Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T18:18:32.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Asian fish tapeworm (Schyzocotyle acheilognathi) discovered in Western Australia may pose a threat to the health of endemic native fishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2021

C.J. Palermo Open the ORCID record for C.J. Palermo [Opens in a new window] ,
D.L. Morgan Open the ORCID record for D.L. Morgan [Opens in a new window] ,
S.J. Beatty Open the ORCID record for S.J. Beatty [Opens in a new window] ,
A. Elliot  and
T.L. Greay Open the ORCID record for T.L. Greay [Opens in a new window]
C.J. Palermo*
Affiliation:
College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia Western Australian State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
D.L. Morgan
Affiliation:
Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
S.J. Beatty
Affiliation:
Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
A. Elliot
Affiliation:
College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
T.L. Greay
Affiliation:
College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia Western Australian State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia Executive Consultant, EpiSeq, PO Box 357, Kwinana, WA 6966, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: C.J. Palermo, E-mail: cindypalermo@outlook.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Asian fish tapeworm (Schyzocotyle acheilognathi) is an important fish parasite with a wide host range that infects over 300 species of fish worldwide. Schyzocotyle acheilognathi has been reported from eastern coastal areas of Australia, but has not been previously reported in Western Australia (WA). During a control program for invasive freshwater fishes in south-western WA, a region with a unique and highly endangered freshwater fish fauna, tapeworms identified as S. acheilognathi from their distinctive scolex morphology were found at a prevalence of 3.3% in goldfish (Carassius auratus), 37.0% in koi carp (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus) and 65.0% in eastern gambusia (Gambusia holbrooki) in a small suburban lake to the north of Perth. For molecular confirmation, the 18S ribosomal RNA gene was targeted at hypervariable V4 region. Koi carp isolates were 100% identical to S. acheilognathi isolated from varying hosts, including the red shiner (Cyprinella lutrensis) and a human sample. Sequences obtained from two eastern gambusia were identified as S. acheilognathi, but formed a discrete cluster and may represent a novel genotype. Isolates from two other eastern gambusia and two goldfish formed a distinct clade with only 91.9% similarity to previously sequenced isolates of S. acheilognathi. This emphasizes the importance of molecular identification methods in addition to morphological identification. The presence and potential for transmission of these parasites in south-western WA may threaten the health of native fishes, which are immunologically naïve to this introduced parasite. Immediate control or containment measures should be implemented to halt the spread of these parasites.

Keywords

Invasive freshwater fishco-invading parasitemodified wetlandphylogeneticWestern Australia

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 95 , 2021 , e60
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The Asian fish tapeworm (Schyzocotyle (formerly Bothriocephalus) acheilognathi) is an intestinal cestode parasite of fishes native to East Asia, and was originally described in 1934 as Bothriocephalus acheilognathi from a single small cyprinid fish (Acheilognathus rhombeus) in Japan (Yamaguti, Reference Yamaguti1934; Kuchta et al., Reference Kuchta, Choudhury and Scholz2018). Unusually for a tapeworm, S. acheilognathi has a very broad host range and has been found in at least 312 freshwater fish species, belonging to 38 families and 14 orders, as a result of worldwide introductions (Kuchta et al., Reference Kuchta, Choudhury and Scholz2018). The species has also been identified in non-piscine vertebrate hosts including a human, amphibians, reptiles and birds (Prigli, Reference Prigli1975; García-Prieto & Osorio-Sarabia, Reference García-Prieto and Osorio-Sarabia1991; Scholz, Reference Scholz1999; Yera et al., Reference Yera, Kuchta, Brabec, Peyron and Dupouy-Camet2013; de León et al., Reference de León, Lagunas-Calvo, García-Prieto, Briosio-Aguilar and Aguilar-Aguilar2018; Kuchta et al., Reference Kuchta, Choudhury and Scholz2018), although these are considered accidental hosts (Kuchta et al., Reference Kuchta, Choudhury and Scholz2018). Infection with S. acheilognathi can cause bothriocephalosis in its host, with clinical signs including blockage of the gastrointestinal tract, destruction of intestinal mucosa, intestinal rupturing, distended abdomen, weight loss, protein depletion, intestinal inflammation, anaemia, diminished swimming ability and eventual mortality (Davydov, Reference Davydov1978; Scott & Grizzle, Reference Scott and Grizzle1979; Brouder, Reference Brouder1999; Hansen et al., Reference Hansen, Choudhury, Heisey, Ahumada, Hoffnagle and Cole2006; Matey et al., Reference Matey, Ervin and Hovey2015; Cole & Choudhury, Reference Cole and Choudhury2016). The clinical signs can also be subtle, leading to reduced growth in the host, which can result in higher predation rates (Hansen et al., Reference Hansen, Choudhury, Heisey, Ahumada, Hoffnagle and Cole2006; Choudhury et al., Reference Choudhury, Zheng, de León, Martínez-Aquino, Brosseau and Gale2013). The global spread of invasive fish species and their parasites, such as S. acheilognathi, is likely attributable to the exotic fish trade (Košuthová et al., Reference Košuthová, Šmiga, Oros, Barčák and Košuth2015; Kuchta et al., Reference Kuchta, Choudhury and Scholz2018).

During the 1960s and 1970s, S. acheilognathi was imported from East Asia to Europe and North America in grass carp, which was introduced to reduce the growth of vegetation in freshwater ecosystems (Choudhury et al., Reference Choudhury, Charipar, Nelson, Hodgson, Bonar and Cole2006, Reference Choudhury, Zheng, de León, Martínez-Aquino, Brosseau and Gale2013; Matey et al., Reference Matey, Ervin and Hovey2015; de León et al., Reference de León, Lagunas-Calvo, García-Prieto, Briosio-Aguilar and Aguilar-Aguilar2018). The parasite has since spread globally (Cole & Choudhury, Reference Cole and Choudhury2016; Kuchta et al., Reference Kuchta, Choudhury and Scholz2018) and has been the cause of numerous devastating infections and high mortalities of naïve hosts in fish hatcheries, with serious economic consequences for the aquaculture industry (Han et al., Reference Han, Shin, Kim, Choresca, Jun and Gomez2010; Kilian et al., Reference Kilian, Klauda, Widman, Kashiwagi, Bourquin and Weglein2012; Oros et al., Reference Oros, Barčák, Bazsalovicsová and Hanzelová2015; Xi et al., Reference Xi, Li, Wang, Nie and Xie2016; Boonthai et al., Reference Boonthai, Herbst, Whelan, Van Deuren, Loch and Faisal2017). Fish are a major source of global income (Shelton & Rothbard, Reference Shelton and Rothbard2006; Olsen & Hasan, Reference Olsen and Hasan2012; Tacon & Metian, Reference Tacon and Metian2013), particularly for developing countries (Mulokozi et al., Reference Mulokozi, Mmanda, Onyango, Lundh, Tamatamah and Berg2020), where koi carp (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus) are often bred for consumption or aesthetic purposes (Rahaman et al., Reference Rahaman, Sabbir, Sarder, Biswas and Ghosh2012). In addition, the invasion of waterways outside of its natural range by S. acheilognathi may threaten native fishes (Choudhury et al., Reference Choudhury, Charipar, Nelson, Hodgson, Bonar and Cole2006; de León et al., Reference de León, Lagunas-Calvo, García-Prieto, Briosio-Aguilar and Aguilar-Aguilar2018). Brouder & Hoffnagle (Reference Brouder and Hoffnagle1997) studied fishes from the Colorado River, USA, and found that three of the rivers’ four endangered fish species host S. acheilognathi (Brouder & Hoffnagle, Reference Brouder and Hoffnagle1997). A subsequent study found S. acheilognathi parasitizing all fish species in the Little Colorado River (Choudhury et al., Reference Choudhury, Hoffnagle and Cole2004). Schyzocotyle acheilognathi has contributed to the decline of 40–60% of the humpback chub (Gila cypha) in the Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA, since the 1990s and is being monitored in the desert of the south-west USA (Choudhury & Cole, Reference Choudhury, Cole and Francis2012).

In Australia, S. acheilognathi has been previously reported from the eastern coastal states including New South Wales (NSW), Queensland and Victoria (Dove & Fletcher, Reference Dove and Fletcher2000). Only three studies have molecularly confirmed the species identity of the parasite in Australia, and all are from NSW (Luo et al., Reference Luo, Nie, Zhang, Wang and Yao2002; Xi et al., Reference Xi, Li, Wang, Nie and Xie2016; Kuchta et al., Reference Kuchta, Choudhury and Scholz2018; Rochat et al., Reference Rochat, Blasco-Costa, Scholz and Unmack2020). With the advent of molecular technology, there has been an increasing need for genus-specific primers that amplify hypervariable regions to enable species identification. Hadziavdic et al. (Reference Hadziavdic, Lekang, Lanzen, Jonassen, Thompson and Troedsson2014) compared all of the regions within the 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene of S. acheilognathi and found that the hypervariable region V4 had the longest variable region with the greatest length of polymorphisms, and also included a 70 bp conserved region for primer annealing. Primers targeting the 18S rRNA V4 region in S. acheilognathi have been successful in identifying the species (Nickrent & Sargent, Reference Nickrent and Sargent1991; Bean et al., Reference Bean, Škeříková, Bonner, Scholz and Huffman2007; Hadziavdic et al., Reference Hadziavdic, Lekang, Lanzen, Jonassen, Thompson and Troedsson2014). In the present study, we report the first evidence of S. acheilognathi from Western Australia (WA), within the South-Western Ichthyological Province, a region of extreme endemism, using morphological and molecular identification at the 18S rRNA V4 locus.

Materials and methods

Study site and sample collection

Between February and May 2018, 134 introduced fish from three species were collected from Blue Lake, a modified wetland in the City of Joondalup, WA (S 31o 44.700′, E 115o 45.9668′) as part of an approved feral fish control program. The fish consisted of 91 goldfish (Carassius auratus), 26 koi carp (C. carpio haematopterus) and introduced eastern gambusia or mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki).

Freshly euthanized fishes were dissected at Murdoch University's Fish Health Unit, Perth, WA, and dead tapeworms were removed from the intestine. Half of the tapeworms from each sample were placed in 10% formalin for microscopy and the remainder placed in 100% ethanol for molecular analysis.

Statistical analysis

Prevalence [percentage (%) of hosts infected with S. acheilognathi, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] and intensity of infection (number of S. acheilognathi found in each host) (Bush et al., Reference Bush, Lafferty, Lotz and Shostak1997) were calculated using the Program QPweb 3.0 (Reiczigel et al., Reference Reiczigel, Marozzi, Fábián and Rózsa2019).

Morphological analysis

For morphological analysis on samples from goldfish and koi carp, tapeworms were first relaxed in sterile water overnight and then stained using a dilute Semichon's acetocarmine stain, dehydrated using a graded alcohol series, cleared in methyl salicylate, mounted whole in Canada balsam and viewed in brightfield on an Olympus BX50 compound microscope [10×–40× (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan)] with an Olympus DP71 universal camera (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan), using cellSens software (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan). The eggs were viewed on the same microscope with a DP1 universal camera but using a Nomarski filter. Infection intensities were viewed on an Olympus stereo microscope SZX7 with an Olympus DP27 camera, using cellSens software.

Molecular analysis

Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from ~25 mg of tapeworm tissue (one tapeworm per extraction) and fish intestinal tissue. The tapeworms and intestinal tissue were dissected in sterile petri dishes and extractions were conducted using a Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, St Louis, Missouri, USA). The 18S rRNA V4 region was amplified using the forward primer Ces1 (5′-CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAACTCCA-3′) and reverse primer Ces2 (5′-CCCCCGCCTGTCTCTTTTGAT-3′) producing a ~420 bp product as previously described (Scholz et al., Reference Scholz, Škeříková, Hanzelová, Koubková and Baruš2003; Bean et al., Reference Bean, Škeříková, Bonner, Scholz and Huffman2007), except that the annealing temperature was adjusted to 64°C after optimization. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted using 25 μl reaction volumes, which consisted of 0.02 U/μl Taq DNA polymerase, 1× reaction buffer, 1 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of each dNTP, 1 μM of each primer, 2 μl template gDNA and PCR-grade water to the final volume. PCR cycling conditions for the Ces1/Ces2 primer set consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 min, followed by 45 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 64°C for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min, with a final elongation step at 68°C for 10 min. PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis using a 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel (Fisher Biotec, Wembley, WA, Australia) in Tris-acetate buffer (consisting of 40 mm Tris-hydrochloride, 20 mM ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid at pH 7.0). PCR products of the expected size were excised from the agarose gel, purified using an in-house filter-tip-based method (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Murphy, Yong, Ng-Hublin, Estscourt and Hijjawi2013) and sequenced using a Big Dye version 3.1 Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Massachusetts, USA) on a 96-capillary 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) at Murdoch University and at the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF), Perth, WA. Sequences were assembled in the forward and reverse directions to produce a consensus sequence, assessed for quality and trimmed of primers using Geneious v10.2.2 (Kearse et al., Reference Kearse, Moir, Wilson, Stones-Havas, Cheung and Sturrock2012). Consensus sequences were checked against nucleotide sequences in the GenBank database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) and aligned with related sequences using the MUSCLE alignment tool (Edgar, Reference Edgar2004) with Geneious software. The 364 bp alignment (including gaps) was imported into the PhyML program (Guindon et al., Reference Guindon, Dufayard, Lefort, Anisimova, Hordijk and Gascuel2010) to assess nucleotide substitution models based on Bayesian Information Criterion. The model general time reversible + gamma distribution (GTR + G) was used to construct a Bayesian phylogenetic tree using Geneious and the MrBayes plugin v3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist, Reference Huelsenbeck and Ronquist2001). The tree was built using the following parameters: Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano (HKY85) + GTR + G model; 1,100,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) length; ‘burn-in’ length of 10,000; subsampling frequency of 200. The tree was rooted with the outgroup sequence Parabothriocephalus gracilis (KR780945) (not shown).

Results

Morphological identification

The tapeworms from the koi carp and goldfish were identified as S. acheilognathi based on the following morphological characters: fleshy heart-shaped scolex with unarmed bothria that were short and deep; proglottids had rounded edges with an absent neck; the first proglottids were immediately posterior to the scolex and much narrower than the scolex; and in mature proglottids, genital pores and vitelline follicles were clearly visible (figs 1 and 2a, b). All tapeworms examined using microscopy had gravid proglottids (fig. 2c), with eggs being both operculated and unembryonated (fig. 2d).

Fig. 1.

Semichon's acetocarmine-stained heart-shaped scolex of Schyzocotyle acheilognathi, from the intestines of koi carp (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus), showing unarmed bothria and proglottids much narrower than the scolex with rounded edges (photo: Aileen Elliot).

Fig. 2.

Semichon's acetocarmine-stained mature and gravid proglottids of Schyzocotyle acheilognathi. (a) Arrows indicate genital pores and (b) vitelline follicles. (c) Gravid proglottids ready for dispersal and (d) operculated and unembryonated eggs, with arrow indicating operculum (photos: Aileen Elliot).

Prevalence and intensity of infection

The length and weight range of the koi carp, goldfish and eastern gambusia as well as molecular confirmation of S. acheilognathi in each of the hosts was recorded with an overall tapeworm prevalence of 8.5% (95% CI 7.5–9.5) (table 1).

Table 1.

Length, weight and prevalence of fishes infected with Schyzocotyle acheilognathi from Blue Lake, Joondalup.

The intensity of infection measured in goldfish and koi carp was high, ranging from 203 to 607 parasites per infected fish (mean = 386, 95% CI 296–486) (table 2 and fig. 3), with evidence of intestinal perforation, blockage and ischemia. Several tapeworms exceeded 400 mm in length, which was almost equal to the length of the intestines in some fish. Eastern gambusia also had a high occurrence of parasite burdens, although intensity of infection was not measured.

Fig. 3.

Intensity of Schyzocotyle acheilognathi infection in one koi carp (photo: Aileen Elliot).

Table 2.

Number of tapeworm scolices found in the goldfish and koi carp from Blue Lake, Joondalup in Western Australia.

a Sample identification code.

b Each scolex was counted as one cestode.

Molecular characterization

The 18S rRNA V4 region was amplified from two koi carp (CP1, CP4), two goldfish (CPAFT3, CPAFT4) and four eastern gambusia (CPAFT1, CPAFT2, CPAFT5 and CPAFT7) (table 3). Sequencing confirmed that two of the koi carp isolates (CP1 and CP4, GenBank accession numbers MT898660 and MT898661) were identical to each other (supplementary appendix) and to S. acheilognathi (KX060604) isolated from red shiner (Cyprinella lutrensis) in the Czech Republic, and from a human sample (HM367066) (Yera et al., Reference Yera, Kuchta, Brabec, Peyron and Dupouy-Camet2013; Brabec et al., Reference Brabec, Kuchta, Scholz and Littlewood2016). Furthermore, isolates CP1 and CP4 were 99.0% similar to 18S rRNA V4 sequences from 12 Schyzocotyle isolates from other fishes, including threadfin shad (Dorosoma pretensense) and C. lutrensis (DQ86690 and AY340106, respectively) (Škerıková et al., Reference Škerıková, Hypša and Scholz2004; Bean et al., Reference Bean, Škeříková, Bonner, Scholz and Huffman2007). Two of the eastern gambusia isolates (CPAFT1 and CPAFT2) (GenBank accession numbers MT898662 and MT898663) were identical and were 99.0% similar to nine BLAST hits, including S. acheilognathi from red shiner (C. lutrensis) (KX060604) and largemouth yellowfish (Labeobarbus kimberleyensis) (KX060602) (Brabec et al., Reference Brabec, Kuchta, Scholz and Littlewood2016). Four of the isolates obtained in this study from two goldfish (C. auratus) (CPAFT3 and CPAFT4) and two eastern gambusia (CPAFT5 and CPAFT7) were identical to each other (GenBank accession numbers (MT898664–MT898667), but only 98.7% similar to a single sequence named S. acheilognathi (AY340104) (Škerıková et al., Reference Škerıková, Hypša and Scholz2004). These Schyzocotyle sp. Blue Lake genotype isolates were then most similar to 12 S. acheilognathi isolated from Nazas chub (Gila conspersa) and a common carp (KX060601 and KX060600, respectively) (Brabec et al., Reference Brabec, Kuchta, Scholz and Littlewood2016). However, sequence similarity with these 12 isolates was only 91.0%, with 99.0% query cover (table 3) (see supplementary appendix table S1).

Table 3.

18S rRNA V4 isolates from fishes with closest matches to sequences in GenBank.

Phylogenetic analysis

All isolates were distinct from Bothriocephalus and Senga species and grouped within Schyzocotyle clades (fig. 4). The koi carp sequences (CP4, MT898661; and CP1, MT898660) grouped with S. acheilognathi sequences (Schyzocotyle Group 2A), and two of the novel eastern gambusia genotypes (CPAFT1, MT898662; and CPAFT2, MT898663) formed a discrete S. acheilognathi subgroup (Schyzocotyle Group 2B) with strong support (posterior probability (PP) = 0.9). Four sequences (MT898664–MT898667) formed a discrete subgroup to S. acheilognathi (Group 3) with strong support (PP = 1.0), which included two goldfish (CPAFT3 and CPAFT4) and two eastern gambusia (CPAFT5 and CPAFT7) (fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Bayesian phylogenetic tree of a 354 bp alignment (including gaps) of 18S rRNA V4 sequences of known Schyzocotyle acheilognathi species and Schyzocotyle sequences derived from this study. Scale bar shows the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Sequences from this study are indicated by colours and symbols in the figure's legend.

Discussion

AFT identification has historically been based on the unique morphology of the scolex, which is inadequate for detecting closely related subtypes (Brabec et al., Reference Brabec, Kuchta, Scholz and Littlewood2016; Xi et al., Reference Xi, Li, Wang, Nie and Xie2016). Indeed, in this study, the gross morphology of the AFT and Schyzocotyle sp. Blue Lake genotype (GenBank accession numbers MT898664–MT898667) was indistinguishable. Schyzocotyle sp. Blue Lake genotype was evident by the low sequence homology (91.9% sequence similarity) to AFT sequences in GenBank (table 3), and the phylogenetic grouping of this tapeworm was distinct from other Schyzocotyle species, with strong support (PP = 1.0) (fig. 4). This emphasizes the need for molecular methods for the subtype identification of Schyzocotyle sp. Blue Lake genotype and the AFT in future studies. As this study targeted a partial fragment of the 18S rRNA gene, characterization of the complete or near full-length of 18S rRNA is required to confirm that Schyzocotyle sp. Blue Lake genotype represents a novel species from an unknown origin. Future studies should also aim to morphologically and genetically characterize Schyzocotyle species identified by this study, which will also aid our understanding of the potential origins of the AFT in south-western WA (Luo et al., Reference Luo, Nie, Zhang, Wang and Yao2002; Xi et al., Reference Xi, Li, Wang, Nie and Xie2016).

In the present study, S. acheilognathi was identified by microscopy and molecular characterization for the first time in WA from introduced goldfish, koi carp and eastern gambusia in a modified urban wetland. If translocated from this locality (e.g. by humans, birds, floods, etc.) to adjacent lentic or lotic systems, this parasite would pose a serious threat to the unique freshwater (and possibly estuarine) fish fauna of south-western WA. Several studies have already shown that AFT can infect fish in environments with low to moderate salinity (Ozturk et al., Reference Ozturk, Aydogdu and Dogan2002; Bean, Reference Bean2008; Bean & Bonner, Reference Bean and Bonner2010; İnnal et al., Reference İnnal, Aydogdu and Guclu2016; Sara et al., Reference Sara, Barour, Sameh, Boualleg and Mourad2016; McAllister et al., Reference McAllister, Bursey, Robison, Connior and Trauth2017; Güven & Öztürk, Reference Güven and Öztürk2018; Zhokhov et al., Reference Zhokhov, Pugacheva, Molodozhnikova and Berechikidze2019), and has already threatened the populations of several endemic species in other countries (Salgado-Maldonado & Pineda-López, Reference Salgado-Maldonado and Pineda-López2003; Choudhury et al., Reference Choudhury, Charipar, Nelson, Hodgson, Bonar and Cole2006, Reference Choudhury, Zheng, de León, Martínez-Aquino, Brosseau and Gale2013; de León et al., Reference de León, Lagunas-Calvo, García-Prieto, Briosio-Aguilar and Aguilar-Aguilar2018).

The inland waters in the south-west of WA have the highest proportion of endemic freshwater fish on the continent and are considered one of the world's biodiversity hotspots (Myers et al., Reference Myers, Mittermeier, Mittermeier, Da Fonseca and Kent2000; Beatty & Morgan, Reference Beatty and Morgan2013; Morgan et al., Reference Morgan, Unmack, Beatty, Ebner, Allen and Keleher2014). Invasive fish species may predate or compete with native fishes, or alter the habitat to the detriment of native species (Olden et al., Reference Olden, Kennard and Pusey2008; Beatty & Morgan, Reference Beatty and Morgan2013; Morgan et al., Reference Morgan, Unmack, Beatty, Ebner, Allen and Keleher2014). An additional threat posed by alien fishes, and one that is often under-appreciated, is the introduction of new parasites and pathogens (co-invaders) (Lymbery et al., Reference Lymbery, Morine, Kanani, Beatty and Morgan2014). Co-invading parasites can be more pathogenic to native fishes than to their natural hosts, possibly due to the lack of coevolutionary existence (Lymbery et al., Reference Lymbery, Morine, Kanani, Beatty and Morgan2014) and, as such, can cause morbidity and mortality on already declining native populations. In south-western WA, many river systems have seasonally intermittent flow, and fish communities must survive the dry season in small, disconnected refuge pools, which could amplify the transmission and effects of co-invading parasites (Lymbery et al., Reference Lymbery, Lymbery and Beatty2020). At least two other species of co-invading parasites, including Ligula intestinalis (Morgan, Reference Morgan2003; Chapman et al., Reference Chapman, Hobbs, Morgan and Gill2006) and Lernaea cyprinacea, have recently been identified in native fishes in south-western WA and they also infect diadromous and estuarine fishes that venture into freshwaters (Hassan et al., Reference Hassan, Beatty, Morgan, Doupé and Lymbery2008). Lernaea cyprinacea was introduced to WA's native waterways as a co-invader with goldfish and now infects at least six native freshwater species (Hassan et al., Reference Hassan, Beatty, Morgan, Doupé and Lymbery2008). The original source of the S. acheilognathi in WA is unknown, but it appears that either goldish or koi carp are likely to be the source as these are the natural hosts for this particular parasite (Dove & Fletcher, Reference Dove and Fletcher2000; Košuthová et al., Reference Košuthová, Šmiga, Oros, Barčák and Košuth2015; Oros et al., Reference Oros, Barčák, Bazsalovicsová and Hanzelová2015; Salgado-Maldonado et al., Reference Salgado-Maldonado, Matamoros, Kreiser, Caspeta-Mandujano and Mendoza-Franco2015; Kuchta et al., Reference Kuchta, Choudhury and Scholz2018).

The histopathological signs of S. acheilognathi in fish hosts are frequently extreme, with the parasite often killing its host (Liao & Shih, Reference Liao and Shih1956; Bauer et al., Reference Bauer, Musselius and Strelkov1969; Edwards & Hine, Reference Edwards and Hine1974; Scott & Grizzle, Reference Scott and Grizzle1979; Pool et al., Reference Pool, Ryder and Andrews1984; Schäperclaus et al., Reference Schäperclaus, Kulow and Schreckenbach1991; Brouder, Reference Brouder1999). In the present study, there was evidence of intestinal perforation and a large number (>600) of S. acheilognathi detected in each fish – far greater than previous studies, which have reported infection intensities of between two and 45 tapeworms (Scholz, Reference Scholz1997; Brouder, Reference Brouder1999; Košuthová et al., Reference Košuthová, Šmiga, Oros, Barčák and Košuth2015). In this study, the high intensity of tapeworms caused blockage and ischemia in parts of the intestines, resulting in intestinal perforations. The size of the tapeworms varied according to the size of the host and in one koi carp sample a single tapeworm measured over 400 mm in length. Over one quarter of the native fishes in south-western WA are listed as threatened with many very small in size (<100 mm total length) (Morgan et al., Reference Morgan, Unmack, Beatty, Ebner, Allen and Keleher2014). As with many parasitic interactions, the pathogenicity of S. acheilognathi increases in smaller hosts, with the potential to impact native fishes further. Gambusia holbrooki has been previously identified as a host for S. acheilognathi (Dove et al., Reference Dove, Cribb, Mockler and Lintermans1997; İnnal et al., Reference İnnal, Aydogdu and Guclu2016; McAllister et al., Reference McAllister, Bursey, Robison, Connior and Trauth2017). Gambusia holbrooki is already widespread throughout Australia and, because of its very large population sizes, represents a potential vector for further spread of the parasite (Morgan & Buttemer, Reference Morgan and Buttemer1996; Reynolds, Reference Reynolds2009). The discovery of S. acheilognathi in WA waters reinforces the importance of invasive fish control programs. Communication and education programs to the wider community are needed to help reduce the release of alien fishes into Australian waterways. It should also be noted that S. acheilognathi poses a potential health risk to humans. Although not generally considered zoonotic, there is one case study that identified a 32-year-old male who was initially diagnosed with Diphyllobothrium; however, molecular analysis of the DNA extracted from eggs in the patient's faeces identified them as S. acheilognathi, highlighting the importance of molecular identification techniques (Yera et al., Reference Yera, Kuchta, Brabec, Peyron and Dupouy-Camet2013). Future research investigations should also study other potential vectors, such as frogs, reptiles and birds (Kuchta et al., Reference Kuchta, Choudhury and Scholz2018), for the transmission of Schyzocotyle spp. in south-western WA. It is imperative that the potential spread and impacts of the invasion of S. acheilognathi be identified in future research to effectively control and manage the transmission of the parasite.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X21000365.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Whadjuk people of the Noongar nation, the Traditional Owners of the land on which this research was conducted. Our thanks to Prof Una Ryan, Prof Alan Lymbery and Dr Charlotte Oskam from Murdoch University, Perth, WA, for their assistance with initial edits on an early draft of the manuscript. We also thank Frances Brigg for technical support with Sanger sequencing at the Western Australian State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre (SABC), Perth WA, and David Chandler (AGRF) for providing valuable advice on PCR applications and technical support. We also thank the anonymous reviewers that edited the manuscript.

Financial support

This research has been co-funded by the City of Joondalup Shire (grant number 19619), the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science National Landcare Program (Environment Small Grants) and by Murdoch University. Cindy Palermo is supported by a Murdoch University Research Scholarship.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors declare that the animals used in this research were euthanized in compliance with Animal Ethics Protocol ID. 401 (permit number R2949/17).

Author contributions

C.J.P., D.L.M. and S.J.B. contributed to the conception and design of the study, and acquisition of data. C.J.P., S.J.B. and A.E. analysed and interpreted the morphological data. C.J.P. and T.L.G. analysed and interpreted the molecular data. C.J.P. drafted the article, and D.L.M., S.J.B., A.E. and T.L.G. critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript submitted for publication.

References

Bauer, O, Musselius, V and Strelkov, Y (1969) Diseases of pond fish. 220 pp. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Cornell University Press, USSR.Google Scholar
Bean, MG (2008) Occurrence and impact of the Asian fish tapeworm Bothriocephalus acheilognathi in the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo Del Norte). Dissertation, Texas State University. Available at https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/3123 (accessed 28 July 2020).Google Scholar
Bean, MG and Bonner, TH (2010) Spatial and temporal distribution of the Asian fish tapeworm Bothriocephalus acheilognathi (Cestoda: Bothriocephalidea) in the Río Grande (Río Bravo del Norte). Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 22(3), 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bean, MG, Škeříková, A, Bonner, TH, Scholz, T and Huffman, DG (2007) First record of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi in the Rio Grande with comparative analysis of ITS2 and V4-18S rRNA Gene Sequences. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 19(2), 71–76.Google Scholar
Beatty, SJ and Morgan, DL (2013) Introduced freshwater fishes in a global endemic hotspot and implications of habitat and climatic change. Biological Invasions Records 2(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Boonthai, T, Herbst, SJ, Whelan, GE, Van Deuren, MG, Loch, TP and Faisal, M (2017) The Asian fish tapeworm Schyzocotyle acheilognathi is widespread in baitfish retail stores in Michigan, USA. Parasites & Vectors 10, 618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brabec, J, Kuchta, R, Scholz, T and Littlewood, DTJ (2016) Paralogues of nuclear ribosomal genes conceal phylogenetic signals within the invasive Asian fish tapeworm lineage: evidence from next generation sequencing data. International Journal of Parasitology 46(9), 555–562.Google ScholarPubMed
Brouder, MJ (1999) Relationship between length of roundtail chub and infection intensity of Asian fish tapeworm Bothriocephalus acheilognathi. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 11(3), 302–304.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouder, MJ and Hoffnagle, TL (1997) Distribution and prevalence of the Asian fish tapeworm, Bothriocephalus acheilognathi, in the Colorado River and tributaries, Grand Canyon, Arizona, including two new host records. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 64(2), 219–226.Google Scholar
Bush, AO, Lafferty, KD, Lotz, JM and Shostak, AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. The Journal of Parasitology 83(4), 575–583.Google Scholar
Chapman, A, Hobbs, R, Morgan, D and Gill, H (2006) Helminth parasitism of Galaxias maculatus (Jenyns 1842) in southwestern Australia. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 15(4), 559–564.Google Scholar
Choudhury, A and Cole, R (2012) Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti (Asian tapeworm). pp. 385–400 in Francis, RA (Ed) A handbook of global freshwater invasive species. London, Earthscan.Google Scholar
Choudhury, A, Hoffnagle, TL and Cole, RA (2004) Parasites of native and nonnative fishes of the Little Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Arizona. Journal of Parasitology 90(5), 1042–1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choudhury, A, Charipar, E, Nelson, P, Hodgson, JR, Bonar, S and Cole, RA (2006) Update on the distribution of the invasive Asian fish tapeworm, Bothriocephalus acheilognathi, in the US and Canada. Comparative Parasitology 73(2), 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhury, A, Zheng, S, de León, GP-P, Martínez-Aquino, A, Brosseau, C and Gale, E (2013) The invasive Asian fish tapeworm, Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934, in the Chagres River/Panama Canal drainage, Panama. Bioinvasion Records 2(2), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, RA and Choudhury, A (2016) Invasive species compendium: Bothriocephalus acheilognathi. Available at http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/91669 (accessed 2 July 2021).Google Scholar
Davydov, O (1978) Effect of Bothriocephalus gowkongensis on the morphological characters and physiological statistics of the carp. Hydrobiology Journal 14, 50–54.Google Scholar
de León, GP-P, Lagunas-Calvo, O, García-Prieto, L, Briosio-Aguilar, R and Aguilar-Aguilar, R (2018) Update on the distribution of the co-invasive Schyzocotyle acheilognathi (= Bothriocephalus acheilognathi), the Asian fish tapeworm, in freshwater fishes of Mexico. Journal of Helminthology 92(3), 279–290.Google Scholar
Dove, A and Fletcher, A (2000) The distribution of the introduced tapeworm Bothriocephalus acheilognathi in Australian freshwater fishes. Journal of Helminthology 74(2), 121–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dove, A, Cribb, T, Mockler, S and Lintermans, M (1997) The Asian fish tapeworm, Bothriocephalus acheilognathi, in Australian freshwater fishes. Marine and Freshwater Research 48(2), 181–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5), 1792–1797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, DJ and Hine, P (1974) Introduction, preliminary handling, and diseases of grass carp in New Zealand. Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 8(3), 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Prieto, L and Osorio-Sarabia, D (1991) Distribución actual de Bothriocephalus acheilognathi en México. In: Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Serie Zoologia 62, 523–526.Google Scholar
Guindon, S, Dufayard, J-F, Lefort, V, Anisimova, M, Hordijk, W and Gascuel, O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59(3), 307–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Güven, A and Öztürk, T (2018) Metazoan parasite faunas of three Gobiid species (Actinopterygii: Gobiidae) inhabiting the lower Kızılırmak Delta in Samsun: a comparative study. Turkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 42(1), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadziavdic, K, Lekang, K, Lanzen, A, Jonassen, I, Thompson, EM and Troedsson, C (2014) Characterization of the 18S rRNA gene for designing universal eukaryote specific primers. PLoS One 9, e87624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, SP, Choudhury, A, Heisey, D, Ahumada, J, Hoffnagle, T and Cole, R (2006) Experimental infection of the endangered bonytail chub (Gila elegans) with the Asian fish tapeworm (Bothriocephalus acheilognathi): impacts on survival, growth, and condition. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84(10), 1383–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, JE, Shin, SP, Kim, JH, Choresca, CH Jr, Jun, JW, Gomez, DK, et al. (2010) Mortality of cultured koi Cyprinus carpio in Korea caused by Bothriocephalus acheilognathi. African Journal of Microbiology Research 4(7), 543–546.Google Scholar
Hassan, M, Beatty, S, Morgan, D, Doupé, R and Lymbery, A (2008) An introduced parasite, Lernaea cyprinacea L., found on native freshwater fishes in the south west of Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 91(2), 149–153.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, JP and Ronquist, F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17(8), 754–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
İnnal, D, Aydogdu, A and Guclu, SS (2016) Invasion of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) in Turkey. Acta Biologica Turcica 29(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
Kearse, M, Moir, R, Wilson, A, Stones-Havas, S, Cheung, M, Sturrock, S, et al. (2012) Geneious basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28(12), 1647–1649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilian, JV, Klauda, RJ, Widman, S, Kashiwagi, M, Bourquin, R, Weglein, S, et al. (2012) An assessment of a bait industry and angler behavior as a vector of invasive species. Biological Invasions 14(7), 1469–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Košuthová, L, Šmiga, Ľ, Oros, M, Barčák, D and Košuth, P (2015) The pathogenic Asian fish tapeworm, Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934 (Cestoda) in the Red discus (Symphysodon discus). Helminthologia 52(3), 52287–52292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchta, R, Choudhury, A and Scholz, T (2018) Asian fish tapeworm: the most successful invasive parasite in freshwaters. Trends in Parasitolology 34(6), 511–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, HH and Shih, LCh (1956) Contribution to the biology and control of Bothriocephalus gowkongensis Yeh, a tapeworm parasitic in the young grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 7(1), 182–185.Google Scholar
Luo, H, Nie, P, Zhang, Y, Wang, G and Yao, W (2002) Molecular variation of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) in different fish host species based on ITS rDNA sequences. Systematic Parasitology 52(3), 159–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lymbery, AJ, Morine, M, Kanani, HG, Beatty, SJ and Morgan, DL (2014) Co-invaders: the effects of alien parasites on native hosts. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 392, 171–177.Google Scholar
Lymbery, AJ, Lymbery, SJ and Beatty, SJ (2020) Fish out of water: aquatic parasites in a drying world. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 12, 300–307.Google Scholar
Matey, VE, Ervin, EL and Hovey, TE (2015) Asian fish tapeworm (Bothriocephalus acheilognathi) infecting a wild population of convict cichlid (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus) in Southwestern California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 114(2), 89–97.Google Scholar
McAllister, CT, Bursey, CR, Robison, HW, Connior, MB and Trauth, SE (2017) New records of helminth parasites (Trematoda, Cestoda, Nematoda) from fishes in the Arkansas and Red River Drainages, Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 96, 2017.Google Scholar
Morgan, DL (2003) Distribution and biology of Galaxias truttaceus (Galaxiidae) in south-western Australia, including first evidence of parasitism of fishes in Western Australia by Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda). Environmental Biology of Fishes 66, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, L and Buttemer, W (1996) Predation by the non-native fish Gambusia holbrooki on small Litoria aurea and L. dentata tadpoles. Australian Journal of Zoology 30(2), 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, DL, Unmack, PJ, Beatty, SJ, Ebner, BC, Allen, MG, Keleher, J, et al. (2014) An overview of the ‘freshwater fishes’ of Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 97, 263–278.Google Scholar
Mulokozi, DP, Mmanda, FP, Onyango, P, Lundh, T, Tamatamah, R and Berg, H (2020) Rural culture: assessment of its contribution to household income and farmers’ perception in selected districts, Tanzania. Tanzania Aquacultural Economic Management 24(4), 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N, Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, Da Fonseca, GA and Kent, J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772), 853–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nickrent, DL and Sargent, ML (1991) An overview of the secondary structure of the V4 region of eukaryotic small-subunit ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Research 19(2), 227–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olden, JD, Kennard, MJ and Pusey, BJ (2008) Species invasions and the changing biogeography of Australian freshwater fishes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
Olsen, RL and Hasan, MR (2012) A limited supply of fishmeal: impact on future increases in global aquaculture production. Trends in Food Science & Technology 27(2), 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oros, M, Barčák, D, Bazsalovicsová, E and Hanzelová, V (2015) Asian fish tapeworm, Khawia japonensis (Yamaguti, 1934), has expanded its European invasive range. Parasitology Research 114(5), 2035–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozturk, M, Aydogdu, A and Dogan, I (2002) The occurrence of helminth fauna in sand goby (Gobius fluviatilis, Pallas, 1811) from lake Uluabat, Turkey. Acta Veterinaria 52(5–6), 381–391.Google Scholar
Pool, D, Ryder, K and Andrews, C (1984) The control of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi in grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella, using praziquantel. Aquaculture Research 15(1), 31–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigli, M (1975) The role of aquatic birds in spreading Bothriocephalus gowkongensis Yeh, 1955 (Cestoda). Parasitology Hungary 8, 61–62.Google Scholar
Rahaman, S, Sabbir, W, Sarder, L, Biswas, S and Ghosh, A (2012) Induced breeding, embryonic and larval development of Koi carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Khulna, Bangladesh. Mesopotamian Journal of Marine Science 27(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Reiczigel, J, Marozzi, M, Fábián, I and Rózsa, L (2019) Biostatistics for parasitologists–a primer to quantitative parasitology. Trends in Parasitology 35(4), 277–281.Google ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, SJ (2009) Impact of the introduced poeciliid Gambusia holbrooki on amphibians in southwestern Australia. Copeia 2009(2), 296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochat, E, Blasco-Costa, I, Scholz, T and Unmack, P (2020) High diversity of metazoan parasites in carp gudgeons (Eleotridae: Hypseleotris spp.) from Eastern Australia. Journal of Helminthology 94, e146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salgado-Maldonado, G and Pineda-López, RF (2003) The Asian fish tapeworm Bothriocephalus acheilognathi: a potential threat to native freshwater fish species in Mexico. Biological Invasions 5(3), 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salgado-Maldonado, G, Matamoros, WA, Kreiser, BR, Caspeta-Mandujano, JM and Mendoza-Franco, EF (2015) First record of the invasive Asian fish tapeworm Bothriocephalus acheilognathi in Honduras, Central America. Parasite 22(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sara, B, Barour, C, Sameh, A, Boualleg, C and Mourad, B (2016) Environmental parameters and parasitism in common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) caught from Oubeira Lake (north-east of Algeria). Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology 11, 1816–9112.Google Scholar
Schäperclaus, W, Kulow, H and Schreckenbach, K (1991) Fish diseases. New Delhi, Amerind Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
Scholz, T (1997) A revision of the species of Bothriocephalus Rudolphi, 1808 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) parasitic in American freshwater fishes. Systematic Parasitology 36(2), 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, T (1999) Parasites in cultured and feral fish. Veterinary Parasitology 84(3–4), 317–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholz, T, Škeříková, A, Hanzelová, V, Koubková, B and Baruš, V (2003) Resurrection of Proteocephalus sagittus (Grimm, 1872) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) based on morphological and molecular data. Systematic Parasitology 56(3), 173–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, AL and Grizzle, JM (1979) Pathology of cyprinid fishes caused by Bothriocephalus gowkongensis Yea, 1955 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea). Journal of Fish Diseases 2(1), 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, WL and Rothbard, S (2006) Exotic species in global aquaculture-A review. Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh 58(1), 3–28.Google Scholar
Škerıková, A, Hypša, V and Scholz, T (2004) A paraphyly of the genus Bothriocephalus Blanchard, 1852 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) inferred from ITS2 and partial 18S rDNA sequences. Journal of Parasitology 90, 612–617.Google Scholar
Tacon, AG and Metian, M (2013) Fish matters: importance of aquatic foods in human nutrition and global food supply. Reviews in Fisheries Science 21(1), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xi, B, Li, W, Wang, G, Nie, P and Xie, J (2016) Cryptic genetic diversity and host specificity of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934 (Eucestoda: Bothriocephalidea). 动物分类学报 41(2), 140–148.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S (1934) Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 4. Cestodes of fishes. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 6(1), 1–112.Google Scholar
Yang, R, Murphy, C, Yong, S, Ng-Hublin, J, Estscourt, A, Hijjawi, N, et al. (2013) Specific and quantitative detection and identification of Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum in clinical and environmental samples. Experimental Parasitology 135(1), 142–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yera, H, Kuchta, R, Brabec, J, Peyron, F and Dupouy-Camet, J (2013) First identification of eggs of the Asian fish tapeworm Bothriocephalus acheilognathi (Cestoda: Bothriocephalidea) in human stool. Parasitology International 62(3), 268–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhokhov, A, Pugacheva, M, Molodozhnikova, N and Berechikidze, I (2019) Alien parasite Species of the fish in the Volga River Basin: a review of data on the species number and distribution. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 10(2), 136–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Semichon's acetocarmine-stained heart-shaped scolex of Schyzocotyle acheilognathi, from the intestines of koi carp (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus), showing unarmed bothria and proglottids much narrower than the scolex with rounded edges (photo: Aileen Elliot).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Semichon's acetocarmine-stained mature and gravid proglottids of Schyzocotyle acheilognathi. (a) Arrows indicate genital pores and (b) vitelline follicles. (c) Gravid proglottids ready for dispersal and (d) operculated and unembryonated eggs, with arrow indicating operculum (photos: Aileen Elliot).

Figure 2

Table 1. Length, weight and prevalence of fishes infected with Schyzocotyle acheilognathi from Blue Lake, Joondalup.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Intensity of Schyzocotyle acheilognathi infection in one koi carp (photo: Aileen Elliot).

Figure 4

Table 2. Number of tapeworm scolices found in the goldfish and koi carp from Blue Lake, Joondalup in Western Australia.

Figure 5

Table 3. 18S rRNA V4 isolates from fishes with closest matches to sequences in GenBank.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of a 354 bp alignment (including gaps) of 18S rRNA V4 sequences of known Schyzocotyle acheilognathi species and Schyzocotyle sequences derived from this study. Scale bar shows the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Sequences from this study are indicated by colours and symbols in the figure's legend.

Supplementary material: File

Palermo et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Palermo et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26 KB