Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:40:07.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What are the factors leading to the success of small planktonic copepods in the Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2015

Thouraya Ben Ltaief
Affiliation:
Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Département des Sciences de la Vie, Université de Sfax, Unité de Recherche UR/11ES72 Biodiversité et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Route Soukra Km 3.5 – BP 1171 – CP 3000 Sfax, Tunisie
Zaher Drira
Affiliation:
Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Département des Sciences de la Vie, Université de Sfax, Unité de Recherche UR/11ES72 Biodiversité et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Route Soukra Km 3.5 – BP 1171 – CP 3000 Sfax, Tunisie
Imen Hannachi
Affiliation:
Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Département des Sciences de la Vie, Université de Sfax, Unité de Recherche UR/11ES72 Biodiversité et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Route Soukra Km 3.5 – BP 1171 – CP 3000 Sfax, Tunisie
Malika Bel Hassen
Affiliation:
Institut National des Sciences et Technologie de la Mer, 2025 Salammbô Tunis, Tunisie
Asma Hamza
Affiliation:
Institut National des Sciences et Technologie de la Mer, Centre de Sfax–BP 1035 – CP 3018
Marc Pagano*
Affiliation:
Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Université de Toulon, IRD, MIO UM 110, 13288 Marseille, France
Habib Ayadi
Affiliation:
Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Département des Sciences de la Vie, Université de Sfax, Unité de Recherche UR/11ES72 Biodiversité et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Route Soukra Km 3.5 – BP 1171 – CP 3000 Sfax, Tunisie
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Pagano, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Université de Toulon, IRD, MIO UM 110, 13288 Marseille, France email: marc.pagano@univ-amu.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An oceanographic cruise conducted during June 2008 in the Gulf of Gabes revealed the existence of different water masses; the Modified Atlantic Waters (MAW) circulated in the upper 100 m in the offshore area, the Mixed Mediterranean Water (MMW) was confined to the inshore region and the Ionian Water (IW) was in deep offshore water. The thermal stratification was indicated by the vertical profiles of temperature generated from a coast-offshore section. Phosphorus limitation was induced by the thermal stratification as shown by the high N/P ratio. Heterotrophic and mixotrophic dinoflagellates were the major contributors to total phytoplankton biomass. Ciliates were less abundant and dominated by tintinnids. Small planktonic copepods (≤1.45 mm) contributed to 93.64% of total copepod abundance in the inshore area as a result of the high density of Oithona similis, Oithona nana, Clausocalanus furcatus and Euterpina acutifrons in this area characterized by warm and salty MMW. In fact, small copepods were significantly correlated to both temperature and salinity. Small copepod fraction prevailed also in the MAW contributing to 71.05% of total copepod abundance as a result of the dominance of O. nana and C. furcatus. Nonetheless, the large copepod Nannocalanus minor was more adapted to the deep IW where it contributed to 44.05% of total copepod abundance. Invasive species were encountered in the offshore region intruded by the Atlantic waters. The Atlantic copepods were scarce and less abundant reflecting the weakening of the Atlantic flow in the eastern basin of the Mediterranean.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the sampled stations in the Gulf of Gabes during a summer cruise in June 2008 and the isobaths 50, 100 and 200 m.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Temperature-salinity diagram showing the presence of different water masses in the Gulf of Gabes during a summer cruise in June 2008. (Ocean Data View (ODV) software, version 4.2.1, R. Schlitzer, http://odv.awi-bremerhaven.de/, 2009).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Vertical profiles of (A) temperature, (B) salinity, and (C) water density during a summer cruise in June 2008 in the Gulf of Gabes according to the coast gradient. Distance on the x-axis is scaled in kilometres from the starting point of the section: First station (10.46°E 33.91°N. The end of the section is located at the most distant station (12.91°E 35.09°N). Black dots represent sampling points.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Vertical profiles of (A) nitrate, (B) ammonium, (C) orthophosphate, (D) silicate, (E) N/P ratio and (F) chlorophyll-a (μg C l−1) during a summer cruise in June 2008. Details of the section are the same as in Figure 3.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Spatial distribution of (A) total phytoplankton density, (B) total phytoplankton biomass, (C) dinoflagellate biomass and (D) the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Noctiluca scintillans biomass, during a summer cruise in June 2008.

Figure 5

Table 1. Densities and biomass of the major microplankton groups encountered in the three water masses of the Gulf of Gabes during a summer cruise in June 2008.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Spatial distribution of (A) total mesozooplankton, (B) total copepods, (C) small copepods and (D) large copepods in the Gulf of Gabes during a summer cruise in June 2008. Small copepods included species with total length of adult ≤1.45 mm.

Figure 7

Table 2. Small and large copepod species classified along an increasing gradient of total body length (TL) and their relative abundance in the three major water masses of the Gulf of Gabes in June 2008 (A copepod species of Atlantic origin referring to Rose, 1933). The highest abundances are in bold.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. The spatial distribution of the main orders making up small copepod communities in the Gulf of Gabes during a summer cruise in June 2008: (A) Cyclopoida, (B) Harpacticoida, (C) small calanoids and (D) Poecilostomatoida.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. The spatial distribution of copepod developmental stages communities in the Gulf of Gabes during a summer cruise in June 2008: (A) nauplii, (B) copepodites and (C) adult.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. The spatial distribution of the diversity index H′ of (A) total copepods, (B) total ciliates and (C) total phytoplankton in the Gulf of Gabes during a summer cruise in June 2008.

Figure 11

Table 3. Miscellaneous zooplankton groups and their relative abundance in the major water masses encountered in the Gulf of Gabes in June 2008.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Canonical Correspondence Analysis applied on the biomass of phytoplankton, ciliates, the abundance of copepod orders and the most dominant copepod species (A) and between stations and physical parameters (B) during a summer cruise in June 2008 in the Gulf of Gabes.