer within the German, the Russian and the Habsburg empires was of great importance for the early development of modern sports in Poland.Reference Wendland10 With the resurrection of an independent Polish state, which came at the end of the First World War, those different models and networks had to be integrated into a new national sports culture. But the differences did not vanish in the interwar years. Despite the link between sports and the concept of nation, there was no straightforward national concept of sport.
The example of Polish football serves to illustrate this development. Due to the political circumstances at the end of the nineteenth century, Polish football initially developed in Habsburg-ruled Galicia.Reference Hałys11 The first documented football matches were played in Krakow and the first football clubs were founded in Lwow in 1903 and 1904, followed by clubs in Krakow in 1906.Reference Lenz12 The football clubs were soon integrated into the sport structures and networks of the Habsburg Empire and were thus connected to Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. Wisła and Cracovia for example, the two main clubs in the city of Krakow, officially registered as associations in 1910 and asked to have their internal regulations approved by the Austrian administration. In the same year, both clubs became members of the Austrian Football Association (Österreichischer Fußball Verband, ÖFV).Reference Pierzchała13 The intention behind this step was to intensify the contact and exchange with clubs not only from other parts of the Habsburg Empire but also beyond. And indeed, Cracovia in particular played an increasing number of matches in 1910 against Austrian, Hungarian and Czech teams, for example the so-called Cricketers from Vienna. Football in Vienna was used as an important point of reference and served as a yardstick to evaluate the performance of local and visiting teams.14
Some of the early football pioneers in Krakow had strong links with Vienna and used them to strengthen the sport's development. One of the most influential figures was Stanisław Kopernicki, editor of the daily newspaper Czas. From 1909 he served as the first vice president of the football club Cracovia and from 1911–13 as the club's president. He initiated some important reforms within the club, for example, hiring the first paid foreign trainer, the Czech František Kożeluh, in 1911. The latter introduced a new style of play in Krakow, based on low, short passes between players, which originated in Scotland and was the dominant style of play in Vienna. Oriented towards the Viennese model, it became known in Poland as the ‘Krakow style’,Reference Mielech15 and is one of the most conspicuous examples of the transfer of sports culture within the Habsburg Empire. Intensified contacts between clubs and the transfers of players, trainers, referees, etc, led to close connections and integration in the football culture of the Empire.
But national aspirations had not been completely marginalized. The development of a Polish football association is evidence of the football pioneers’ struggle to negotiate between national interests, sports, and even economic interests.
Just shortly after joining, Wisła Krakow left the ÖFV again in November 1910. Following the Czech model, and supported by their colleagues from Prague who had established an independent Czech football association in 1901, the Wisła officials founded an independent Polish football association (Polski Związek Towarzystw Sportowych Piłki Nożnej or Związek Footballistów Polski, ZFP) in May 1911, which aimed to represent all parts of partitioned Poland. Only 11 mostly small and insignificant clubs from Galicia followed their invitation to join. Furthermore, neither the Czech nor the Polish Football Association was able to become a member of FIFA because of an Austrian veto, and both were thus banned from competing with clubs from FIFA member associations. In the case of Wisła, this meant that even their local rival Cracovia, as a member of the ÖFV, was not allowed to arrange matches with them. There then followed attempts to establish an international association (UIAFA) as an alternative to FIFA, but these attempts were unsuccessful in the long run, as was the attempt to sustain an independent Polish football association. After only two months, the ZFP dissolved and Wisła applied once again for membership in the ÖFV.Reference Pierzchała13 Obviously, integration within an internationally recognized network seemed to have gained priority over national aspirations. It can be assumed that economic interests played an important part in this decision. At that time, football had already become a profitable business for many of those involved: international matches started to attract large crowds of spectators, particularly in Poland, while international contacts were an important precondition for the clubs’ successful development. As a response to the foundation of the ZFP, Stanisław Kopernicki and other Cracovia officials established a Polish Football Association by the end of 1911 within the Austrian Association (Związek Polski Piłki Nożnej, ZPPN). The ZPPN had very limited autonomy and was largely dependent on the ÖFV. Kopernicki himself became the first president of the ZPPN before being elected vice president of the ÖFV and later even a FIFA delegate.
The early development of football in Habsburg-ruled Galicia is one of several examples of how the inter-imperial transfer influenced the diffusion of sports in the Polish territories. Similar developments took place in the other parts of partitioned Poland. For instance, in the Russian territories the early stages of football was much more directly influenced by England and English migrants, just as it was in the whole of the Russian Empire. Here too, Polish football and clubs were integrated into the sports structures of the ruling power. An illustration of this is the selection of players from Lodz who went to Moscow to take part in the final round of the Russian competition in 1913.Reference Grüne16 Even though they were from the Polish territories of the Russian Empire, at least some of them were ethnically Germans. Germans constituted a huge minority in the multi-national industrial town of Lodz, and Germans were known to be the most successful footballers among the other Russian, Polish and Jewish players.Reference Bogusz17
After the First World War and the resurrection of an independent Polish state, the three different sports cultures had to integrate to become a national union. Once again the development of institutions and organizations for the whole of Poland originated in Galicia, especially Krakow and Lwow. Even before the war was over, preparations for the foundation of a Polish football association in an independent Poland were already underway under the leadership of Józef Lustgarten and Jan Weyssenhoff from Krakow.Reference Bieniarzówna18 The first president of the new Polish Football Association (Polski Związek Piłki Nożnej, PZPN), established in 1919, was Etnard Cetnarowski, president of the football club Cracovia from Krakow, where the head office of the association was first set up. Krakow and Lwow were very much to dominate Polish football, especially in the beginning of the interwar years.
Even after independent Polish institutions were established, the old networks still persisted. It was not by chance that the Polish national team's first international match was played against Hungary and that the most frequent football contacts in the early interwar period – at national as well as club level – were with Czechoslovakia, Hungary or Yugoslavia. There was also a lively exchange of players, trainers and other experts, such as the Hungarian Imre Poszony who became coach of Cracovia. Polish football in Galicia remained strongly connected with and oriented towards Vienna, Budapest and Prague. The coverage of Polish sports magazines, such as the Przegląd Sportowy, illustrates the strong focus on football in the successor states of the Habsburg Empire.
Even if sports were used as a means of national representation and identification for the young Polish nation, the importance of transnational networks dating back to partition times should not be underestimated. Famously, the imprint of the Habsburg Empire on football in the successor states was most clearly felt in the concept of ‘Danubian Football’ – the style and system of play in Austria, Hungary and Czechoslovakia, particularly in the interwar years.Reference Marschik and Sottopietra19 But through Galicia, Poland was at least partly integrated in this network, clearly showing that sports diffusion and sports culture were not necessarily bound to national borders and territories.
Beyond modernization
Sport is commonly perceived as an aspect of modern societies that is connected to and intertwined with other developments in economic, political, social and cultural modernization. From the end of the nineteenth century, governments and social elites started to promote sports as a modernizing force.
English sport has been perceived as modern because it accompanied the predominant position of Great Britain in industry and commerce in the second half of the nineteenth century. The triumph of football across the world serves as a prominent example. The agents of industrial modernization were simultaneously ambassadors for football: entrepreneurs, merchants, employees of international banks, sailors, students and teachers disseminated the knowledge and practice of football around the globe. Moreover, the acceptance of football was highest among members of the urban educated elites. Engaging in modern sports was linked to self-perception and self-representation as a modern cosmopolitan individual.Reference Hüser20
At first glance, Poland seems to fit this picture of football and the zeal of modernization. The first years of the so-called Second Polish Republic were characterized by a modernizing enthusiasm, and the nationally-oriented social elites in particular harboured great expectations of growth and development. Sports in Poland, especially in international competitions such as the Olympic Games, served as a yardstick in the process of modernizing the country and were used to measure the gap in relation to developed nations, not only in respect of sports but also in terms of civilization in general. Integration in European sports became synonymous with integration within wider European civilization: ‘Europe calls for us to be – as any other country – integrated into the family of civilized and free nations.’21
This expressed need for modernization and civilization derived from the perception that Poland was lagging behind and lacked modern development in comparison to other nations in Western and Central Europe. This assumed ‘relative backwardness’ reflected a Western perspective on the East that was based on Western patterns and ideas of modernization.Reference Girginov and Collins22
Sport became part of a programme to modernize the country. But – importantly – the development of sport in Poland did not follow simple patterns of modernization. It cannot be seen merely as an aspect, by-product or reflection of modern economic or social development, but was, rather, a sphere in its own right, generating its own dynamics, and producing its own images and concepts of modernity. Polish football did not evolve primarily in the industrialized urban centres of Poland, such as Warsaw or Lodz, or even in the mining district of Upper Silesia. Instead, as we have seen, at least until the interwar years, its key base was in the less industrialized Galicia, in Krakow or Lwow. We must ask ourselves, therefore, why the modern English sport of football developed so successfully in supposedly non-modern Galicia?
The diffusion of football in Eastern Europe took multiple and twisted routes. Some of the disseminators were migrants or members of transnational communities such as the Jews living in the Polish lands. Among Eastern European Jews, the German Jews, often called ‘Berliner’, were perceived as the modernizers par excellence in all branches of religious, social or cultural life. The leadership of German Jews was recognized in the fields of learning, politics and in sports, and German was the lingua franca of the secularly educated East European Jews in the nineteenth century. One of the institutions transferring physical culture from Central to Eastern Europe was the German gymnastics movement (‘Turnbewegung’). For the Jews in Eastern Europe the German Jewish gymnastic movement played a similar role. But the ‘Turner’ decidedly did not bring ‘modern sports’ to Eastern Europe, preferring German Turnen instead. From the perspective of the Turnbewegung, modern sports were hardly perceived as harbingers of a new and better world. Football in particular was held to be brutal, ugly and dangerous – the pamphlet ‘Fusslümmelei’ by German gymnast (Turner) Karl Planck published in 1898 famously painted a picture of improvised playing fields, corrupt referees, and violent spectators rather than the educated gentlemen.Reference Planck23
The German Jewish gymnastics club (Jüdischer Turnverein) Bar Kochba Berlin was founded in the same year that Planck so publicly criticized football. Even though the Jewish gymnastic movement was geared to the German cultural concept of Turnen, politically it was oriented towards Jewish nationalism and therefore reached out to the East European Jews as members of the Jewish nation. Gymnastics was perceived as an instrument for bodily enhancing the diaspora Jews and making them fit for building a nation state. Whilst the Jewish Turnerschaft was not officially Zionist, all of Bar Kochba's founders were Zionist activists.Reference Doron and Shmuel24 Zionist ideology can be found in all publications of the Turnerschaft. Zionism is also represented by their colours (blue and white). Moreover, club names (Makkabi, Bar Kochba and Ha Koach) constitute ample evidence of their Zionist beliefs.Reference Reuveni25 From that time on, German Jewish gymnasts led the gymnastics movement in Central and Eastern Europe on an institutional level. Since Turnen was perceived to be culturally German, the German Turnerschaft addressed gymnasts in an ‘all-German’ sense. Accordingly, the Jewish Turnbewegung did not only turn to the Jews in the German Reich, but to ‘all Jews of German tongue’.Reference Hilbrenner26 From a European perspective, only Jews of the Russian Empire and Western Europe were excluded from the organizations of the Jüdische Turnerschaft.Reference Hilbrenner26
The Jewish Turner opposed modern sports as much as their non-Jewish counterparts. First of all, such sports were believed to be dangerous and harmful to the body and its functions. According to the Jüdische Turnzeitung in 1913 and 1914, one of the many diseases modern sport was likely to lead to was the abnormal enhancement of the lungs and heart muscle. Football was singled out for particular criticism because it exercised the feet rather than the body.Reference Eisen27
But more importantly from the perspective of the Turnerschaft, sport represented bourgeois capitalism and the shortcomings of modernity. Turnen was supposed to be the sport of the masses, of the whole Jewish community. With the help of Turnen, the individual Jew would merge into the Jewish nation. Sport, on the other hand, with its emphasis on effort and accomplishment, symbolized the principle of individualism. From the viewpoint of Jewish nationalists, individualism was to be defeated. Sportsmen were perceived to be rich and assimilated Western Jews, who had already renounced their belonging to the Jewish people. As such, they were seen as a threat to the Zionist cause. Turnen, by contrast, was perfectly suited to it, improving, it was argued, the moral and hygienic standard of the Eastern European Jewish masses, the basis of the future Jewish nation.Reference Eisen27
From the perspective of the Turnerschaft, sport was perceived to be modern, with Turnen deemed more appropriate for the backward Jewish masses. This perspective reflects a modernist belief, as this statement in the Jüdische Turnzeitung of 1909 shows:
As two hostile brothers, gymnasts and sportsmen still confront each other in enmity. While the older brother regards the younger as inferior, the younger believes the older to be backward.Reference Prof. Albu28
However, contrary to this modernist belief, it was thanks to the seemingly ‘backward’ Eastern European Jews that modern sports were introduced to the ranks of the Jüdische Turnbewegung. Opposed to the ideology of the German Zionists who believed Turnen to be ideal for the Jewish masses in Eastern Europe, Eastern European Jews perceived sport to be much more satisfactory for their needs. Sport, and football in particular, was very well suited to the small and impecunious clubs of Eastern Europe, as the football amateur and pioneer Georg Eisen noted in the Jüdische Turnzeitung as early as 1911:
We have frequently reported on the difficulties we have obtaining a gym hall. These problems have often impeded the foundation of a Turnverein. But you can find a meadow for athletics and football anywhere.Reference Galizisch-bukowinischer Kreis29
In 1913, the Jüdische Turnzeitung was re-launched as Jüdische Turn- und Sportzeitung, giving sport and Turnen equal importance. In the same year, the traditional mass gymnastics event (Schauturnen) on the occasion of the Eleventh Zionist Congress was replaced by a tournament devoted to both forms of body culture.
And by 1914 it was explicitly stated that sport suited the circumstances prevailing in Eastern Europe much better than Turnen:
A sport club is restricted neither by the size of the gym hall nor by the quantity of equipment. Their gym hall is the court, where hundreds can find room, their equipment is air, light and water. Nothing is too expensive and so the clubs can take advantage of find ideal conditions for the physical education of the Jewish masses. […] In this way the sport clubs fulfil their national duty, and their share in the Jewish renaissance is much greater than that of the Turnvereine.Reference Galizisch-bukowinischer Kreis29
It was not, therefore, the modernism of Eastern Europe but precisely its backwardness that favoured the spread of the modern English sport of football. Moreover, the sporting environment in Galicia encouraged Jewish Zionist football amateurs. Despite German Jewish cultural leadership, in the field of sport it was East European Jewish athletes who took the lead in introducing football to the Zionist gymnastic movement.
In 1911, the Jüdische Turnzeitung reported from Galicia:
Three semesters ago, when football enthusiasm reached its climax in all strata of society, young people founded a Jewish football club next to the Jewish Makkabi. The club, wearing white and blue, chose the name ‘Bar Kochba’.Reference Krakau30
Thus, while German Jewish gymnasts were still highly critical of football, in Krakow there were already other football clubs for Jews with a national orientation.Reference Hilbrenner26
Multiple identities
While the Jüdische Turnzeitung was reporting on the Zionist (national Jewish middle class) football club ‘Bar Kochba’ in Krakow in 1911, there were at least four other football clubs for Jewish athletes to join: Jugend (Zydowskie Klub Sportowe Jugend, Jewish Sports Club Youth), Jutrzenka (Zydowskie towarzystwo sportowe Jutrzenka, Jewish Sports Club Jutrzenka), Diana from the Krakow district of Podgorze, and the best-known and most successful of all, Makkabi.Reference Hilbrenner26 But football was not only restricted to the Krakow metropolis, the Jüdische Turnzeitung reporting also on the Jewish football club Samson in Tarnów. Nevertheless, there were clear differences between the clubs. Samson, for instance, was open to non-Jews, while Bar Kochba was evidently restricted to Jews only, and it is clear that the Zionist Jewish gymnasts were indignant about the fact the former had goyim (gentiles) in its ranks.Reference Hilbrenner26 This report clearly illustrates the differences between different clubs. There was a further important difference between the clubs Makkabi and Jutrzenka. Makkabi was a Jewish national club and part of the Jüdische Turnerschaft, and can therefore be considered a middle-class establishment, while the Jutrzenka was socialist and therefore politically opposed to the bourgeois Zionist clubs. Even though Jutrzenka was described as ‘extremely assimilationist’Reference Krakau31 it was nevertheless to a certain extent also Jewish nationalist, because non-Jewish socialists had their own sports clubs that were also open to Jews. Another possibility for middle-class Jews with command of Polish and loyalty to the Polish cause was to get involved with a Polish club. One of the most important Krakow football clubs, Cracovia, was perceived to be a Jewish club (especially by anti-Semites) until well into the interwar period, even though it was definitely Polish and had a number of assimilated Jews among players and functionaries.Reference Jürgs32
The rich choice of football clubs in Jewish nationalist circles in Krakow is testimony to the diversity of the landscape of sports institutions in Poland.Reference Jacobs33 Sports clubs formed along and across almost every social, cultural and political divide.Reference Rokicki34 Jewish society in Poland and throughout Eastern Europe in the interwar period was socially and culturally segmented, diverse, and transnational per se. The huge number of sports clubs sheds light on the many possible loyalties and identity options open to Polish Jews.Reference Hałys7, Reference Blecking35
The majority of Jews were religious (Chassidim or Orthodox Jews), and most of them opposed sport. When it comes to sport, therefore, we have to focus on the smaller number of secular Jews. But these did not fall into a homogeneous group. They can be classified as nationalist Jews on the one hand and assimilated Jews on the other, even though this rather simplistic division leaves a lot of open questions. Nationalist Jews could be of socialist, communist, liberal, Zionist or Diaspora nationalist orientation, speaking in Yiddish, Hebrew, German, Russian or Polish. Cooperation was possible between some groups but not all.Reference Mendelsohn36
Of particular importance for the development of sport was the Yiddish workers movement, politically represented by the Algemainer jidisher arbeter-bund fun Rusland, Pojln un Lite, known as the ‘Bund’. Its sports section was called morgenshtern.Reference Jacobs37 In 1937, the Warsaw division of morgenshtern had 1500 members and was thus the largest local sports organization in the whole of Poland (outstripping even the other non-Jewish and socialist clubs).Reference Jacobs38 The Jewish socialists opposed football as bourgeois, commercialized and individualistic. Interestingly, the same objections were also raised by the bourgeois German Jewish gymnasts against modern sports, including football. Nevertheless, football was very popular among young Jews, which meant that even the morgenshtern could not totally ignore its existence, and they too set up a football division.
The Zionist socialists of the Poalei Zion (Workers of Zion), who preferred Hebrew to Yiddish, also had their own sports organizations. They were politically divided between right and left. The leftwing Poalei Zion had its own sports section called Gwiazda (Star), while the rightwing Poalei Zion's athletes trained in Hapoel (The Worker). Both wings of the Zionist socialists had strong football divisions compared with the morgenshtern.Reference Jacobs39
Non-socialist Zionists were active in the gymnastics movement (Turnerbewegung) and formed the Makkabi, Bar Kochba and Hakoach clubs, as noted above.Reference Reuveni25
Assimilated Jews could identify with or join Polish or German (and on rare occasions also Ukrainian) sport clubs. In the Russian territories they may have favoured Russian high culture and could join a suitable club. In the Baltic region, e.g. Vilnius, they could join a Russian, Polish, Lithuanian or Jewish club. At the local level, Jewish players could always be found in non-Jewish local teams. The attendance of Jews in non-Jewish clubs is not particularly evident from sports history sources, but most biographical studies of Jewish athletes refer to at least short-term participation in non-Jewish clubs.Reference Postal, Silver and Silver40 The engagement of a Jew in a non-Jewish club might have been due either to outstanding athletic talent or economic factors. Others became affiliated with clubs because they were located in the neighbourhood or because they were attached to schools or factories. Thus, membership in a sports club with a specific national or cultural identity would also be based on considerations of urban topography.Reference Emeliantseva41 Furthermore, as the example of the Lodz Germans in the Russian football tournaments in Moscow shows, this range of identity options was not specifically Jewish.Reference Bogusz17
Thus, the existence of many Jewish football clubs in interwar Poland is testimony to the variety of identity options open to the citizens of the Second Polish Republic. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the choices involved were of ephemeral character; membership in a sports club was not necessarily a life-long commitment. The frequent changes of sports clubs underline the situational identities of the modern individual and his multifaceted loyalties and belongings.
Conclusion
In modern Poland, where sport was used intensively as a means of national representation and identification, sport developed not on a national scale, but rather in parallel with transnational networks. These networks were not restricted by national borders; thus, they underline the importance of regions alongside the paradigm of the nation state. One region of paramount importance for research in European sports history is rural and multi-national Galicia. Even though sport was perceived as a modernizing force by the supposedly backward Eastern European states, it was precisely the traditional and non-modern groups in Galicia who cultivated sports in the general population and fostered its acceptance in other social milieus. Moreover, the social groups and milieus engaging in sports must be analysed in detail. Micro-analysis of the diversity of Jewish sport clubs in interwar Poland has, by necessity, a reach that goes beyond national sports historiography, since the Jewish community is transnational and quintessentially migrant. The Jewish gymnastics movement (Jüdische Turnerbewegung) displays transnational activities in Germany and Eastern Europe, sheds light on cross-border entanglements and transfers, and breaks down the monolithic understanding of sport as an activity that resides in a single European country. Questions of national identity and belonging, which were of the uttermost importance for East Central Europe and its newly founded nation states, were negotiated in the sphere of sports. As these sporting examples show, national identity is dependent and contingent rather than essential.
Anke Hilbrenner is Assistant Professor in the Department of East European History at the University of Bonn. Her monograph Diaspora-Nationalismus, on the Russian Jewish historian Simon Dubnov, appeared with Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht in 2006, and she now specializes in the history of terrorism and political violence in the Russian Empire before 1917 as well as the history of sport in Eastern Europe. She is the founding member of a scientific network on Eastern European sport sponsored by the DFG (German Research Foundation). Her recent publications include articles on women's football in Russia and the Soviet Union and the emergence of Jewish sports in Germany and East Central Europe in the early twentieth century. She co-edited the three volumes of Überall ist der Ball rund (Klartext 2006–11) on the history of football in Eastern Europe.
Britta Lenz received an MA in Eastern European History, Political Science and Sociology at the University of Bonn (2005), where she is currently finishing her PhD on ‘Sports and Leisure Associations in the Integration of Polish-speaking Migrants in the Ruhr Area 1900–1939’. Her research interests include migration history, the history of soccer in Eastern Europe (especially Poland), and memorial culture in Belarus. She has published a major essay in the Archiv für Sozialgeschichte (‘Vereint im Verein? Städtische Freizeitkultur und die Integration von polnischen und masurischen Zuwanderern im Ruhrgebiet zwischen 1900 und 1939’, vol. 46, 2006) and collaborated with Dittmar Dahlmann and Anke Hilbrenner over the two volumes on soccer in Eastern Europe.