Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:54:40.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tree phenology in montane forests of southern Ecuador can be explained by precipitation, radiation and photoperiodic control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

Sven Günter*
Affiliation:
Institute of Silviculture, Centre of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Germany
Bernd Stimm
Affiliation:
Institute of Silviculture, Centre of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Germany
Manuel Cabrera
Affiliation:
Area Agropecuaria y Recursos Naturales Renovables, Universidad Nacional de Loja, Ecuador
Maria Luisa Diaz
Affiliation:
Area Agropecuaria y Recursos Naturales Renovables, Universidad Nacional de Loja, Ecuador
Manuel Lojan
Affiliation:
Area Agropecuaria y Recursos Naturales Renovables, Universidad Nacional de Loja, Ecuador
Eduardo Ordoñez
Affiliation:
Area Agropecuaria y Recursos Naturales Renovables, Universidad Nacional de Loja, Ecuador
Michael Richter
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Michael Weber
Affiliation:
Institute of Silviculture, Centre of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Germany
*
1Corresponding author. Current address: Lehrstuhl für Waldbau, Am Hochanger 13, 85354 Freising, Germany. Email: sven_gunter@yahoo.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We investigated the effect of seasonality on tree phenology in the tropical montane rain forest of southern Ecuador and analysed possible triggering factors. Two hypotheses were tested: (1) Interspecific synchronization of flowering and fruiting phenology is higher at study sites with pronounced rainfall seasonality compared with sites within perhumid forests. (2) Proximate causes for flowering in closely situated seasonal and perhumid sites are either photoperiodicity or climatic factors. Two nearby study sites with contrasting precipitation patterns were selected at the same altitude east and west of the western Cordillera. Eighty trees from 13 species were observed over a 2.5-y period. Three species were common to both study sites. Phenological and climate data were collected and cross-correlated by conducting a time-series analysis. At the perhumid site, very clear annual patterns of phenological behaviour could be observed for most of the selected rain-forest tree species, but with a poor interspecific synchronization. On the nearby seasonal site in contrast, most species showed high synchrony in their phenological behaviour coinciding with the dry season. There is strong evidence that flowering is induced not by one factor alone: we identified photoperiodic control, radiation and precipitation as possible proximate causes for both sites. Our results confirm studies which state that these factors are closely linked to each other in the tropics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location of the study sites and climate conditions in the research area (a). The perhumid site San Francisco SF is located east of the western Cordillera, all other sites at the western site are seasonal in rain fall. The phenological observations were conducted at San Francisco (b) and El Bosque (e). Juglans neotropica was studied at Argelia (c). The phenological data from San Francisco were cross-correlated to the respective climate data (T = mean monthly temperature, P = mean annual precipitation), those from El Bosque and Argelia were cross-correlated to the Vilcabamba (d) climate data. Radiation data only were available for the study sites Vilcabamba and San Francisco (f).

Figure 1

Table 1. Ecological characteristics of the 13 study species at the two study sites (S = seasonal, P = perhumid or at both sites). Sources for pollination data: Chazdon et al. (2003), Smith et al. (2004), Regal (1982), Wolff et al. (2003). Source for dispersal data: Stimm et al. (2008). Dispersal mode: W = Wind, A = Animal, G = Gravity.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Mean flowering (a) and fruiting (b) intensity of all individuals (n = 40 per site) of the studied species in the seasonal site El Bosque (broken lines) and the perhumid site San Francisco (solid lines). The arrows represent the Spring and Autumn equinoxes.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Flowering (a–d) and fruiting intensity (e–h) of Myrica pubescens, Piptocoma discolor, Tabebuia chrysantha, Cedrela montana, Vismia tomentosa, Heliocarpus americanus, Isertia laevis, Clethra revoluta (top to bottom) in the perhumid site San Francisco from 1 January 2001. The arrows represent the spring and autumn equinoxes.

Figure 4

Table 2. Synchronization of phenological patterns in the perhumid forest San Francisco. Moving correlation coefficients of flowering patterns are shown above the diagonal, those for fruiting below. The moving correlation coefficients were calculated for time lag = 0. Values with asterisks are significant at the level P < 0.05.

Figure 5

Table 3. Synchronization of phenological patterns in the seasonal forest El Bosque. Moving correlation coefficients of flowering patterns are shown above the diagonal, those for fruiting below. The moving correlation coefficients were calculated for time lag = 0. Values with asterisks are significant at the level P < 0.05.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Flowering (a–c) and fruiting (d–f) intensity of Cinchona oficinalis, Myrica pubescens, Cupania sp., Prumnopitys montana, Juglans neotropica, Alnus acuminata, Cedrela montana, Clethra revoluta (top to bottom) in the seasonal site El Bosque from 1 January 2001. The arrows represent the spring and autumn equinoxes.

Figure 7

Table 4. Weighted mean flowering initiations per year and tree during the period around the spring equinox (22 March ± 30 d) and the autumn equinox (22 September ± 30 d) in comparison with the whole year (n = 5 for each species and study site). Due to different time spans of the equinoxes (60 d) and the year (365 d), the number of flowering events during the equinoxes were weighted to annual values. Significant differences between equinox and annual values are indicated by asterisks.

Figure 8

Figure 5. Flowering intensity of the three tree species in common (lower x-axis with days from 1 January 2001) at the perhumid site San Francisco (a) and the seasonal site El Bosque (b) in relationship to radiation and precipitation (upper x-axis with standardized climate data). The arrows represent the spring and autumn equinoxes.

Figure 9

Table 5. The highest cross-correlation coefficients and respective time-lags (in parentheses) between phenophases (Flower = Flowering, Fruit = Fruiting) of species in common at both study sites (Cedrela montana, Clethra revoluta and Myrica pubescens) and meteorological parameters in the seasonal study site El Bosque. Significant values at P < 0.05 are indicated by asterisks.

Figure 10

Table 6. The highest cross-correlation coefficients and respective time-lags (in parentheses) between phenophases (Flower = Flowering, Fruit = Fruiting) of species in common at both study sites (Cedrela montana, Clethra revoluta and Myrica pubescens) and meteorological parameters in the perhumid study site San Francisco. Significant values at P < 0.05 are indicated by asterisks.