Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:07:38.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Broadband dual linear polarized (DLP) antenna array for energy harvesting system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2019

Dalia N. Elsheakh*
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii @ Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA Electronices Research Institute, Cairo,Egypt
*
Author for correspondence: Dalia N. Elsheakh, E-mail: daliaelsheakh@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A broadband linear polarized antenna is designed for radio frequency energy harvesting. The antenna covers the frequency range from 1 up to 6 GHz with relative impedance bandwidth of 126% at −6 dB reflection coefficient |S11| and extended from 1.1 to 3.3 GHz and from 4.2 to 5.6 GHz at |S11| ≤ −10 dB. A 2 × 2 dual linear polarized (DLP) antenna array is designed based on the antenna element by using equal phase and equal power divider 1-to-4 Wilkinson power divider with 180° phase shifter. The DLP antenna array covers the frequency band from 1.8 to 2.9 GHz. This frequency band covers a wide range of modern wireless communication standards, including GSM 1800, UMTS 2100, Wi-Fi 2.4, and most of LTE bands. The developed array prototype was then used to experimentally validate the simulation results. The horizontally and vertically polarized gain of the designed array were found to be quite similar across the 1.8–2.9 frequency band with an average gain value of 5.5 dBi.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 
Figure 0

Table 1. The comparison of the proposed antenna and other researches

Figure 1

Fig. 1. The structure geometry of the proposed 2 × 2 array antenna. (a) Top view. (b) Bottom view.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. (a) Design steps, (b) 3D-geometry, and (c) photo of the fabricated single antenna element, top, and bottom layer.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a)The simulated design steps and (b)–(d) the effect of |S11| of different values of Φ, Lsand Ws, respectively.

Figure 4

Table 2. Optimized antenna dimensions (unit in mm)

Figure 5

Fig. 4. (a) The comparison between the simulated and measured reflection coefficient versus frequency and (b) the antenna element gain.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. (a) the feeding network for the 2 × 2 dual polarized antenna array, (b) reflection coefficient variation versus frequency for feeding network.

Figure 7

Table 3 The isolation between the different polarization antennas

Figure 8

Fig. 6. (a) Photo of fabricated 2 × 2 dual polarized antenna array and (b) the array reflection coefficient variation versus frequency.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Simulated and measured horizontally and vertically polarized gain in the broadside direction.

Figure 10

Table 4. Values of the realized gain in the broadside direction at different wireless frequency applications

Figure 11

Table 5. Simulated and measured normalized radiation pattern at different wireless communication frequencies; simulated (H-pol —, V-pol –.–) and measured (H-pol —, V-pol –.–)

Figure 12

Table 6. The ambient received power at different frequencies for single element and array power in dBm.