Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T01:19:26.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Small-scale spatial variability of zoobenthic communities in a commercial Mediterranean port

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

Chryssanthi Antoniadou*
Affiliation:
Aristotle University, School of Biology, Department of Zoology, Thessaloniki, Greece
Sarantis Sarantidis
Affiliation:
Aristotle University, School of Biology, Department of Zoology, Thessaloniki, Greece
Chariton Chintiroglou
Affiliation:
Aristotle University, School of Biology, Department of Zoology, Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: C. Antoniadou, Aristotle University, School of Biology, Department of Zoology, Thessaloniki, Greece email: antonch@bio.auth.gr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of the limited information on the ecology of port communities, the present work aims at assessing the small-scale spatial variability of zoobenthos inhabiting hard and soft substrata, in a Mediterranean port with high levels of commercial shipment. Samples were collected in summer from three stations and four depth levels, using core and quadrate samplers. A total of 34,578 individuals were collected, identified to 118 animal species. Soft substratum communities were impoverished and their structure varied spatially according to sediment composition. At a functional level deposit feeders dominated; their abundance decreased at the silty sites. Biotic indices were found inadequate for the assessment of ecological quality, due to the very low abundance of the fauna. Fouling communities varied spatially in vertical scales; diversity indices and the abundance of Bivalvia varied also in horizontal scales. Suspension and deposit feeders dominated showing a decreasing trend with depth. Two animal-dominated communities, serpulid blocks in the lower midlittoral zone and mussel beds in the sublittoral, substituted an algal-dominated community, which has been previously recorded from the same port quays. This substitution may be due to the intensive mussel farming in the nearby area contributing to the rapid expansion of mussels and of their serpulid biofoulers. Despite the existence of biogenic substrata, which enhance habitat complexity, the diversity of the associated fauna decreased and most species were tolerant to organic pollution. Recursive biomonitoring seems necessary to assess the ecological status of communities and to develop integrated management plans for temperate ports.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the study area and aerial image of Thessaloniki Port, indicating sampling sites.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Percentage contribution of the main taxonomic groups to the abundance of the fauna, at each sampling site and depth.

Figure 2

Table 1. Taxonomic list of the species found (+) in the fouling community, i.e serpulid blocks (Sb) and mussel beds (Mb), and soft substratum community (SS) at each sampled quay (Q1–Q3) of Thessaloniki Port. Dominant species in bold and marked with two crosses (++) at the relevant assemblage.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Spatial variability of diversity (species richness, Shannon–Wiener and Pielou's evenness) and abundance (number of individuals m−2) of the fouling fauna in total, and of each dominant taxonomic group, at horizontal and vertical scales (bars represent standard error).

Figure 4

Table 2. Analysis of variance results for the spatial effects (i.e. stations and depth) on fouling community parameters.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Hierarchical cluster and non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination of port communities' structure, based on Bray–Curtis similarity index calculated from log-transformed numerical abundance data.

Figure 6

Table 3. Species contributing to about 60% of the average in-group similarity or among groups dissimilarity resulting from SIMPER analysis.

Figure 7

Table 4. Estimated biotic indices, AMBI and BENTIX results.