Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T17:26:40.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacterial response to a weak 2006 El Niño condition in an upwelling area of the Humboldt Current System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Marcelo Fuentes*
Affiliation:
Center for Oceanographic Research in the Eastern South Pacific (COPAS)
Rubén Escribano
Affiliation:
Center for Oceanographic Research in the Eastern South Pacific (COPAS) Department of Oceanography, Marine Biology Station at Dichato, University of Concepción, Chile
L. Antonio Cuevas
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Jahnebakken 5, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Fuentes, Center for Oceanographic Research in the Eastern South Pacific (COPAS) email: marcelfu@udec.cl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abundance and production of the pelagic heterotrophic bacteria community were studied at northern Chile during winter and summer periods of 2006–2007 in relation to seasonal changes in physical and chemical variables, including the influence of a weak El Niño event. Bacterial abundance was estimated by flow cytometry and secondary bacterial production by protein synthesis after bacterial uptake of 14C-isoleucine. Bacterial biomass showed high values in the range of 2.84 at 96.6 µ g C l−1d−1 with a bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) of 37.4% in the summer of 2007, and 2.7% in the winter of 2006. High amounts of C (~1.2 to 1.8 g C m−2 d−1) were used for bacterial respiration in the upper 20 m. Environmental impact on bacterial abundance and BGE was reflected in a positive correlation with phytoplankton biomass (r2 > 0.40 P < 0.05), and a lack of correlation with temperature (P > 0.05). Seasonal differences in abundance and BGE were mainly attributed to an ‘abnormally’ warm winter of 2006, which caused a greater stratification of the water column—a weaker and much deeper oxycline. The oxycline is normally shallower (<20 m) in the zone because of the ascent of the oxygen minimum zone (OMZ) upon upwelling. Winter 2006 conditions indicated presence of a weak El Niño event. Bacteria abundance increased during this warming event, but their metabolic activity was drastically reduced, resulting in a very low BGE. Our study suggests that changes from a prevailing sub-oxic to a highly oxygenated water column could have impacted the bacterial community, thus reducing its productive capacity. Therefore, variation in vertical distribution of the OMZ forced by upwelling variability and the El Niño impact might play an important role in the dynamics of the microbial component in this highly productive upwelling system.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The coastal upwelling zone off Chile, illustrating the area of the Bay of Chipana, northern Chile, and the sampling station for assessing bacterial activity upon upwelling variation.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Satellite images of chlorophyll-a (left side) and sea surface temperature (right side) during monitoring days winter 2005 to summer 2007 (chlorophyll-a data are obtained from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and temperature data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration satellites and available at www.antares.ws).

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of oceanographic parameters during winter 2005 to summer 2006 in the Bay of Chipana, northern Chile. SST, sea surface temperature; T10, temperature at 10 m; Sϕ, surface salinity; OMZ, oxygen minimum zone; Φ20, stratification; SD, standard deviation.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Oceanographic variables: (A) temperature; (B) oxygen; (C) salinity; (D) photosynthetically active radiation in the Bay of Chipana, northern Chile, during winter 2005 to summer 2007.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Vertical profiles of nutrients at the Bay of Chipana (northern Chile) (μM) during four sampling periods (2005–2007): (A) phosphate (PO4); (B) nitrite (NO2); (C) nitrate (NO3); (D) silicates (Si(OH)2).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Chlorophyll-a (mg m−3) profiles (mean and standard deviation) for each study period: (A) winter 2005; (B) summer 2006; (C) winter 2006; (D) summer 2007.

Figure 6

Table 2. Two-way analysis of variance to test for interannual and seasonal differences in oceanographic conditions at the Bay of Chipana, northern Chile during the period July 2005 to February 2007. SS, sum of squares; df, degrees of freedom; MS, mean square; F ratio and P value with significance <0.05.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Bacterial abundance profiles (BA) in cell ml−1 (mean and standard deviation) for each study period: (A) winter 2005; (B) summer 2006; (C) winter 2006; (D) summer 2007.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Bacterial production (BP) profiles in μgC L−1 d−1 (mean and standard deviation) for each study period: (A) winter 2005; (B) summer 2006; (C) winter 2006; (D) summer 2007.

Figure 9

Table 3. Mean and standard deviation of bacterial production (BP), respiration (BR), biomass (BB) and abundance (BA) from July 2005 to February 2007 in the Bay of Chipana, northern Chile. Values were integrated over the upper 20 m layer.

Figure 10

Table 4. Mean and standard deviation of bacterial growth rate (BGR), doubling time (DT) and bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) in the Bay of Chipana, northern Chile from July 2005 to February 2007.

Figure 11

Table 5. Two-way analysis of variance for testing interannual and seasonal differences in bacterial production (BP), bacterial abundance (BA), bacterial biomass (BB), doubling time (DT) and bacterial growth efficiency (BGE), in the Bay of Chipana, northern Chile during the period July 2005 to February 2007. SS, sum of square; df, degrees of freedom; MS, mean square; F ratio and P value with significance <0.05.

Figure 12

Fig. 8. Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) and bacterial production (BP) relationship (R2 = 0.43; P < 0.05). Data collected in the Bay of Chipana, northern Chile, during July 2005 to February 2007.

Figure 13

Fig. 9. Bacterial growth efficiency and chlorophyll-a relationship, in the Bay of Chipana, northern Chile, during winter 2005 to summer 2007.

Figure 14

Fig. 10. Principal component analysis on the biological and oceanographic variables during winter 2005 to summer 2007. Three factors were derived accounting for 76% of total variance. Factor 1 versus Factor 2 plot (upper panel), allows a consistent grouping of nutrients (solid line), biological variables (dotted minor line) and ocenographic variables (dotted mayor line). Factor 1 versus Factor 3 plot (lower panel) shows biological–chemical association (solid line) and oceanographic group, coinciding with groups defined by a K-means analysis.