Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:18:43.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Titania-based electrospun nanofibrous materials: a new model for organic pollutants degradation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2018

Xiaohui Wu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Textile Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
Yang Si
Affiliation:
Innovation Center for Textile Science and Technology, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
Jianyong Yu
Affiliation:
Innovation Center for Textile Science and Technology, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
Bin Ding*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Textile Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China Innovation Center for Textile Science and Technology, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
*
Address all correspondence to Prof. Bin Ding at binding@dhu.edu.cn

Abstract

Effective degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater is of great importance to the environment and human society. TiO2-based electrospun nanofibrous materials combining the properties of the large specific surface area, high aspect ratio, tunable compositions and structures, as well as easy to recycle, show great promise for the efficient removal of organic pollutants. In this Prospective paper, the recent progress in the degradation of organic water contaminants over visible-light-responsive TiO2-based nanofibrous materials is summarized, with emphasis on the strategies for improving the visible-light photocatalytic activity of TiO2-based nanofibrous materials. Finally, the current challenges and future outlook in this field are discussed.

Information

Type
Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Phase structures of TiO2: (a) anatase, (b) rutile, (c) brookite, and (d) TiO2 (B). Reprinted with permission from Ref. 19 (American Chemical Society, 2014).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of photocatalytic reaction process on TiO2-based materials. (b) Images of TiO2-based electrospun nanofibers for visible-light photocatalysis, reprinted with permission from Ref. 27 (Elsevier, 2013), Ref. 29 (American Chemical Society, 2011), Ref. 31 (American Chemical Society, 2009), and Ref. 33 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017), respectively.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of (a) UTF and (b) CTF calcined at 500 °C. Visible light photodegradation plots of (c) RhB and (d) phenol. (e) Possible photodegradation mechanism of S-doped TNFs under visible-light irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 28 (Elsevier, 2014).

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of TNCuPc/TiO2 hierarchical nanostructures. (b) Fourier transform infrared spectra and (c) UV-vis reflectance spectra of the samples: bare TNFs (T0) (curve a), TNCuPc/TiO2 hierarchical nanostructures (PT1) (curve b), TNCuPc/TiO2 hierarchical nanostructures (PT2) (curve c) and TNCuPc without TNFs (P0) (curve d). (d) Changes of the concentration of RhB over different samples. Adapted with permission from Ref. 29 (American Chemical Society, 2011).

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the preparation of P/TS nanofibrous membrane. (b) Visible-light photocatalytic degradation curves of MO on TiO2 powder, TS, PANI-coated SiO2 and P/TS nanofibrous membranes. (c) Concentration changes of MO during the five repeated processes on P/TS nanofibrous membranes. (d) SEM images of P/TS nanofibrous membranes after five cycles. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 18 (Elsevier, 2014).

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a) Schematic illustration of the formation of TiO2-CDs nanostructure fibers. (b) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of P25, bare TNFs and TiO2-CDs nanostructured fibers. (c) Time-dependent visible light photocatalytic degradation of RhB. (d) A mechanistic proposal for the degradation of RhB under visible light irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 49 (Elsevier, 2013).

Figure 6

Figure 7. SEM images of the α-Fe2O3/TiO2 heterostructure in low (a) and high resolution (b), and the inset in (a) is the possible corresponding morphology graph. (c) Schematic illustration of the charge separation between TiO2 and Fe2O3 in the α-Fe2O3/TiO2 heterostructure under visible light. (d) Photocatalytic degradation curves of different dyes under visible light irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 55 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2016). (e) Schematic for the fabrication of CuO/TiO2 hybrid nanofibers. (f) Changes in RhB concentration with the increasing of irradiation time. (g) Photodegradation rate constants of RhB. (0), (1), (2), (5), and (10) represent the mass percentage of CuO in CuO/TiO2 nanofibers, and “blank” means without any photocatalysts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 62 (Elsevier, 2017).

Figure 7

Figure 8. (a) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of SnS2/TiO2 (AR) hierarchical nanostructures. (b) Elemental mapping images of Ti, O, Sn, and S. (c) Schematic showing the possible bonding configurations of the SnS2/TiO2. (d) Concentration changes of RhB as a function of irradiation time on different samples: (1) TNFs (anatase phase), (2) TNFs (AR), (3) SnS2/TiO2 (anatase phase), (4) SnS2/TiO2 (AR), and (5) SnS2 nanosheets. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 71 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013).

Figure 8

Figure 9. (a) The sketch map and images of Bi2WO6/TiO2 hierarchical heterostructures at different magnifications. (b) Photocatalytic degradation of RhB in the presence of different catalysts under visible-light irradiation. (c) Variations of COD and transmittance of RhB aqueous solutions with irradiation time. (d) Schematic diagram for energy band matching and electron-hole separation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 31 (American Chemical Society, 2009).

Figure 9

Figure 10. (a) Schematic illustration for the fabrication of 3D g-C3N4/TiO2 HHs. (b) Photocatalytic degradation of RhB over the as-fabricated materials under visible light irradiation. (c) Photocurrent spectra of TiO2 NFs, g-C3N4/TiO2 HHs and pure g-C3N4 electrodes. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 95 (Elsevier, 2017).

Figure 10

Figure 11. (a) Synthesis procedure of Au@TNFs and Au@Ag@TNFs. (b) TEM image of Au@Ag@TNFs. (c) Time-dependent photocatalytic degradation of MB by different samples under solar light irradiation. (d) Kinetics of MB degradation by different samples under solar light irradiation. Adapted with permission from Ref. 33 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017).

Figure 11

Table I. Summary of TiO2-based nanofibrous materials for organic pollutants degradation.