Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T22:59:25.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in an obstetrics emergency hospital and neonatal care unit—Haiti, 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2018

Katerina Chaintarli,
Annick LengletOpen the ORCID record for Annick Lenglet[Opens in a new window],
Bregeneve Dabord Beauzile,
Rodnie Senat-Delva,
Marie-Marcelle Mabou,
Chiara Martino,
Marine Berthet,
Sidney Wong and
Joost Hopman
Katerina Chaintarli
Affiliation:
European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Solna, SwedenHealth Protection Surveillance Center, Dublin, IrelandMédecins Sans Frontières Operational Centre Amsterdam, Port au Prince, Haiti
Annick Lenglet*
Affiliation:
European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Solna, SwedenRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Bregeneve Dabord Beauzile
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières Operational Centre Amsterdam, Port au Prince, Haiti
Rodnie Senat-Delva
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières Operational Centre Amsterdam, Port au Prince, Haiti
Marie-Marcelle Mabou
Affiliation:
The Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections, Port au Prince, Haiti
Chiara Martino
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Marine Berthet
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières Operational Centre Amsterdam, Port au Prince, Haiti
Sidney Wong
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Joost Hopman
Affiliation:
Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author for correspondence: Annick Lenglet, Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Centre Amsterdam, Plantage Middenlaan 14, 1018 DD, Amsterdam. E-mail: annick.lenglet@amsterdam.msf.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A point-prevalence survey of mothers and neonates admitted to an obstetrics emergency hospital in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, revealed that 13 of 127 gram-negative bacteria isolates (10%) from rectal swabs were ESBL-positive in women and 30 of 59 gram-negative bacteria isolates (51%) from rectal swabs were ESBL-positive in neonates. Length of hospital stay and antibiotic consumption were risk factors for ESBL colonization.

Information

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 39 , Issue 11 , November 2018, pp. 1381 - 1383
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

Patient colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing gram-negative bacteria (ESBL-GNB) could serve as a potential reservoir for transmission of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in a hospital setting. Individuals colonized with ESBL-Enterobacteriaceae are also known to be at a higher risk of ESBL-GNB infection following their colonization.Reference Reddy, Malczynski and Obias 1 We encountered an outbreak of MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae in the neonatal care unit (NCU) of the Médecins Sans Frontiéres (MSF) obstetric emergency hospital in Port au Prince (CRUO), Haiti, between 2014 and 2015.Reference Lenglet, Faniyan and Hopman 2 As part of ongoing surveillance activities for MDR bacteria and in an effort to better target infection, prevention, and control (IPC) measures throughout the hospital, we conducted a point-prevalence survey to estimate the prevalence of colonization with ESBL-GNB and to identify risk factors for colonization with ESBL-GNB in women and neonates admitted to this hospital.

Methods

We collected single rectal swabs from all women waiting for admission and admitted mothers and neonates in CRUO between July 11 and July 22, 2016. The number of swabs per day was limited due to the daily processing capacity of the microbiological laboratory.

Rectal bacteriology transport swabs with Amies agar gel (Copan Diagnostics, Murrieta, CA) were collected at ambient temperature and stored in sterile containers 4°C and were transported to the processing laboratory daily. The methods used for testing have been described previously.Reference Lenglet, Faniyan and Hopman 2 The choice of antibiotics was based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines (M100-S25), 3 and ESBL confirmation was based on the methods outlined in the guidelines of the Microbiological Association of France (CASFM 2013). 4

The medical director of MSF-OCA approved the survey; it formed part of the routine monitoring and evaluation of antimicrobial resistance in the hospital. The Haitian Ethics Review Committee approved the implementation of this survey. All women and caretakers of neonates provided written informed consent for participation.

We calculated the prevalence of colonization by estimating the proportions of ESBL-GNB of the total number of GNB isolates per admission room. We calculated the proportions of susceptibility of ESBL-GNB for each antibiotic. Finally, we used multivariable exact Poisson regression to account for the small sample size to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and to identify risk factors for colonization with ESBL-GNB. All analyses were conducted using Stata version 14.1 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Results

In total, 112 women and 64 neonates participated in the survey; 2 women refused to participate (99% response). The mean age of the women was 29.1 years (standard deviation [SD], 6.8 years), and they had spent a median of 2 days in the hospital. Among women, 26 (23%) took antibiotics in the 2 weeks prior to their admission to the hospital and 40 (45%) received antibiotics during their current hospital stay. Neonates were a median of 5 days old at the time of sampling (mean, 7.1 days; SD, 12.7 days) and 43 (69%) had received antibiotics since their birth at the hospital. We isolated 127 GNB from women and 59 from neonates, for a total of 186 GNB isolates. We detected >1 isolate in samples from 24 patients (16 women and 8 neonates), and samples from 15 patients showed no growth (2 women and 13 neonates).

From women, Escherichia coli was isolated from 102 of 112 rectal swabs (91%) and K. pneumoniae was isolated from 15 of 112 rectal swabs (13%). Klebsiella oxytoca (n=2), Enterobacter cloacae (n=3), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=2), Morganella morganii (n=1), Enterobacter spp (n=1), and Serratia spp (n=1) were also identified in samples from women. From neonates, 31 of 64 samples (48%) yielded E. coli, and 17 of 64 samples (27%) yielded K. pneumonia. Klebsiella oxytoca (n=4), E. cloacae (n=1), Klebsiella spp (n=1), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=1) were also isolated from neonatal samples.

Among women, 13 of 127 isolates (10%) were ESBL-GNB: K. pneumonia, 4 of 15; K. oxytoca, 1 of 2; and E. coli, 8 of 99. Overall, the proportion of ESBL-GNB isolates was highest in the intensive care unit (2 of 8, 25%) and the cholera ward (2 of 8, 25%), while no ESBL-GNB were isolated in triage or in the delivery room (Table 1). Among neonates, 29 of 59 isolates (49%) were ESBL-GNB: K. pneumonia (10 of 17), K. oxytoca (4 of 4), and E. coli (14 of 30). ESBL-GNB were isolated in all wards housing neonates except for the delivery room (ie, soon after birth).

Table 1

ESBL-Positive Isolates by Admission Room for Women and Neonates, CRUO – Haiti, July 2016Footnote a

Note. NA, not available. Kangaroo Mother Care refers to a ward where mothers and their newborn premature newborns are encouraged to have skin-on-skin contact to reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes in these infants.

a Total GNB isolates in women, n=127 and in neonates, n=59.

Susceptibilities to amikacin and imipenem in ESBL-GNB from neonates and women were ≥90% (Fig. 1). Cefoxitin and piperacillin/tazobactam susceptibilities in all samples were ~70% (Fig. 1). Susceptibilities to amoxicillin/clavulanic, cefotaxim, gentamicin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were <40% for all ESBL-GNB isolates (Fig. 1). Susceptibility to ciprofloxacin was significantly higher in neonatal isolates (90%) than in isolates from women (31%; P<.0001).

Fig. 1

Antibiotic suspectibility in ESBL-GNB isolates in neonates (n=29) and women (n=13) in CRUO, Haiti, 2016. Note. AMI, amikacin; AMOXICLAV, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CEFO, cefotaxim; CEFOX, cefoxitine; CIPRO, ciprofloxacine; GENT, gentamycin; IMI, imipenem; PIPTAZO, piperacillin/tazobactam; TMP/SMX, trimethoprone/sulfamexazole.

We adjusted the multivariable exact Poisson regression for patient type (women vs neonates), antibiotic consumption prior to hospital admission or while admitted, shared room between women or neonates, and length of hospital stay. Colonization with ESBL-GNB was associated with being a neonate (aPR, 4.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8–12.6), with having consumed antibiotics (aPR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.0–9.3), and with being admitted for >1 day (aPR, 2.9; 95% CI, 0.7–25.7).

Discussion

Our survey shows that prevalence for ESBL-GNB was dramatically higher in neonates than in women admitted to this obstetrics emergency hospital and that antibiotic susceptibility in ESBL-GNB isolated from neonates was lower than in those isolates from women. ESBL-GNB colonization was associated with being a neonate, having stayed longer in the hospital, and having consumed antibiotics in the weeks prior to or during hospital admission. The colonization of ESBL-GNB in women and neonates occurs during their hospital stay, which is also supported by the finding that no ESBL-GNB were found to colonize women in triage or the delivery room. In CRUO, most surveyed neonates were admitted to the NCU (mainly for prematurity or low birthweight) and likely acquired their ESBL-GNB from the hospital environment and breaches of IPC measures. Evidence indicates that in premature neonates, bacterial colonization within 4 weeks after birth was dominated by potentially pathogenic GNB, likely from the hospital environment, rather than commensal bacteria.Reference Barrett, Kerr and Murphy 5 The finding that antibiotic use was associated with ESBL-GNB colonization in neonates and adults has been reported elsewhere.Reference Cassettari, da Silveira and Dropa 6 , Reference Harris, McGregor and Johnson 7 A high proportion of women in the current survey reported having taken antibiotics prior to hospital admission for the delivery, and self-medication with antibiotics (a known risk factor for favoring antibiotic resistance development) is a common practice in Haiti.Reference Moise, Bernard and Henrys 8

This study has several limitations. Several patients (women and neonates) had already taken or were already on antibiotic treatment at the time of sampling, which may have led to the underestimation of the true prevalence of bacterial isolates sensitive to those antibiotics. Rectal sampling in women might have led to the underestimation of colonization due to low sensitivity or incorrect sampling methods. Point-prevalence surveys are also subject to overestimating the burden of disease at the community level because patients with healthcare-associated infections often stay at the hospital for longer and, thus, would have a greater chance to be included in the study.Reference Llata, Gaynes and Fridkin 9

In conclusion, the current point-prevalence survey provides new and clear insights into the epidemiology of ESBL-GNB in this hospital in Haiti and strengthens the findings from routine surveillance for bloodstream infections and treatment failure. Based on these findings, we recommend that prevalence surveys be carried out annually at CRUO as part of the routine surveillance in the hospital to help identify trends of colonization with ESBL-GNB, to provide evidence pertaining to healthcare-associated infections, and to evaluate the efficacy of existing antibiotic and infection prevention and control strategies.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients admitted to CRUO, Port-au-Prince, Haiti, during this study for their participation. We also thank Cono Ariti for statistical analysis advice.

Financial support

All field work associated with this study was funded through operational costs of MSF-OCA in Haiti. The funder had no role in the design or interpretation of results from the analysis.

Conflict of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

1. Reddy, P, Malczynski, M, Obias, A, et al. Screening for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae among high-risk patients and rates of subsequent bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:846–852.Google Scholar
2. Lenglet, A, Faniyan, O, Hopman, J. A nosocomial outbreak of clinical sepsis in a neonatal care unit (NCU) in Port-Au-Prince Haiti, July 2014 – September 2015. PLoS Curr 2018. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.58723332ec0de952adefd9a9b6905932.Google Scholar
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (M100-S25). Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2015.Google Scholar
4. Sommaire: La Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française Microbiologie. Société Française de Microbiologie website. http://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/UserFiles/files/casfm/CASFM2013vjuin.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed August 13, 2018.Google Scholar
5. Barrett, E, Kerr, C, Murphy, K, et al. The individual-specific and diverse nature of the preterm infant microbiota. Arch Dis Child 2013;98:F334–F340.Google Scholar
6. Cassettari, VC, da Silveira, IR, Dropa, M, et al. Risk factors for colonisation of newborn infants during an outbreak of extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in an intermediate-risk neonatal unit. J Hosp Infect 2009;71:340–347.Google Scholar
7. Harris, AD, McGregor, JC, Johnson, JA, et al. Risk factors for colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing bacteria and intensive care unit admission. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:1144–1149.Google Scholar
8. Moise, K, Bernard, JJ, Henrys, JH. Evaluation of antibiotic self-medication among outpatients of the state university hospital of Port-Au-Prince, Haiti: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J 2017;28:4.Google Scholar
9. Llata, E, Gaynes, R, Fridkin, S. Measuring the scope and magnitude of hospital-associated infection in the United States: the value of prevalence surveys. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:1434–1440.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1ESBL-Positive Isolates by Admission Room for Women and Neonates, CRUO – Haiti, July 2016a

Figure 1

Fig. 1Antibiotic suspectibility in ESBL-GNB isolates in neonates (n=29) and women (n=13) in CRUO, Haiti, 2016. Note. AMI, amikacin; AMOXICLAV, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CEFO, cefotaxim; CEFOX, cefoxitine; CIPRO, ciprofloxacine; GENT, gentamycin; IMI, imipenem; PIPTAZO, piperacillin/tazobactam; TMP/SMX, trimethoprone/sulfamexazole.