This collection examines the difficulties of categorising mentally disordered offenders and asks whether they are doomed to marginalisation (Harris) as neither offenders nor mentally disordered.

The contributors are agreed that this is not a homogeneous group and that most people with mental health problems who offend pose no risk to the public. They recognise that many of the most marginalised do not need the definition of seriously mentally ill, but are made vulnerable by the multiplicity of their mental health and social care needs. Preston-Shoot rightly argues that when deliberating on policy and practice in this area, we must consider the social and economic context and the impact of professional and organisational structures on events leading to the crisis. He urges upon us a message practitioners will recognise; that eligibility criteria and operational procedures have become more important than the relationship and as a result social work is losing its human purpose.

The status confusion of mentally disordered offenders is a consistent theme throughout, as is the consequent importance of a multi-disciplinary approach, flexibility and of balancing risk, needs and liberty on a case-by-case basis. Many contributors are nevertheless drawn to risk and mental illness at the most serious end of the spectrum, with little discussion on how we manage the remainder who spend most of their lives in the community in poor housing with little support.

There were times when one wondered what the benefit of bringing these pieces together in one volume was, other than the (not unimportant) honouring of Hershel Prins. The chapters vary widely in tone and quality: some being rather dense analyses of what others rightly treat as a practical issue. Some are simply a summary of current legislation and practice in the area. The one on review tribunals, while interesting, was not really concerned with mentally disordered offenders at all.

Of course, variety is the spice of an anthology and most people working in the field will find something useful and stimulating in the arguments made in this book. It highlights the damage done by excessive legalism and by a reliance upon inquiries-with-hindsight to determine policy and procedures. It leaves one with the heartwarming conviction that it is alright to bring humanity into practice. As Prins says”… [the world is] a messy and unpredictable place, but everyone… has to do his or her best to get by decently, and to try to do more good than harm along the way”.