1 Introduction and the main results
Consider the Hénon family
$$ \begin{align*} f_{a, b} : (x, y)\longmapsto (x^2-a-by, x) \end{align*} $$
defined on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
, where
$(a, b)\in {\mathbb {R}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^{\times }$
. Let
$\Omega (f_{a, b})$
be the non-wandering set of
$f_{a, b}$
. We say that
$f_{a, b}$
is a hyperbolic horseshoe on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
if
$f_{a, b} : \Omega (f_{a, b}) \to \Omega (f_{a, b})$
is topologically conjugate to the full shift with two symbols and
$\Omega (f_{a, b})$
is a hyperbolic set for
$f_{a, b}$
. Denote by
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{a, b})$
the topological entropy of
$f_{a, b} : \Omega (f_{a, b}) \to \Omega (f_{a, b})$
. We know that
$0\leq h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{a, b})\leq \log 2$
for any
$(a, b)\in {\mathbb {R}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^{\times }$
. Note also that if
$f_{a, b}$
is a hyperbolic horseshoe, then
$f_{a, b}$
attains the maximal entropy on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
, that is,
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{a, b})=\log 2$
.
In [Reference Arai and IshiiAI], we have defined the hyperbolic horseshoe locus as
$$ \begin{align*} \mathcal{H}_{{\mathbb{R}}}\equiv \{(a, b) \in{\mathbb{R}}\times{\mathbb{R}}^{\times} : f_{a, b} \text{ is a hyperbolic horseshoe on } {\mathbb{R}}^2\} \end{align*} $$
and the maximal entropy locus as
$$ \begin{align*} \mathcal{M}_{{\mathbb{R}}}\equiv \{(a, b) \in{\mathbb{R}}\times{\mathbb{R}}^{\times} : f_{a, b} \text{ attains the maximal entropy on } {\mathbb{R}}^2\}. \end{align*} $$
Let us set
$\mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }\equiv \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}\cap \{\pm b>0\}$
. Based on previous work [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ2], it has been shown in [Reference Arai and IshiiAI] that there exists a real analytic function
$a_{\mathrm {tgc}} : {\mathbb {R}}^{\times } \to {\mathbb {R}}$
from the b-axis to the a-axis of the parameter space
${\mathbb {R}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^{\times }$
for the Hénon family
$f_{a, b}$
with
$\lim _{b\to 0}a_{\mathrm {tgc}}(b)=2$
so that:
-
•
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
if and only if
$a>a_{\mathrm {tgc}}(b)$
; -
•
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {M}_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
if and only if
$a\geq a_{\mathrm {tgc}}(b)$
.
Moreover, it has been shown that:
-
• when
$(a, b)\in \partial \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^+$
holds (that is,
$a=a_{\mathrm {tgc}}(b)$
and
$b>0$
),
$f_{a, b}$
has exactly one orbit of homoclinic tangencies of
$W^s(p_1)$
and
$W^u(p_1)$
; -
• when
$(a, b)\in \partial \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^-$
holds (that is,
$a=a_{\mathrm {tgc}}(b)$
and
$b<0$
),
$f_{a, b}$
has exactly one orbit of heteroclinic tangencies of
$W^s(p_1)$
and
$W^u(p_3)$
,
where
$p_1$
(respectively
$p_3$
) is the unique saddle fixed point in the first (respectively third) quadrant. These results extend the previous assertions in [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ2] for the case
$|b|<0.05$
to all
$b\ne 0$
. We note that their proofs (and the ones in [Reference Arai and IshiiAI] as well) rely on the profound theory of quasi-hyperbolicity [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℂ8] combined with a detailed analysis of Hénon maps with maximal entropy [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ1].
In their subsequent paper [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3], Bedford and Smillie classified the dynamics of
$f_{a, b}$
in terms of a symbolic dynamics when
$(a, b)$
is close to the boundary
$\partial \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^+$
. However, their result holds only for
$0<b<0.4$
approximately because their construction is based on Yoccoz puzzle pieces for the complex one-dimensional map
$p(z)=z^2-1$
(see the last paragraph of [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Appendix B]).
The purpose of the current article is to generalize the results in [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3] for all
$b\ne 0$
(including the case
$b<0$
as well) by applying the new Markov-like partition constructed in [Reference Arai and IshiiAI]. To present our results, let us first recall that we have defined in [Reference Arai and IshiiAI] a neighborhood
$\mathcal {F}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
of
$\partial \mathcal {H}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
so that
$f_{a, b}$
satisfies the crossed mapping condition with respect to a certain family of projective polydisks
$\{\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\}_{i\in \Sigma ^{\pm }}$
for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
(see [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Theorem 2.12(iii)]). Moreover, their real sections
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
cover the set
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
of points in
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
whose both forward and the backward orbits by
$f_{a, b}$
are bounded. Let
$a^{\pm }_{\mathrm {aprx}}$
be the piecewise linear function approximating
$\partial \mathcal {H}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
as in [Reference Arai and IshiiAI] and set
$$ \begin{align*} \mathcal{E}^{\pm}_{{\mathbb{R}}} \equiv \{(a, b) \in{\mathbb{R}}\times \{\pm b>0 \} : |a-a^{\pm}_{\mathrm{aprx}}(b)|\leq 0.05 \}. \end{align*} $$
One can easily see that
$\mathcal {E}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}\subset \mathcal {F}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Moreover, in Appendix A, we show that
$\mathcal {E}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
forms a neighborhood of
$\partial \mathcal {H}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
(see Proposition A.1).
Let
$p_i\in {\mathbb {R}}^2$
be the unique saddle fixed point for
$i=1, 3$
and the unique saddle periodic point of period two for
$i=2, 4$
in the ith quadrant. In Theorem 4.3 (respectively Theorem 4.6), we obtain a partition of
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus (W^s(p_2)\cup W^s(p_4))$
(respectively
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s(p_3)$
) into two parts, say, the left part and the right part for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
(respectively for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
). Figures 1 and 2 describe the shape of the partition pieces. This partition defines a coding with the alphabet
$\{L, R\}$
by assigning L to the left part and R to the right part. (Our coding is different from that in [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3] when
$b>0$
is close to
$0$
.) As pointed out in [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3], this coding has both advantages and disadvantages; an advantage is that it applies to Hénon maps degenerated from the horseshoe and a disadvantage is that the associated coding map is no more one-to-one.
$\{L, R\}$
-partition for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
$\{L, R\}$
-partition for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
Given a word w over an alphabet,
$\overline {w}$
denotes either the left-infinite repetition
$\cdots www$
or the right-infinite repetition
$www \cdots $
(depending on the context). Let
$\cdot $
be the ‘decimal point’ of a bi-infinite symbol sequence
$\cdots \varepsilon _{-1}\cdot \varepsilon _{0}\varepsilon _{1}\cdots $
. Our first main result concerns [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3, Theorem 1].
Theorem 1.1. We have the following.
-
(1) When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, there are at most two points in
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus (W^s(p_2)\cup W^s(p_4))$
with
$\{L, R\}$
-coding
$\overline {R}L\cdot L\overline {R}\in \{L, R\}^{{\mathbb {Z}}}$
counted without multiplicity. Moreover:-
(a)
$f_{a, b}$
is a hyperbolic horseshoe on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
if and only if there are two such points; -
(b)
$f_{a, b}$
has a quadratic tangency but
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{a, b})=\log 2$
if and only if there is one such point; -
(c)
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{a, b})<\log 2$
if and only if there are no such points.
-
-
(2) When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, there are at most four points in
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s(p_3)$
with
$\{L, R\}$
-coding
$\overline {L}RR\cdot L\overline {R}\in \{L, R\}^{{\mathbb {Z}}}$
counted without multiplicity. Moreover:-
(a)
$f_{a, b}$
is a hyperbolic horseshoe on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
if and only if there are four such points; -
(b)
$f_{a, b}$
has a quadratic tangency but
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{a, b})=\log 2$
if and only if there are three such points; -
(c)
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{a, b})<\log 2$
if and only if there are at most two such points.
-
Obviously the map in either case (a) or (b) of Theorem 1.1 cannot be topologically conjugate to the map in case (c) because they have different values of topological entropy. M. Asaoka (private communication) pointed out that the map in case (b) is not expansive on its non-wandering set. Hence, the map in case (a) is not topologically conjugate to the map in case (b), that is, the map
$f_{a, b}$
with
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }$
cannot be topologically conjugate to the map
$f_{a, b}$
with
$(a, b)\in \partial \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }$
.
We found that the paper [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3] does not contain a proof of its theorem 1 (which corresponds to our Theorem 1.1). Since our Theorem 1.1 originates from [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3, Theorem 1], we describe the proof of Theorem 1.1 in detail in §4.2. We also remark that the paper [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3] did not treat the case
$b<0$
since their partition cannot directly apply to this case. Indeed, it can be shown that the number of points in
$W^s(p_1)\cap W^u(p_3)$
having an appropriate
$\{L, R\}$
-coding with respect to the partition in [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3] is infinite and cannot provide a classification like [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3 Theorem 1] (see Remark 4.10).
Next we analyze case (b) of Theorem 1.1 in detail. Denote by
$\sigma : \{\alpha , \beta \}^{{\mathbb {Z}}}\to \{\alpha , \beta \}^{{\mathbb {Z}}}$
the shift map on the space of bi-infinite sequences with two symbols. Our second main result concerns [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3, Theorem 2].
Theorem 1.2 We have the following.
-
(1) If
$(a, b)\in \partial \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^+$
, then
$f_{a, b} : \Omega (f_{a, b})\to \Omega (f_{a, b})$
is topologically conjugate to the factor map
$\sigma /_{\sim } : \{\alpha , \beta \}^{{\mathbb {Z}}}/_{\sim }\to \{\alpha , \beta \}^{{\mathbb {Z}}}/_{\sim }$
, where we define
$\sim $
as
$$ \begin{align*}\sigma^n(\overline{\alpha}\beta\cdot \beta\beta\overline{\alpha})\sim \sigma^n(\overline{\alpha}\beta\cdot \alpha\beta\overline{\alpha})\end{align*} $$
for all
$n\in \mathbb {Z}.$
-
(2) If
$(a, b)\in \partial \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^-$
, then
$f_{a, b} : \Omega (f_{a, b})\to \Omega (f_{a, b})$
is topologically conjugate to the factor map
$\sigma /_{\sim } : \{\alpha , \beta \}^{{\mathbb {Z}}}/_{\sim }\to \{\alpha , \beta \}^{{\mathbb {Z}}}/_{\sim }$
, where we define
$\sim $
as for all
$$ \begin{align*}\sigma^n(\overline{\beta}\alpha\cdot \beta\beta\overline{\alpha})\sim \sigma^n(\overline{\beta}\alpha\cdot \alpha\beta\overline{\alpha})\end{align*} $$
$n\in \mathbb {Z}.$
Note that, in [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3], the alphabet
$\{a, b\}$
is used instead of {α, β}.
It would be interesting to generalize our results to:
-
(1) a real Hénon map on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
, where
$(a, b)$
is taken near the boundary of a hyperbolic component (see [Reference AraiA1] for hyperbolic components in the real parameter space); -
(2) a complex Hénon map on
${\mathbb {C}}^2$
, where
$(a, b)$
is taken near the boundary of the complex horseshoe locus (compare [Reference Bedford and DujardinBD, Theorem 3.6] for a related result which claims that a topological horseshoe is a hyperbolic horseshoe in
${\mathbb {C}}^2$
).
The structure of this paper is as follows. In §2, we discuss some properties of symbolic dynamics associated with a family of boxes as well as its refinement. In §3, we characterize local stable/unstable manifolds in terms of the symbolic dynamics above. In §4, we construct the
$\{L, R\}$
-partition and prove Theorem 1.1. In §5, we construct the
$\{\alpha , \beta \}$
-partition and prove Theorem 1.2. Some statements in this article are proved by Arai [Reference AraiA2] with the help of computer assistance (see Appendix A for details).
2 Symbolic codings and refinements
In [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, §2.1], we constructed a complex neighborhood
$\mathcal {F}^{\pm }$
of the boundary
$\partial \mathcal {H}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^{\pm }\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
, we can regard
$f_{a, b}$
as a complex dynamical system defined on
${\mathbb {C}}^2$
. Denote by
$K_{a, b}$
the set of points in
${\mathbb {C}}^2$
whose both forward and backward orbits by
$f_{a, b}$
are bounded in
${\mathbb {C}}^2$
.
Let us write
$\mathcal {F}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}\equiv \mathcal {F}^{\pm }\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
is a real parameter, the restriction
$f_{a, b}|_{{\mathbb {R}}^2} : {\mathbb {R}}^2\to {\mathbb {R}}^2$
is well defined. We denote it by
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
when we insist it has real dynamics and write
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\equiv K_{a, b}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
.
2.1 Symbolic codings
Given a finite set called an alphabet
$\Sigma $
and a subset
$\mathfrak {T}\subset \Sigma \times \Sigma $
called the set of allowed transitions, we define
$$ \begin{align*}\mathfrak{S}_{\mathrm{fwd}}(\mathfrak{T})\equiv\{(i_n)_{n\geq 0}\in {\Sigma}^{{\mathbb{N}}} : (i_n, i_{n+1})\in \mathfrak{T} \text{ for all } n\geq 0 \} \end{align*} $$
and call its element a forward admissible sequence with respect to
$\mathfrak {T}$
. Also we define
$$ \begin{align*} \mathfrak{S}_{\mathrm{bwd}}(\mathfrak{T})\equiv\{(i_n)_{n\leq 0}\in {\Sigma}^{-{\mathbb{N}}} : (i_{n-1}, i_n)\in \mathfrak{T} \text{ for all } n\leq 0 \} \end{align*} $$
and call its element a backward admissible sequence with respect to
$\mathfrak {T}$
. Finally, we set
$$ \begin{align*} \mathfrak{S}(\mathfrak{T})\equiv\{(i_n)_{n\in {\mathbb{Z}}}\in {\Sigma}^{{\mathbb{Z}}} : (i_n, i_{n+1})\in \mathfrak{T} \text{ for all } n\in{\mathbb{Z}} \} \end{align*} $$
and call its element a bi-infinite admissible sequence with respect to
$\mathfrak {T}$
.
Below, we set
${\Sigma }^+\equiv \{0, 1, 2, 3\}$
and
${\Sigma }^-\equiv \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4\}$
. Choose a subset of
${\Sigma ^+\times \Sigma ^+}$
as
$$ \begin{align*} \mathfrak{T}^+\equiv\{(0, 0), (0, 2), (0, 3), (1, 0), (2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 1)\} \end{align*} $$
and a subset of
$\Sigma ^-\times \Sigma ^-$
as
$$ \begin{align*}\mathfrak{T}^-\equiv\{(0, 0), (0, 2), (1, 0), (1, 2), (2, 4), (3, 4), (4, 1), (4, 3) \}.\end{align*} $$
We then write
$\mathfrak {S}^{\pm }_{\mathrm {fwd}}\equiv \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {fwd}}(\mathfrak {T}^{\pm })$
,
$\mathfrak {S}^{\pm }_{\mathrm {bwd}}\equiv \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {bwd}}(\mathfrak {T}^{\pm })$
and
$\mathfrak {S}^{\pm }\equiv \mathfrak {S}(\mathfrak {T}^{\pm })$
.
The transition diagram for
$\mathfrak {S}^+$
(respectively
$\mathfrak {S}^-$
) is a directed graph whose vertex set is
$\Sigma ^+$
(respectively
$\Sigma ^-$
) and the arrow set is
$\mathfrak {T}^+$
(respectively
$\mathfrak {T}^-$
). See Figures 3 and 4.
Transition diagram for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}\cap \{b> 0\}$
.
Transition diagram for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}\cap \{b< 0\}$
.
Let
$D_u$
and
$D_v$
be two topological disks in
$\mathbb {C}$
. A projective polydisk (or a projective box, or simply a box)
$\mathcal {B}=D_u\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D_v$
is the product sets of
$D_u$
and
$D_v$
with respect to certain projective coordinates in
$\mathbb {C}^2$
(see [Reference IshiiI, §4.3] as well as [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, §2.2] for more detail).
Definition 2.1. Let
$\mathcal {B}=D_u\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D_v$
(respectively
$\mathcal {B}'=D^{\prime }_u\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D^{\prime }_v$
) be a projective polydisk, and let
$\pi _u : \mathcal {B}\to D_u$
and
$\pi _v : \mathcal {B}\to D_v$
(respectively
$\pi ^{\prime }_u : \mathcal {B}'\to D^{\prime }_u$
and
${\pi ^{\prime }_v : \mathcal {B}'\to D^{\prime }_v}$
) be the projections. We say that
$f : \mathcal {B} \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}') \rightarrow \mathcal {B}'$
satisfies the crossed mapping condition (CMC) of degree d if it satisfies conditions (1) and (2) below, where
$\iota : \mathcal {B} \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}') \rightarrow \mathcal {B}$
denotes the inclusion map.
-
(1) The map
$(\pi ^{\prime }_u \circ f, \pi _v \circ \iota ) : \mathcal {B} \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^{\prime }) \rightarrow D^{\prime }_u \times D_v$
is proper and degree d. -
(2) The sets
$\pi _u(\mathcal {B} \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}'))$
and
$\pi ^{\prime }_v(\mathcal {B}' \cap f(\mathcal {B}))$
are relatively compact in
$D_u$
and
$D^{\prime }_v$
, respectively.
See [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Definition 2.11] as well as [Reference Ishii and SmillieIS, Definition 5.1] for the original definition.
Definition 2.2. A triple
$(f_{a, b}, \{\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\}_{i\in \Sigma ^{\pm }}, \mathfrak {T}^{\pm })$
is said to satisfy the crossed mapping condition if
$f_{a, b} : \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i \cap f_{a, b}^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_j) \rightarrow \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_j$
satisfies the crossed mapping condition for all
$(i, j) \in \mathfrak {T}^{\pm }$
.
The next proposition is identical to [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Theorem 2.12(iii)].
Theorem 2.3. For
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^{\pm }\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
, there is a family of projective polydisks
$\{\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\}_{i\in \Sigma ^{\pm }}$
in
${\mathbb {C}}^2$
so that the triple
$(f_{a, b}, \{\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\}_{i\in \Sigma ^{\pm }}, \mathfrak {T}^{\pm })$
satisfies the crossed mapping condition.
The next fact is proved in [Reference Arai and IshiiAI] and will be used later.
Lemma 2.4. We have:
-
(1)
$\mathcal {B}^+_0{\kern-1pt}\cap{\kern-1pt} \mathcal {B}^+_1{\kern-1pt}\cap{\kern-1pt} K_{a, b}{\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt}\mathcal {B}^+_0{\kern-1pt}\cap{\kern-1pt} \mathcal {B}^+_2{\kern-1pt}\cap{\kern-1pt} K_{a, b}{\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt}\mathcal {B}^+_1{\kern-1pt}\cap{\kern-1pt} \mathcal {B}^+_3{\kern-1pt}\cap{\kern-1pt} K_{a, b}{\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt}\emptyset $
for
$(a, b){\kern-1pt}\in{\kern-1pt} \mathcal {F}^+\cap \{b{\kern-1pt}>{\kern-1pt}0\}$
; -
(2)
$\mathcal {B}^-_0\ \cap\ \mathcal {B}^-_1\ \cap\ K_{a, b}\ =\ \mathcal {B}^-_0\ \cap\ \mathcal {B}^-_3\ \cap\ K_{a, b}\ =\ \mathcal {B}^-_0\ \cap\ \mathcal {B}^-_4\ \cap\ K_{a, b}\ =\ \mathcal {B}^-_1\ \cap\ \mathcal {B}^-_2\ \cap\ K_{a, b}= \mathcal {B}^-_1\cap \mathcal {B}^-_4\cap K_{a, b}=\mathcal {B}^-_2\cap \mathcal {B}^-_3\cap K_{a, b}=\emptyset $
for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^-\cap \{b<0\}$
.
Proof. For claim (1), see the proof of [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Lemma 3.4(i)]. For claim (2), see the proof of [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Lemma 3.7(i)].
For
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^{\pm }\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
, define the orbit space of
$f_{a, b}$
as
$$ \begin{align*} \Lambda^{\pm}\equiv\{((i_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}, (z_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}) : (i_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}\in\mathfrak{S}^{\pm}, \ z_n\in\mathcal{B}^{\pm}_{i_n}, \ f(z_n)=z_{n+1} \}. \end{align*} $$
By [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Proposition 3.1], we see that
$$ \begin{align*} \bigcap_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}f^n\bigg(\bigcup_{i\in\Sigma^{\pm}}\mathcal{B}^{\pm}_i\bigg)=K_{a, b}.\end{align*} $$
Therefore, the projection
$$ \begin{align*}\Phi : \Lambda^{\pm}\ni ((i_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}, (z_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}) \longmapsto z_0 \in K_{a, b}\end{align*} $$
can be defined.
Definition 2.5. A bi-infinite sequence
$(i_n)_{n\in {\mathbb {Z}}}\in \mathfrak {S}^{\pm }$
is called a
$\Sigma ^{\pm }$
-coding of
$z_0\in K_{a, b}$
if it satisfies
$\Phi ((i_n)_{n\in {\mathbb {Z}}}, (f^n(z_0))_{n\in {\mathbb {Z}}})=z_0$
.
The next proposition is a restatement of [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Propositions 3.3 and 3.6].
Proposition 2.6. Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^{\pm }\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
. Then,
$\Phi : \Lambda ^{\pm }\to K_{a, b}$
is surjective.
In particular, every point in
$K_{a, b}$
has at least one
$\Sigma ^{\pm }$
-coding thanks to Proposition 2.6.
One can also show that the map
$\Phi $
is almost injective. To do this, below we write
${\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i=D^{\pm }_{u, i}\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D^{\pm }_{v, i}}$
.
Lemma 2.7. (Numerical Check 1)
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, there exist projective polydisks
$\mathcal {P}^+_{0, 3}$
,
$\mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2}$
, and
$\mathcal {P}^+_{2, 3}$
so that:
-
(1)
$\mathcal {P}^+_{0, 3}\supset \mathcal {B}^+_0\cap \mathcal {B}^+_3$
,
$\mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2}\supset \mathcal {B}^+_1\cap \mathcal {B}^+_2$
, and
$\mathcal {P}^+_{2, 3}\supset \mathcal {B}^+_2\cap \mathcal {B}^+_3$
hold; -
(2)
$f : \mathcal {P}^+_{0, 3}\ \cap\ f^{-1}(\mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2})\ \to\ \mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2}$
,
$f : \mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2}\ \cap\ f^{-1}(\mathcal {P}^+_{0, 3})\ \to\ \mathcal {P}^+_{0, 3}$
, and
$f : \mathcal {P}^+_{2, 3}\ \cap\ f^{-1}(\mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2})\to \mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2}$
are crossed mappings of degree one.
Proof. See Appendix A.
Lemma 2.8. (Numerical Check 2)
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, there exist projective polydisks
$\mathcal {P}^-_{0, 2}$
,
$\mathcal {P}^-_{1, 3}$
,
$\mathcal {P}^-_{2, 4}$
, and
$\mathcal {P}^-_{3, 4}$
so that:
-
(1)
$\mathcal {P}^-_{0, 2}\supset \mathcal {B}^-_0\cap \mathcal {B}^-_2$
,
$\mathcal {P}^-_{1, 3}\supset \mathcal {B}^-_1\cap \mathcal {B}^-_3$
,
$\mathcal {P}^-_{2, 4}\supset \mathcal {B}^-_2\cap \mathcal {B}^-_4$
, and
$\mathcal {P}^-_{3, 4}\supset \mathcal {B}^-_3\cap \mathcal {B}^-_4$
hold; -
(2)
$f : \mathcal {P}^-_{0, 2}\ \cap\ f^{-1}(\mathcal {P}^-_{2, 4})\ \to\ \mathcal {P}^-_{2, 4}$
,
$f : \mathcal {P}^-_{1, 3}\ \cap\ f^{-1}(\mathcal {P}^-_{2, 4})\ \to\ \mathcal {P}^-_{2, 4}$
,
$f : \mathcal {P}^-_{2, 4}\ \cap\ f^{-1}(\mathcal {P}^-_{3, 4})\to \mathcal {P}^-_{3, 4}$
, and
$f : \mathcal {P}^-_{3, 4}\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {P}^-_{3, 4})\to \mathcal {P}^-_{3, 4}$
are crossed mappings of degree one.
Proof. See Appendix A.
Proposition 2.9. We have the following.
-
(1) Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then,
$1\leq \mathrm {card}(\Phi ^{-1}(z))\leq 2$
for any
$z\in K_{a, b}$
and moreover
$\mathrm {card}(\Phi ^{-1}(z))= 1$
if and only if
$z\in K_{a, b}\setminus (V^s(p_2)\cup V^s(p_4))$
. -
(2) Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then,
$1\leq \mathrm {card}(\Phi ^{-1}(z))\leq 2$
for any
$z\in K_{a, b}$
and moreover
$\mathrm {card}(\Phi ^{-1}(z))= 1$
if and only f
$z\in K_{a, b}\setminus V^s(p_3)$
.
Probably Proposition 2.9 would hold for any
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^{\pm }\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
, but we restrict ourselves to
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
which is sufficient for our purpose. The same would hold for Lemmas 2.10, 2.11, 3.1, and 3.2 below.
To prove this proposition, we need to introduce a finite directed graph called the pairwise transition diagram for
$\mathfrak {T}^{\pm }$
as follows. A vertex is an unordered pair
$\{i, j\}\subset \Sigma ^{\pm }$
so that
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\cap \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_j\cap K_{a, b}\ne \emptyset $
(see Lemma 2.4), and there is an arrow from
$\{i, j\}$
to
$\{i', j'\}$
if and only if both
$f : \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i'})\to \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i'}$
and
$f : \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_j\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{j'})\to \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{j'}$
are crossed mappings (by exchanging
$i'$
and
$j'$
, if necessary). See Figures 5 and 6.
Pairwise transition diagram for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
Pairwise transition diagram for
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
Proof. We first prove case (1). Given a point
$z\in K_{a, b}$
, let us consider the following condition (
$\ast $
):
there exists
$N\in \mathbb {Z}$
so that
$f^N(z)\in \mathcal {B}^+_{i_N}\cap \mathcal {B}^+_{j_N}$
holds for some
$\{i_N, j_N\}\subset \Sigma ^+$
with
$i_N\ne j_N$
.
Suppose first the case that
$z\in K_{a, b}$
does not satisfy condition (
$\ast $
). Since
$K_{a, b}\subset \bigcup _{i\in \Sigma ^+}\mathcal {B}^+_i$
, this means that for any
$n\in \mathbb {Z}$
, there exists a unique
$i_n\in \Sigma ^+$
so that
$f^n(z)\in \mathcal {B}^+_{i_n}$
. This obviously implies that
$\mathrm {card}(\Phi ^{-1}(z))=1$
.
Suppose second the case that
$z\in K_{a, b}$
satisfies condition (
$\ast $
). Since for every
$z\in K_{a, b}$
, there exist at most two
$i\in \Sigma ^+$
so that
$z\in \mathcal {B}^+_i$
(see item (1) of Lemma 2.4), such a pair
$\{i_N, j_N\}$
is uniquely determined for a given N. We next observe that in the pairwise transition diagram, there exists exactly one out-going arrow from every vertex of the form
$\{i, j\}$
with
$i\ne j$
(focus on bold arrows in Figure 5) and there are no arrows from such a vertex to a vertex of the form
$\{k, k\}$
. This implies that there exists a unique path
$\{i_N, j_N\}\to \{i_{N+1}, j_{N+1}\}\to \cdots $
in the diagram starting from the vertex
$\{i_N, j_N\}$
. Since this holds for every N appearing in condition (
$\ast $
), we conclude that
$\mathrm {card}(\Phi ^{-1}(z))=2$
. This together with the conclusion in the previous paragraph yields that
$z\in K_{a, b}$
satisfies condition (
$\ast $
) if and only if
$\mathrm {card}(\Phi ^{-1}(z))= 2$
.
Under condition (
$\ast $
), we also observe that the path
$\{i_N, j_N\}\to \{i_{N+1}, j_{N+1}\}\to \cdots $
eventually falls into the cycle
$\{0, 3\}\to \{1, 2\}\to \{0, 3\}\to \cdots $
of period
$2$
. Now we apply Lemma 2.7. Since
$\mathcal {P}^+_{0, 3}\supset \mathcal {B}^+_0\cap \mathcal {B}^+_3$
and
$\mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2}\supset \mathcal {B}^+_1\cap \mathcal {B}^+_2$
hold by item (1) of Lemma 2.7, this implies that
$f^n(z)$
eventually drops into either
$\mathcal {P}^+_{0, 3}$
or
$\mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2}$
and stays there. By item (2) of Lemma 2.7, we see that
$f^n(z)$
eventually belongs to either the local stable manifold of
$p_2$
in
$\mathcal {P}^+_{0, 3}$
or the local stable manifold of
$p_4$
in
$\mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2}$
. Therefore, we may conclude that
${z\in V^s(p_2)\cup V^s(p_4)}$
. Conversely, suppose that
$z\in V^s(p_2)\cup V^s(p_4)$
. Since
$p_2\in \mathcal {B}^+_0\cap \mathcal {B}^+_3$
and
$p_4\in \mathcal {B}^+_1\cap \mathcal {B}^+_2$
, there exists
$N\in \mathbb {Z}$
so that either
$f^N(z)\in \mathcal {B}^+_0\cap \mathcal {B}^+_3$
or
$f^N(z)\in \mathcal {B}^+_1\cap \mathcal {B}^+_2$
holds. In particular, condition (
$\ast $
) is satisfied. Therefore, we conclude that
$z\in K_{a, b}$
satisfies condition (
$\ast $
) if and only if
$z\in V^s(p_2)\cup V^s(p_4)$
.
The argument above obviously shows
$1\leq \mathrm {card}(\Phi ^{-1}(z))\leq 2$
for all
$z\in K_{a, b}$
. By combining the conclusions in the previous two paragraphs, we obtain
$\mathrm {card}(\Phi ^{-1}(z))= 2$
if and only if
$z\in V^s(p_2)\cup V^s(p_4)$
, which proves case (1). The proof for case (2) is similarly obtained by using Lemma 2.8.
2.2 Refined codings
In what follows, it is essential to refine the boxes
$\mathcal {B}^+_2$
,
$\mathcal {B}^-_2$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
.
Lemma 2.10. (Numerical Check 3)
When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, the crossed mapping
$$ \begin{align*}f^4 : \mathcal{B}^+_2\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_3 \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_1\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_2))))\longrightarrow \mathcal{B}^+_2\end{align*} $$
of degree two satisfies the off-criticality condition.
Proof. See Appendix A.
It then follows from [Reference IshiiI, Theorem 2.14] that the domain
$$ \begin{align*} \mathcal{B}^+_2\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_3 \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_1\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_2)))) \end{align*} $$
consists of two connected components denoted as
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2'}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2"}$
with
$p_4\in \mathcal {B}^+_{2'}$
. Moreover, both
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2'}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2"}$
are biholomorphic to polydisks, and
$f^4 : \mathcal {B}^+_{2'}\to \mathcal {B}^+_2$
and
$f^4 : \mathcal {B}^+_{2"}\to \mathcal {B}^+_2$
are crossed mappings of degree one (see Step 5 of the proof of [Reference IshiiI, Theorem 2.14]).
Lemma 2.11. (Numerical Check 4)
When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, the crossed mapping
$$ \begin{align*}f^2 : \mathcal{B}^-_i\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^-_4 \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^-_3))\longrightarrow \mathcal{B}^-_3\end{align*} $$
of degree two satisfies the off-criticality condition for
$i=2, 3$
.
Proof. See Appendix A.
Again, it then follows from [Reference IshiiI, Theorem 2.14] that the domain
$$ \begin{align*}\mathcal{B}^-_i\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^-_4 \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^-_3))\end{align*} $$
consists of two connected components denoted as
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i'}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i"}$
for
$i=2, 3$
with
$p_3\in \mathcal {B}^-_{3'}$
. Moreover, both
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i'}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i"}$
are biholomorphic to polydisks, and
$f^2 : \mathcal {B}^-_{i'}\to \mathcal {B}^-_3$
and
${f^2 : \mathcal {B}^-_{i"}\to \mathcal {B}^-_3}$
are crossed mappings of degree one. Note that, a priori, we are not able to distinguish the components
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i'}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i"}$
(modulo the condition
$p_3\in \mathcal {B}^-_{3'}$
) until items (3) and (4) of Corollary 3.6, where we determine
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i'}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i"}$
so that
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i', {\mathbb {R}}}$
contains a curve
$\gamma _{i, \mathrm {left}}$
on the ‘left’ and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i", {\mathbb {R}}}$
contains a curve
$\gamma _{i, \mathrm {right}}$
on the ‘right’.
It is useful to consider the corresponding refined symbolic dynamics as follows. We set
$\widetilde {{\Sigma }}^+\equiv \{0, 1, 2', 2", 3\}$
and
$\widetilde {{\Sigma }}^-\equiv \{0, 1, 2', 2", 3', 3", 4\}$
. Choose a subset of
$\widetilde {\Sigma }^+\times \widetilde {\Sigma }^+$
as
$$ \begin{align*} \widetilde{\mathfrak{T}}^+\equiv\{(0, 0), (0, 2'), (0, 2"), (0, 3), (1, 0), (2', 3), (2", 3), (3, 1)\} \end{align*} $$
and a subset of
$\widetilde {\Sigma }^-\times \widetilde {\Sigma }^-$
as
$$ \begin{align*} \widetilde{\mathfrak{T}}^-\equiv\{(0, 0), (0, 2'), & (0, 2"), (1, 0), (1, 2'), (1, 2"), \\ & (2', 4), (2", 4), (3', 4), (3", 4), (4, 1), (4, 3'), (4, 3") \}. \end{align*} $$
We then write
$\widetilde {\mathfrak {S}}^{\pm }_{\mathrm {fwd}}\equiv \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {fwd}}(\widetilde {\mathfrak {T}}^{\pm })$
,
$\widetilde {\mathfrak {S}}^{\pm }_{\mathrm {bwd}}\equiv \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {bwd}}(\widetilde {\mathfrak {T}}^{\pm })$
, and
$\widetilde {\mathfrak {S}}^{\pm }\equiv \mathfrak {S}(\widetilde {\mathfrak {T}}^{\pm })$
.
For
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
, define the refined orbit space of
$f_{a, b}$
as
$$ \begin{align*} \widetilde{\Lambda}^{\pm}\equiv\{((i_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}, (z_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}) : (i_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}\in\widetilde{\mathfrak{S}}^{\pm}, \ z_n\in\mathcal{B}^{\pm}_{i_n}, \ f(z_n)=z_{n+1} \}. \end{align*} $$
Since
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2'}\cup \mathcal {B}^+_{2"}\subset \mathcal {B}^+_2$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i'}\cup \mathcal {B}^-_{i"}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_i$
(
$i=2, 3$
) hold, we see that
$$ \begin{align*} \bigcap_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}f^n\bigg(\bigcup_{i\in\widetilde{\Sigma}^{\pm}}\mathcal{B}^{\pm}_i\bigg)\subset K_{a, b}.\end{align*} $$
Therefore, the projection
$$ \begin{align*}\widetilde{\Phi} : \widetilde{\Lambda}^{\pm}\ni ((i_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}, (z_n)_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}) \longmapsto z_0 \in K_{a, b}\end{align*} $$
can be defined.
Definition 2.12. A bi-infinite sequence
$(i_n)_{n\in {\mathbb {Z}}}\in \widetilde {\mathfrak {S}}^{\pm }$
is called a
$\widetilde {\Sigma }^{\pm }$
-coding of
$z_0\in K_{a, b}$
if it satisfies
$\widetilde {\Phi }((i_n)_{n\in {\mathbb {Z}}}, (f^n(z_0))_{n\in {\mathbb {Z}}})=z_0$
.
3 Local stable/unstable manifolds
3.1 Dynamics in
${\mathbb {C}}^2$
For a real parameter
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
, we let
$p_i\in {\mathbb {R}}^2$
be either the unique saddle fixed point (for
$i=1, 3$
) or the unique saddle periodic point of period two (for
$i=2, 4$
) of
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
in the ith quadrant. For a complex parameter
${(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^{\pm }\cap \{b\ne 0\}}$
, denote again by
$p_i\in {\mathbb {C}}^2$
its complex continuation. Let
$V^{s/u}(p_i)$
be the complex stable/unstable manifold at
$p_i$
. Denote by
$V^{s/u}_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_i)_j$
the connected component of
$V^{u/s}(p_i) \cap \mathcal {B}_j^{\pm }$
containing
$p_i$
.
Recall that a bi-infinite
$\mathfrak {T}^{\pm }$
-admissible sequence
$I=(i_n)_{n\in {\mathbb {Z}}}\in \mathfrak {S}^{\pm }$
is a
$\Sigma ^{\pm }$
-coding of
$z\in K_{a, b}$
if and only if
$z\in \bigcap _{n\in \mathbb {Z}}f^{-n}(\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i_n})$
. Based on this observation, we define
$$ \begin{align*} K^s_I\equiv \bigcap_{n\geq 0}f^{-n}(\mathcal{B}^{\pm}_{i_n}) \end{align*} $$
for a forward
$\widetilde {\mathfrak {T}}^{\pm }$
-admissible sequence
$I=(i_n)_{n\geq 0}\in \widetilde {\mathfrak {S}}^{\pm }_{\mathrm {fwd}}$
. We also define
$$ \begin{align*} K^u_J\equiv \bigcap_{n\leq 0}f^{-n}(\mathcal{B}^{\pm}_{j_n}) \end{align*} $$
for a backward
$\widetilde {\mathfrak {T}}^{\pm }$
-admissible sequence
$J=(j_n)_{n\leq 0}\in \widetilde {\mathfrak {S}}^{\pm }_{\mathrm {bwd}}$
. Given a point
$z\in K_{a, b}$
, a forward
$\widetilde {\mathfrak {T}}^{\pm }$
-admissible sequence
$I=(i_n)_{n\geq 0}\in \widetilde {\mathfrak {S}}^{\pm }_{\mathrm {fwd}}$
is called a forward
$\widetilde {\Sigma }^{\pm }$
-coding of z if z belongs to
$K^s_I$
.
We first characterize local stable manifolds in terms of forward
$\widetilde {\Sigma }^{\pm }$
-coding.
Lemma 3.1. Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have the following.
-
(1)
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_0$
and
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0=K^s_{\overline {0}}$
. -
(2)
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_2$
and
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2=K^s_{\overline {2'310}}$
. -
(3)
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_0$
and
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0=K^s_{\overline {02'31}}$
. -
(4)
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_1$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_1$
and
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_1=K^s_{\overline {102'3}}$
. -
(5)
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_3$
and
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3=K^s_{\overline {3102'}}$
. -
(6)
$f^{-1}(V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)\cap \mathcal {B}^+_2$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_2$
. Moreover,
$f^{-1}(V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)\cap \mathcal {B}^+_2=K^s_{2"\overline {2'310}}$
.
Proof. Claim (1) follows from the fact that
$f : \mathcal {B}^+_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_0)\to \mathcal {B}^+_0$
is a crossed mapping of degree one.
It follows from the definition of
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2'}$
that
$\bigcap _{n\geq 0}f^{-4n}(\mathcal {B}^+_{2'})\kern1.3pt{=}\kern1.3pt K^s_{\overline {2'310}}$
. Since
${f^4 : \mathcal {B}^+_{2'}\kern1.3pt{\to}\kern1.3pt \mathcal {B}^+_2}$
is a crossed mapping of degree one,
$\bigcap _{n\geq 0}f^{-4n}(\mathcal {B}^+_{2'})$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_2$
containing the fixed point
$p_4$
and hence is equal to
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2$
. This proves claim (2).
Claim (3) follows from claim (2) and the fact that
$f : \mathcal {B}^+_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_2)\to \mathcal {B}^+_2$
is a crossed mapping of degree one, claim (4) follows from claim (3) and the fact that
$f : \mathcal {B}^+_1\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_0)\to \mathcal {B}^+_0$
is a crossed mapping of degree one, claim (5) follows from claim (4) and the fact that
$f : \mathcal {B}^+_3\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_1)\to \mathcal {B}^+_1$
is a crossed mapping of degree one, and claim (6) follows from claim (2) and the fact that
$f : \mathcal {B}^+_{2"}\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_2)\to \mathcal {B}^+_2$
is a crossed mapping of degree one.
Similarly, we have the following lemma.
Lemma 3.2. Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have the following.
-
(1)
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_0$
and
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0=K^s_{\overline {0}}$
. -
(2)
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
and
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3=K^s_{\overline {3'4}}$
. -
(3)
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_4$
and
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4=K^s_{\overline {43'}}$
. -
(4)
$f^{-1}(V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4)\cap \mathcal {B}^-_2$
consists of two mutually disjoint vertical disks of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_2$
denoted by
$V_{2'}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_{2'}$
and
$V_{2"}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_{2"}$
. Moreover,
$V_{2'}=K^s_{2'\overline {43'}}$
and
$V_{2"}=K^s_{2"\overline {43'}}$
. -
(5)
$f^{-1}(V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4)\cap \mathcal {B}^-_3$
consists of two mutually disjoint vertical disks of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
denoted by
$V_{3'}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_{3'}$
and
$V_{3"}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_{3"}$
. Moreover,
$V_{3'}=K^s_{3'\overline {43'}}$
and
$V_{3"}=K^s_{3"\overline {43'}}$
. -
(6)
$f^{-1}(V_{2'})\cap \mathcal {B}^-_1$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_1$
. Moreover,
$f^{-1}(V_{2'})\cap \mathcal {B}^-_1=K^s_{12'\overline {43'}}$
. -
(7)
$f^{-1}(V_{2'})\cap \mathcal {B}^-_0$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_0$
. Moreover,
$f^{-1}(V_{2'})\cap \mathcal {B}^-_0=K^s_{02'\overline {43'}}$
.
Proof. Claim (1) follows from the fact that
$f : \mathcal {B}^-_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_0)\to \mathcal {B}^-_0$
is a crossed mapping of degree one.
It follows from the definition of
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3'}$
that
$\bigcap _{n\geq 0}f^{-2n}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3'})=K^s_{\overline {3'4}}$
. Since
${f^2 : \mathcal {B}^-_{3'}\to \mathcal {B}^-_3}$
is a crossed mapping of degree one,
$\bigcap _{n\geq 0}f^{-2n}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3'})$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
containing the fixed point
$p_3$
and hence is equal to
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
. This proves claim (2).
Claim (3) follows from claim (2) and the fact that
$f : \mathcal {B}^-_4\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_3)\to \mathcal {B}^-_3$
is a crossed mapping of degree one. Claims (6) and (7) follow from the fact in claim (3) that
$V_{2'}$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_2$
and that
$f : \mathcal {B}^-_1\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_2)\to \mathcal {B}^-_2$
and
$f : \mathcal {B}^-_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_2)\to \mathcal {B}^-_2$
are crossed mappings of degree one.
By Lemma 2.11 and claim (2), we see that
$f^{-2}(V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3)\cap \mathcal {B}^-_i$
consists of two mutually disjoint vertical disks of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_i$
for
$i=2, 3$
. Since we have
$f^{-1}(V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4)\cap \mathcal {B}^-_i=f^{-2}(V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3)\cap \mathcal {B}^-_i$
, the first half of claims (4) and (5) follow. The second half of claims (4) and (5) easily follows from claim (3).
For
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^+\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
, we know that
$f : \mathcal {B}^+_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_0)\to \mathcal {B}^+_0$
is a crossed mapping of degree one. Hence,
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_0$
and
$V^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
is a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_0$
. For
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^-\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
, we know that
$f : \mathcal {B}^-_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_0)\to \mathcal {B}^-_0$
is a crossed mapping of degree one. Hence,
$V^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_0$
. The next fact is stated in [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Proposition 3.10].
Proposition 3.3. When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^-\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
,
$V^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
is a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
.
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^+\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
. For a forward admissible sequence of the form
${I=i_0 i_1\cdots i_n\overline {0}\in \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {fwd}}^+}$
, we define
$$ \begin{align*}V^s_I(a, b)^+\equiv \mathcal{B}^+_{i_0}\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_{i_1}\cap\cdots\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_{i_n}\cap f^{-1}(V^s_{\mathrm{loc}}(p_1)_0))\cdots),\end{align*} $$
and for a backward admissible sequence of the form
$J=\overline {0}j_{-n}\cdots j_{-1}j_0\in \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {bwd}}^+$
, we define
$$ \begin{align*}V^u_J(a, b)^+\equiv \mathcal{B}^+_{j_0}\cap f(\mathcal{B}^+_{j_{-1}}\cap\cdots\cap f(\mathcal{B}^+_{j_{-n}}\cap f(V^u_{\mathrm{loc}}(p_1)_0))\cdots).\end{align*} $$
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {F}^-\cap \{b\ne 0\}$
. For a forward admissible sequence of the form
${I=i_0 i_1\cdots i_n\overline {0}\in \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {fwd}}^-}$
, we define
$$ \begin{align*}V^s_I(a, b)^-\equiv \mathcal{B}^-_{i_0}\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^-_{i_1}\cap\cdots\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^-_{i_n}\cap f^{-1}(V^s_{\mathrm{loc}}(p_1)_0))\cdots),\end{align*} $$
and for a backward admissible sequence of the form
$J=\overline {43}j_{-n}\cdots j_{-1}j_0\in \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {bwd}}^-$
, we define
$$ \begin{align*}V^u_J(a, b)^-\equiv \mathcal{B}^-_{j_0}\cap f(\mathcal{B}^-_{j_{-1}}\cap\cdots\cap f(\mathcal{B}^-_{j_{-n}}\cap f(V^u_{\mathrm{loc}}(p_3)_3))\cdots).\end{align*} $$
Remark 3.4. The set
$K^u_J$
is all the points whose
$\Sigma ^{\pm }$
-coding is J, but we defined
$V^u_J(a, b)^{\pm }$
as a piece of a certain local unstable manifold. Hence,
$V^u_J(a, b)^{\pm }\subset K^u_J$
always holds but
$V^u_J(a, b)^{\pm }$
is not necessarily equal to
$K^u_J$
. For example,
$K^u_{\overline {43}}$
consists of infinitely many mutually disjoint horizontal disks in
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
in the case of
$b < 0$
. However,
$V^u_{\overline {43}}(a, b)^-$
is one of those disks. For the motivation of our definition, see Remark 4.10.
3.2 Dynamics in
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
Let us assume that
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. We denote the real slice of
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i$
by
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}\equiv \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. A curve
$\gamma $
in
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
is said to be horizontal (respectively vertical) if the projection
$\pi _x : \gamma \to D_{x, {\mathbb {R}}}$
(respectively
$\pi _y : \gamma \to D_{y, {\mathbb {R}}}$
) is a bijection, where
$D_{x, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$D_{y, {\mathbb {R}}}$
are intervals so that
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}=D_{x, {\mathbb {R}}}\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D_{y, {\mathbb {R}}}$
.
Recall that
$p_i$
is either the unique saddle fixed point (for
$i=1, 3$
) or the unique saddle periodic point of period two (for
$i=2, 4$
) in the ith quadrant. Denote by
$W^{u/s}_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_i)_j$
the connected component of
$W^{u/s}(p_i) \cap \mathcal {B}_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }$
containing
$p_i$
. We have
$W^{u/s}_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_i)_j=V^{u/s}_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_i)_j\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
.
Corollary 3.5. Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have the following.
-
(1)
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^+_{0,\mathrm{right}}$
and
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0=K^s_{\overline {0}}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(2)
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^+_{2,\mathrm{right}}$
and
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2\hspace{-1pt}= \hspace{-1pt}K^s_{\overline {2'310}}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(3)
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^+_{0,\mathrm{left}}$
and
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0=K^s_{\overline {02'31}}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(4)
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_1$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^+_{1,\mathrm{left}}$
and
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_1=K^s_{\overline {102'3}}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(5)
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^+_{3,\mathrm{right}}$
and
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3= K^s_{\overline {3102'}}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(6)
$f^{-1}_{{\mathbb {R}}}(W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)\cap \mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^+_{2,\mathrm{left}}$
and
$f^{-1}_{{\mathbb {R}}}(W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)\cap \mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}=K^s_{2"\overline {2'310}}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
.
Proof. This immediately follows from Lemma 3.1 by taking the real parts.
We also know that
$V^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
is a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_0$
. Therefore,
$W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
is a horizontal curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
.
When there are two mutually disjoint vertical curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
, we can distinguish the left one and the right one.
Corollary 3.6. Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have the following.
-
(1)
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^-_{0,\mathrm{right}}$
and
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0=K^s_{\overline {0}}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(2)
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^-_{3,\mathrm{left}}$
and
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3=K^s_{\overline {3'4}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(3)
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^-_{4,\mathrm{right}}$
and
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4=K^s_{\overline {43'}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(4)
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-1}(W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4)\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
consists of two mutually disjoint vertical curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
; the left one is denoted by
$\gamma^-_{2, \mathrm {left}}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_{2', {\mathbb {R}}}$
and the right one is denoted by
$\gamma^-_{2, \mathrm {right}}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_{2", {\mathbb {R}}}$
. Moreover,
$\gamma^-_{2, \mathrm {left}}=K^s_{2'\overline {43'}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
and
$\gamma^-_{2, \mathrm {right}}=K^s_{2"\overline {43'}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(5)
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-1}(W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4)\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
consists of two mutually disjoint vertical curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
; the left one is denoted by
$\gamma^-_{3, \mathrm {left}}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_{3', {\mathbb {R}}}$
and the right one is denoted by
$\gamma^-_{3, \mathrm {right}}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_{3", {\mathbb {R}}}$
. Moreover,
$\gamma^-_{3, \mathrm {left}}=K^s_{3'\overline {43'}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
and
$\gamma^-_{3, \mathrm {right}}=K^s_{ 3"\overline {43'}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(6)
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-1}(\gamma^-_{2, \mathrm {left}})\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^-_{1, \mathrm {left}}$
. Moreover,
$\gamma^-_{1, \mathrm {left}}=K^s_{12'\overline {43'}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(7)
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-1}(\gamma^-_{2, \mathrm {left}})\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
denoted by
$\gamma^-_{0, \mathrm {left}}$
. Moreover,
$\gamma^-_{0, \mathrm {left}}=K^s_{02'\overline {43'}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
.
Proof. This immediately follows from Lemma 3.2 by taking the real parts.
Below, when the context is clear, we drop the superscript
$\pm$
in
$\gamma^\pm_{j,\mathrm{left}}$
and
$\gamma^\pm_{j,\mathrm{right}}$
, and write
$\gamma_{j,\mathrm{left}}$
and
$\gamma_{j,\mathrm{right}}$
, respectively.
Since
$p_3\in \gamma _{3, \mathrm {left}}$
, we have
$\gamma _{3, \mathrm {left}}=W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
. We also know that
$V^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
is a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
(see Proposition 3.3), and hence
$W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
is a horizontal curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
.
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. For a forward admissible sequence of the form
$I=i_0 i_1\cdots i_n\overline {0}\in \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {fwd}}^+$
, we define
$$ \begin{align*}W^s_I(a, b)^+\equiv \mathcal{B}^+_{i_0, {\mathbb{R}}}\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_{i_1, {\mathbb{R}}}\cap\cdots\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^+_{i_n, {\mathbb{R}}}\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}^{-1}(W^s_{\mathrm{loc}}(p_1)_0))\cdots),\end{align*} $$
and for a backward admissible sequence of the form
$J=\overline {0}j_{-n}\cdots j_{-1}j_0\in \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {bwd}}^+$
, we define
$$ \begin{align*}W^u_J(a, b)^+\equiv \mathcal{B}^+_{j_0,{\mathbb{R}}}\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(\mathcal{B}^+_{j_{-1},{\mathbb{R}}}\cap\cdots\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(\mathcal{B}^+_{j_{-n},{\mathbb{R}}}\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(W^u_{\mathrm{loc}}(p_1)_0))\cdots).\end{align*} $$
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. For a forward admissible sequence of the form
$I=i_0 i_1\cdots i_n\overline {0}\in \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {fwd}}^-$
, we define
$$ \begin{align*}W^s_I(a, b)^-\equiv \mathcal{B}^-_{i_0, {\mathbb{R}}}\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^-_{i_1, {\mathbb{R}}}\cap\cdots\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}^{-1}(\mathcal{B}^-_{i_n, {\mathbb{R}}}\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}^{-1}(W^s_{\mathrm{loc}}(p_1)_0))\cdots),\end{align*} $$
and for a backward admissible sequence of the form
$J=\overline {43}j_{-n}\cdots j_{-1}j_0\in \mathfrak {S}_{\mathrm {bwd}}^-$
, we define
$$ \begin{align*}W^u_J(a, b)^-\equiv \mathcal{B}^-_{j_0,{\mathbb{R}}}\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(\mathcal{B}^-_{j_{-1},{\mathbb{R}}}\cap\cdots\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(\mathcal{B}^-_{j_{-n},{\mathbb{R}}}\cap f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(W^u_{\mathrm{loc}}(p_3)_3))\cdots).\end{align*} $$
As in [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Definition 4.4],
$W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-$
is decomposed into two parts: the ‘inner part’
$W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm {inner}}$
and the ‘outer part’
$W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm {outer}}$
.
4 Dynamics near the boundary
$\partial \mathcal {H}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
4.1 The
$\{L, R\}$
-coding
In this subsection, we define the
$\{L, R\}$
-coding with respect to our box systems
$\{\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\}_{i\in \Sigma ^{\pm }}$
. We note that our partition to define the
$\{L, R\}$
-coding is more involved than that given in [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3].
When
$\gamma \subset \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
is a vertical curve, the notion of left/right component of
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma $
can be defined and denoted as
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma )$
and
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma )$
.
Propositions 4.1 and 4.4 will be crucial in the rest of this paper.
Proposition 4.1. Suppose that
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Let
$z\in K_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
and let
$(i_n)_{n\geq 0}\in \mathfrak {S}^+_{\mathrm {fwd}}$
be its forward
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding.
-
(1) If
$i_0=0$
, then z belongs to the closure of
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0)$
. -
(2) If
$i_0=1$
, then z belongs to the closure of
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_1)$
. -
(3) If
$i_0=2$
, then z belongs to the closure of
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)$
. -
(4) If
$i_0=3$
, then z belongs to the closure of
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3)$
.
Proof. Let
$i_0=0$
and assume that z belongs to
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0)$
. Since
$(i_n)_{n\geq 0}$
is admissible,
$i_1$
is either
$2$
or
$3$
(but not
$1$
). It follows that
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}(z)$
belongs to
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)$
(compare [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Lemma 4.7]) and
$i_1=2$
. Similarly, since
$i_2$
is either
$2$
or
$3$
(but not
$0$
), it follows that
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^2(z)$
belongs to
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3)$
and
$i_2=3$
. A similar argument shows that
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^3(z)$
belongs to
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_1)$
and
$i_3=1$
, and
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^4(z)$
belongs to
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0)$
and
$i_4=0$
. By repeating this, we see that
${z\in K^s_{\overline {0231}}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2}$
. Moreover, since
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)\subset \mathcal {B}^+_{2', {\mathbb {R}}}$
, we obtain
$z\in K^s_{\overline {02'31}}\cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. It follows from Lemma 3.1(1) that
$z\in W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0$
, which contradicts to the assumption that
$z\in \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0)$
. Hence, claim (1) of this proposition is proved. The proofs for the other cases are similar.
To define the
$\{L, R\}$
-partition, it is important to control the slopes of local stable manifolds. To obtain a simple criterion for estimates of the slopes, we employ the Poincaré metric and (vertical) Poincaré cone field (see [Reference IshiiI, Definition 2.5]). Let
$\mathcal {P}=D_x\times D_y$
be a polydisk, where
$D_x\subset \mathbb {C}$
is a round disk of radius
$\delta>0$
and
$D_y\subset \mathbb {C}$
is the round disk of radius
$R>0$
. Take
$0<r<R$
and set
$\mathcal {P}'=D_x\times D^{\prime }_y$
, where
$D^{\prime }_y\subset \mathbb {C}$
is the round disk of radius r. Denote by
$|v_x|_P$
(respectively
$|v_y|_P$
) the Poincaré metric in
$D_x$
(respectively
$D_y$
).
Let D be a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {P}$
. It has been shown in [Reference IshiiI, Corollary 2.10] that every tangent vector
$v\in T_zD$
belongs to the vertical Poincaré cone at z:
$$ \begin{align*} C^v_z= \{v=(v_x, v_y) \in T_z \mathcal{P} : |v_y|_P\geq |v_x|_P\}. \end{align*} $$
As in the example following [Reference IshiiI, Corollary 2.10], the condition
$|v_y|_P\geq |v_x|_P$
is rewritten as
$$ \begin{align*}\frac{|v_y|_E}{|v_x|_E}\geq \frac{R^2-|y|^2}{\delta^2-|x|^2},\end{align*} $$
where
$|v_x|_E$
(respectively
$|v_y|_E$
) denotes the Euclidean metric in
$\mathbb {C}$
. Moreover, if we restrict z to
$\mathcal {P}'$
, the estimate above yields
$$ \begin{align*}\frac{|v_y|_E}{|v_x|_E}\geq \frac{R^2-r^2}{\delta^2}\end{align*} $$
for any
$v\in T_{z'}D$
and any
$z'\in \mathcal {P}'$
. Finally, let us replace
$\mathcal {P}=D_x\times D_y$
by the projective polydisk
$D_x\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D_y$
, where the u-direction is
$(1, 0)$
and the v-direction is
$(s, 1)$
with
$s\ne 0$
. The computation
$$ \begin{align*} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & |s| \\[5pt] 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\[5pt] \frac{R^2-r^2}{\delta^2} \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\delta^2+|s|(R^2-r^2)}{\delta^2} \\[5pt] \frac{R^2-r^2}{\delta^2} \end{bmatrix} \end{align*} $$
shows that the slope of
$v\in T_{z'}D$
in modulus is estimated from below by
$$ \begin{align} \frac{R^2-r^2}{\delta^2+|s|(R^2-r^2)} \end{align} $$
for any
$z'\in \mathcal {P}'$
.
In the following lemma, a horizontal edge (respectively vertical edge) of a quadrilateral
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
in
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
is a connected component of the real part of
$D^{\pm }_{u, i}\times _{\mathrm {pr}} \partial D^{\pm }_{v, i}$
(respectively
$\partial D^{\pm }_{u, i}\times _{\mathrm {pr}} D^{\pm }_{v, i}$
). Given a closed interval
$I=[\alpha , \beta ]$
in the y-axis, we put
$|I|=|\beta -\alpha |$
and let
$D_I$
be the disk in the complex y-plane centered at
$({\alpha +\beta})/{2}$
with radius
${|I|}/{2}$
. As before, given a polydisk
$\mathcal {P}_i$
, denote by
$\mathcal {P}_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
its real part.
Lemma 4.2. (Numerical Check 5)
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
-
(1) One can find two concentric intervals
$I_2=[y_2-R_2, y_2+R_2]$
and
$I^{\prime }_2=[y_2-r_2, y_2+r_2]$
in the y-axis with
$r_2<R_2$
and a disk
$D_2$
of radius
$\delta _2>0$
so that:-
(a) a projective polydisk of the form
$\mathcal {P}_2=D_2\times _{\mathrm {pr}} D_{I_2}$
contains
$p_2$
; -
(b)
$f^2 : \mathcal {P}_2\cap f^{-2}(\mathcal {P}_2)\to \mathcal {P}_2$
is a crossed mapping of degree one; -
(c)
$\mathrm {pr}_y(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}})\subset I^{\prime }_2$
; -
(d)
$\mathcal {P}_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^+_{i , {\mathbb {R}}}$
does not intersect the vertical edges of
$\mathcal {B}^+_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
for
$i=0, 3$
; -
(e) the slopes of the horizontal edges of
$\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
in modulus are bounded by from above, where
$$ \begin{align*}\frac{R_2^2-r_2^2}{\delta_2^2+|s_2|(R_2^2-r_2^2)}\end{align*} $$
$(s_2, 1)$
is the v-direction in defining
$\mathcal {P}_2$
.
-
-
(2) One can find two concentric intervals
$I_4=[y_4-R_4, y_4+R_4]$
and
$I^{\prime }_4=[y_4-r_4, y_4+r_4]$
in the y-axis with
$r_4<R_4$
and a disk
$D_4$
of radius
$\delta _4>0$
so that:-
(a) a projective polydisk of the form
$\mathcal {P}_4=D_4\times _{\mathrm {pr}} D_{I_4}$
contains
$p_4$
; -
(b)
$f^2 : \mathcal {P}_4\cap f^{-2}(\mathcal {P}_4)\to \mathcal {P}_4$
is a crossed mapping of degree one; -
(c)
$\mathrm {pr}_y(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}})\subset I^{\prime }_4$
; -
(d)
$\mathcal {P}_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^+_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
does not intersect the vertical edges of
$\mathcal {B}^+_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
for
$i=1, 2$
; -
(e) the slopes of the horizontal edges of
$\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
in modulus are bounded by from above, where
$$ \begin{align*} \frac{R_4^2-r_4^2}{\delta_4^2+|s_4|(R_4^2-r_4^2)} \end{align*} $$
$(s_4, 1)$
is the v-direction in defining
$\mathcal {P}_4$
.
-
Proof. See Appendix A.
The polydisk
$\mathcal {P}_2$
.
Let
$P^+_L$
be the union of
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)$
and
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3)$
. Let
$P^+_R$
be the union of
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0)$
and
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_1)$
.
Theorem 4.3. For
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, the pair
$\{P^+_L, P^+_R\}$
forms a partition for
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus (W^s(p_2)\cap W^s(p_4))$
, that is: (1)
$P^+_L\cap P^+_R\cap K_{{\mathbb {R}}}=\emptyset $
and (2)
$P^+_L\cup P^+_R\supset K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus (W^s(p_2)\cap W^s(p_4))$
.
Proof. Let
$C_2$
be the real local stable manifold at
$p_2$
in the real part
$\mathcal {P}_{2, \mathbb {R}}$
. By Lemma 4.2(1)(b),
$C_2$
is a vertical curve connecting the upper boundary and the lower boundary of
${\mathbb {R}}\times I_2$
so that it divides
${\mathbb {R}}\times I_2$
into the left part and the right part. Note that
${C_2\cap \mathcal {P}_{2, \mathbb {R}}\ne \emptyset} $
by Lemma 4.2(1)(a). This together with Lemma 4.2(1)(d) yields that
$C_2$
intersects
$\partial \mathcal {B}^+_{i, \mathbb {R}}$
only at its horizontal edges for
$i=0, 3$
.
However, thanks to the estimate in equation (4.1),
$C_2$
intersects each of the horizontal edges exactly once by Lemma 4.2(1)(c) and (e). It follows that
$C_2$
divides
$\mathcal {B}^+_{i, \mathbb {R}}$
(
${i=0, 3}$
) into two connected components, one is in the left part of
${\mathbb {R}}\times I_2$
and the other is in the right part of
${\mathbb {R}}\times I_2$
. By the uniqueness of the stable manifold
$W^s(p_2)$
, we see that
$C_2\cap \mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}= W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0$
and
$C_2\cap \mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}= W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3$
. Therefore, it follows that
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3)\cap \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0)=\emptyset $
. A similar argument with Lemma 4.2(2) shows that
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)\cap \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_1)=\emptyset $
. This together with
$\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap K_{{\mathbb {R}}}=\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap K_{{\mathbb {R}}}=\emptyset $
(see item (1) of Lemma 2.4) yields item (1) of Theorem 4.3.
Take
$z\in K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus (W^s(p_2)\cap W^s(p_4))$
. Since
$z\notin W^s(p_2)\cap W^s(p_4)$
, it does not belong to the boundary of the pieces in Proposition 4.1). Hence, there exists a
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding
${(i_n)_{n\in \mathbb {Z}}\in \mathfrak {S}^+}$
of z by Proposition 2.6. Then, Proposition 4.1 yields that z belongs to either
$P^+_L$
or
$P^+_R$
. This proves item (2) of Theorem 4.3.
Therefore, this defines a unique
$\{L, R\}$
-coding for every point in
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus (W^s(p_2)\cap W^s(p_4))$
.
Proposition 4.4. Suppose that
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Let
$z\in K_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
and let
$(i_n)_{n\geq 0}\in \mathfrak {S}^-_{\mathrm {fwd}}$
be its forward
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding.
-
(1) If
$i_0=0$
, then z belongs to the closure of
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0)$
. -
(2) If
$i_0=1$
, then z belongs to the closure of
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{1, \mathrm {left}})$
. -
(3) If
$i_0=2$
, then z belongs to the closure of
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{2, \mathrm {left}})$
. -
(4) If
$i_0=3$
, then z belongs to the closure of
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {left}}) \cap \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {right}})$
. -
(5) If
$i_0=4$
, then z belongs to the closure of
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4)$
.
Proof. The proof is similar to that of Proposition 4.1, and hence is omitted.
Lemma 4.5. (Numerical Check 6)
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
-
(1) One can find two concentric intervals
$I_3=[y_3-R_3, y_3+R_3]$
and
$I^{\prime }_3=[y_3-r_3, y_3+r_3]$
in the y-axis with
$r_3<R_3$
and a disk
$D_3$
of radius
$\delta _3>0$
so that:-
(a) a projective polydisk of the form
$\mathcal {P}_3=D_3\times _{\mathrm {pr}} D_{I_3}$
contains
$p_3$
; -
(b)
$f : \mathcal {P}_3\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {P}_3)\to \mathcal {P}_3$
is a crossed mapping of degree one; -
(c)
$\mathrm {pr}_y(\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}})\subset I^{\prime }_3$
; -
(d)
$\mathcal {P}_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
does not intersect the vertical edges of
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
for
$i=2, 3, 4$
; -
(e) the slopes of the horizontal edges of
$\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
,
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}$
in modulus are bounded byfrom above, where
$$ \begin{align*}\frac{R_3^2-r_3^2}{\delta _3^2+|s_3|(R_3^2-r_3^2)}\end{align*} $$
$(s_3, 1)$
is the v-direction in defining
$\mathcal {P}_3$
.
-
-
(2) One can find two concentric intervals
$I_1=[y_1-R_1, y_1+R_1]$
and
$I^{\prime }_1=[y_1-r_1, y_1+r_1]$
in the y-axis with
$r_1<R_1$
and a disk
$D_1$
of radius
$\delta _1>0$
so that:-
(a) a projective polydisk of the form
$\mathcal {P}_1=D_1\times _{\mathrm {pr}} D_{I_1}$
does not contain
$p_3$
; -
(b)
$f : \mathcal {P}_1\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {P}_3)\to \mathcal {P}_3$
is a crossed mapping of degree one; -
(c)
$\mathrm {pr}_y(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}})\subset I^{\prime }_1$
; -
(d)
$\mathcal {P}_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
does not intersect the vertical edges of
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i, {\mathbb {R}}}$
for
$i=1, 3$
; -
(e) the slopes of the horizontal edges of
$\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
in modulus are bounded byfrom above, where
$$ \begin{align*}\frac{R_1^2-r_1^2}{\delta _1^2+|s_1|(R_1^2-r_1^2)}\end{align*} $$
$(s_1, 1)$
is the v-direction in defining
$\mathcal {P}_1$
.
-
Proof. See Appendix A.
As an immediate consequence of Lemma 2.11, we know that
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^2(\mathcal {B}^-_{i', {\mathbb {R}}})$
and
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^2(\mathcal {B}^-_{i", {\mathbb {R}}})$
are connected components of
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}}(\mathcal {B}^-_{i, {\mathbb {R}}})\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}) \cap \mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
for
$i=2, 3$
. Let
$P^-_L$
be the union of
$\mathrm {left}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^2(\mathcal {B}^-_{2', {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^-_{3', {\mathbb {R}}})\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {right}})$
and
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4)$
. Let
$P^-_R$
be the union of
$\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
,
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{1, \mathrm {left}})$
,
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{2, \mathrm {left}})$
, and
$\mathrm {right}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^2(\mathcal {B}^-_{2", {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^-_{3", {\mathbb {R}}})\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {left}})$
.
Theorem 4.6. For
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, the pair
$\{P^-_L, P^-_R\}$
forms a partition for
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s(p_3)$
, that is (1)
$P^-_L\cap P^-_R\cap K_{{\mathbb {R}}}=\emptyset $
and (2)
$P^-_L\cup P^-_R\supset K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s(p_3)$
.
Proof. We proceed as in the proof of Theorem 4.3. First, it follows from Lemma 4.5 that
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {right}}){\kern2pt}\cap{\kern2pt} \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{1, \mathrm {left}}){\kern2pt}={\kern2pt}\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4)){\kern2pt}\cap{\kern2pt} \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{2, \mathrm {left}})=\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4))\cap \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {left}})=\emptyset $
. This together with
$\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap K_{{\mathbb {R}}}=\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap K_{{\mathbb {R}}}=\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap K_{{\mathbb {R}}}=\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap K_{{\mathbb {R}}}=\emptyset $
(see item (2) of Lemma 2.4) yields item (1) of Theorem 4.6.
The proof of item (2) of Theorem 4.6 is slightly different from that of item (2) of Theorem 4.3 since we replace
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
by
$f^2_{{\mathbb {R}}}(\mathcal {B}^-_{2', {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^-_{3', {\mathbb {R}}})$
and
$f^2_{{\mathbb {R}}}(\mathcal {B}^-_{2", {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^-_{3", {\mathbb {R}}})$
. Notice that we use
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i', {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{i", {\mathbb {R}}}$
(
$i=2, 3$
) to define the partition
$\{P^-_L, P^-_R\}$
, but we do not use
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2', {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2", {\mathbb {R}}}$
to define the partition
$\{P^+_L, P^+_R\}$
. Take any
$z\in K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s(p_3)$
. Then, it follows from Propositions 2.6 and 2.9(2) that z has a unique
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding
$(i_n)_{n\in \mathbb {Z}}\in \mathfrak {S}^-$
. If
$i_0\ne 3$
, then Proposition 4.4(1), (2), (3), and (5) yield that z belongs to either
$P^-_L$
or
$P^-_R$
. So, suppose that
$i_0=3$
. Then, the forward
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding of
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-2}(z)$
is either
$243\cdots $
or
$343\cdots $
. Hence,
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-2}(z)\in (\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\cup \mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}})\cap f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}\cap f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}))$
. It then follows that
$$ \begin{align} \nonumber K_{{\mathbb{R}}}\cap\mathcal{B}^-_{3, {\mathbb{R}}}&\subset (f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(\mathcal{B}^-_{2, {\mathbb{R}}})\cap \mathcal{B}^-_{4, {\mathbb{R}}})\cap \mathcal{B}^-_{3, {\mathbb{R}}})\cup(f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(f_{{\mathbb{R}}}(\mathcal{B}^-_{3, {\mathbb{R}}})\cap \mathcal{B}^-_{4, {\mathbb{R}}})\cap \mathcal{B}^-_{3, {\mathbb{R}}}) \\ &= f_{{\mathbb{R}}}^2(\mathcal{B}^-_{2', {\mathbb{R}}}\cup \mathcal{B}^-_{3', {\mathbb{R}}})\cup f_{{\mathbb{R}}}^2(\mathcal{B}^-_{2", {\mathbb{R}}}\cup \mathcal{B}^-_{3", {\mathbb{R}}}). \end{align} $$
Thanks to claim (4) of Proposition 4.4, we observe that
$z\in (K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}})\setminus W^s(p_3)$
is a point in
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {left}}) \cap \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {right}})$
. This together with the inclusion in equation (4.2) yields that z belongs to either
$P^-_L$
or
$P^-_R$
, and hence we have item (2) of Theorem 4.6.
Therefore, this defines a unique
$\{L, R\}$
-coding for every point in
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s(p_3)$
.
4.2 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Below,
$\mathrm {card}(A)$
denotes the cardinality of A counted without multiplicity. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is based on the following two results from [Reference Arai and IshiiAI].
Theorem 4.7. [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Theorem 5.1]
When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, we have
${h_{\mathrm {top}}}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}})=\log 2$
if and only if
$\mathrm {card}(W_{31\overline {0}}^s(a, b)^+\cap W_{\overline {0}23}^u(a, b)^+)\geq 1$
. When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, we have
${h_{\mathrm {top}}}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}})=\log 2$
if and only if
${\mathrm {card}}(W_{41\overline {0}}^s(a, b)^-\cap W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm {inner}})\geq 1$
.
Theorem 4.8. [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Theorem 5.14]
When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
,
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
is a hyperbolic horseshoe on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
if and only if
$\mathrm {card}(W_{31\overline {0}}^s(a, b)^+\cap W_{\overline {0}23}^u(a, b)^+)=2$
. When
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
,
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
is a hyperbolic horseshoe on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
if and only if
$\mathrm {card}(W_{41\overline {0}}^s(a, b)^-\cap W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm {inner}})=2$
.
Let us set
$$ \begin{align*}S(a, b)^+\equiv W_{31\overline{0}}^s(a, b)^+\cap W_{\overline{0}23}^u(a, b)^+\end{align*} $$
and
$$ \begin{align*}S(a, b)^-\equiv W_{41\overline{0}}^s(a, b)^-\cap W_{\overline{43}4124}^u(a, b)^-.\end{align*} $$
Note that we dropped ‘inner’ from
$W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm {inner}}$
in the definition above because the inner part and the outer part of
$W_{\overline {43}4124}^u(a, b)^-$
cannot be distinguished by the
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding. As an immediate consequence of Theorems 4.7 and 4.8, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 4.9. We have the following.
-
(1) Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have
$\mathrm {card}(S(a, b)^+) \leq 2$
. Moreover:-
(a)
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
is a hyperbolic horseshoe on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
if and only if
$\mathrm {card}(S(a, b)^+)=2$
; -
(b)
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
has a quadratic tangency but
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}})=\log 2$
if and only if
$\mathrm {card}(S(a, b)^+)=1$
; -
(c)
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}})<\log 2$
if and only if
$\mathrm {card}(S(a, b)^+)=0$
.
-
-
(2) Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have
$\mathrm {card}(S(a, b)^-) \leq 4$
. Moreover:-
(a)
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
is a hyperbolic horseshoe on
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
if and only if
${\mathrm {card}}(S(a, b)^-)=4$
; -
(b)
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
has a quadratic tangency but
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}})=\log 2$
if and only if
${\mathrm {card}}(S(a, b)^-)=3$
; -
(c)
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}})<\log 2$
if and only if
${\mathrm {card}}(S(a, b)^-)\leq 2$
.
-
Proof. The bound
$\mathrm {card}(S(a, b)^+) \leq 2$
in case (1) follows from the fact that
$V_{31\overline {0}}^s(a, b)^+$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_3$
and
$V_{\overline {0}23}^u(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^+_3$
. The bound
$\mathrm {card}(S(a, b)^-) \leq 4$
in case (2) follows from the fact that
$V_{41\overline {0}}^s(a, b)^-$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_4$
and
$V_{\overline {43}4124}^u(a, b)^-$
consists of two horizontal disks of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^-_4$
.
Consider first the classification in case (2). If
$W_{41\overline {0}}^s(a, b)^-$
intersects
$W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm {inner}}$
, then it follows that
$W_{41\overline {0}}^s(a, b)^-$
intersects
$W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm {outer}}$
exactly twice (see [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Figure 25 as well as Definition 4.4]). Hence,
$$ \begin{align*} \mathrm{card}(W_{41\overline{0}}^s(a, b)^-\cap W^u_{\overline{43}4124}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm{inner}})=\max \{0, \mathrm{card}(S(a, b)^-)-2\}. \end{align*} $$
Then, claim (a) follows from Theorem 4.8, claim (c) follows from Theorem 4.7 and that
$(a, b)$
belongs to the closure of
$\mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }$
if and only if
${h_{\mathrm {top}}}(f_{a, b})=\log 2$
(see [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Main Corollary]), and claim (b) follows from claims (a), (c), and that
$\mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }$
is open. Proof for the classification in case (1) is similar and hence omitted.
Thanks to this corollary, our task to finish the proof of Theorem 1.1 is to transfer the
$\Sigma ^{\pm }$
-coding to the
$\{L, R\}$
-coding. Notice that the paper [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3] lacks a proof of its theorem 1 which corresponds to our Theorem 1.1.
Proof of Theorem 1.1(1)
For a point
$z\in K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus (W^s(p_2)\cap W^s(p_4))$
, we consider the following conditions:
-
(a) the
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding of z exists and is
$\overline {0}2\cdot 31\overline {0}$
; -
(b)
$f^{-2}(z)\in W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
; -
(c)
$f^2(z)\in W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
; -
(d) the
$\{L, R\}$
-coding of z is
$\overline {R}L\cdot L\overline {R}$
.
It is easy to see that
$z\in S^+(a, b)$
if and only if z satisfies conditions (a), (b), and (c). Assume that condition (a) holds. Then, the forward
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding of
$f^2(z)$
is
$\overline {0}\in \mathfrak {S}^+_{\mathrm {fwd}}$
. Since
$f : \mathcal {B}^+_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_0)\to \mathcal {B}^+_0$
is a crossed mapping of degree one, this yields condition (c) as in Corollary 3.5(1). Since the backward
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding of
$f^{-2}(z)$
including the
$0$
th digit is
$\overline {0}\in \mathfrak {S}^+_{\mathrm {bwd}}$
, a similar argument yields condition (b). Therefore, it is sufficient to prove that condition (a) holds if and only if condition (d) holds. Note that
$\overline {R}L\cdot L\overline {R} = \overline {R}L\cdot LR\overline {R}$
.
(a) implies (d): Since
$z\notin W^s(p_2)\cup W^s(p_4)$
, Proposition 4.1 and the definition of the partition
$\{P_L^+, P_R^+\}$
imply the following.
-
• If
$i_0=0$
, then
$z\in \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_0)\subset P_R^+$
. -
• If
$i_0=1$
, then
$z\in \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_1)\subset P_R^+$
. -
• If
$i_0=2$
, then
$z\in \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_4)_2)\subset P_L^+$
. -
• If
$i_0=3$
, then
$z\in \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_2)_3)\subset P_L^+$
.
Therefore, we replace the
$0$
s and
$1$
s in
$\overline {0}2\cdot 31\overline {0}$
by R, and the
$2$
s and
$3$
s in
$\overline {0}2\cdot 31\overline {0}$
by L to obtain
$\overline {R}L\cdot LR\overline {R}$
.
(d) implies (a): We note that z has a unique
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding thanks to Proposition 2.6 and claim (1) of Proposition 2.9.
First consider the forward
$\{L, R\}$
-coding
$LR\overline {R}$
. By the definition of the
$\{L, R\}$
-partition, the
$0$
th digit of the
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding is either
$2$
or
$3$
. There is no arrow from
$2$
to the R-side in the transition graph, but there is an arrow
$3\to 1$
from
$3$
to the R-side. Hence, the
$0$
th digit of the
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding is
$3$
and the
$1$
st digit is
$1$
. Then, the only arrow from
$1$
to the R-side is
$1\to 0$
. By repeating this argument, we obtain
$31\overline {0}$
as the forward
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding.
Next, consider the backward
$\{L, R\}$
-coding
$\overline {R}LL$
(including the
$0$
th digit). As discussed above, the
$0$
th digit of the
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding is
$3$
. The only arrow in the transition graph from the L-side to
$3$
is
$2\to 3$
, and hence the
$-1$
th digit is
$2$
. Then, there are two arrows
$0\to 2$
and
$1\to 2$
from the R-side to
$2$
. There is no arrow from the R-side to
$1$
, but there is an arrow
$1\to 2$
from the R-side. Hence, the
$-2$
th digit of the
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding is
$1$
. By repeating this argument, we obtain
$\overline {0}23$
as the backward
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding including the
$0$
th digit.
By combining the forward and the backward
$\Sigma ^+$
-codings above, we obtain condition (a).
Proof of Theorem 1.1(2)
For a point
$z\in K_{{\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s(p_3)$
, we consider the following conditions:
-
(a) the
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding of z exists and is
$\overline {43}412\cdot 41\overline {0}$
; -
(b)
$f^{-4}(z)\in W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
; -
(c)
$f^2(z)\in W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
; -
(d) the
$\{L, R\}$
-coding of z is
$\overline {L}RR\cdot L\overline {R}$
.
It is easy to see that
$z\in S^-(a, b)$
if and only if z satisfies conditions (a), (b), and (c). Assume that condition (a) holds. Then, the forward
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding of
$f^2(z)$
is
$\overline {0}\in \mathfrak {S}^-_{\mathrm {fwd}}$
. Since
$f : \mathcal {B}^-_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_0)\to \mathcal {B}^-_0$
is a crossed mapping of degree one, this yields condition (c) as in Corollary 3.6(1). Therefore, it is sufficient to prove that conditions (a) and (b) hold if and only if condition (d) holds. Note that
$\overline {L}RR\cdot L\overline {R} = \overline {LL}LRR\cdot LR\overline {R}$
.
(a) and (b) imply (d): Since
$z\notin W^s(p_3)$
, Proposition 4.4 and the definition of the partition
$\{P_L^-, P_R^-\}$
imply the following.
-
• If
$i_0=0$
, then
$z\in \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0)\subset P_R^-$
. -
• If
$i_0=1$
, then
$z\in \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{1, \mathrm {left}})\subset P_R^-$
. -
• If
$i_0=2$
, then
$z\in \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{2, \mathrm {left}})\subset P_R^-$
. -
• If
$i_0=3$
, then
$z\in \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {left}}) \cap \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus \gamma _{3, \mathrm {right}})$
. -
• If
$i_0=4$
, then
$z\in \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}\setminus W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4)\subset P_L^-$
.
Therefore, we replace the
$0$
s,
$1$
s, and
$2$
s in
$\overline {43}412\cdot 41\overline {0}$
by R, and the
$4$
s in
$\overline {43}412\cdot 41\overline {0}$
by L to obtain
$\overline {L\ast }LRR\cdot LR\overline {R}$
.
The problem here is that
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
is divided into both a part of
$P^-_L$
and a part of
$P^-_R$
, and hence we need to determine the letters in the
$-(2n+4)$
th digits (
$n\geq 0$
) which are denoted by
$\ast $
above. Here, we claim that
$$ \begin{align} f_{{\mathbb{R}}}^{-(2n+4)}(z)\in W^u_{\mathrm{loc}}(p_3)_3 \end{align} $$
holds for all
$n\geq 0$
. Indeed, the case
$n=0$
is identical to assumption (b) and we see that
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-(2(n+1)+4)}(z)=f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-2}(f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-(2n+4)}(z))\in f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-2}(W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3)\subset W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
, and hence equation (4.3) is proved. The claim in equation (4.3) together with case (4) of Proposition 4.4 implies that
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-(2n+4)}(z)\in P_L^-$
(see Figure 8). Therefore, we conclude
$\ast =L$
and condition (d) follows.
The real box
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
.
(d) implies (a): We note that z has a unique
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding thanks to Proposition 2.6 and case (2) of Proposition 2.9. Then, the rest of the argument is similar to the proof of ‘(d) implies (a)’ in the case
$b>0$
, and hence is omitted.
(d) implies (b): A discussion similar to the previous paragraph yields that the only transition with
$LRRL$
is
$4124$
. Therefore, the backward
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding of z including the
$0$
th digit is
$\overline {43}4124\in \mathfrak {S}^+_{\mathrm {bwd}}$
. Moreover, by case (3) of Proposition 4.4 and the definition of the partition piece
$P^-_L$
, we see that
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-(2n+4)}(z)\in f^2_{{\mathbb {R}}}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3', {\mathbb {R}}})$
. This yields
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-(2n+6)}(z)\in \mathcal {B}^-_{3', {\mathbb {R}}}$
for all
$n\geq 0$
. Since
$f^2 : \mathcal {B}^-_{3'}\to \mathcal {B}^-_3$
is a crossed mapping of degree one, we have
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-(2n+6)}(z)\in W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_{p_3'}$
(compare item (2) of Corollary 3.6). Hence,
$f_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{-4}(z)\in f^2_{{\mathbb {R}}}(W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_{3'})= W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
and claim (b) is proved.
Remark 4.10
-
(a) When
$b \kern1.3pt{<}\kern1.3pt 0$
, the crossed mapping
$f^2 : \mathcal {B}^-_3\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_4 \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_3))\to \mathcal {B}^-_3$
has degree two. Then the set
$K^u_{\overline {43}}$
consists of infinitely many horizontal disks in
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
, and
$K^u_{\overline {43}4124} \cap K^s_{41\overline {0}}$
consists of infinitely many points. Hence, we cannot classify the dynamics of the Hénon maps only by the number of points with the
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding
$\overline {43}412\cdot 41\overline {0}$
. In Corollary 4.9(2), we classify the dynamics by
$S(a, b)^-$
instead. Here,
$S(a, b)^-$
is the number of intersection points of
$W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-$
and
$W^s_{41\overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
, and
$W^u_{\overline {43}4124}(a, b)^-$
is defined as a certain preimage of the local unstable manifold
$W^u_{\overline {43}}(a, b)^-$
, one of the disks which
$K^u_{\overline {43}}$
consists of. -
(b) Our goal was to classify the dynamics in terms of
$\{ L, R \}$
-coding. Hence, our
$\{ L, R \}$
-partition must distinguish
$W^u_{\overline {43}}(a, b)^-$
from the other horizontal disks in
$K^u_{\overline {43}}$
(more precisely, claim (d) must imply claim (a) in the proof of Theorem 1.1(2)). This is the reason why we refined the box
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
into two parts
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3^{\prime }}$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3^{\prime \prime }}$
so that
$f^2 : \mathcal {B}^-_{3^{\prime }} \rightarrow \mathcal {B}^-_{3^{\prime }}$
has degree one and hence we have
$K^u_{\overline {43^{\prime }}} = W^u_{\overline {43}}(a, b)^-$
. -
(c) However, since
$f : \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_0)\to \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_0$
is degree one,
$K^{u/s}_{\overline {0}}$
are disks of degree one without any refinement.
5 Dynamics at the boundary
$\partial \mathcal {H}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
The purpose of this section is to prove Theorem 1.2.
For simplicity, we write
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) \equiv \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {left}})$
(
$j = 0, 1, 2$
) and
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) \equiv \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {right}})$
(
$j = 2, 3$
) below. Let
$\mathfrak {M}^+_1$
be the family of these sets. Similarly, we write
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) \equiv \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {left}})$
(
$j = 0, 1, 2, 3$
) and
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) \equiv \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {right}})$
(
$j = 2, 3, 4$
) below. Let
$\mathfrak {M}^-_1$
be the family of these sets. We call the elements of
$\mathfrak {M}^{\pm }_1$
margins of
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}$
.
5.1 Refined dynamics
We first refine local stable/unstable manifolds for our purpose. The proofs of the following lemmas are analogous to Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, and hence are omitted.
Lemma 5.1. Let
$(a, b) \in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have the following.
-
(1)
$V^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_0$
and
$V^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+ = K^s_{\overline {0}}$
. -
(2)
$V^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_1$
and
$V^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+ = K^s_{1 \overline {0}}$
. -
(3)
$V^s_{3 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_3$
and
$V^s_{3 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+ = K^s_{3 1 \overline {0}}$
. -
(4)
$V^u_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_0$
and
$V^u_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0}}$
. -
(5)
$V^u_{\overline {0} 3}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^+_3$
and
$V^u_{\overline {0} 3}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 3}$
. -
(6)
$V^u_{\overline {0} 2}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_2$
and
$V^u_{\overline {0} 2}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 2}$
. -
(7)
$V^u_{\overline {0} 3 1}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^+_1$
and
$V^u_{\overline {0} 3 1}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 3 1}$
. -
(8)
$V^u_{\overline {0} 2 3}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^+_3$
and
$V^u_{\overline {0} 2 3}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 2 3}$
. -
(9)
$V^u_{\overline {0} 2 2}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_2$
and
$V^u_{\overline {0} 2 2}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 2 2}$
. -
(10)
$V^u_{\overline {0} 3 1 0}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^+_0$
and
$V^u_{\overline {0} 3 1 0}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 3 1 0}$
.
Lemma 5.2. Let
$(a, b) \in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have the following.
-
(1)
$V^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_0$
and
$V^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^- = K^s_{\overline {0}}$
. -
(2)
$V^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_1$
and
$V^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^- = K^s_{1 \overline {0}}$
. -
(3)
$V^s_{4 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
is a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_4$
and
$V^s_{4 1\overline {0}}(a, b)^- = K^s_{4 1 \overline {0}}$
. -
(4)
$V^u_{\overline {43}}(a, b)^-$
is a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
and
$V^u_{\overline {43}}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43}}$
. -
(5)
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4}(a, b)^-$
is a horizontal disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^-_4$
and
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4}$
. -
(6)
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 3}(a, b)^-$
consists of two mutually disjoint disks of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_3$
. Moreover,
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 3}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43}}$
. -
(7)
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1}(a, b)^-$
is a horizontal disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^-_1$
and
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1}$
. -
(8)
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0}(a, b)^-$
is a horizontal disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^-_0$
and
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0}$
. -
(9)
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2}(a, b)^-$
consists of two mutually disjoint disks of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_2$
. Moreover,
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2}$
. -
(10)
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 0}(a, b)^-$
is a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_0$
and
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 0}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 0}$
. -
(11)
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 2}(a, b)^-$
consists of two mutually disjoint disks of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^-_2$
. Moreover,
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 2}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 2}$
. -
(12)
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2 4}(a, b)^-$
consists of two mutually disjoint disks of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^-_4$
. Moreover,
$V^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2 4}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2 4}$
.
The corollary below follows from Lemma 5.1 (see Figure 9).
The
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding of pieces of stable/unstable manifolds for
$b>0$
.
Corollary 5.3. Let
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have the following.
-
(1)
$W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+ = K^s_{\overline {0}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(2)
$W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+ = K^s_{1 \overline {0}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(3)
$W^s_{3 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^s_{3 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+ = K^s_{3 1 \overline {0}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(4)
$W^u_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(5) The intersection of
$W^u_{\overline {0} 3}(a, b)^+$
and
$\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{3 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+)}$
consists of two horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{3 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+)}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {0} 3}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 3} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(6)
$W^u_{\overline {0} 2}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {0} 2}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 2} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(7) The intersection of
$W^u_{\overline {0} 3 1}(a, b)^+$
and
$\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+)}$
consists of two horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+)}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {0} 3 1}(a, b)^+\hspace{-1pt} =\hspace{-1pt} K^u_{\overline {0} 3 1} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(8)
$W^u_{\overline {0} 2 3}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
from its right boundary to itself. Moreover,
$W^u_{\overline {0} 2 3}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 2 3} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
and this curve is tangent to
$W^s_{3 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
at just one point. -
(9)
$W^u_{\overline {0} 2 2}(a, b)^+$
is a horizontal curve in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {0} 2 2}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 2 2} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(10) The intersection of
$W^u_{\overline {0} 3 1 0}(a, b)^+$
and
$\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+)}$
consists of two horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+)}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {0} 3 1 0}(a, b)^+ = K^u_{\overline {0} 3 1 0} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
.
Proof. The claims (1)–(4), (6), and (9) immediately follow from Lemma 5.1. Claim (8) follows from this lemma and the assumption that
$W^u_{\overline {0}23}(a, b)^+$
is tangent to
$W^s_{31\overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
at just one point. Since
$W^u_{\overline {0}3}(a, b)^+$
is further out than
$W^u_{\overline {0}23}(a, b)^+$
,
$W^u_{\overline {0}23}(a, b)^+$
intersects with
$W^s_{31\overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
at distinct two points. This proves the claim (5). Claim (7) follows from claim (5), and claim (10) follows from claim (7).
Similarly, we have the corollary below from Lemma 5.2 (see Figure 10). The proof is analogous to that of Corollary 5.3, and hence is omitted.
Corollary 5.4. Let
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Then, we have the following.
-
(1)
$W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^- = K^s_{\overline {0}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(2)
$W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^- = K^s_{1 \overline {0}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(3)
$W^s_{4 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
is a vertical curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^s_{4 1\overline {0}}(a, b)^- = K^s_{4 1 \overline {0}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(4)
$W^u_{\overline {43}}(a, b)^-$
is a horizontal curve in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {43}}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(5) The intersection of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4}(a, b)^-$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{4 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-)$
consists of two horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}} {\kern-1pt}\setminus{\kern-1pt} \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}} {\kern-1pt}\setminus{\kern-1pt} W^s_{4 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-)$
and
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4}(a, b)^- {\kern-1pt}\subset{\kern-1pt} K^u_{\overline {43} 4} {\kern-1pt}\cap{\kern-1pt} {\mathbb {R}}^2$
.Figure 10The
$\Sigma ^-$
-coding of pieces of stable/unstable manifolds for
$b<0$
. -
(6)
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 3}(a, b)^-$
consists of two mutually disjoint horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
. Moreover,
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 3}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43}} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(7) The intersection of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1}(a, b)^-$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-)}$
consists of two horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-)}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(8) The intersection of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0}(a, b)^-$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^-)}$
consists of two horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^-)}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(9)
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2}(a, b)^-$
consists of two mutually disjoint horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
. Moreover,
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(10) The intersection of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 0}(a, b)^-$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^-)}$
consists of two horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \overline {\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^-)}$
and
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 0}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 0} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(11)
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 2}(a, b)^-$
consists of two mutually disjoint horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
. Moreover,
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 2}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 2} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. -
(12)
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2 4}(a, b)^-$
consists of two mutually disjoint horizontal curves in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}$
from the right boundary to itself and
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2 4}(a, b)^- \subset K^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2 4} \cap {\mathbb {R}}^2$
. Moreover, the inner one of these two curves is
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2 4}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm {inner}}$
and this curve is tangent to
$W^u_{4 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
at just one point.
The following definitions of pieces of stable/unstable manifolds are necessary to construct the
$\{\alpha , \beta \}$
-partition for the proof of Theorem 1.2. First, we let
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
-
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{0, \mathrm {right}}$
as
$W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{1, \mathrm {right}}$
as
$W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {left}}$
as
$W^s_{3 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{0, \mathrm {upper}}$
as
$W^u_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^+$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {upper}}$
(respectively
$\gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {lower}}$
) as the upper (respectively lower) connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {0} 3}(a, b)^+ \cap (\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {left}}))$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{2, \mathrm {upper}}$
(respectively
$\gamma ^+_{2, \mathrm {lower}}$
) as the upper (respectively lower) connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {0} 2}(a, b)^+ \cap \mathcal {B}^+_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{1, \mathrm {upper}}$
(respectively
$\gamma ^+_{1, \mathrm {lower}}$
) as the upper (respectively lower) connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {0} 3 1}(a, b)^+ \cap (\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^+_{1, \mathrm {right}}))$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {inner}}$
as
$W^u_{\overline {0} 2 3}(a, b)^+$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{2, \mathrm {upper}}$
as
$W^u_{\overline {0} 2 2}(a, b)^+$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^+_{0, \mathrm {lower}}$
as the lower connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {0} 3 1 0}(a, b)^+ \cap (\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^+_{0, \mathrm {right}}))$
.
See Figure 11 for more details. Next, we let
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
-
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{0, \mathrm {right}}$
as
$W^s_{\overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{1, \mathrm {right}}$
as
$W^s_{1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {left}}$
as
$W^s_{4 1 \overline {0}}(a, b)^-$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{3, \mathrm {lower}}$
as
$W^u_{\overline {43}}(a, b)^-$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {upper}}$
(respectively
$\gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {lower}}$
) as the upper (respectively lower) connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4}(a, b)^- \cap (\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {left}}))$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{3, \mathrm {upper}}$
(respectively
$\gamma ^-_{3, \mathrm {lower}}$
) as the upper (respectively lower) connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 3}(a, b)^-$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{1, \mathrm {upper}}$
(respectively
$\gamma ^-_{1, \mathrm {lower}}$
) as the upper (respectively lower) connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1}(a, b)^- \cap (\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^-_{1, \mathrm {right}}))$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{0, \mathrm {lower}}$
as the lower connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0}(a, b)^- \cap (\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^-_{0, \mathrm {right}}))$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{2, \mathrm {lower}}$
as the lower connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2}(a, b)^- \cap \mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{0, \mathrm {upper}}$
as the upper connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 0}(a, b)^- \cap (\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{0, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^-_{0, \mathrm {right}}))$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{2, \mathrm {upper}}$
as the upper connected component of
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 0 2}(a, b)^- \cap \mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
. -
• We write
$\gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {inner}}$
as
$W^u_{\overline {43} 4 1 2 4}(a, b)^-_{\mathrm {inner}}$
.
See Figure 12 for more details.
Margins in
$\mathfrak {M}^+_2$
.
Margins in
$\mathfrak {M}^-_2$
.
5.2 The
$\{\alpha , \beta \}$
-coding
The purpose of this subsection is to define the
$\{\alpha , \beta \}$
-coding. We basically follow the construction of
$B^a$
and
$B^b$
in [Reference Bedford and SmillieBSℝ3, §6]. Hereafter, we always assume that
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
For
$\gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {left}}$
,
$\gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {right}}$
,
$\gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {upper}}$
,
$\gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {lower}}$
,
$\gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {inner}}$
given in the previous subsection, we set
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
,
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
,
$\mathrm {upper}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
,
$\mathrm {lower}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
,
$\mathrm {inner}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) \subset \mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}$
as follows (see Figure 11).
-
• We write
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}) \equiv \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {left}})$
. -
• We write
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) \equiv \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {right}})$
(
$j = 0, 1$
). -
• We write
$\mathrm {upper}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
as the part further up than
$\gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {upper}}$
in either
$\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) (j = 0, 1)$
,
$\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} (j = 2)$
, or
$\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) (j = 3)$
. -
• We write
$\mathrm {lower}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
as the part lower than
$\gamma ^+_{j, \mathrm {lower}}$
in either
$\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) (j = 0, 1)$
,
$\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} (j = 2)$
, or
$\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) (j = 3)$
. -
• We write
$\mathrm {inner}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}})$
as the part further in than
$\gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {inner}}$
in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}$
.
Let
$\mathfrak {M}^+_2$
be the family of sets defined as above.
For
$\gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {left}}$
,
$\gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {right}}$
,
$\gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {upper}}$
,
$\gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {lower}}$
,
$\gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {inner}}$
given in the previous subsection, we set
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
,
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
,
$\mathrm {upper}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
,
$\mathrm {lower}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
,
$\mathrm {inner}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) \subset \mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}$
as follows (see Figure 12).
-
• We write
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}) \equiv \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{3, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {left}})$
. -
• We write
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) \equiv \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {right}})$
(
$j = 0, 1$
). -
• We write
$\mathrm {upper}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
as the part further up than
$\gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {upper}}$
in either
$\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) (j = 0, 1)$
,
$\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} (j = 2, 3)$
, or
$\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) (j = 4)$
. -
• We write
$\mathrm {lower}(\mathcal {B}^+_{j, {\mathbb {R}}})$
as the part lower than
$\gamma ^-_{j, \mathrm {lower}}$
in either
$\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) (j = 0, 1)$
,
$\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} (j = 2, 3)$
, or
$\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}} \setminus \mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}) (j = 4)$
. -
• We write
$\mathrm {inner}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}})$
as the part further in than
$\gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {inner}}$
in
$\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}$
.
Let
$\mathfrak {M}^-_2$
be the family of sets defined as above. We call the elements of
$\mathfrak {M}^{\pm }_2$
the margins of
$\mathcal {B}^{\pm }_{j, {\mathbb {R}}}$
just like
$\mathfrak {M}^{\pm }_1$
.
We then construct the
$\{\alpha , \beta \}$
-partition as described in Figures 13 and 14. Define
$\mathcal {B}_{j, \alpha , \mathbb {R}}^{+}$
for
$j = 0$
and
$\mathcal {B}_{j, \beta , \mathbb {R}}^{+}$
for
$j = 1, 2$
as
$\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{+} \setminus (\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{+}) \cup \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{+}) \cup \mathrm {upper}(\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{+}) \cup \mathrm {lower}(\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{+}))$
. The set
$\mathcal {B}_{3, \mathbb {R}}^{+} \setminus (\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}_{3, \mathbb {R}}^{+}) \cup \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}_{3, \mathbb {R}}^{+}) \cup \mathrm {upper}(\mathcal {B}_{3, \mathbb {R}}^{+}) \cup \mathrm {lower}(\mathcal {B}_{3, \mathbb {R}}^{+}))$
with one point
$\star ^+$
being removed has two connected components. We let
$\mathcal {B}^+_{3, \alpha , {\mathbb {R}}}$
be the upper one with
$\star ^+$
being added, and let
$\mathcal {B}^+_{3, \beta , {\mathbb {R}}}$
be the lower one with
$\star ^+$
being added.
Definition 5.5. We define
$\mathcal {B}_{\alpha , \mathbb {R}}^{+} \equiv \mathcal {B}_{0, \alpha , \mathbb {R}}^{+} \cup \mathcal {B}_{3, \alpha , \mathbb {R}}^{+}$
and
$\mathcal {B}_{\beta , \mathbb {R}}^{+} \equiv \mathcal {B}_{1, \beta , \mathbb {R}}^{+} \cup \mathcal {B}_{2, \beta , \mathbb {R}}^{+} \cup \mathcal {B}_{3, \beta , \mathbb {R}}^{+}$
.
The
$\{ \alpha , \beta \}$
-partition (
$b> 0$
).
The
$\{ \alpha , \beta \}$
-partition (
$b < 0$
).
Similarly, define
$\mathcal {B}_{j, \alpha , \mathbb {R}}^{-}$
for
$j = 0, 1$
and
$\mathcal {B}_{j, \beta , \mathbb {R}}^{-}$
for
$j = 2, 3$
as
$\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{-} \setminus (\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{-}) \cup \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{-}) \cup \mathrm {upper}(\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{-}) \cup \mathrm {lower}(\mathcal {B}_{j, \mathbb {R}}^{-}))$
. The set
$\mathcal {B}_{4, \mathbb {R}}^{-} \setminus (\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}_{4, \mathbb {R}}^{-}) \cup \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}_{4, \mathbb {R}}^{-}) \cup \mathrm {upper}(\mathcal {B}_{4, \mathbb {R}}^{-}) \cup \mathrm {lower}(\mathcal {B}_{4, \mathbb {R}}^{-}))$
with one point
$\star ^-$
being removed has two connected components. We let
$\mathcal {B}^-_{4, \alpha , {\mathbb {R}}}$
be the upper one with
$\star ^-$
being added, and let
$\mathcal {B}^-_{4, \beta , {\mathbb {R}}}$
be the lower one with
$\star ^-$
being added.
Definition 5.6. We define
$\mathcal {B}_{\alpha , \mathbb {R}}^{-} \equiv \mathcal {B}_{0, \alpha , \mathbb {R}}^{-} \cup \mathcal {B}_{2, \alpha , \mathbb {R}}^{-} \cup \mathcal {B}_{4, \alpha , \mathbb {R}}^{-}$
and
$\mathcal {B}_{\beta , \mathbb {R}}^{-} \equiv \mathcal {B}_{1, \beta , \mathbb {R}}^{-} \cup \mathcal {B}_{3, \beta , \mathbb {R}}^{-} \cup \mathcal {B}_{4, \beta , \mathbb {R}}^{-}$
.
The transitions between the margins can be described in the following two lemmas.
Lemma 5.7. The transitions between margins in
$\mathfrak {M}^+_2$
are given by Figure 15. In this figure, for example,
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}}) \rightarrow \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}})$
means
$f(\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^+_{3, {\mathbb {R}}})) \cap \mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \subset \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}})$
.
The transitions between margins in
$\mathfrak {M}^+_2$
.
Lemma 5.8. The transitions between margins in
$\mathfrak {M}^-_2$
are given by Figure 16. In this figure,
$\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}}) \rightarrow \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}})$
means
$f(\mathrm {left}(\mathcal {B}^-_{4, {\mathbb {R}}})) \cap \mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}} \subset \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^-_{1, {\mathbb {R}}})$
.
The transitions between margins in
$\mathfrak {M}^-_2$
.
From these lemmas, we have the following proposition.
Proposition 5.9. For
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, we have
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}} \subset \mathcal {B}^+_{\alpha , {\mathbb {R}}} \cup \mathcal {B}^+_{\beta , {\mathbb {R}}}$
.
Proof. Suppose
$p \in K_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. It suffices to show that
$$ \begin{align*} \text{the 0th coordinate of the } \Sigma^+\text{-coding of } p \text{ is } 1 \Longrightarrow p \notin M \end{align*} $$
for any
$M \in \mathfrak {M}^+_2$
(compare Proposition 4.1). Here, we show this claim for
$M = \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}})$
for example. We can also show this for another M similarly.
Take a point
$p \in K_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Assume that the zeroth coordinate of the
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding of p is
$1$
and
$p \in \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}})$
. By the transitions between symbols, the first coordinate of the
$\Sigma ^+$
-coding of p is either 0 or 2. Since
$p \in \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{1, {\mathbb {R}}})$
, the first coordinate must be
$0$
. Then, we have
$f(p) \in \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}})$
by Lemma 5.7. By chasing the orbit of p similarly, we can find that
$f^{n_0}(p)$
belongs to
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}})$
and
$f^n(p)$
also belongs to
$\mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}})$
for any
$n> n_0$
. Therefore,
$f^{n_0}(p)$
lies on
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)^+_0$
. This contradicts to the fact that
$f^{n_0}(p) \in \mathrm {right}(\mathcal {B}^+_{0, {\mathbb {R}}})$
.
Proposition 5.10. For
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, we have
$K_{{\mathbb {R}}} \subset \mathcal {B}^-_{\alpha , {\mathbb {R}}} \cup \mathcal {B}^-_{\beta , {\mathbb {R}}}$
.
Proof. The proof is similar to that of the previous proposition, and hence is omitted.
5.3 Proof of Theorem 1.2
In this subsection, we continue to assume that
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. Below, we write
$$ \begin{align*} K_{\mathrm{fwd}} \equiv \{ p \in \mathbb{C}^2 : (f^n(p))_{n \geq 0} \text{ is bounded} \} \end{align*} $$
and
$$ \begin{align*} K_{\mathrm{bwd}} \equiv \{ p \in \mathbb{C}^2 : (f^n(p))_{n \leq 0} \text{ is bounded} \} \end{align*} $$
as the forward/backward filled Julia set of
$f_{a, b}$
, respectively. We also write
$J_{\mathrm {fwd}} \equiv \partial K_{\mathrm {fwd}}$
and
$J_{\mathrm {bwd}} \equiv \partial K_{\mathrm {bwd}}$
as the forward/backward Julia set, and let
$J \equiv J_{\mathrm {fwd}} \cap J_{\mathrm {bwd}}$
be the Julia set. By [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Proposition 3.1], the filled Julia set
$K_{\mathrm {fwd}} \cap K_{\mathrm {bwd}}$
coincides with
$K \equiv K_{a, b}$
. Moreover, the filled Julia set is included in the real plane
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
and coincides with the Julia set J by [Reference Bedford, Lyubich and SmillieBLS, Theorem 10.1(4), (7)] since
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f) = \log {2}$
holds. Hence, we have
${J = K = K_{\mathbb {R}}}$
.
We write
$\mathcal {B}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
as the region in
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
enclosed by the curves
$W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0$
,
$\gamma ^+_{1, \mathrm {lower}}$
,
$\gamma ^+_{2, \mathrm {lower}}$
,
$\gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {left}}$
,
$\gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {upper}}$
,
$\gamma ^+_{3, \mathrm {lower}}$
, and
$f^{-1}(W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0)$
. Moreover, let
$\mathcal {B}^+_{\tilde {\alpha }, {\mathbb {R}}} = f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_{\alpha , {\mathbb {R}}})$
and
${\mathcal {B}^+_{\tilde {\beta }, {\mathbb {R}}} = f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_{\beta , {\mathbb {R}}})}$
. Also, we write
$\mathcal {B}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
as the region in
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
enclosed by the curves
$W^u_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_3$
,
$\gamma ^-_{0, \mathrm {upper}}$
,
$\gamma ^-_{1, \mathrm {lower}}$
,
$\gamma ^-_{2, \mathrm {upper}}$
,
$\gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {left}}$
,
$\gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {upper}}$
,
$\gamma ^-_{4, \mathrm {lower}}$
, and
$f^{-1}(W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_1)_0)$
. Moreover, let
$\mathcal {B}^-_{\tilde {\alpha }, {\mathbb {R}}} = f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_{\alpha , {\mathbb {R}}})$
and
$\mathcal {B}^-_{\tilde {\beta }, {\mathbb {R}}} = f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_{\beta , {\mathbb {R}}})$
. Then, the
$\{ \tilde {\alpha }, \tilde {\beta } \}$
-partition is described in Figure 17.
The
$\{ \tilde {\alpha }, \tilde {\beta } \}$
-partition.
For any point
$p \in J$
, the
$\{ \tilde {\alpha }, \tilde {\beta } \}$
-coding of
$f^{-1}(p)$
coincides with the symbolic sequence obtained by replacing
$\alpha $
and
$\beta $
in the
$\{ \alpha , \beta \}$
-coding of p for
$\tilde {\alpha }$
and
$\tilde {\beta }$
, respectively.
From now, we assume that
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. The argument for the case
$(a, b) \in \partial \mathcal {H}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
is similar, and hence will be omitted.
For
$p \in K$
, let
$s^+(p)$
be the set of all
$\{ \alpha , \beta \}$
-codings of p, that is,
$$ \begin{align*} s^+(p) \equiv \{ (s_j)_{j \in {\mathbb{Z}}} {\kern-1pt}\in{\kern-1pt} {\{ \alpha, \beta \}}^{{\mathbb{Z}}} : (f^j(p) \in \mathcal{B}^+_{\alpha, {\mathbb{R}}} \text{ and } s_j {\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt} \alpha) \text{ or } (f^j(p) \in \mathcal{B}^+_{\beta, {\mathbb{R}}} \text{ and } s_j {\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt} \beta) \}. \end{align*} $$
In the case that
$p = f^n(\star ^+)$
for some
$n \in {\mathbb {Z}}$
, we have
$s^+(p) = \{ \sigma ^n(\overline {\alpha } \beta \cdot \alpha \beta \overline {\alpha }), \sigma ^n(\overline {\alpha } \beta \cdot \beta \beta \overline {\alpha }) \}$
. However, if
$p \in J^{\prime } \equiv J \setminus \{ f^n(\star ^+) : n \in {\mathbb {Z}} \}$
, then
$s^+(p)$
consists of one point. Therefore,
$s^+ : p \mapsto s^+(p)$
is a map from J to
${\{ \alpha , \beta \}}^{{\mathbb {Z}}} / {\sim }$
, where
$\sim $
is the equivalence relation generated by
$\sigma ^n(\overline {\alpha } \beta \cdot \alpha \beta \overline {\alpha }) \sim \sigma ^n(\overline {\alpha } \beta \cdot \beta \beta \overline {\alpha })$
,
$n \in {\mathbb {Z}}$
.
Proposition 5.11. The map
$s^+: J \rightarrow {\{ \alpha , \beta \}}^{{\mathbb {Z}}}$
is continuous.
Proof. The map
$s^+$
is obviously continuous on
$J^{\prime }$
. We show that it is continuous on
$f^n(\star ^+)$
. The neighborhood basis for
$s^+(f^n(\star ^+))$
according to the quotient topology is given by
${\{ \ast \alpha ^N \beta \cdot ? \beta \alpha ^N \ast \}}_{N \geq 0}$
, where
$?$
is either
$\alpha $
or
$\beta $
, and
$\ast $
means any one-sided infinite sequence. Take any N. The map
$f^j$
is continuous for each
$j \in {\mathbb {Z}}$
such that
$-N \leq j \leq N$
,
$j \neq 0$
. Hence, we can choose a neighborhood
$U_j$
of
$f^{n+j}(\star ^+)$
such that
$U_j \subset \mathcal {B}^+_{\alpha }$
if
$-N \leq j \leq N$
,
$j \neq 0, \pm 1$
and
$U_j \subset \mathcal {B}^+_{\beta }$
if
$j = \pm 1$
. Then,
$U = \bigcap _{j \in {\mathbb {Z}}} f^{-j}(U_j)$
is a neighborhood of
$f^n(\star ^+)$
and satisfies
$p \in U \cap J \Rightarrow s^+(p) \in \{ \sigma ^n(\ast \alpha ^N \beta \cdot ? \beta \alpha ^N \ast ) \}$
.
To prove Theorem 1.2 in the case
$b> 0$
, it suffices to show that the continuous map
$s^+$
is bijective. In the rest this subsection, we will show its surjectivity and injectivity.
For each binomial number
$0 \leq \theta \leq 1$
, we define a curve
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
in
$\mathcal {B}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
included in
$\overline {W^s(p_1)}$
as follows. For
$\theta = 0, 1$
, let
$\tau ^s_0$
be the right-hand boundary of
$\mathcal {B}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
and let
$\tau ^s_1$
be its left-hand boundary.
Next, for a finite binomial
$0 < \theta < 1$
, we define
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
inductively as follows. Assume that
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
is already defined for a finite binomial
$0 < \theta \leq 1$
. Then, we let
$f^{-1}(\tau ^s_{\theta }) \cap \mathcal {B}^+_{\alpha , {\mathbb {R}}} = \tau ^s_{\theta / 2}$
and
$f^{-1}(\tau ^s_{\theta }) \cap \mathcal {B}^+_{\beta , {\mathbb {R}}} = \tau ^s_{1 - \theta / 2}$
for
$\theta ^{\prime } = {\theta }/{2}, 1 - {\theta }/{2}$
. However,
$\tau ^s_{1/2} = f^{-1}(\tau ^s_1)$
for
$\theta ^{\prime } = \tfrac 12$
instead. The curve
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
is represented as two connected curves
$\tau ^s_{\theta ^{\prime } \pm }$
from the upper hand boundary of
$\mathcal {B}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
to its lower hand boundary, where
$\tau ^s_{\theta ^{\prime } +}$
is left of
$\tau ^s_{\theta ^{\prime } -}$
. By definition,
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
is included in
$W^s(p_1)$
for any finite binomial
$0 \leq \theta \leq 1$
. Also, for any point in
$W^s(p_1) \cap \mathcal {B}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, there is a unique finite binomial
$\theta $
such that the curve
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
passes that point.
Finally, any infinite binomial
$0 \leq \theta \leq 1$
can be represented as the limit of some sequence
$(\theta _j)_j$
of finite binomials. Then, we have
$\tau ^s_{\theta _j} \subset f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_i)$
for some preimage
$f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_i)$
and large j. For each j, the connected component
$V_j$
of
$W^s(p_1) \cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_i)$
including
$\tau ^s_{\theta _j}$
can be described as a graph of some holomorphic function since this component is a vertical disk of
$f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_i)$
. Since the sequence of these functions uniformly converges, its limit function is also holomorphic. Hence, the limit set V of
$V_j$
is a graph of this holomorphic function, which implies V is a vertical disk of
$f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_i)$
. We let
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
be the limit set of
$\tau ^s_{\theta _j}$
. Then,
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
is a curve from the upper hand boundary of
$\mathcal {B}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
to its lower hand boundary, and it is included in V.
Remark 5.12. A finite binomial number
$\theta $
has two infinite binomial representations (e.g.
$0.1 = 0.0111\cdots = 0.1000\cdots $
). Each representation corresponds to each of the two curves
$\tau ^s_{\theta \pm }$
of degree one, respectively (e.g.
$\tau ^s_{0.0111\cdots } = \tau ^s_{0.1-}$
,
$\tau ^s_{0.1000\cdots } = \tau ^s_{0.1+}$
). From now, we distinguish two infinite binomial representations of a finite binomial number if needed.
For a point
$p \in J^{\prime }$
, we choose
$0 \leq \theta \leq 1$
so that
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
passes p. Let
$0. d_1 d_2 d_3 \cdots $
be the binomial representation of
$\theta $
. By the definition of
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
,
$d_j = 0$
if and only if
$f^j(p) \in \mathcal {B}^+_{\alpha , {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$d_j = 1$
if and only if
$f^j(p) \in \mathcal {B}^+_{\beta , {\mathbb {R}}}$
for each
$j \geq 1$
. Hence, we have the following proposition.
Proposition 5.13. The map
$s^+ : J \rightarrow {\{ \alpha , \beta \}}^{{\mathbb {Z}}} / {\sim }$
is surjective.
Proof. Let
$\mathcal {S}^{\prime } = {\{ \alpha , \beta \}}^{{\mathbb {Z}}} \setminus \bigcup _{j \in {\mathbb {Z}}} \sigma ^j \{ \overline {\alpha } \beta \cdot \alpha \beta \overline {\alpha }, \overline {\alpha } \beta \cdot \beta \beta \overline {\alpha } \}$
. It suffices to show that there exists a point
$p \in J^{\prime }$
for each
$s \in \mathcal {S}^{\prime }$
with
$s^+(p) = s$
. Take any
$s = (s_j)_j \in \mathcal {S}^{\prime }$
. For each j, let
$d_j = 0$
if
$s_j = \alpha $
and
$d_j = 1$
if
$s_j = \beta $
, and consider a binomial number
$\theta ^j = d_j. d_{j+1} d_{j+2} d_{j+3} \cdots $
. If we choose a point
$p_n \in \tau ^s_{\theta ^{-n}} \cap J$
for each
$n \in {\mathbb {Z}}$
, then the jth coordinate of the
$\{ \alpha , \beta \}$
-coding of
$f^n(p_n)$
is
$s_j$
for
$j \geq -n$
. Since J is compact,
$f^n(p_n) \in \tau ^s_{\theta ^0}$
has a cluster point
$p \in \tau ^s_{\theta ^0}$
. Here, if p is on the orbit of
$\star ^+$
, then we have
$s \in \mathcal {S}^{\prime }$
. Therefore, p belongs to
$J^{\prime }$
and satisfies
$s^+(p) = s$
.
We can also construct a curve
$\tau ^u_{\vartheta }$
included in
$\overline {W^u(p_1)}$
for each binomial number
${0 \leq \vartheta \leq 1}$
by a similar argument according to
$\mathcal {B}^+_{\alpha , {\mathbb {R}}}$
,
$\mathcal {B}^+_{\beta , {\mathbb {R}}}$
instead of
$\mathcal {B}^+_{\tilde {\alpha }, {\mathbb {R}}}$
,
$\mathcal {B}^+_{\tilde {\beta }, {\mathbb {R}}}$
. For a point
$p \in J^{\prime }$
, we choose
$0 < \vartheta < 1$
so that
$\tau ^u_{\vartheta }$
passes p, and let
$0. d_0 d_{-1} d_{-2} \cdots $
be the infinite binomial representation of
$\vartheta $
. Then,
$d_j = 0$
if and only if
$f^j(p) \in \mathcal {B}^+_{\alpha , {\mathbb {R}}}$
and
$d_j = 1$
if and only if
$f^j(p) \in \mathcal {B}^+_{\beta , {\mathbb {R}}}$
for each
$j \leq 0$
. Therefore, we have the following proposition.
Proposition 5.14. The map
$s^+ : J \rightarrow {\{ \alpha , \beta \}}^{{\mathbb {Z}}} / {\sim }$
is injective.
Proof. It suffices to show that there exists at most one point
$p \in J^{\prime }$
for any
$s = (s_j)_j \in \mathcal {S}^{\prime }$
with
$s^+(p) = s$
. Let
$d_j = 0$
if
$s_j = \alpha $
and
$d_j = 1$
if
$s_j = \beta $
for each
$j \in {\mathbb {Z}}$
, and consider two binomial numbers
$\theta = 0. d_1 d_2 d_3 \cdots $
and
$\vartheta = 0. d_0 d_{-1} d_{-2} \cdots $
. Then,
$\theta $
corresponds to a curve
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
(or one of
$\tau ^s_{\theta \pm }$
), and
$\vartheta $
corresponds to a curve
$\tau ^u_{\vartheta }$
(or one of
$\tau ^u_{\vartheta \pm }$
). We can obtain a point p with
$s^+(p) = s$
as an intersection point of
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
and
$\tau ^u_{\vartheta }$
.
The curve
$\tau ^s_{\theta } \cap U^+$
is included in either
$\mathcal {B}^+_0 \cup \mathcal {B}^+_1$
,
$\mathcal {B}^+_0 \cup \mathcal {B}^+_2$
, or
$\mathcal {B}^+_3$
, and
$\tau ^u_{\vartheta } \cap U^+$
is included in either
$\mathcal {B}^+_0 \cup \mathcal {B}^+_3$
or
$\mathcal {B}^+_1 \cup \mathcal {B}^+_2 \cup \mathcal {B}^+_3$
. Hence,
$\tau ^s_{\theta } \cap \tau ^u_{\vartheta }$
is included in one of four boxes
$\mathcal {B}^+_i$
(
$i = 0, 1, 2, 3$
). We can obtain
$\tau ^s_{\theta } \cap \mathcal {B}^+_i$
as the intersection of a vertical disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_i$
and
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
, or as one of two branches of the intersection of a vertical disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^+_i$
and
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
. Also, we can obtain
$\tau ^u_{\vartheta } \cap \mathcal {B}^+_i$
as the intersection of a horizontal disk of degree one in
$\mathcal {B}^+_i$
and
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
, or as one of two branches of the intersection of a horizontal disk of degree two in
$\mathcal {B}^+_i$
and
${\mathbb {R}}^2$
. Therefore,
$\tau ^s_{\theta }$
and
$\tau ^u_{\vartheta }$
intersect at at most one point.
Acknowledgements
Both authors thank Zin Arai in Tokyo Institute of Technology who performed computer-assisted proofs mentioned above. The second-named author is grateful to Kanae Hiraga for her visit to Kyushu University in 2022 which inspired him to employ the Poincaré metric in the argument presented just before Lemma 4.2. The second-named author is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18H01138, 20H01809, and 22H05107.
A Appendix. Computer-assisted proofs
In this appendix, we explain the proofs of Proposition A.1 and Lemmas 2.7, 2.8, 2.10, 2.11, 4.2, and 4.5. These proofs require computer-assistance, and are performed by Arai [Reference AraiA2]. Note that these lemmas concern only the real parameters
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, and hence the computational cost is not so high.
Proposition A.1. The locus
$\mathcal {E}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
forms a neighborhood of
$\partial \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }$
.
Proof. When
$(a, b)$
belongs to the left boundary of
$\mathcal {E}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, we show that there exists a periodic point of period
$7$
in
$\mathbb {C}^2\setminus \mathbb {R}^2$
by using the interval Krawczyk method (see [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Theorem 2.12(i)]). This implies
$h_{\mathrm {top}}(f_{a, b})<\log 2$
by [Reference Bedford, Lyubich and SmillieBLS, Theorem 10.1]. When
$(a, b)$
belongs to the right boundary of
$\mathcal {E}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
, we show that
$f_{a, b}$
is hyperbolic by using a technique in [Reference AraiA1] (see [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Theorem 2.12(ii)]). These results together with [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Main Theorem] yields that the locus
$\mathcal {E}^{\pm }_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
forms a neighborhood of
$\partial \mathcal {H}_{{\mathbb {R}}}^{\pm }$
.
Proof of Lemmas 2.7 and 2.8
For Lemma 2.7, we first choose appropriate topological disks
$\widetilde {D}^+_{u, i}\subset D^+_{u, i}$
(
$i=0, 1, 2$
) and set
$\mathcal {P}^+_{0, 3}\equiv \widetilde {D}^+_{u, 0}\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D^+_{v, 0}\subset \mathcal {B}^+_0$
,
$\mathcal {P}^+_{1, 2}\equiv \widetilde {D}^+_{u, 1}\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D^+_{v, 1}\subset \mathcal {B}^+_1$
and
$\mathcal {P}^+_{2, 3}\equiv \widetilde {D}^+_{u, 2}\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D^+_{v, 2}\subset \mathcal {B}^+_2$
so that conditions (1) and (2) in the lemma are satisfied.
For Lemma 2.8, we choose appropriate topological disks
$\widetilde {D}^-_{u, i}\subset D^-_{u, i}$
(
$i=0, 1, 2, 3$
) and set
$\mathcal {P}^-_{0, 2}\equiv \widetilde {D}^-_{u, 0}\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D^-_{v, 0}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_0$
,
$\mathcal {P}^-_{1, 3}\equiv \widetilde {D}^-_{u, 1}\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D^-_{v, 1}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_0$
,
$\mathcal {P}^-_{2, 4}\equiv \widetilde {D}^-_{u, 2}\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D^-_{v, 2}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_0$
and
$\mathcal {P}^-_{3, 4}\equiv \widetilde {D}^-_{u, 3}\times _{\mathrm {pr}}D^-_{v, 3}\subset \mathcal {B}^-_0$
so that conditions (1) and (2) in the lemma are satisfied.
Proof of Lemmas 2.10 and 2.11
Let
$\pi _{u, i} : \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i\to D^{\pm }_{u, i}$
be the projection given by
$\pi _{u, i}(u, v)=u$
and let
$\iota _{v_0, i} : D_{u, i}\to \mathcal {B}^{\pm }_i$
be given by
$\iota _{v_0, i}(u)=(u, v_0)$
for
$v_0\in D^{\pm }_{v, i}$
. The proof is similar to [Reference Arai and IshiiAI, Lemma 3.13] and goes as follows.
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^+_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. For Lemma 2.10, we show the following claim by computer assistance. For every fixed
$v_0\in D_{v, 2}^+$
, we have
$$ \begin{align*} \frac{d}{du}\{\pi^-_{u, 2} \circ f^4\circ\iota_{v_0, 2}(u)\}\ne 0 \end{align*} $$
for
$u\in D_{u, 2}^+$
with
$\iota _{v_0, 2}(u)\in \mathcal {B}^+_2\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_3\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_1\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_0\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^+_2))))$
.
Let
$(a, b)\in \mathcal {E}^-_{{\mathbb {R}}}$
. For Lemma 2.11, we show the following claims by computer assistance.
-
(1) For every fixed
$v_0\in D_{v, 2}^-$
, we have for
$$ \begin{align*} \frac{d}{du}\{\pi^-_{u, 3} \circ f^2\circ\iota_{v_0, 2}(u)\}\ne 0\end{align*} $$
$u\in D_{u, 2}^-$
with
$\iota _{v_0, 2}(u)\in \mathcal {B}^-_3\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_4\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_2))$
.
-
(2) For every fixed
$v_0\in D_{v, 3}^-$
, we have for
$$ \begin{align*}\frac{d}{du}\{\pi^-_{u, 3} \circ f^2\circ\iota_{v_0, 3}(u)\}\ne 0\end{align*} $$
$u\in D_{u, 3}^-$
with
$\iota _{v_0, 3}(u)\in \mathcal {B}^-_3\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_4\cap f^{-1}(\mathcal {B}^-_3))$
.
Proof of Lemmas 4.2 and 4.5
We define the projective polydisk
$\mathcal {P}_i=D_i\times _{\mathrm {pr}} D_{I_i}$
in claim (b) as follows. For
$i=2, 3, 4$
, we first compute the stable direction at the saddle point
$p_i$
and define
$\pi _u$
to be the projection to this direction. We also define
$\pi _v$
as the projection
$\mathrm {pr}_y$
orthogonal to the y-axis. We let
$D_i$
be a disk centered at
$\pi _u(p_i)$
and determine its radius
$\delta _i>0$
is determined so that claims (a) and (c) hold. For
$i=1$
, we approximately compute the tangential direction of
$W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4$
at some
$p\in W^s_{\mathrm {loc}}(p_3)_4\cap \mathcal {B}^-_{2, {\mathbb {R}}}$
and pull it back by f to define the direction of the projection
$\pi _u$
for
$\mathcal {P}_1$
. We also define
$\pi _v$
as the projection
$\mathrm {pr}_y$
orthogonal to the y-axis. We let
$D_1$
be a disk centered at
$\pi _u(f^{-1}(p))$
and determine its radius
$\delta _1>0$
is determined so that claims (a) and (c) hold.
