Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T01:41:45.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A semi-lumped microstrip UWB bandpass filter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Darine Kaddour*
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics, Electromagnetism, and Photonics (IMEP-LAHC), UMR 5130 CNRS, INPG-UJF, BP 257, 3 parvis Louis Neel, 38016 Grenoble cedex 1, France. Phone: +33 (0)4 56529491; Fax: +33 (0)4 56529501; Email: kaddour@enserg.fr, arnould@enserg.fr and ferrari@enserg.fr
Jean-Daniel Arnould
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics, Electromagnetism, and Photonics (IMEP-LAHC), UMR 5130 CNRS, INPG-UJF, BP 257, 3 parvis Louis Neel, 38016 Grenoble cedex 1, France. Phone: +33 (0)4 56529491; Fax: +33 (0)4 56529501; Email: kaddour@enserg.fr, arnould@enserg.fr and ferrari@enserg.fr
Philippe Ferrari
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics, Electromagnetism, and Photonics (IMEP-LAHC), UMR 5130 CNRS, INPG-UJF, BP 257, 3 parvis Louis Neel, 38016 Grenoble cedex 1, France. Phone: +33 (0)4 56529491; Fax: +33 (0)4 56529501; Email: kaddour@enserg.fr, arnould@enserg.fr and ferrari@enserg.fr
*
Corresponding author: D. Kaddour Email: kaddour@enserg.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a miniaturized bandpass filter for ultra-wide-band applications is proposed. It is based on the embedding of high-pass structures in a low-pass filter. A semi-lumped technology combining surface-mounted capacitors and transmission lines has been used. The filter design rules have been carried out. Furthermore, two filters having a 3-dB fractional bandwidth of 142 and 150%, centered at 0.77 and 1 GHz, respectively, have been realized for a proof of concept. Measured characteristics, in good agreement with simulations, show attractive properties of return loss (|S11| <−18 dB), insertion loss (<0.3 dB), and a maximum group delay and group delay variation of 2 and 1.3 ns, respectively. A distributed filter based on the same low-pass/high-pass approach has been also realized and measured for comparison. The size reduction reaches 85% for the semi-lumped filter, and its selectivity is improved with a shape factor of 1.3:1 instead of 1.5:1. The semi-lumped filter's drawback is related to a smaller rejection bandwidth compared to the distributed one. To improve the high-frequency stopband, an original technique for spurious responses suppression based on capacitively loaded stubs has been proposed. Even if the performances do not reach that obtained for the distributed approach, with this technique spurious responses are pushed until eight times the center frequency. A sensitivity study vs. critical parameters has also been carried out, showing the robustness of the design.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distributed bandpass filter layout.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Equivalent electrical circuit of the semi-lumped bandpass filter.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Elementary section of the low-pass filter.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Simulation response of the bandpass filters using parameters' values given in Table 1.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Transmission zeros of the 0.77 GHz filter and the low-pass filters using capacitors values of 1.8 and 3.9 pF.

Figure 5

Table 1. Electrical lengths and capacitors' values of the proposed UWB semi-lumped bandpass filters.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. UWB filter equivalent electrical circuit with capacitively loaded stubs.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Comparison of the electrical length of the capacitively loaded stub (Csp = 0.4 pF) and the unloaded stub.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Simulated insertion loss for the 0.77 GHz filter with loaded and unloaded stubs.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Semi-lumped UWB bandpass filter layout.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Photograph of distributed and semi-lumped UWB bandpass filters centered at 1 GHz.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Comparison between the simulation and measurement results of the 1 GHz filter.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Comparison between the simulated and measured group delay of the 1 GHz filter.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Comparison between the measured responses to 3 GHz, for both UWB bandpass filters centered at 1 GHz, realized in distributed and semi-lumped technologies.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Comparison between the measured responses to 12 GHz, for both UWB bandpass filters centered at 1 GHz, realized in distributed and semi-lumped technologies.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Layout of the bended stub's filter with all dimensions, in mm.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. Photograph of the semi-lumped 0.77 GHz filter (a) without bended stubs and (b) with bended stubs.

Figure 17

Fig. 17. Comparison between the measured frequency responses to 5 GHz, for both semi-lumped filters with straight and bended stubs.

Figure 18

Fig. 18. Photograph of the semi-lumped filter A, designed for spurious response improvement with capacitively loaded stubs.

Figure 19

Fig. 19. Comparison between measured frequency responses, for both UWB filters centered at 0.77 GHz with loaded and unloaded stubs.

Figure 20

Fig. 20. The UWB bandpass filter response for several values of the capacitor's quality factor calculated at 1 GHz (Q = 50, 100, 200, and 400).