Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:33:38.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-protein diet during gestation and lactation affects mammary gland mRNA abundance, milk composition and pre-weaning litter growth in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2010

M. Kucia
Affiliation:
Research Unit Nutritional Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
M. Langhammer
Affiliation:
Research Unit Genetics and Biometry, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
S. Görs
Affiliation:
Research Unit Nutritional Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
E. Albrecht
Affiliation:
Research Unit Muscle Biology and Growth, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
H. M. Hammon
Affiliation:
Research Unit Nutritional Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
G. Nürnberg
Affiliation:
Research Unit Genetics and Biometry, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
C. C. Metges*
Affiliation:
Research Unit Nutritional Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of a high-protein diet (HP) on pregnancy, lactational and rearing success in mice. At the time of mating, females were randomly assigned to isoenergetic diets with HP (40% w/w) or control protein levels (C; 20%). After parturition, half of the dams were fed the other diet throughout lactation resulting in four dietary groups: CC (C diet during gestation and lactation), CHP (C diet during gestation and HP diet during lactation), HPC (HP diet during gestation and C diet during lactation) and HPHP (HP diet during gestation and lactation). Maternal and offspring body mass was monitored. Measurements of maternal mammary gland (MG), kidney and abdominal fat pad masses, MG histology and MG mRNA abundance, as well as milk composition were taken at selected time points. HP diet decreased abdominal fat and increased kidney mass of lactating dams. Litter mass at birth was lower in HP than in C dams (14.8 v. 16.8 g). Dams fed an HP diet during lactation showed 5% less food intake (10.4 v. 10.9 g/day) and lower body and MG mass. On day 14 of lactation, the proportion of MG parenchyma was lower in dams fed an HP diet during gestation as compared to dams fed a C diet (64.8% v. 75.8%). Abundance of MG α-lactalbumin, β-casein, whey acidic protein, xanthine oxidoreductase mRNA at mid-lactation was decreased in all groups receiving an HP diet either during gestation and/or lactation. Milk lactose content was lower in dams fed an HP diet during lactation compared to dams fed a C diet (1.6% v. 2.0%). On days 14, 18 and 21 of lactation total litter mass was lower in litters of dams fed an HP diet during lactation, and the pups’ relative kidney mass was greater than in litters suckled by dams receiving a C diet. These findings indicate that excess protein intake in reproducing mice has adverse effects on offspring early in their postnatal growth as a consequence of impaired lactational function.

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1 Representative micrographic pictures of the fourth inguinal mammary gland tissue of mouse dams fed a C diet: Pre-mating (A), day 14 of gestation (B), day 14 of lactation (C), 2 days after weaning (D). H&E staining, light areas correspond to adipose tissue, dark areas correspond to parenchyma. Magnifications × 40, scale bars are set according to the cutting area (cut thickness 16 μm).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Food intake (g/2 days) of mouse dams fed a C and an HP diet during gestation and lactation. Symbols represent LSM ± s.e.; C (during gestation), CC (filled circles); CHP (open circles); HPC (open triangles); HP (during gestation), HPHP (filled triangles). Symbols with different letters differ within day (P < 0.05). The data were analysed by two-way ANOVA (‘gestation diet’ and ‘lactation diet’) and interaction. Number of dams diminished during the study: gestation (n = 225–167), lactation (n = 160–77), weaning (n = 46).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Body mass of lactating mouse dams fed a C and an HP diet during gestation and/or lactation. Bars represent LSM ± s.e.; CC (white bars), CHP (white, hatched bars), HPC (grey, checked bars), HPHP (black bars). The P-values of main effects (gestation (G) and lactation (L) diet) are presented for each day. Interaction was not significant. The data were analysed by two-way ANOVA (‘gestation diet’ and ‘lactation diet’), interaction and covariable ‘food intake’. Number of dams in parentheses: day 3 (n = 157), 14 (n = 127), day 18 (n = 86), day 21 (n = 85) and day 2 after weaning on day 21 (n = 29).

Figure 3

Table 1 Relative mammary gland (right inguinal), liver, right kidney, right abdominal fat pad and right thigh muscle (Quadriceps femoris) mass1 (% BM) at different gestation (G) and lactation (L) days collected from dams fed control (C) or an HP diet during gestation and/or lactation and after weaning

Figure 4

Figure 4 Development of total litter mass (standardized to 10 pups at birth) until weaning. Pups were exposed to maternal C and HP diet during in utero and/or early post-natal life until weaning. Symbols represent LSM ± s.e. for standardized litter mass; CC (filled circles), CHP (open circles), HPC (open triangles), HPHP (filled triangle). The P-values of main effects (gestation (G) and lactation (L) diet) and interaction are presented for each day. The data were analysed by two-way ANOVA (‘gestation diet’ and ‘lactation diet’), interaction and random factor dam. Number of litters in parentheses: day 1 (n = 165), day 3 (n = 132), day 14 (n = 49), day 18 (n = 33) and day 21 (weaning) (n = 32).

Figure 5

Figure 5 Parenchyma proportion (% area) in mammary gland tissue of pregnant and lactating mouse dams fed a C and an HP diet during gestation and/or lactation. Bars represent LSM ± s.e.; pre-mating (grey bars), C (white, striped bars), HP (white, checked bars), CC (white bars), CHP (white, hatched bars), HPC (grey, checked bars), HPHP (black bars). The P values of main effects (gestation (G) and lactation (L) diet) and interaction are presented for each day. If interaction was significant letters indicate differences according to Tukey–Kramer test (post-weaning). The data were analysed by two-way ANOVA (‘gestation diet’ and ‘lactation diet’), interaction and covariable ‘food intake’. Number of dams in parentheses: pre-mating (n = 12), day 14 gestation (n = 19), day 14 lactation (n = 41) and post-weaning (n = 25). Values are calculated from weighted means (%) of triplicate histological cuts of the mammary gland tissue and expressed as % of total tissue area (100 = parenchyma + adipose tissue).

Figure 6

Table 2 Dry matter, protein, lactose and fat contents in pooled milk (days 3, 14 and 18 of lactation) of mouse dams fed control (C) or HP diet during gestation (G) and/or lactation (L)1

Figure 7

Figure 6 Mammary gland mRNA abundance of α-lactalbumin (A), WAP (whey acidic protein) (B), XOR (xanthine oxidoreductase) (C) and β-casein (D) relative to the expression of β-actin on day 14 of lactation in mouse dams fed a C and an HP diet during gestation and/or lactation. Bars represent LSM ± s.e.; CC (open bars), CHP (open, hatched bars), HPC (grey, checked bars), HPHP (closed bars). The P-values of main effects (gestation (G) and lactation (L) diet) and interaction are presented for each day. If interaction was significant letters indicate differences according to Tukey–Kramer test. The data were analysed by two-way ANOVA (‘gestation diet’ and ‘lactation diet’), interaction and covariable ‘food intake’. Number of dams in parentheses: CC (n = 8); CHP (n = 8); HPC (n = 9); HPHP (n = 9).