Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:23:31.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvement of ion acceleration in radiation pressure acceleration regime by using an external strong magnetic field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2019

H. Cheng Open the ORCID record for H. Cheng [Opens in a new window] ,
L. H. Cao ,
J. X. Gong ,
R. Xie ,
C. Y. Zheng  and
Z. J. Liu
H. Cheng
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing, 100088, China
L. H. Cao*
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing, 100088, China Center of Applied Physics and Technology, HEDPS, and SKLNPT, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 1000871, China IFSA Collaborative Innovation Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China
J. X. Gong
Affiliation:
Center of Applied Physics and Technology, HEDPS, and SKLNPT, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 1000871, China
R. Xie
Affiliation:
Center of Applied Physics and Technology, HEDPS, and SKLNPT, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 1000871, China
C. Y. Zheng
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing, 100088, China Center of Applied Physics and Technology, HEDPS, and SKLNPT, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 1000871, China IFSA Collaborative Innovation Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China
Z. J. Liu
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing, 100088, China Center of Applied Physics and Technology, HEDPS, and SKLNPT, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 1000871, China
*
Author for correspondence: Lihua Cao, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China. E-mail: cao_lihua@iapcm.ac.cn

Abstract

Two-dimensional particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations have been used to investigate the interaction between a laser pulse and a foil exposed to an external strong longitudinal magnetic field. Compared with that in the absence of the external magnetic field, the divergence of proton with the magnetic field in radiation pressure acceleration (RPA) regimes has improved remarkably due to the restriction of the electron transverse expansion. During the RPA process, the foil develops into a typical bubble-like shape resulting from the combined action of transversal ponderomotive force and instabilities. However, the foil prefers to be in a cone-like shape by using the magnetic field. The dependence of proton divergence on the strength of magnetic field has been studied, and an optimal magnetic field of nearly 60 kT is achieved in these simulations.

Keywords

External magnetic fieldsPIC simulationsproton accelerationproton divergence promotionsradiation pressure acceleration

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 217 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Introduction

Ion acceleration via laser–plasma interaction has attracted much attention due to its lower cost and convenience compared with the conventional ion accelerator. The utilization of an ultra-intense laser provides an extremely strong electromagnetic field and an ultra-high acceleration rate for ion acceleration. This has generated an alternative of the conventional particle acceleration and has been used widely in numerous applications of high-energy ions, such as ion sources (Daido et al., Reference Daido, Nishiuchi and Pirozhkov2012; Wagner et al., Reference Wagner, Deppert, Brabetz, Fiala, Kleinschmidt, Poth, Schanz, Tebartz, Zielbauer, Roth, Stohlker and Bagnoud2016), radiography (Edwards et al., Reference Edwards, Sinclair, Goldsack, Krushelnick, Beg, Clark, Dangor, Najmudin, Tatarakis, Walton, Zepf, Ledingham, Spencer, Norreys, Clarke, Kodama, Toyama and Tampo2002), hadron therapy of diseases (Bulanov and Khoroshkov Reference Bulanov and Khoroshkov2002), and fast ignition inertial confinement fusion (Roth et al., Reference Roth, Cowan, Key, Hatchett, Brown, Fountain, Johnson, Pennington, Snavely, Wilks, Yasuike, Ruhl, Pegoraro, Bulanov, Campbell, Perry and Powell2001). It has also given a strong motivation to research pertinent questions (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Yan, Chen, He, Ma, Bin, Schreiber, Tajima and Habs2013; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Pae, Choi, Lee, Kim, Singhal, Sung, Lee, Lee, Nickles, Jeong, Kim and Nam2016; Honrubia et al., Reference Honrubia, Morace and Murakami2017; Yogo et al., Reference Yogo, Mima, Iwata, Tosaki, Morace, Arikawa, Fujioka, Johzaki, Sentoku, Nishimura, Sagisaka, Matsuo, Kamitsukasa, Kojima, Nagatomo, Nakai, Shiraga, Murakami, Tokita, Kawanaka, Miyanaga, Yamanoi, Norimatsu, Sakagami, Bulanov, Kondo and Azechi2017).

The basic scheme of ion acceleration via laser–plasma interaction is the relativistic flying mirror concept in which the ponderomotive force of laser pushes electrons away from rear surface of target when an ultra- intense laser pulse ejects into a plasma or a foil. The slap of electrons accelerated by strong electromagnetic waves to nearly light speed forms a strong charge separation field to pull ions to co-propagate with the laser pulse. Based on this frame, the mechanisms of ion acceleration via laser–plasma interaction include mainly the following aspects: Target normal sheath acceleration (Hatchett et al., Reference Hatchett, Brown, Cowan, Henry, Johnson, Key, Koch, Langdon, Lasinski, Lee, Mackinnon, Pennington, Perry, Phillips, Roth, Sangster, Singh, Snavely, Stoyer, Wilks and Yasuike2000; Wilks et al., Reference Wilks, Langdon, Cowan, Roth, Singh, Hatchett, Key, Pennington, Mackinnon and Snavely2001; Mora, Reference Mora2003), radiation pressure acceleration (RPA) (Esirkepov et al., Reference Esirkepov, Borghesi, Bulanov, Mourou and Tajima2004; Klimo et al., Reference Klimo, Psikal, Limpouch and Tikhonchuk2008; Robinson et al., Reference Robinson, Zepf, Kar, Evans and Bellei2008; Yan et al., Reference Yan, Wu, Sheng, Chen and Meyer-ter-Vehn2009), Coulomb explosion (Kovalev and Bychenkov Reference Kovalev and Bychenkov2003; Bulanov et al., Reference Bulanov, Brantov, Bychenkov, Chvykov, Kalinchenko, Matsuoka, Rousseau, Reed, Yanovsky, Litzenberg, Krushelnick and Maksimchuk2008), and so on. In this paper, we will focus on the enhancement of ion acceleration via RPA by using an external longitudinal magnetic field. RPA is one of the most efficient mechanisms because nearly all the laser energy is transferred to ions. When the electric field inspired by a laser is nearly the same as the charge separation field, which is defined as E m = 2πen e l where e, n e, and l are charge of electron, electron density, and the thickness of foil, ions and electrons will move together with the laser pulse. According to the double Doppler effect, the laser reflected by the plasma mirror will get a downshift of frequency Δω = (1 − 1/4γ 2)ωL. This means that each photon energy transferred to ions is referred to ${\rm \Delta} \varepsilon = \hbar {\rm \Delta} \omega $, where γ and ωL are the Lorentz factor of plasma mirror and frequency of laser, respectively. In the relativistic regime, the velocity of electron-ion layer is almost equal to light speed, making γ ≫ 1. This will lead to an almost complete laser energy transferred to ions, making RPA a promising approach to obtain high-energy ions. However, some limitations of ion-beam quality such as (i) transverse target expansion (Dollar et al., Reference Dollar, Zulick, Thomas, Chvykov, Davis, Kalinchenko, Matsuoka, McGuffey, Petrov, Willingale, Yanovsky, Maksimchuk and Krushelnick2012), (ii) slightly focused laser group velocity (Bulanov et al., Reference Bulanov, Esarey, Schroeder, Bulanov, Esirkepov, Kando, Pegoraro and Leemans2015), and (iii) target transparency (Macchi et al., Reference Macchi, Veghini and Pegoraro2009) greatly harm the quality of proton via RPA. In this paper, we will focus on the influence of the transverse target expansion which results in reduction of electron density. This tends to terminate the process of RPA ahead of time. It may excite some harmful transverse instabilities such as Rayleigh–Taylor like instability (Pegoraro and Bulanov, Reference Pegoraro and Bulanov2007; Palmer et al., Reference Palmer, Schreiber, Nagel, Dover, Bellei, Beg, Bott, Clarke, Dangor, Hassan, Hilz, Jung, Kneip, Mangles, Lancaster, Rehman, Robinson, Spindloe, Szerypo, Tatarakis, Yeung, Zepf and Najmudin2012) and Weibel-like instability (Yoon and Davidson Reference Yoon and Davidson1987). Furthermore, deconstruction of foil caused by the transverse expansion enlarges the proton divergence and reduces the quality of proton. Significant work has been devoted to decreasing the proton divergence and improving the quality of proton (Weng et al., Reference Weng, Murakami and Sheng2015; Zou et al., Reference Zou, Zhuo, Yu, Wu, Yang, Shao, Ma, Yin and Ge2015; Shen et al., Reference Shen, Qiao, Zhang, Kar, Zhou, Chang, Borghesi and He2017).

A magnetic field of over several kilotesla has been obtained with a capacitor-coil target driven by a high-power laser. The strength of magnetic field has increased from 60 T to 1.5 kT over the past 30 years (Daido et al., Reference Daido, Miki, Mima, Fujita, Sawai, Fujita, Kitagawa, Nakai and Yamanaka1986; Fujioka et al., Reference Fujioka, Zhang, Ishihara, Shigemori, Hironaka, Johzaki, Sunahara, Yamamoto, Nakashima, Watanabe, Shiraga, Nishimura and Azechi2013; Abe et al., Reference Abe, Law, Korneev, Fujioka, Kojima, Lee, Sakata, Matsuo, Oshima, Arikawa, Yogo, Nakai, Norimatsu, Humiers, Santos, Kondo, Sunahara, Gus'kov and Tikhonchuk2018; Nakamura et al., Reference Nakamura, Ikeda, Sawabe, Matsuda and Takeyama2018). Therefore, it is expectable to obtain a higher magnetic field with the rapid development of laser technology and innovative laser–plasma research in the future. The investigation in combination of plasma and strong magnetic field has also attracted much attention (Arefiev et al., Reference Arefiev, Toncian and Fiksel2016; Stark et al., Reference Stark, Toncian and Arefiev2016; Gong et al., Reference Gong, Cao, Pan, Xiao, Wu, Zheng, Liu and He2017).

In this paper, 2D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations have been carried out to investigate ion acceleration in RPA regime with an external magnetic field. The divergence of proton has been improved greatly in the RPA regime by using an external longitudinal magnetic field. In the absence of magnetic field, the foil develops into a bubble-like shape from the simulations. The foil prefers to be in a cone-like shape by using the magnetic field. Furthermore, the dependence of proton divergence on the strength of magnetic field has been studied, and an optimal magnetic field of nearly 60 kT is achieved under the conditions considered in this paper.

Simulation and results

In order to investigate ion acceleration via RPA with a longitudinal strong magnetic field, some two-dimensional PIC simulations have been performed using the EPOCH code (Arber et al., Reference Arber, Bennett, Brady, Lawrence-Douglas, Ramsay, Sircombe, Gillies, Evans, Schmitz, Bell and RIdgers2015). The simulation scheme is shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 1.

A laser pulse with the normalized laser amplitude of a 0 = 70 ejects into a hydrogen foil with an external longitudinal magnetic field. The wavelength of laser is 1 µm and the density of hydrogen foil is 80n c, where n c is the critical density (1.1 × 1021/cm3).

A circularly polarized laser pulse irradiates the hydrogen foil, which is transversely Gaussian as E L(y) = E 0exp(−y 2/r 2), with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of r = 10λ and a laser duration of 15 T L, where E 0 has been regarded as the electric field amplitude of the laser pulse, and λ is the wavelength of 1 µm, and T L is the normalized laser amplitude of a 0 = (eE 0)/(m ecω0) = 70, where m e, c, and ω0 are the mass of electron, the speed of light in vacuum, and the local frequency of light, respectively.

In our two-dimensional PIC simulations, the dimensions of the simulation box are 80 µm × 140 µm with 3200 × 5600 cells. There are 50 particles for each cell. The laser pulse ejects into the simulation box from the left boundary. The hydrogen foil locates at 2 µm < x < 2.5 µm, with a foil thickness of D = 0.5 µm, and the density of electron and proton is homogeneously 80n c, where n c = 1.1 × 1021 /cm3 is the critical density for the laser pulse. To study the effect of a strong magnetic field on ion acceleration via RPA, we compare two cases with or without magnetic field applied in the longitudinal direction. The comparison of electron and ion density is shown in Figure 2.

Fig. 2.

The density of electrons (a and c) and protons (b and d) without magnetic field (a and b) and with magnetic field (c and d), B x = 100  kT. The density of electrons and protons are normalized to the critical density n c = 1.1 × 1021/cm3 at 140T L in the simulations.

As shown in Figure 2a and 2b, the foil is in bubble-like shape in the absence of a magnetic field. However, electrons expand comparatively more slowly with a longitudinal magnetic field of B x = 100 kT as shown in Figure 2c. In this case, the foil reveals a cone-like structure as shown in Figure 2c and 2d. The density of charged particles plays a key role in RPA. Reduction of electron areal density greatly harms the quality of proton. As shown in Figure 3a, the density of electrons decreases from 80n c to nearly 7n c along x-axis when y = 0 area in both cases. In the absence of a magnetic field, the electron density is nearly 0.2n c at 140T L. And the electron density with a magnetic field is near 1.1n c. It indicates a strong longitudinal field which greatly helps to restrict the transverse expansion and the structure of foil has also been changed into a cone-like shape. As shown in Figure 3b, the proton density with a magnetic field is almost seven times more than that without a magnetic field.

Fig. 3.

Spatial evolution of density of electrons (a) and protons (b) along x-axis when y = 0 in the presence of magnetic field (red line) and in the absence of magnetic field (blue line) at 40T L and 140T L. The spatial variable is normalized by the wavelength of laser and the density of charged particles is normalized by the critical density.

Figure 4 presents the comparison of proton momentum distribution to study the effect of magnetic field on the divergence of proton. θ is the emission angle. As shown in Figure 4a and 4c, the configuration of electrons demonstrates that transverse expansion of electrons has been indeed suppressed by introducing of a longitudinal magnetic field. We define p x(e) and p y(e) as the longitudinal momentum and the transverse momentum of electrons, and p x(p) and p y(p) as the longitudinal momentum and the transverse momentum of proton. Although the maximum p y(e) in Figure 4a and 4c are almost the same, the maximum p x(e) in Figure 4c with a magnetic field has been promoted. And maxima p x(p) in Figure 4b and 4d are almost the same in both cases, but the maximum p y(p) in Figure 4d with magnetic field is 0.1m pc less than that in Figure 4b. This may contribute to the inhibition of the electron transverse motion. When electrons are driven by the longitudinal magnetic field, the transverse motion of electrons will be suppressed. And this restrains electrons to pull protons in the transverse direction and finally reduces the transverse momentum of protons. Meanwhile, the magnetic field has little impact on the longitudinal acceleration. However, p y(p) in Figure 4d is roughly 0.3m pc and 0.4m pc in Figure 4b. The maximum proton energy is 660 MeV with a magnetic field, and it is 700 MeV in the absence of a magnetic field. The notable improvement to divergence of proton beam and enhancement of the areal density are achieved, even if the maximum energy decreases slightly in the presence of magnetic field. As shown in Figure 4b and 4d, the proton distributions in the momentum are quite different in both cases. Therefore, the divergence of ion beams improved remarkably with an external magnetic field.

Fig. 4.

The distribution in the momentum of electrons (a and c) and protons (b and d). (a) and (b) are the cases without magnetic field and (c) and (d) are the one with magnetic field (B x = 100 kT). The momentum of particles is normalized by the product of static mass and laser speed (m p(e)c), where m p and m e is the mass of electron and proton, respectively.

Now we focus on the proton divergence. The angular distribution of protons with energy larger than 300 MeV is shown in Figure 5. The FWHM of the proton angular distribution with a magnetic field is about 4° and it is 20° without a magnetic field. The distribution peaks at 0°. Restriction of electrons offered by the magnetic field impacts on directly the motion of protons and improves remarkably the proton divergence. Then we will study the dependence of proton divergence on strength of magnetic field. In the following simulations, the magnitudes of magnetic field are assumed to be 25, 40, and 100 kT. The proton distribution as a function of energy and emission angle at 140T L is given in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6b–6d, the maximum energy of protons is almost 660 MeV and is slightly less than that in Figure 6a. It can be seen that the maximum proton energy is almost the same in different strengths of magnetic field.

Fig. 5.

The distribution of angle and density of protons whose energy is larger than 300 MeV with magnetic field (red line, B x = 100 kT) and without magnetic field (blue line). Here θ is the angle between the momentum of protons and the x-axis.

Fig. 6.

The proton distribution as a function of energy and emission angle with different magnetic fields at 140T L. The magnetic field used is (a) 0 kT, (b) 25 kT, (c) 40 kT, and 100 kT. θ is the angle between the momentum of protons and the x-axis.

As shown in Figure 6, the emission angle of proton depends on the strength of magnetic field. The full width of the distribution envelop of Figure 6 at 300 MeV has been used to investigate the dependence of proton divergence on the strength of magnetic field. As shown in Figure 7, the range of proton emission angle whose energy is 300 MeV reduces to the minimum of 15° at 60 kT from 70° without magnetic field, then increases to 42° at 100 kT. From Figure 7, there exists an optimal magnetic field of 60 kT to achieve the minimum proton divergence. The intense magnetic field is required to overcome the transverse expansion. In fact, the foil is developing into a cone-like shape once the magnetic field exceeds the optimal magnetic field as shown in Figure 2c and 2d. In this case, the majority of protons move along the cone-like shape, which leads to increasing emission angle of proton.

Fig. 7.

The distribution of the range of proton emission angle whose energy is 300 MeV as a function of magnetic field. The magnitude if magnetic field varies from 0 to 100 kT.

Conclusion

We have implied several two-dimensional PIC simulations to investigate the effect of an external longitudinal magnetic field on RPA. Under the conditions of these simulations, with a strong magnetic field, the foil of n 0 = 80n c pushed by a laser of a 0 = 70 will become a cone-like shape instead of a bubble-like shape in the absence of a magnetic field. The density of the charged particle is almost seven times more than that without a magnetic field. It reveals that the transverse expansion of electrons has been suppressed by a strong longitudinal magnetic field. This greatly helps to improve the proton divergence. The dependence of proton divergence on the strength of a magnetic field has been studied, and an optimal magnetic field of nearly 60 kT is achieved in these simulations. It is expectable to obtain such a magnetic field in the future with the rapid development of new technology, although the required magnetic field of dozens of kilotesla is currently unachievable. Therefore, applying an external magnetic field via RPA is potentially promising to improve the quality of protons.

Author ORCIDs

H. Cheng, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1511-6017.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the useful discussion of J. Q. Yu and X. Q. Yan. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grand Nos. 11875091 and 11475030) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0401100).

References

Abe, Y, Law, KFF, Korneev, P, Fujioka, S, Kojima, S, Lee, SH, Sakata, S, Matsuo, K, Oshima, A, Arikawa, Y, Yogo, A, Nakai, A, Norimatsu, T, Humiers, E, Santos, JJ, Kondo, K, Sunahara, A, Gus'kov, S and Tikhonchuk, V (2018) Whispering gallery effect in relativistic optics. JETTP Letters 107, 351–354.Google Scholar
Arber, TD, Bennett, K, Brady, CS, Lawrence-Douglas, A, Ramsay, MG, Sircombe, NJ, Gillies, P, Evans, RG, Schmitz, H, Bell, AR and RIdgers, CP (2015) Contemporary particle-in-cell approach to laser-plasma modelling. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 5, 113001.Google Scholar
Arefiev, A, Toncian, T and Fiksel, G (2016) Enhanced proton acceleration in an applied longitudinal magnetic field. New Journal of Physics 18, 105011.Google Scholar
Bulanov, SV and Khoroshkov, VS (2002) Feasibility of using laser ion accelerators in proton therapy. Plasma Physics Reports 28, 453.Google Scholar
Bulanov, SS, Brantov, A, Bychenkov, VY, Chvykov, V, Kalinchenko, G, Matsuoka, T, Rousseau, P, Reed, S, Yanovsky, V, Litzenberg, DW, Krushelnick, K and Maksimchuk, A (2008) Accelerating monoenergetic protons from ultrathin foils by flat-top laser pulses in the directed-Coulomb-explosion regime. Physical Review E 78, 026412.Google Scholar
Bulanov, SS, Esarey, E, Schroeder, CB, Bulanov, SV, Esirkepov, TZ, Kando, M, Pegoraro, F and Leemans, WP (2015) Enhancement of maximum attainable ion energy in the radiation pressure acceleration regime using a guiding structure. Physical Review Letters 114, 105003.Google Scholar
Daido, H, Miki, F, Mima, K, Fujita, M, Sawai, K, Fujita, H, Kitagawa, Y, Nakai, S and Yamanaka, C (1986) Generation of a strong magnetic field by an intense CO2 laser pulse. Physical Review Letters 56, 846–849.Google Scholar
Daido, H, Nishiuchi, M and Pirozhkov, AS (2012) Review of laser-driven ion sources and their applications. Reports of Progress in Physics 75, 056401.Google Scholar
Dollar, F, Zulick, C, Thomas, AGR, Chvykov, V, Davis, J, Kalinchenko, G, Matsuoka, T, McGuffey, C, Petrov, GM, Willingale, L, Yanovsky, V, Maksimchuk, A and Krushelnick, K (2012) Finite spot effects on radiation pressure acceleration from intense high-contrast laser interactions with thin targets. Physical Review Letters 108, 175005.Google Scholar
Edwards, RD, Sinclair, MA, Goldsack, TJ, Krushelnick, K, Beg, FN, Clark, EL, Dangor, AE, Najmudin, Z, Tatarakis, M, Walton, B, Zepf, M, Ledingham, KWD, Spencer, I, Norreys, PA, Clarke, RJ, Kodama, R, Toyama, Y and Tampo, M (2002) Characterization of a gamma-ray source based on a laser-plasma accelerator with applications to radiography. Applied Physics Letters 80, 2129–2131.Google Scholar
Esirkepov, T, Borghesi, M, Bulanov, SV, Mourou, G and Tajima, T (2004) Highly efficient relativistic-ion generation in the laser-piston regime. Physical Review Letters 92, 175003.Google Scholar
Fujioka, S, Zhang, Z, Ishihara, K, Shigemori, K, Hironaka, Y, Johzaki, T, Sunahara, A, Yamamoto, N, Nakashima, H, Watanabe, T, Shiraga, H, Nishimura, H and Azechi, H (2013) Kilotesla magnetic field due to a capacitor-coil target driven by high power laser. Scientific Reports 3, 1170.Google Scholar
Gong, JX, Cao, LH, Pan, KQ, Xiao, KD, Wu, D, Zheng, CY, Liu, ZJ and He, XT (2017) Enhancing the electron acceleration by a circularly polarized laser interaction with a cone-target with an external longitudinal magnetic field. Physics of Plasmas 24, 033103.Google Scholar
Hatchett, SP, Brown, CG, Cowan, TE, Henry, EA, Johnson, JS, Key, MH, Koch, JA, Langdon, AB, Lasinski, BF, Lee, RW, Mackinnon, AJ, Pennington, DM, Perry, MD, Phillips, TW, Roth, M, Sangster, TC, Singh, MS, Snavely, RA, Stoyer, MA, Wilks, SC and Yasuike, K (2000) Electron, photon, and ion beams from the relativistic interaction of petawatt laser pulses with solid targets. Physics of Plasmas 7, 2076.Google Scholar
Honrubia, JJ, Morace, A and Murakami, M (2017) On the intense proton beam generation and transport in hollow cones. Matter and Radiation at Extremes 2, 28.Google Scholar
Kim, IJ, Pae, KH, Choi, IW, Lee, CL, Kim, HT, Singhal, H, Sung, JH, Lee, SK, Lee, HW, Nickles, PV, Jeong, TM, Kim, CM and Nam, CH (2016) Radiation pressure acceleration of protons to 93 MeV with circularly polarized petawatt laser pulses. Physics of Plasmas 23, 070701.Google Scholar
Klimo, O, Psikal, J, Limpouch, J and Tikhonchuk, VT (2008) Monoenergetic ion beams from ultrathin foils irradiated by ultrahigh-contrast circularly polarized laser pulses. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 11, 031301.Google Scholar
Kovalev, VF and Bychenkov, VY (2003) Analytic solutions to the Vlasov equations for expanding plasmas. Physical Review Letters 90, 185004.Google Scholar
Macchi, A, Veghini, S and Pegoraro, F (2009) “Light Sail” acceleration reexamined. Physical Review Letters 103, 085003.Google Scholar
Mora, P (2003) Plasma expansion into a vacuum. Physical Review Letters 90, 185002.Google Scholar
Nakamura, D, Ikeda, A, Sawabe, H, Matsuda, YH and Takeyama, S (2018) Record indoor magnetic field of 1200 T generated by electromagnetic flux-compression. Review of Scientific Instruments 189, 095106.Google Scholar
Palmer, CAJ, Schreiber, J, Nagel, SR, Dover, NP, Bellei, C, Beg, FN, Bott, S, Clarke, RJ, Dangor, AE, Hassan, SM, Hilz, P, Jung, D, Kneip, S, Mangles, SPD, Lancaster, KL, Rehman, A, Robinson, APL, Spindloe, C, Szerypo, J, Tatarakis, M, Yeung, M, Zepf, M and Najmudin, Z (2012) Rayleigh–Taylor instability of an ultrathin foil accelerated by the radiation pressure of an intense laser. Physical Review Letters 108, 225002.Google Scholar
Pegoraro, F and Bulanov, SV (2007) Photon bubbles and ion acceleration in a plasma dominated by the radiation pressure of an electromagnetic pulse. Physical Review Letters 99, 065002.Google Scholar
Robinson, APL, Zepf, M, Kar, S, Evans, R and Bellei, C (2008) Radiation pressure acceleration of thin foils with circularly polarized laser pulses. New Journal of Physics 10, 013021.Google Scholar
Roth, M, Cowan, TE, Key, MH, Hatchett, SP, Brown, C, Fountain, W, Johnson, J, Pennington, DM, Snavely, RA, Wilks, SC, Yasuike, K, Ruhl, H, Pegoraro, F, Bulanov, SV, Campbell, EM, Perry, MD and Powell, H (2001) Fast ignition by intense laser-accelerated proton beams. Physical Review Letters 86, 436–439.Google Scholar
Shen, XF, Qiao, B, Zhang, H, Kar, S, Zhou, CT, Chang, HX, Borghesi, M and He, XT (2017) Achieving stable radiation pressure acceleration of heavy ions via successive electron replenishment from ionization of a high-z material coating. Physical Review Letters 118, 204802.Google Scholar
Stark, DJ, Toncian, T and Arefiev, AV (2016) Enhanced multi-MeV photon emission by a laser-driven electron beam in a self-generated magnetic field. Physical Review Letters 116, 185003.Google Scholar
Wagner, F, Deppert, O, Brabetz, C, Fiala, P, Kleinschmidt, A, Poth, P, Schanz, VA, Tebartz, A, Zielbauer, B, Roth, M, Stohlker, T and Bagnoud, V (2016) Maximum proton energy above 85 MeV from the relativistic interaction of laser pulses with micrometer thick CH2 targets. Physical Review Letters 116, 205002.Google Scholar
Wang, HY, Yan, XQ, Chen, JE, He, XT, Ma, WJ, Bin, JH, Schreiber, J, Tajima, T and Habs, D (2013) Efficient and stable proton acceleration by irradiating a two-layer target with a linearly polarized laser pulse. Physics of Plasmas 20, 013101.Google Scholar
Weng, SM, Murakami, M and Sheng, ZM (2015) Reducing ion energy spread in hole-boring radiation pressure acceleration by using two-ion-species targets. Laser and Particle Beams 33, 103–107.Google Scholar
Wilks, SC, Langdon, AB, Cowan, TE, Roth, M, Singh, M, Hatchett, S, Key, MH, Pennington, D, Mackinnon, A and Snavely, RA (2001) Energetic proton generation in ultra-intense laser–solid interactions. Physics of Plasmas 8, 542.Google Scholar
Yan, XQ, Wu, HC, Sheng, ZM, Chen, JE and Meyer-ter-Vehn, J (2009) Self-organizing GeV, nanocoulomb, collimated proton beam from laser foil interaction at 7 × 1021 W/cm2. Physical Review Letters 103, 135001.Google Scholar
Yogo, A, Mima, K, Iwata, N, Tosaki, S, Morace, A, Arikawa, Y, Fujioka, S, Johzaki, T, Sentoku, Y, Nishimura, H, Sagisaka, A, Matsuo, K, Kamitsukasa, N, Kojima, S, Nagatomo, H, Nakai, M, Shiraga, H, Murakami, M, Tokita, S, Kawanaka, J, Miyanaga, N, Yamanoi, K, Norimatsu, T, Sakagami, H, Bulanov, SV, Kondo, K and Azechi, H (2017) Boosting laser-ion acceleration with multi-picosecond pulses. Physics of Plasmas 7, 42451.Google Scholar
Yoon, PH and Davidson, RC (1987) Exact analytical model of the classical Weibel instability in a relativistic anisotropic plasma. Physical Review A 35, 2718–2721.Google Scholar
Zou, DB, Zhuo, HB, Yu, TP, Wu, HC, Yang, XH, Shao, FQ, Ma, YY, Yin, Y and Ge, ZY (2015) Enhanced laser-radiation-pressure-driven proton acceleration by moving focusing electric-fields in a foil-in-cone target. Physics of Plasmas 22, 023109.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. A laser pulse with the normalized laser amplitude of a0 = 70 ejects into a hydrogen foil with an external longitudinal magnetic field. The wavelength of laser is 1 µm and the density of hydrogen foil is 80nc, where nc is the critical density (1.1 × 1021/cm3).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The density of electrons (a and c) and protons (b and d) without magnetic field (a and b) and with magnetic field (c and d), Bx = 100  kT. The density of electrons and protons are normalized to the critical density nc = 1.1 × 1021/cm3 at 140TL in the simulations.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Spatial evolution of density of electrons (a) and protons (b) along x-axis when y = 0 in the presence of magnetic field (red line) and in the absence of magnetic field (blue line) at 40TL and 140TL. The spatial variable is normalized by the wavelength of laser and the density of charged particles is normalized by the critical density.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. The distribution in the momentum of electrons (a and c) and protons (b and d). (a) and (b) are the cases without magnetic field and (c) and (d) are the one with magnetic field (Bx = 100 kT). The momentum of particles is normalized by the product of static mass and laser speed (mp(e)c), where mp and me is the mass of electron and proton, respectively.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The distribution of angle and density of protons whose energy is larger than 300 MeV with magnetic field (red line, Bx = 100 kT) and without magnetic field (blue line). Here θ is the angle between the momentum of protons and the x-axis.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. The proton distribution as a function of energy and emission angle with different magnetic fields at 140TL. The magnetic field used is (a) 0 kT, (b) 25 kT, (c) 40 kT, and 100 kT. θ is the angle between the momentum of protons and the x-axis.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. The distribution of the range of proton emission angle whose energy is 300 MeV as a function of magnetic field. The magnitude if magnetic field varies from 0 to 100 kT.