Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T10:31:37.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bioclimatic assessment of abiotic factors affecting relative abundance and distribution of wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in western Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2018

Owen Olfert*
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
Ross M. Weiss
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
Haley Catton
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, 5403 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada
Héctor Cárcamo
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, 5403 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada
Scott Meers
Affiliation:
Crop Diversification Centre, 301 Horticultural Station Road East, Brooks, Alberta, T1R 1E6, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: owen.olfert@agr.gc.ca)

Abstract

Wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), indigenous to North America, quickly adapted from host native grasses to wheat crops (Triticum Linnaeus (Poaceae)) with expansion of agriculture on the Great Plains of North America. Bioclimatic simulation tools, such as Climex, predict the potential geographic distribution and establishment of insects in ecosystems, based on climate. The ecoclimatic index, a measure of ecological suitability, integrates potential population growth with stresses to produce estimates of relative abundance. This simulation software was used to develop a bioclimate model for C. cinctus in western Canada. Results fostered a better understanding of how C. cinctus responded to selected climate variables. Two general circulation models were then applied to assess the response of C. cinctus populations to future climate. Relative to current climate, predicted changes in C. cinctus distribution and relative abundance were greatest for 2030, with a small further increase for 2070. Across the Prairies and Boreal Plains Ecozones, changes in ecoclimatic index were greater than in geographic distribution. Both general circulation models indicated most of this area would be categorised as very favourable. This suggests that the potential for pest populations could expand into areas that do not currently experience economic losses associated with C. cinctus.

Information

Type
Behaviour & Ecology
Copyright
© 2018 Entomological Society of Canada. Parts of this are a work of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Composite maps based on surveys conducted across western Canada. Average per cent cut stems (A) caused by Cephis cinctus in Alberta (2003–2017) and Saskatchewan (1926–1936). Average per cent cut stem results are presented as: green=0–1%; yellow =1–2%; orange=2–4%, and red > 4%. Average risk categories (B) based on surveys conducted between (1938 and 1942). Average risk categories are presented as: green=light, yellow=moderate, orange=potentially severe, and red=severe.

Figure 1

Table 1 Values for parameter settings for the Climex model projecting Cephus cintus distribution and relative abundance in western Canada.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Potential distribution of Cephis cinctus in North America. Black points represent recorded presence of C. cinctus and the grey region represents areas where the modelled range of C. cinctus indicates that the species could establish (ecoclimatic-index values are ≥ 5).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Potential distribution and relative abundance of Cephis cinctus in western Canada under current climate. Ecoclimatic-index values were presented in five categories: grey=unfavourable (1–5); green=marginal (5–10); yellow=suitable (10–15); orange=favourable (15–20), and red=very favourable (> 20).

Figure 4

Table 2 Results of sensitivity analysis for Cephus cintus model.

Figure 5

Fig. 4 Predicted ecoclimatic-index values for Cephis cinctus in western Canada for temperatures that are 1 °C warmer (A) and cooler (B) than current climate; and 2 °C warmer (C) and cooler (D) than current climate. The final two maps reflect precipitation levels that are 40% greater (E) and 40% less (F) than current climate. Ecoclimatic-index values are presented in five categories: grey=unfavourable (1–5); green=marginal (5–10); yellow=suitable (10–15); orange=favourable (15–20), and red=very favourable (> 20).

Figure 6

Table 3 Canadian agricultural area in western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba) with ecoclimatic-index (EI) values ≥15 (favourable to very favourable risk categories) for Cephus cinctus, based on current climate and nine incremental scenarios (% of total area).

Figure 7

Table 4 Effect of changes in temperature and precipitation from current values on ecoclimatic-index values for Cephus cintus at six locations in western Canada.

Figure 8

Fig. 5 Predicted relative abundance and potential distribution for Cephis cinctus in western Canada based on CSIRO Mark 3.0 general circulation model projections for 2030 (A) and 2070 (B) and MIROC-H general circulation model projections for 2030 (C) and 2070 (D). Ecoclimatic-index values were presented in five categories: grey=unfavourable (1–5), green=marginal (5–10), yellow=suitable (10–15), orange=favourable (15–20), and red=very favourable (> 20).

Figure 9

Table 5 Ecoclimatic-index values and percent area (ecoclimatic index ≥ 15) for Cephus cintus based on current climate and two general circulation models (CSIRO Mark 3.0 and MIROC-H) for 2030 and 2070.

Figure 10

Table 6 Ecoclimatic-index values for Cephus cintus at six locations in western Canada.