Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T10:56:43.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tissue motion annular displacement of the mitral valve using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography predicts the left ventricular ejection fraction in normal children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2013

David E Black*
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Jen Bryant
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Charles Peebles
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Keith M Godfrey
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Mark Hanson
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Joseph J Vettukattil
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence to: Dr D. E. Black, MBBCh, MRCPCH, FCP, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO166YD, United Kingdom. Tel: 07548322088; Fax: 02380798419; E-mail: david.black@uhs.nhs.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: The gold standard for determining the left ventricular ejection fraction is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Other parameters for determining the ejection fraction such as M-mode echocardiography are operator-dependant and often inaccurate. Assessment of the displacement of the mitral valve annulus using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography may provide an accurate and simple method of determining the left ventricular ejection fraction in children. Method: We retrospectively studied 70 healthy 9-year-old children with no history of cardiovascular disease who had been assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Mitral displacement was determined using the tissue motion annular displacement (TMAD) feature of Philips QLAB version 9. The midpoint displacement of the mitral valve was calculated, and the predicted left ventricular ejection fraction was compared with magnetic resonance imaging-derived and M-mode-derived ejection fractions. Results: The mean ejection fraction derived from magnetic resonance imaging (64.5 (4.6)) was similar to that derived from the TMAD midpoint (60.9 (2.7), p = 0.001) and the M-mode (61.9 (7), p = 0.012). The TMAD midpoint correlated strongly with the magnetic resonance imaging-derived ejection fraction (r = 0.69, p < 0.001), as did the predicted fraction (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). The M-mode ejection fraction showed a poor linear correlation with both magnetic resonance imaging-derived and TMAD-derived fractions (r = 0.33 and 0.04, respectively). Conclusion: TMAD of the mitral valve is a simple, effective, and highly reproducible method of assessing the ejection fraction in normal children. It shows a strong linear correlation with magnetic resonance imaging-derived ejection fraction and is superior to M-mode-derived ejection fractions.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1 A 2-D TTE of a parasternal long axis image of the LV, which was used for calculation of the M-mode ejection fraction using the Teichholz method. 2D TTE = two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiogram; LV = left ventricle.

Figure 1

Figure 2 A four-chamber apical view of the LV used for tracking mitral valve displacement. Points are selected at the medial (1) and lateral (2) mitral valve annulus and LV apex (square). The points are automatically tracked through the cardiac cycle, producing a curve indicating the displacement over time. Two curves are generated representing displacement of the medial and lateral points of the mitral valve annulus. Colour kinesis demonstrates mitral annular displacement. Values are generated for maximum displacement of the medial, lateral, and midpoint of the mitral valve annulus, and a percentage is calculated indicating the LV longitudinal shortening fraction. LV = left ventricle.

Figure 2

Table 1 Subject characteristics.

Figure 3

Table 2 Left ventricular functional data for study cohort.

Figure 4

Figure 3 Graphic display of the correlation between CMRI-derived LVEF and TMAD midpoint displacement of the mitral valve (r = 0.69) and the predicted LVEF from the quadratic formula (r = 0.67). CMRI = cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; TMAD = tissue motion annular displacement.

Figure 5

Figure 4 The Bland–Altman plot comparing the ejection fraction derived from magnetic resonance imaging with that derived from TMAD midpoint displacement using a quadratic formula. This shows that the differences between the measurements observed were dispersed around the mean, with the majority staying within the limits of agreement (−4 to 10). The mean difference between the two measurements was not found to be statistically significant, with a coefficient of variation of 6%. TMAD = tissue motion annular displacement.

Figure 6

Figure 5 The Bland–Altman plot comparing the LVEF derived from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with that derived from M-mode using the Teicholz method. This shows that the differences between the measurements observed were dispersed around the mean, with the majority staying with the limits of agreement. There was a wider limit of agreement (−10 to 17.0). The mean difference between the two measurements was not found to be statistically significant. There was however a larger coefficient of variation of 14%. LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.

Figure 7

Figure 6 The Bland–Altman plot for intraobserver variability for TMAD. The intraobserver variability was small, with a coefficient of variation of 1.6%. The differences between the measurements observed were dispersed around the mean and stayed within the limits of agreement (0.95 to −1.95). TMAD = tissue motion annular displacement.

Figure 8

Figure 7 The Bland–Altman plot for interobserver variability for TMAD. The interobserver variability showed a strong correlation for TMAD, with a coefficient of variation of 3.7%. The differences between the measurements observed were dispersed around the mean and stayed within the limits of agreement (2.95 to −2). TMAD = tissue motion annular displacement.