Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:52:19.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Propagation management methods have altered the genetic variability of two traditional mango varieties in Myanmar, as revealed by SSR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

R. Hirano
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
H. Ishii
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
Than Htun Oo
Affiliation:
Vegetable and Fruits Research and Development Centre, Myanma Agriculture Service, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, Hlegu, Yangon Division, Myanmar
S. A. Gilani
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
A. Kikuchi
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
K. N. Watanabe*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: nabechan@gene.tsukuba.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is an important fruit crop with a long cultivation history in Myanmar. This study evaluated the genetic variation within two economically important traditional varieties, ‘Yin Kwe’ and ‘Sein Ta Lone’, and the relationship between genetic variation and propagation practices. Genetic variation was estimated by genotyping 94 individuals with 12 single sequence repeat markers. ‘Yin Kwe’ (n = 53) showed higher levels of observed heterozygosity (Ho = 0.59) and average genetic distance among individuals (Da = 0.29) than did ‘Sein Ta Lone’ (n = 41; Ho = 0.45; Da = 0.09). The differences between the two varieties at the DNA level were significant (Fst = 0.44). The broader genetic background in ‘Yin Kwe’ compared with ‘Sein Ta Lone’ was also demonstrated by neighbour-joining and principal coordinates analyses. Differences in variety uses and propagation practices were determined by interviewing local specialists in Lower Myanmar (southern Myanmar). ‘Yin Kwe’ was often used as a rootstock for ‘Sein Ta Lone’. Clonal propagation by grafting was observed frequently for ‘Sein Ta Lone’ but never for ‘Yin Kwe’. The differences in genetic variation between these two varieties might have been caused by the propagation practices for each variety, which result from their respective uses.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011
Figure 0

Table 1 Collection locations and number of samples

Figure 1

Table 2 SSR markers used in this study

Figure 2

Table 3 SSR markers used in this study and summary statistics for each variety

Figure 3

Fig. 1 Neighbour-joining dendrogram of ‘Yin Kwe’ and ‘Sein Ta Lone’. Underlined numbers on branches indicate bootstrap values obtained by using 1000 permutations. Only bootstrap values larger than 50 are indicated. Arrows indicate individuals of ‘Sein Ta Lone’ that fell within the ‘Yin Kwe’ portion of the tree.

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Principal coordinates plot of ‘Sein Ta Lone’ and ‘Yin Kwe’. Filled triangles indicate ‘Yin Kwe’, and open circles indicate ‘Sein Ta Lone’. Arrows indicate the same individuals as in Fig. 1.

Figure 5

Table 4 AMOVA and F values for the mango varieties ‘Sein Ta Lone’ and ‘Yin Kwe’