Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T13:10:25.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of www.AntarcticGlaciers.org as a tool for online science communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

Bethan J. Davies
Affiliation:
Centre for Glaciology, Department for Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK E-mail: bdd@aber.ac.uk
Neil F. Glasser
Affiliation:
Centre for Glaciology, Department for Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK E-mail: bdd@aber.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2014
Figure 0

Table 1.Common challenges and mitigations for scientists engaging in online science communication (Peters and others, 2008a; Besley and Tanner, 2011; Harris, 2011; Somerville and Hassol, 2011; Bik and Goldstein, 2013; Darling and others, 2013; Smith and others, 2013; Stewart and Nield, 2013)

Figure 1

Fig. 1.Screenshot of AntarcticGlaciers.org homepage.

Figure 2

Fig. 2.Analysis of visitors to AntarcticGlaciers.org (see Table 2 for definition of terms). (a) Unique visitors and page views, as determined over 18 months from website launch by Google Analytics. (b) Sources of traffic through time to the website (number of visitors per month). All traffic is unpaid (i.e. there was no paid advertising). (c) Sources of traffic to AntarcticGlaciers.org over the first 18 months. Search traffic includes people using Google, Yahoo or other search engines. Referral traffic includes people who have followed a link from another website. Direct traffic includes people who have typed in the URL directly. (d) Results of web-based survey, indicating the most common answers people gave in a free-text answer when asked what they liked about the website. (e) Results of web-based survey, indicating the most common answers people gave in a free-text answer when asked how the website could be improved. (f) Analysis of followers to @AntarcticGlacie on Twitter, using self-identification given in the ‘bios’ on followers Twitter pages. Raw numbers are given in parentheses.

Figure 3

Table 2.Definition of terms

Figure 4

Table 3.Age of respondents of survey

Figure 5

Table 4.Occupation of respondents

Figure 6

Table 5.Advantages and disadvantages of outreach websites and blogs as a means of science communication