Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:07:36.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sourceland controls and dispersal pathways of Holocene muds from boreholes of the Ionian Basin, Calabria, southern Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2015

FRANCESCO PERRI*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Ecologia e Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
SALVATORE CRITELLI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Ecologia e Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
ROCCO DOMINICI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Ecologia e Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
FRANCESCO MUTO
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Ecologia e Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
MAURIZIO PONTE
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Ecologia e Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
*
†Author for correspondence: francesco.perri@unical.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Deep-marine muds were collected from two boreholes (Crati II and Neto VI) along the Ionian Calabrian Basin. The samples from the Crati II and the Neto VI boreholes show a similar mineralogical distribution; the marine muds contain mostly phyllosilicates, quartz, calcite, feldspars and dolomite. Traces of gypsum are present in a few samples. The Neto muds show higher concentrations of carbonates than the Crati muds; these contents are mainly related to recycling of the Neogene–Quaternary carbonate-rich marine deposits of the Crotone Basin, which mostly influences the composition of the Neto muds. The geochemical signatures of the muds mainly reflect a provenance characterized by felsic rocks with a minor, but not negligible, mafic supply. In particular, the hinterland composition of the Crati drainage area is on average more mafic in composition than the Neto drainage area. The higher mafic concentration of the Crati sample muds is probably related to the ophiolitiferous units that are exposed in the Crati drainage basin. The degree of source area weathering was most probably of low–moderate intensity because the Chemical Index of Alteration values for the studied muds range from 67 to 69. Furthermore, the low and constant Al/K and Rb/K ratios suggest low–moderate weathering without important fluctuations in weathering intensity. The Al2O3–TiO2–Zr ternary diagram and the values of the Index of Compositional Variability indicate that both the Neto and Crati muds are first-cycle, compositionally immature sediments, related to a tectonically active (collision) setting such as the Calabria–Peloritani Arc, where chemical weathering plays a minor role.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geological sketch map of the northern sector of the Calabria–Peloritani Arc and the investigated area in the northern Ionian Basin (Taranto Gulf). The positions of the Crati II and Neto VI boreholes are also shown. 1 – Sedimentary rocks (Pliocene to Holocene); 2 – clastic rocks and evaporites (Serravallian to Messinian); 3 – Cilento Group (Middle Miocene); 4 – Apennine units of the Pollino Massif (Triassic to Miocene); 5 to 7 – Liguride Complex: 5 – Calabro–Lucanian Flysch Unit (Upper Jurassic to Upper Oligocene); 6 – Ophiolitiferous blocks and melange; 7 – Frido Unit (Upper Jurassic to Upper Oligocene); 8 – Longobucco and Caloveto Groups (Lower Lias to Lower Cretaceous) and Paludi Formation (Upper Oligocene); 9 – Malvito, Diamante–Terranova and Gimigliano ophiolitiferous units (Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous); 10 – Sila, Castagna and Bagni basement units (Palaeozoic); 11 – plutonic rocks (Sila Batholith, Palaeozoic). Modified from Critelli et al. (2013), Perri et al. (2008) and Perri et al. (2012b).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Sand–silt–clay ternary diagram of the studied samples from the Neto and Crati boreholes.

Figure 2

Table 1. Results of whole-rock mineralogical analyses for the studied samples from the Neto and Crati boreholes

Figure 3

Table 2. Major- and trace-element concentrations and ratios for the studied samples from the Neto borehole

Figure 4

Table 3. Major- and trace-element concentrations and ratios for the studied samples from the Crati borehole

Figure 5

Figure 3. Chemical classification of the samples from the Neto and Crati boreholes, based on the log(SiO2/Al2O3) v. log(Fe2O3/K2O) diagram of Herron (1988).

Figure 6

Figure 4. Major- and trace-element compositional ranges normalized to the GLOSS (Global Subducting Sediment; Plank & Langmuir, 1998).

Figure 7

Figure 5. Variation diagrams using major- and trace-element ratios for the Neto and Crati muds.

Figure 8

Figure 6. Fe2O3–K2O–Al2O3 diagram where the studied muds plot along a trend defined by chlorite and muscovite–illite end-members. GLOSS – Global Subducting Sediment; PASS – Post-Archaean Australian Shale; UCC – Upper Continental Crust.

Figure 9

Figure 7. (a) Ternary A–CN–K (Fedo et al.1995) and (b) A–N–K diagrams. Legend: Ms – muscovite; Ilt – illite; Kln – kaolinite; Chl –chlorite; Gbs – gibbsite; Smt – smectite; Bt – biotite; Pl – plagioclase; Kfs – K-feldspar; A – Al2O3; CN – CaO+Na2O; K – K2O; CIA – Chemical Index of Alteration (Nesbitt & Young, 1982).

Figure 10

Figure 8. The MFW diagram (Ohta & Arai, 2007) suggesting moderate weathering conditions. M – mafic source; F – felsic source; W – weathered material. The weathering trends of both the Neto and Crati sediments indicate an intermediate source-rock composition; however, the weathering trends suggest a relatively mafic composition for the Crati sediments. Compositional linear trends were drawn following the method of von Eynatten (2004).

Figure 11

Figure 9. Ternary 15Al2O3–300TiO2–Zr plot (modified from Garcia, Coehlo & Perrin, 1991) showing the confidence regions of the studied muds. 90% confidence regions were drawn following the method of Weltje (2002). GLOSS – Global Subducting Sediment; PAAS – Post-Archaean Australian Shale.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Main chemical and mineralogical variations through the samples from the Neto and Crati boreholes.

Figure 13

Table 4. Mann–Whitney U-test of incompatible and compatible trace-element log-ratios

Figure 14

Figure 11. Discriminant diagram of Roser & Korsch (1988) suggesting that the studied sediments are related to a recycled orogen. F1 and F2 are discriminant functions using the chemical composition of the studied samples.

Figure 15

Figure 12. V–Ni–La*4 ternary diagram, showing fields representative of felsic, mafic and ultramafic rocks plot separately (e.g. Bracciali et al.2007; Perri, Muto & Belviso, 2011). The studied samples plot close to the felsic composition and to the Palaeozoic basement rocks and Mesozoic sedimentary covers. UCC – Upper Continental Crust; PAAS – Post-Archaean Australian Shale.

Figure 16

Figure 13. Diagram of the tectonic settings (modified from Verma et al.2013). ARC – island and continental arc; RIFT – within-plate (continental rift and ocean island together); COLL – collisional setting. DF1 and DF2 are discriminant functions using the chemical composition of the studied samples.