Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T22:36:00.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structures for biomimetic, fluidic, and biological applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2016

Emmanuel Stratakis
Affiliation:
Institute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology–Hellas, Greece; stratak@iesl.forth.gr
Hojeong Jeon
Affiliation:
Center for Biomaterials, Biomedical Research Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea; jeonhj@kist.re.kr
Sangmo Koo
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA; sangmo.koo@berkeley.edu

Abstract

Controlling the interactions of light with matter is crucial for the success and scalability of materials-processing applications. When ultrashort pulsed lasers are used, the optimal interplay between the laser and the material parameters enable highly precise and controllable fabrication, allowing structuring down to the nanometer scale. Besides this, a unique aspect for many applications is the possibility of material modifications at multiple length scales, leading to complex micro- and nanoscale architectures, while adding a new dimension to optimization of the structures. As a result, femtosecond laser micro-/nanoprocessing offers unique capabilities for three-dimensional, material-independent modification, opening new opportunities for innovation and exploitation in the materials industry. This article focuses on the implementation of ultrashort pulsed laser-based micro- and nanofabrication methodologies for the realization of structures relevant to biomimetic, fluidic, and biological applications. The wealth of possibilities and the number of new approaches for obtaining complex high-resolution features at the micro- and nanoscales are demonstrated.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Three-dimensional biomimetic scaffold fabrication using multiphoton polymerization. (a) Schematic of a multiphoton polymerization setup. Reproduced with permission from Reference 14. © 2012 AIP Publishing. (b) (i) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of a fabricated F/10–50 (Fiber/diameter–spacing [μm]) and (ii–iii) confocal images of cardiomyocytes aligned on the fiber showed the sarcomere structure stained by sarcomeric α-actinin and intercellular gap junctions stained by connexin 43 on the F/5–50, and white arrows pointing to connexin 43 staining. Reproduced with permission from Reference 22. © 2014 Elsevier. (c) SEM image of gelatin scaffolds produced by multiphoton polymerization; (iv) before 100 CDU/mL collagenase solution treatment, (v) after 1 h and (vi) 2 h. Top-row images are low magnification and bottom row is high magnification of the top row. Reproduced with permission from Reference 18. © 2011 ACS Publications. Note: λ, wavelength; τ, pulse duration; AOM, acoustic-optic modulator; CMOS, complementary metal-oxide semiconductor; fs, femtosecond.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Wetting and water transport properties of femtosecond (fs) laser-fabricated structures and responsive surfaces. (a) Top left: Picture of a water droplet on a fs laser structured silicon surface (dark area of 5 × 5 mm2); (top right) Contact angle is 154° ± 10°; (bottom left) scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the artificial surface comprising protrusions with conical asperities. (bottom right) High magnification SEM image of a single protrusion. The surface was structured in the presence of 667 mbar SF6 at a laser fluence of 2.47 J/cm2 with an average of 500 pulses. Reproduced with permission from Reference 28. © 2008 Wiley. (b) Top left: picture of a lotus leaf; (top right) contact angle is 153° ± 10°; bottom left: SEM image of the leaf surface; bottom right: high magnification SEM image of a single papillose. Reproduced with permission from Reference 28. © 2008 Wiley. (c) Contact angle measurements of a water drop on structured Si surfaces coated with a hydrophobic (●) and hydrophilic (○) coating, respectively, plotted as a function of laser fluence. Representative pictures of water droplets are presented as insets. The wetting response of the structured surfaces can be switched from hydrophobic to hydrophilic depending on the chemical nature of the coating. (d) Characteristic images of water droplets residing on poly(2-diethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDEAEMA) functionalized artificially structured surface following immersion at pH 8.5, pH 2.5 (complete wetting), and again at pH 8.5. The scheme shows the protonation/deprotonation process (the tertiary amine group becomes charged/neutral) of PDEAEMA. Note: SA, corresponding sliding angle of the respective surface. Reproduced with permission from Reference 33. © 2010 RSC Publishing. (e) Selective snapshots of a 4-μl water droplet spreading uphill as a function of time (t) on a vertically positioned laser structured substrate. The irradiated area, colored in light brown, is of 8 mm × 10 mm size. Reproduced with permission from Reference 30. © 2015 American Institute of Physics.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Three-dimensional (3D) microfluidic channel using femtosecond (fs) laser direct writing. (a) Schematic of the procedures for 3D microfluidic channel fabrication using fs laser direct writing. Reproduced with permission from Reference 38. © 2012 RSC Publishing. (b) (top left) Schematic of 3D microfluidic mixer, (top right) top-view optical micrograph of two mixing units, and (bottom) result of two fluid mixing (red and green fluid). Reproduced with permission from Reference 44. © 2012 RSC Publishing. (c) (left) Top view of the microfluidic laser and (right) side view of the microfluidic chamber and through channel. Reproduced with permission from Reference 48. © 2004 OSA Publishing. (d) (top left) Optical transmission image of a fabricated microchannel, and (bottom left) schematic and (right) result of cell detection using fluorescence emission. Reproduced with permission from Reference 49. © 2009 RSC Publishing. Note: RBC, red blood cell.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a–b) Top-view scanning electron microscope images of micropatterned Si substrates of (a) low and (b) high roughness; confocal microscope images of neurofilament positive sympathetic neurons grown on (c) low and (d) high roughness micropatterned Si substrates for six days. Scale bar: 150 μm. Confocal microscopy images of whole dorsal root ganglia explants (colored with violet) on (e) low and (f) high roughness micropatterned Si substrates. S100 positive Schwann cells and neurofilament positive sympathetic neurons are shown in green and red, respectively. Scale bar: 300 μm. Reproduced with permission from Reference 55. © 2015 Elsevier.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Nanocrater-patterned surface created by femtosecond laser direct-write lithography to control cell adhesion and migration. (a) Scanning electron microscope image of the patterned craters. The inset shows an enlarged patterned surface. (b) Cross-sectional profiles at the center line of the ablated nanocraters depending on pulse energies using 100× objective. Inset image is an atomic force microscope top view of a crater. (c) Cross-sectional profiles of the nanocraters obtained using a 50× objective. By using high numerical aperture objectives, submicrometer-scale features can be fabricated. (d) Schematic diagram representing pattern design. (e) Time-lapse phase contrast images of fibroblast cells cultured on the patterned surface. Reproduced with permission from Reference 61. © 2015 Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Hierarchical topographies on electrospun nanofiber scaffolds by femtosecond laser direct-write lithography. (a) Schematic illustration of the (left) electrospinning process, (right) laser-ablated microscale groove patterns, and (middle) engineered fibrous platform. (b) Immunofluorescence images of sarcomeric myosin heavy chain-positive C2C12 myoblasts on patterned fibrous platforms after five days of culturing (green, myosin heavy chain; red, F-actin; blue, nuclei). Well-ordered formation of myotubes are observed on the 10- and 20-μm spacing patterned surfaces, but scattered myotubes are observed on the control and 80-μm spacing patterns. Reproduced with permission from Reference 64. © 2016 ACS Publications. Note: fs, femtosecond.