Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:30:41.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compact dual-band truncated patch antenna with fractal defected ground structure for wireless applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2015

B. Rama Sanjeeva Reddy*
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, India. Phone: +91 944 097 47 34
D. Vakula
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, India. Phone: +91 944 097 47 34
*
Corresponding author: B. R. Sanjeeva Reddy Email: sanjeev.antenna@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a compact, dual-band patch antenna is proposed over Minkowski fractal defected ground structure (DGS) for bandwidth enhancement of global positioning system (GPS) applications. The proposed design combines the truncated dual L-shaped slits cut on diagonal corners of radiating patch and fractal defect on the metallic ground plane. This concept shifts the frequencies to lower bands with improvement in antenna radiation properties. By deploying symmetrical and asymmetrical boundaries to the structure for the fractal DGS on metallic ground plane, improvement in bandwidth and gain are obtained. Compact antenna size is achieved for dual-band GPS frequencies of L1 (1.575 GHz) and L2 (1.227 GHz). The measured results for antenna prototype are (1.2–1.245 GHz): L2 band and (1.51–1.59 GHz): L1 band for 10 dB return loss bandwidth with better pattern radiation. Gain value with and without DGS is observed for compact antenna overall volume of 0.32λ0 × 0.32λ0 × 0.024λ0.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geometry of the proposed antenna (all dimensions in mm).

Figure 1

Table 1. Optimized geometrical dimensions of the proposed structure.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. (a) Arrow head, (b) H-shaped slot, (c) open-loop dumbbell, (d) symmetric fractal shape, and (e) asymmetric fractal shape.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Design iterations: (a) basic patch, (b) truncated L-shaped spur lines without DGS, and (c) truncated corners with Minkowski fractal DGS.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Simulated return loss curves for design iterations.

Figure 5

Table 2. Simulated results of antenna design iterations.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Average and vector current distributions at: (a) 1.202 GHz and (b) 1.657 GHz.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Simulated E-plane radiation patterns for (a) phi = 0° and (b) phi = 90° at resonant frequencies of 2.56, 3.02, 3.72, and 4.98 GHz (y–z plane) (without DGS).

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Photograph of the proposed antenna working for L1 and L2 bands: (a) top view and (b) bottom view.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Simulated and measured return loss curve for the proposed antenna.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Measured and simulated gain response of the proposed antenna.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Measured and simulated antenna efficiency for the proposed antenna.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Measured and simulated radiation patterns in the y–z plane at 1.202 and 1.657 GHz.

Figure 13

Table 3. Simulated results of antenna design iterations.