Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T09:10:29.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure and function of eukaryotic fatty acid synthases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2010

Timm Maier
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Marc Leibundgut
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Daniel Boehringer
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Nenad Ban*
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
*
*Author for correspondence: Nenad Ban, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland. Tel.: +4144 6332785; Fax: +41 44 6331246; Email: ban@mol.biol.ethz.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In all organisms, fatty acid synthesis is achieved in variations of a common cyclic reaction pathway by stepwise, iterative elongation of precursors with two-carbon extender units. In bacteria, all individual reaction steps are carried out by monofunctional dissociated enzymes, whereas in eukaryotes the fatty acid synthases (FASs) have evolved into large multifunctional enzymes that integrate the whole process of fatty acid synthesis. During the last few years, important advances in understanding the structural and functional organization of eukaryotic FASs have been made through a combination of biochemical, electron microscopic and X-ray crystallographic approaches. They have revealed the strikingly different architectures of the two distinct types of eukaryotic FASs, the fungal and the animal enzyme system. Fungal FAS is a 2·6 MDa α6β6 heterododecamer with a barrel shape enclosing two large chambers, each containing three sets of active sites separated by a central wheel-like structure. It represents a highly specialized micro-compartment strictly optimized for the production of saturated fatty acids. In contrast, the animal FAS is a 540 kDa X-shaped homodimer with two lateral reaction clefts characterized by a modular domain architecture and large extent of conformational flexibility that appears to contribute to catalytic efficiency.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Illustrations of the ‘swinging arm hypothesis’ for yeast FAS. (a, b) During the cyclic fatty acid biosynthesis, the reaction intermediates remain attached to a central phosphopantetheine arm, which is covalently linked to the enzyme. The length and flexibility of the swinging arm allow it to reach all the catalytic enzymes surrounding it. (c) Model of the multifunctional yeast FAS complex based on the swinging arm concept. (a–c) Reproduced with permission from Lynen (1967) © the Biochemical Society.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Models of yeast FAS based on EM and cross-linking studies. (a) Early negative stain electron micrograph showing yeast FAS particles. (b, c) The negative stain EM micrographs of FAS particles cross-linked with antibodies raised against the β-chain reveal cross-linking via the domes (left panels), whereas particles cross-linked with anti-α-chain antibodies are connected at the central disc (right panels). The model of FAS derived from these experiments is shown in (c). (d) Model proposed by the Wakil group, which is based on stereoscopic EM micrographs and chemical cross-linking of neighboring α-chains. (e) Electron density contour map of an early 3D negative stain electron tomography reconstruction of the FAS particle. (f) 3D cryo-EM reconstruction of the FAS complex determined to 21 Å resolution. Although in the top and side views, the central disc and the arch-like domes of particless are readily visible, the limited resolution does not allow the assignment of individual domains. (a) Reproduced with permission from Lynen (1967) © the Biochemical Society, (b, c) adapted with permission from Wieland et al. (1978), (d) modified with permission from Stoops & Wakil (1980), (e) adapted with the permission of Walter de Gruyter from Hackenjos & Schramm (1987) and (f) reprinted from Kolodziej et al. (1997) with the permission of Elsevier.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Different models of the animal FAS structure. (a) Wooden model of chicken FAS based on small angle neutron scattering. (b) Proposed organization of chicken FAS based on cross-linking and partial digestion. (c) Conceptual intertwined head-to-head model. (d) Cryo-EM 3D reconstruction of human FAS at 23 Å resolution. (a) Modified from Stoops et al. (1987) © 1987 The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, (b) modified from Tsukamoto et al. (1983) © 1983 The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, (c) adapted with permission from Rangan et al. (2001) © 2001 American Chemical Society and (d) modified from Brink et al. (2002) © 2002 National Academy of Sciences, USA.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Early crystallization of eukaryotic FASs. (a) Crystals of yeast FAS grown at different pH values (top: pH 6.5; bottom left: pH 7.5; bottom right: pH 5.5) with ammonium sulfate as a precipitant. (b) Microcrystals of rat FAS, original image taken at 1000× magnification with phase contrast under oil immersion. (a) Modified with permission from Oesterhelt et al. (1969) and (b) adapted from Linn (1981) with the permission of Elsevier.

Figure 4

Fig. 5.Catalytic cycle and linear domain organization of fungal FAS. (a) Catalytic cycle of fungal FAS. Acetyl-CoA serves as a starter substrate for iterative stepwise elongation by two carbon units donated from the elongator substrate malonyl-CoA in a decarboxylative condensation. Substrate loading is catalyzed by AT and MPT, the latter is also responsible for product release. KS catalyzes the decarboxylative condensation and KR, DH and ER are modifying the β-carbon position until full saturation. (b) Linear domain organization of fungal FAS, drawn approximately to sequence scale.

Figure 5

Fig. 6.Derivatization of T. lanuginosus FAS with heavy atom cluster compounds. (a) Structure (left) and binding sites (right) of the Ta6Br12 cluster. The positions of the clusters were identified by direct method search procedures based on single-wavelength anomalous dispersion data. (b) Structure of the W12O40 cluster (left), representing the core structure of the W10-cluster used for derivatization of FAS. Right: binding sites of this cluster obtained through cross-anomalous difference map calculation based on phases obtained from Ta6Br12 derivatization. In (a) and (b), a large number of the observed binding sites are located around the surface of the particle, approximately outlined here by a low resolution EM volume (Kolodziej et al.1997), and they obey the expected 3-fold symmetry.

Figure 6

Fig. 7.Experimental electron density maps of T. lanuginosus FAS. (a)–(c) Experimental electron density maps of fungal FAS at 8 Å resolution based on Ta6Br12 derivatization directly after SAD phasing (a), after solvent flipping (b) and after NCS averaging (c). (d) Final experimental electron density map at 3·1 Å resolution after domain-wise NCS averaging and solvent flipping.

Figure 7

Fig. 8.Structural organization of fungal FAS. (a) Crystal structure of yeast FAS at 3·1 Å resolution, colored by domains as indicated in (b), less well-conserved linking regions are shown in gray. The central wheel comprises the dimeric KS and KR domains and the peripheral PPT, while the β-chain domes contain the AT, MPT, ER and DH domains. The ACP attachment points are indicated by black spheres. The positions of the three- and one of the 2-fold symmetry axes are indicated. (b) Sequence comparison of FAS from various fungi. The presence of single-chain FAS in mycobacteria and basidiomycetes, such as Coprinopsis cinerea, indicates that the two-chain FAS occurring in most ascomycetes, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are a result of gene splitting. The split occurs in various positions, but never within the linkers of the ACP, where it would conflict with double tethering.

Figure 8

Fig. 9.Structures of isolated α- and β-chains from fungal FAS and the topology of catalytic domains. (a) The β-chain is formed by consecutive globular domains, whereas the α-chain adopts a highly intertwined structure with numerous insertions into the KS domain and a complex extension of the KR, which together form the rigid scaffold of the central wheel. The catalytic domains are shown in different colors, expansion segments or additional structural domains are depicted in gray. Note that the MPT (blue) is formed by both chains. The C-terminus of the β-chain and the N-terminus of the α-chain (highlighted in red) are only a few Å apart in the assembled FAS complex. The flexible linkers flanking the ACP domain, which are not visible in the structure, are indicated with dashed lines. (b) The topology diagram shows the folds of the catalytic domains (in color) and additional parts (gray) of one α- and β-chain. The DH domain (bright green) consists of a double-hotdog fold closely resembling the hydratase fold from the β-oxidation pathway (Koski et al.2004, 2005), with a third structural hotdog fold inserted between the two catalytic halves. MPT (blue) and AT (red) share a similar fold, but contain different expansion segments. The highly complex diagram would look similar in ‘single-chain FASs’, except that in the MPT, both termini (highlighted in red) would be connected via a few additional amino acid residues (Figure kindly provided by S. Jenni).

Figure 9

Fig. 10.Topological distribution of one full set of catalytic sites in the reaction chamber. (a) The section through the FAS particle shows one of the three full sets of catalytic sites per reaction chamber. The catalytic clefts are arranged in a circular manner around the central and peripheral ACP anchor points (shown as large magenta spheres) in the order of the reaction cycle. The free diffusion of the ACP (bright blue), which in the view is stalled at the KS (orange), is restricted by the flanking linkers (dashed lines, anchor points on ACP as small spheres, magenta). The diffusion distance to the AT (red) is considerably larger than to the centrally arranged MPT, reflecting the frequency of malonyl and acetyl substrate use. (b) Planar map projection of the interior of the fungal FAS particle, showing schematically the chain distribution in the complex. The six α-chains (bright and dark blue) form the central wheel, capped by three β-chains on each side (orange, yellow and red), which form the domes. Inspection of one full set of catalytic centers (connected by arrows) shows that the catalytic domains originate from two α- and two β-chains and that the ACP of one α-chain cannot interact with the KS of the same chain.

Figure 10

Fig. 11.Substrate specificity of the acetyl and MPTs in fungal FAS (residues are numbered according to yeast FAS). (a) AT specifically recognizes the acetyl moiety with a closed reaction pocket containing a hydrophobic isoleucine. The AT transfers the primer substrate in a two-step reaction first from the phosphopantetheine moiety of CoA to its catalytic serine and in a second step to the prosthetic phosphopantetheine arm of ACP. (b) For elongation substrate transfer, the double-specific MPT recognizes the malonyl moiety via a bidentate salt bridge in its catalytic center, which in the two-step reaction mechanism is first bound to the catalytic serine of MPT and then transferred to ACP. (c) As soon as the fatty acid product has reached a chain length of C16 or longer, its saturated acyl chain binds to a hydrophobic cleft of the MPT, thereby preventing further binding of the elongation substrate malonyl-CoA until the mature fatty acid is back-transferred from ACP to CoA.

Figure 11

Fig. 12.Domain composition and reaction cycle of animal FAS. (a) Catalytic reaction cycle of animal FAS, see text for details. (b) Linear domain arrangement of animal FAS based on sequence and biochemical analysis of animal FAS before structure determination. (c) Linear domain arrangement of animal FAS based on the crystal structure of porcine FAS.

Figure 12

Fig. 13.Chain-length determination in animal FAS by the TE domain. (a) Crystal structure of the TE domain of human FAS (rainbow coloring from N- to C-terminus) in complex with a hydrolysis product of the inhibitor Orlistat (Pemble et al.2007), which occupies three pockets with a suggested specificity for short, medium and long acyl chains. The C16/C18 pocket is mainly formed by the α-helical substrate-binding domain (upper part, light green). (b) Schematic depiction of binding of medium-chain length acyl-ACP intermediates into a pocket not allowing cleavage (upper panel). Only the binding of long chain acyl moieties into the cognate long chain acyl pocket allows productive positioning of the acyl-ACP thioester bond and cleavage from ACP (lower panel).

Figure 13

Fig. 14.Experimental electron density maps of animal FAS. Experimentally phased crystallographic electron density maps of porcine FAS in the DH (upper panel) and ER (lower panel) region. The left column shows the experimental density at 4·5 Å resolution (Maier et al.2006) used for the rigid-body fitting of template domains, while the right panel depicts the experimental density after phase extension to 3·2 Å resolution (Maier et al.2008) with alternative views of the same regions. This map was used for initial atomic model building of porcine FAS.

Figure 14

Fig. 15.Strategies for high-resolution data collection for animal FAS crystals. (a) Crystals of up to 0·7 mm in length (mounted in nylon loop for data collection) were obtained through a fine-screening of crystallization conditions. (b) Illustration of the data collection strategy: the crystals are exposed at multiple, non-overlapping positions to reduce radiation damage. Exposure of free-standing parts of the crystals not surrounded by excess liquid results in the absence of typical rings of solvent scattering from diffraction patterns. (c) Data collection using an open flow helium cryostat to flood the full path of the direct beam with helium. At temperatures around 10 K, radiation damage is mitigated, and the background from scattering of the direct beam is reduced in a helium atmosphere.

Figure 15

Fig. 16.Structural overview of animal FAS. The crystal structure of porcine FAS is shown in cartoon representation colored by domains as in Fig. 12. The dimeric enzyme consists of two centrally connected parts, a lower ‘condensing’ part containing the KS and MAT domain and an upper ‘modifying’ part containing the β-carbon modification domains. The anchor points for the non-resolved C-terminal ACP/TE domains are shown as black spheres. The top and bottom view (lower panels) demonstrate the S-shape of the two parts, the ψME domain is protruding from the main body of FAS. The position of the pseudo-2-fold symmetry axis is indicated by arrows/ellipsoids.

Figure 16

Fig. 17.Domain linking in animal FAS. The conserved catalytic core domains are shown in surface representation and are colored as in previous figures, linking regions are shown as light gray tubes. Only the KS–MAT linker domain acts as a true adapter between two domains and adopts a folded core structure, while most other linkers are extended stretches of polypeptide wrapped around the surface of the catalytic domains.

Figure 17

Fig. 18.The KR has an organizing role for the modifying upper part of animal FAS. The KR domain is the only domain of the modifying part of animal FAS that contacts all other domains of this region. The non-enzymatic domains have no direct interactions with any other domain of animal FAS except for the KR.

Figure 18

Fig. 19.Topology of the DHs in animal, bacterial and fungal fatty acid biosynthesis. Although the DH of all FAS systems are built on double-hotdog folds, these occur in different topologies: animal FAS uses a pseudo-dimer with active site residues (white dots) distributed over both subdomains, and the substrate-binding tunnel mainly formed by the C-terminal subdomain DH2 (Maier et al.2008). Bacterial FAS DH is a true homodimer with two active sites and substrate-binding tunnels (Kimber et al.2004), while fungal FAS DH is again a pseudo-dimer with an insertion of another hotdog-related fold without catalytic function (Jenni et al.2007; Lomakin et al.2007). All active site residues are located in the C-terminal hotdog fold, while the substrate-binding tunnel is formed by the N-terminal one. Both pseudo-dimeric, eukaryotic FAS DH domains only have a single active site. In the schematics, catalytic site residues are indicated by white dots, while substrate-binding pockets and acyl chains are shown in black and as dashed lines, respectively.

Figure 19

Fig. 20.Linker regions and the ψKR domain mimic the oligomerization state of the homologous bacterial KR. The KR domain of animal FAS (left) (Maier et al.2008) is monomeric, but essential contacts observed in the bacterial KR tetramer (right) (Price et al.2004) are preserved. The ψKR domain provides the lateral helical contacts to stabilize the active site region. The continuous β-sheet stretching over two subunits of the bacterial KR tetramer is shortcut by two strands originating from linker regions, which interconnect the central β-sheets of the KR and ψKR domain.

Figure 20

Fig. 21.Diversity of ERs in animal, bacterial and fungal fatty acid biosynthesis. The ER is the enzyme with the largest structural differences between the different FAS systems: animal FAS ER is a dimeric member of the medium chain dehydrogenases with a substrate-binding site formed between a substrate-specific subdomain and a nucleotide-binding Rossmann-fold (Maier et al.2008). The bacterial ER FabI is a short-chain dehydrogenase tetramer with the substrate binding site integrated into a core nucleotide binding fold through extended loops (Ward et al.1999). Bacterial FabK ER is a dimeric TIM-barrel protein (Saito et al.2008). It is related to the enzymatic domain of fungal FAS ER, which is a monomer that carries an additional subdomain with a structural role for integration into the multienzyme (Jenni et al.2007; Lomakin et al.2007).

Figure 21

Fig. 22.A structural model of full-length animal FAS illustrating linking of the ACP and TE domains. Hypothetical model of full-length FAS obtained by orienting the ACP domain (Ploskon et al.2008) towards the KS active site using the ACP position in fungal FAS as a guide. The TE domain (Chakravarty et al.2004; Pemble et al.2007) is modeled with an extended linker of correct length, without contacting the body of animal FAS.

Figure 22

Fig. 23.Active site topology of animal FAS. Relative positioning of active sites in animal FAS depicted by the substrate binding cavities in blue surface representations for the KS, MAT, DH and ER domains. NADP cofactors bound to the KR and ER domains are shown as dark blue spheres (Maier et al.2008).

Figure 23

Fig. 24.Illustration of substrate shuttling by the ACP domain. ACP is represented at low resolution, approximating its shape and size. The panels show ACP in hypothetical positions for interaction of the phosphopantetheine arm with the active sites of MAT, KS, KR and ER. The FAS body is shown in surface representation, one chain colored by domains and the other shown in blue. The lateral clefts are just sufficiently wide to allow ACP passage, and the ψME domain (shown in purple) constrains the ACP motion, directing it into close vicinity of the catalytic domains.

Figure 24

Fig. 25.Structural variability of animal FAS inferred from its crystal structure. (a) Key hinge regions revealed by structural superposition of the non-identical halves of FAS are indicated as circles (Maier et al.2008). One of the clefts is narrower than the other and the weak interface around the central connection between the upper and lower part suggests a possibility for a balance-type opening/closing motion. It could even permit a large degree of an out-of-plane rotation (‘twist’) around the central connection, possibly up to complete flips. (b) A large out-of-plane rotation between the upper and lower part of FAS would change the mode of intra- versus inter-chain substrate transfer and could explain a minor mode of substrate transfer observed in biochemical assays, where the ACP of one chain can serve the MAT of both chains.

Figure 25

Fig. 26.Electron microscopic observation of conformational changes in animal FAS. (a) Average images of four classes of FAS representing the main rearrangements of FAS domains. (b) 3D structures obtained for the four classes of FAS conformation calculated by the random conical tilt approach (yellow). (c) The KS, MAT, DH, ER, KR and SD domains were fitted into the density (colored). Remaining density (transparent gray) may accommodate the TE and/or ACP domains. (d) Fit of the atomic structures of individual domains filtered to match the resolution of the EM structures. FAS domain movements are indicated by arrows. A 25° swinging and a 90° swiveling motion of the upper relative to the lower part of FAS is observed. Additional rearrangements occur within the upper part of FAS. Figure courtesy of E. Brignole, F. J. Asturias.